Jinzhong Lin, Matthieu G. Gagnon, David Bulkley, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Advertisements

Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Andrei Korostelev, Sergei Trakhanov, Martin Laurberg, Harry F. Noller 
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Interaction of Era with the 30S Ribosomal Subunit
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
James M. Ogle, Frank V. Murphy, Michael J. Tarry, V. Ramakrishnan  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structural Insights into RNA-Dependent Ring Closure and ATPase Activation by the Rho Termination Factor  Emmanuel Skordalakes, James M. Berger  Cell 
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Locking and Unlocking of Ribosomal Motions
Hani S. Zaher, Rachel Green  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
The Path of Messenger RNA through the Ribosome
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Crystal Structures of a Ligand-free MthK Gating Ring: Insights into the Ligand Gating Mechanism of K+ Channels  Sheng Ye, Yang Li, Liping Chen, Youxing.
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Seisuke Yamashita, Kozo Tomita  Structure 
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages (June 2015)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ski7 Is a GTP-Binding Protein Adopting the Characteristic Conformation of Active Translational GTPases  Eva Kowalinski, Anthony.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 111, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Mapping the Position of Translational Elongation Factor EF-G in the Ribosome by Directed Hydroxyl Radical Probing  Kevin S Wilson, Harry F Noller  Cell 
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 123, Issue 7, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Specific DNA-RNA Hybrid Recognition by TAL Effectors
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Solution Structure of the E. coli 70S Ribosome at 11.5 Å Resolution
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages (October 2008)
Structural Basis for Kinase-Mediated Macrolide Antibiotic Resistance
Yong Xiong, Fang Li, Jimin Wang, Alan M. Weiner, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Ribosomal translocation: EF-G turns the crank
Presentation transcript:

Conformational Changes of Elongation Factor G on the Ribosome during tRNA Translocation  Jinzhong Lin, Matthieu G. Gagnon, David Bulkley, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell  Volume 160, Issue 1, Pages 219-227 (January 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.049 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2015 160, 219-227DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.049) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Structures of EF-G Bound to the Pre- and Posttranslocation Ribosome (A and B) Overview of EF-G bound to the PRE (A) and the POST (B) ribosome. Shown are the 50S (gray) and the 30S (ivory) subunits, the A site (blue), P site (pink), and E site (orange) tRNAs, mRNA (cyan), and EF-G with its five domains colored differently. (C and D) Cartoon representations of EF-G shown in the compact conformation (C) from the PRE complex and the elongated conformation (D) from the POST complex. Domains of EF-G are colored and labeled as in (A) and (B). See also Figure S1, Table S1, and Movie S1. Cell 2015 160, 219-227DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.049) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Partial Electron Density for the POST and the PRE Complexes (A–D) Unbiased Fobs – Fcalc difference Fourier map of EF-G and the P-site tRNA in the POST complex in the presence of fusidic acid (A), EF-G and the A- and P-site tRNAs in the PRE complex (B), EF-G and the P-site tRNA in the POST complex in the absence of fusidic acid (C), and EF-G and the P-site tRNA in the dityromycin complex (D). All maps are contoured at 2.5σ obtained after initial refinement with an empty ribosome as a starting model. Domains of EF-G are colored as in Figure 1. See also Table S1. Cell 2015 160, 219-227DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.049) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison of the EF-G Structures in the Elongated and the Compact Conformations (A) Inset is a superimposition of the structures of the elongated and the compact EF-G through domain I. Helices in the compact EF-G are displayed as cylinders. Lower right is a close-up view of the movements of domains III and IV. For clarity, conformational change of domain V is displayed separately in the lower left, where the one from the compact EF-G is colored in light blue. The GDP nucleotide is shown as spheres. (B and C) Structures of the compact (B) and the elongated (C) EF-G viewed from the catalytic site. The switch II is colored in light blue as indicated. The switch I loop is disordered and not shown in both complexes. See also Movie S2. Cell 2015 160, 219-227DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.049) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Interfaces between Domains III, IV, and V of EF-G and the Ribosome in the PRE and the POST Complexes (A) Overview of the ribosome showing the orientation of the insets (B) and (C). Elements of the ribosome are indicated and colored differently. (B and C) Positions of domains III (B) and IV (C) on the ribosome in the two complex structures. (D) Surroundings of domain V in the two complex structures. Helix 43/44, L11-NTD in the stalk base (Sb), helix 89, and the sarcin-ricin loop (SRL) are shown in yellow in the POST complex and pink in the PRE complex. The L11-NTD in the PRE complex is not visible. Cell 2015 160, 219-227DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.049) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Contacts between Domain V of EF-G, the Stalk Base, and the Sarcin-Ricin Loop (A and B) Nucleotides at the tips of H43, H44, and the SRL are exposed in the PRE complex and are in close contacts with domain V in the POST complex. Positions of Sb from the two copies in the crystal of the PRE complex shown in the inset of (A) demonstrate that Sb becomes flexible in the PRE state. See also Figure S2 and Movie S2. Cell 2015 160, 219-227DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.049) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Structure of EF-G Bound to the Ribosome Trapped by the Antibiotic Dityromycin (A) Overview of the structure of the complex. The components are colored in the same scheme as in Figure 1, except that here ribosomal protein S12, instead of mRNA, is shown in cyan. Dityromycin (Dit) binds to protein S12 located behind EF-G. (B) Close-up of EF-G, S12, and dityromycin (brown). (C) Model of EF-G from the POST complex on the ribosome showing the steric collision between domain III and dityromycin. See also Movie S2. Cell 2015 160, 219-227DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.049) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Conformational Changes of EF-G on the Ribosome EF-G in complex with GTP transiently folds into a compact conformation, from an elongated conformation in the ribosome-free state, after engaging the ribosome in the pretranslocational state to avoid a collision with the A-site tRNA (steps A–D). Rotation of the 30S subunit enables domain IV moving next to the A-site tRNA, a step that can be blocked by the antibiotic dityromycin (steps C–E). Further conformational changes of EF-G with concomitant GTP hydrolysis facilitate tRNA translocation (steps E and F). This process involves swiveling of the 30S head domain (Ramrath et al., 2013), which is not shown here. The antibiotic viomycin prevents translocation by locking the ribosome in the rotated state, while not affecting the initial conformational changes of EF-G (Munro et al., 2010). tRNA translocation is completed by dissociation of EF-G in complex with GDP from the ribosome (steps F and G). Cell 2015 160, 219-227DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.049) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Design of L9-EF-G Fusion Protein, Related to Figure 1 (A) In the wild-type ribosome crystal, the C-terminal domain (CTD) of L9 (magenta) contacts the shoulder of the 30S subunit from a neighboring ribosome. EF-G (blue) is placed on the ribosome to show the overlap between L9-CTD and EF-G. (B) A detailed view of the clash between L9-CTD and EF-G. Close-up shows the close proximity between Asn74 of L9 and Asp8 of EF-G. Cell 2015 160, 219-227DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.049) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Model of the Antibiotic Thiostrepton Bound to the PRE and POST Complexes, Related to Figure 5 (A and B) The stalk base (orange) and thiostrepton (blue) from the complex of the 50S subunit with thiostrepton (Harms et al., 2008) is superimposed on the stalk base from the POST complex (yellow) (A) and the PRE complex (pink) (B). For clarity, only domains I and V from EF-G are shown in each complex. The last ten residues of domain V in the PRE complex are flexible and invisible in the crystal structure, and thus not displayed in this figure. Cell 2015 160, 219-227DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.049) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions