Reviewing Core Indicators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why does ERA Need to Flourish
Advertisements

1 Conclusions of Workshop 1: Monitoring and evaluation (M+E) financial engineering instruments for SMEs Fifth Plenary Meeting JEREMIE Networking Platform.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Draft guidance on monitoring and evaluation : Concepts and recommendations.
© Shutterstock - olly Joint Action Plan: Towards a management more focused on results Annual meeting with the Managing Authorities of the European territorial.
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
1 W ORKSHOP ON S TRATEGIC P ROGRAMMING, M ONITORING AND EVALUATION F OCUSING ON P ERFORMANCE AND RE SULTS Madrid, 22 February 2013 Ines Hartwig DG Employment,
Ex post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes , focusing on the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and Cohesion Fund (CF) – Work Package.
Annual Implementation. Reports (AIR) 2013 … on 7 years of activity DG REGIO B2-European Semester & Evaluation 1.
1 Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs Compliance monitoring in the Department of Home Affairs 30 April 2013.
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal Marko Prijatelj Directorate General for Regional.
Technical Assistance Strategy Romania-Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Operational Programme Technical Meeting&Joint Approval Committee, Bucharest,
18 March th meeting of the Evaluation Expert Committie 1 Thematic Working Group „Ex post Evaluation Guidelines” State of play Jela Tvrdonova.
26 June 2008 DG REGIO Evaluation Network Meeting Ex-post Evaluation of Cohesion Policy Programmes co-financed by the European Fund for Regional.
Evaluation workshop on the Economic Development OP Budapest, 24 April 2013 Jack Engwegen Head of Unit, Hungary DG Regional and Urban Policy European Commission.
Additionality of Structural Funds (CPR Article 86, Annex III)
Directorate for Food, Agriculture, and Fisheries 1 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION DE COOPÉRATION ET DE DEVELOPMENT.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Transport Enhancing TEN-T funding Pawel Stelmaszczyk Special Envoy for European Mobility Network DG MOVE Warsaw, 18 December 2013.
M&E requirements for grant signing: M&E Plan Workshop on effective Global Fund Grant negotiation and implementation planning January 2008 Manila,
Regional Policy Result Orientation of future ETC Programes Veronica Gaffey Head of Evaluation & European Semester 23 April 2013.
SFC2014 and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) management
Machinery and Equipment and PPPs Richard Dibley 3 rd Technical Advisory Group Meeting.
Portfolio Committee on Appropriations Quarter 1 Expenditure and Performance 24 August 2012 The Presidency Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation.
Agriculture and Rural Development SFC2014 structured approach DG Agriculture and Rural Development G.2 - Unit "Financial coordination of Rural development"
Agriculture and Rural Development SFC2014 and Rural Development Programmes (RDPs) management Petr Lapka DG Agriculture and Rural Development Unit "Consistency.
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal 12 th meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated.
2 November John Childs and Deborah Woodley
Workshop on Strategic Programming, Monitoring and evaluation Focusing on Performance and REsults Madrid, 22 February 2013 Ines Hartwig DG Employment,
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
Veronica Gaffey & Antonella Schulte-Braucks
Environmental Liability Directive 5th Stakeholder Workshop Multi-Annual ELD Rolling Work Programme (MAWP) Maison des Associations Internationales.
Background Legal basis of the TA financing decision: Article 45 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions.
John Walsh Alida Staicu
Performance Framework
Core Indicators: Annual Reporting Exercise 2011
How to improve their contribution to programme quality?
Draft Guidance Document (ERDF/ESF)
Performance framework review and reserve
Lessons from FEAD AIR and audit recommendations
Core Indicators: Pilot Exercise and AIR in 2010
Preparation of Annual Implemention Reports (AIR) 2013
ESF evaluation plans Jeannette Monier, Impact Assessment and Evaluation Unit, DG EMPL ESF EVALUATION PARTNERSHIP MEETING 13 March 2015.
Evaluation network DG REGIO 14th April 2011
ESF Performance reports and Thematic reports
Youth Employment Initiative
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Evaluation Network Meeting: Brussels, October 2010
TÓTH Gábor DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Operational Programmes Selected Impressions from Negotiations
Core Indicators: Definitions and Use
Amending the Performance Framework
DG EMPL studies on the ESF future
AIR 2012 – Guidance Lessons learned Incl Strategic Report
Adam Abdulwahab Evaluation network, Brussels,14th April 2011
Costas VOYIATZIS DG EMPL - Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
Result Orientation of Interreg Programmes
Cohesion Policy and Biodiversity
REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE: PROVINCIAL OVERSIGHT VISITS.
Common Indicators – Annex 1 of Concepts and Recommendations Paper
Monitoring of the 3rd PCI list in view of the PCI selection
DG REGIO B2-European Semester & Evaluation
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
DG REGIO Evaluation-Related Activities State of play
Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 23rd November 2012
Core Indicators: Annual Reporting Exercise 2010
DG REGIO Evaluations State of play
DG Justice and Consumers
Jeannette Monier and Louise Reid
Presentation transcript:

Reviewing Core Indicators in Operational Programmes Results and suggested simplifications Evaluation network meeting Brussels, 2nd April 2009

Discussion at Last Meeting ERDF/CF core indicators give unreliable information Difficulties Use of core indicators varies and ambiguous Different interpretation of baselines and targets Features of IT system

OP Screening for Core Indicators DG REGIO desk officers went through 229 Objective 1 & 2 programmes (97% of ERDF/CF OPs excl. TA) Results: In 71% of cases OP uses core indicator when relevant Only 42% of core indicators are encoded in SFC2007 as core indicators Different measurement units are used for the same core indicators across different OPs

Suggestions for Data Transfer Simplify data requirements: only ask what is essential Structured data transfer focuses on core indicators (only core indicators to be aggregated) One baseline data for the period (can be zero) One target data for the period Annual achievement for every reporting year Improve IT system

How Can This Work? Use of core indicators need to improve Cover areas with significant financial allocation Rigorous use of core indicators, esp. measurement units! Indicators “very similar” to core indicators 2009: Year for improving and testing Annual Implementation Reports submitted as normal with all information (including indicators) No structured reporting of indicators 2010 onwards: reporting as normal

Working Document No.7 Draft, will be finalised when SFC2007 improvement is finished Focuses on practicalities of reporting indicators in SFC2007 Annex contains recommended definitions Refinement of core indicators Reflect discussion and agreements of last network meeting

Main Messages of WD7 Only one baseline for the period Only one target Can be zero Not attached to a specific year (beginning of period) Only one target Does not include baseline Not attached to a specific year (end of period) Annual achievements reported every year Achievements are not cumulative Standard use of measurement units is essential

Thank you for your attention