IR Theory No Limits Debate.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IR2501 Theories of International Relations
Advertisements

Structure and Agency in Foreign Policy Analysis
MDAW 2013: DCH & MBK.  Realism  Idealism  Liberalism  Marxism  Critical Theory(s)
International Relations Theory
Understanding IR Theories I: Liberalism and Realism
POSC 2200 – Theoretical Approaches
The best US foreign policy is one based on contemporary understandings of realism. Such a policy would be more successful, particularly in avoiding wars,
Neo-Realism: a structural theory of IR
Realist and Neorealist Theories of War
Today  Updates: Kenya and Chad  Simulation: your country assignments  The Cold War, /91 Causes of the Cold War  Cuban Missile Crisis  The.
Plan for Today: Understanding Classical Realism and Neorealism
Realism Kenneth Waltz Kaisa Ellandi Lecture 2.
Realism.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY IN POLICY DEBATE Houston Urban Debate League.
Neo-realists – neo-liberals The debate to date. Neo-realism Neo-Liberalist.
IR 501 Lecture Notes (2) Realism
ESSENTIALS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Finishing classical realism. Neorealism. Other contemporary realism.
Topics Today: Neorealism and Other Contemporary Realism 1.Completing introduction to neorealist principles. 2.Introduction to another version of contemporary.
Realism. Assumptions  States: unitary, rational actors -Treaty of Westphalia (1648)  Anarchy: no central government  Survival: primary objective 
International Relations
GO131: International Relations Professor Walter Hatch Colby College.
Institutions and Environmental Cooperation. Today Types of global environmental problems The role of international institutions (regimes): realist vs.
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
International Relations
Liberalism: Conclusion Lecture 14. The Question of the Month How Can Countries Move from Anarchy, War of All Against All, to Cooperation? Security Dilemma.
International Politics on the World Stage WORLD POLITICS INTERNATIONAL POLITICS ON THE WORLD STAGE ******** International Politics.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY INTRODUCTION HC 35.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES: PLURALISM OR LIBERALISM
POSC 1000(056) Introduction to Politics Politics and Governance the Global Level/Conclusions and Exam Advice Russell Alan Williams.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
Neoliberal institutionalism 1975 Keohane and Nye-power and interdependence 1984-Keohane After Hegemony.
©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. ©2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Thinking Theoretically: Putting.
Introducing the IR Paradigms
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO? THE REALIST (I.E., THE DOMINANT) PERSPECTIVE States have primacy as unitary intl. actors (while leaders come and go, states.
Introducing the IR Paradigms 1: Liberalism(s) in IR Prepared for Junior International Politics Class at NENU, Fall 2015.
WHY DO ALL STATES FIGHT? THE THIRD IMAGE -Even nice leaders and nice states fight. -Very different states and people behave similarly and predictably -Some.
Liberal alternatives International Security in the Modern World Masaryk University in Brno 1-2 July 2012 Věra Stojarová.
Unit 3 Seminar.  You will be getting a break during Unit 4- there are no grade assignments due  The exam that you took for Unit 3 was not graded-I am.
NEO-REALISM AND NEO-LIBERALISM THEORIES
Advanced Networks in view of International Relations (BoF) - Case: Hub of AN in Northeast Asia The 16 th APAN/ANC August 27, Busan Marriott Hang Ryeol.
Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism Introduction to International Relations IF Gao Xiaolei I34020.
International System International Relations. Basic concepts What is IR? Who are the actors/players in IR? Why they behave in a certain way? What quality.
The conflict over international Law. There is an ongoing argument over the extent to which international law and international institutions such as the.
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Liberalisms and Idealisms.
Realism vs Liberalism. What would you do? To be able to define the competing international relations theories of realism and liberalism.
Prof. Murat Arik School of Legal Studies Kaplan University PO420 Global Politics Unit 2 Approaches to World Politics and Analyzing World Politics.
Presentation by Dr. Kevin Lasher. TrumanKennan.
Intensive Readings in International Relations Fall 2006 Peking University Instructor: Ji Mi ( 吉宓)
CONCEPTS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS.  Concept: is a general notion or an idea of something.  Cold war: is a state of diplomatic tension between East.
Prof. Murat Arik School of Legal Studies Kaplan University PO420 Global Politics Unit 2 Approaches to World Politics and Analyzing World Politics.
Liberalism (Liberal Internationalism) A political theory founded on the natural goodness of humans and the autonomy of the individual. It favours civil.
System, State and Individual
Power & IR theorıes.
With William Kim and Friends
** Emergence of Realism
Lecture 8.1 LIBERALISM A. Alternative to realism
Introduction to International Relations
Introduction to Global Politics
Systemic & Dyadic Explanations of Interstate Conflict
World Politics Under a system of Anarchy
Tradeoffs in Negotiations Creating a win-win outcome
Realism Oliver-Daddow compares the neo-liberalism and neo-realism. There is three assumptions in both sides that state is central actor, states are sovereign.
Security Theory And Peak Oil Theory.
STATES & NON-STATE ACTORS
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO
Introduction to Global Politics
Theories of International Relations
Presentation transcript:

IR Theory No Limits Debate

Definition International relations theory is the study of how the system of states could be made to Cooperate in spreading the rule of law, peacefully manage interstate relations, preserve international order and minimize the prospects of war

Many Schools of Thought: Realism Realism – Hans Morgenthou said, “International politics is struggle for power” A particular view of the world, or paradigm, defined by the following assumptions: the international world is anarchic and consists of independent political units called states; states are the primary actors and inherently possess some offensive military capability or power which makes them potentially dangerous to each other; states can never be sure about the intentions of other states; the basic motive driving states is survival or the maintenance of sovereignty; states act rational think always about how to survive.

Key Terms Paradigm Sovereignty a philosophical and theoretical framework of a scientific school or discipline Sovereignty is the quality of having supreme, independent authority over a territory.

Liberalism Liberalism  political theory founded on the natural goodness of humans and the autonomy of the individual. It favors civil and political liberties, government by law with the consent of the governed, and protection from arbitrary authority. To Liberal theorists, states are but one actor in world politics, and even states can cooperate together Does not need to be military conflict States are interdependent other actors such as Transnational Corporations, the IMF and the United Nations play a role.

Key Terms - 1 Wilsonian Idealism Idealism holds that a state should make its internal political philosophy the goal of its foreign policy. For example, an idealist might believe that ending poverty at home should be coupled with tackling poverty abroad. It particularly emphasized the ideal of American Exceptionalism.

Key Terms –2 democratic peace thesis holds that democracies, rarely go to war with one another. that democratic leaders must answer to the voters for war, and therefore have an incentive to seek alternatives; that such statesmen have practice settling matters by discussion, not by arms, and do the same in foreign policy; that democracies view non-democracies as threatening, and go to war with them over issues which would have been settled peacefully between democracies; and that democracies tend to be wealthier than other countries, and the wealthy tend to avoid war, having more to lose.

Neorealism A theory developed by Kenneth Waltz in which states seek to survive within an anarchical system. Although states may seek survival through power balancing, balancing is not the aim of that behaviour. Balancing is a product of the aim to survive. The major powers set the terms of international relations. – they are in control. These major powers are referred to as poles; hence the international system (or a regional subsystem), at a particular point in time, may be characterised as unipolar, bipolar or multipolar.

Key terms Neorealism 1 anarchical system Thus, international politics, each state presumably will behave by their own interests. 

Key Terms Neorealism: Balancing Balance of power -a balance of power exists when there is parity or stability between competing forces. Security in equilibrium

Neoliberalism 1 their approach tends to emphasize the possibility of mutual wins, they are interested in institutions which can arrange jointly profitable arrangements and compromises.

Hegemony Hegemonic Stability Theory, or HST, is a theory of international relations. HST indicates that the international system is more likely to remain stable when a single nation-state is the dominant world power, or hegemon.[1]  When a hegemon exercises leadership, either through diplomacy, coercion, or persuasion, it is actually deploying its "preponderance of power." This is called hegemony, which refers to a state's ability to "single-handedly dominate the rules and arrangements ...[of] international political and economic relations

Links/authors http://ccline.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/how-does-the-condition-of-anarchy-shape-international-politics/ Henry Kissinger Kenneth Waltzer E.H.Carr  Robert Keohane http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hegemonic_stability_theory