Analgesic Adherence Measurement in Cancer Patients: Comparison Between Electronic Monitoring and Diary Wendy H. Oldenmenger, MSc, Michael A. Echteld, PhD, Rianne de Wit, PhD, Peter A.E. Sillevis Smitt, MD, PhD, Dirk L. Stronks, PhD, Gerrit Stoter, MD, PhD, Carin C.D. van der Rijt, MD, PhD Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 639-647 (December 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.01.015 Copyright © 2007 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Feasibility instruments. Feasibility is defined as the use of the respective instrument during the entire evaluable study period. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2007 34, 639-647DOI: (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.01.015) Copyright © 2007 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Mean (SD) adherence rates for MEMS and diary. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2007 34, 639-647DOI: (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.01.015) Copyright © 2007 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Mean adherence rates: one analgesic in comparison to multiple analgesics. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2007 34, 639-647DOI: (10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.01.015) Copyright © 2007 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee Terms and Conditions