Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nitrogen Network Plot Data Prepared By Bill Copeland.
Advertisements

Influence of Minjingu rock phosphate on biological nitrogen fixation and performance of Lupin (Lupinus albus) in Kabete, Kenya.
Sorghum Fertility Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University Dept Plant and Soil Sciences.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
Nutrient Management Workbook 2009 Jon Rausch, Amanda Meddles & Robert Mullen Ohio State University Extension.
Nutrient Management Workbook 2009 Jon Rausch, Amanda Meddles & Robert Mullen Ohio State University Extension.
Triticale For P Removal Brad Brown University of Idaho 2008 Idaho Nutrient Management Conference.
May 15,  Rates – current industry recommendations  Soil and Foliar Applied ◦ Boron, Chlorine, Copper, Zinc ◦ Calcium – Foliar only  NDVI, Soil,
2  Objective: Improve in-season estimate of yield for winter wheat utilizing profile soil moisture (0-80 cm) obtained from Oklahoma Mesonet data. Lahoma.
2014 Tech Meeting Dan Fiser. 2  Crop: Potatoes  Location: Stockton Ca  Dates: –Harvesting: July 2,2014  Objective: Evaluation of Intracept  Treatments:
Animal, Plant & Soil ScienceAnimal, Plant & Soil Science D3-3 Fertilizer Formulations Animal, Plant & Soil Science D3-3 Fertilizer Formulations.
Conducting Experimental Trials Gary Palmer. Scientific Method  Formulation of Hypothesis  Planning an experiment to objectively test the hypothesis.
Cotton Research Oklahoma State University. Exp. 439, Altus OK
342.T1 Model Agricultural Core Curriculum: Supplement University of California, Davis Sources of Primary Plant Nutrients Types of Nitrogen Fertilizers.
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet Rationale Weather is an aspect of agricultural sciences that cannot.
Fertilizer Calculations. Overview Soil Test Recommendations Total Nutrient Needs Available Nutrient Sources Concentration of Nutrient in each source Calculating.
Highway 56 West Adams, MN Lynn Lagerstedt.
Need for Soil Testing? By Drew Mosburg Soil
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
The Magruder Plots A Century of Wheat Research in Oklahoma A.C. Magruder Horace J. Harper Robert L. Westerman Oklahoma State University.
Nitrate Sources and Nitrate Loading. Historical Yield of Burley Tobacco in Kentucky.
Part 2: Answers to practical fertilizer management problems Fundamentals of Nutrient Management December 16-17, 2009 West Virginia University Extension.
Agriculture and Nutrient Cycles Chapter 2.7. Agriculture and Nutrient Cycles The seeds, leaves, flowers and fruits of plants all contain valuable nutrients.
PURSUIT OF SUSTAINABLE HIGH-YIELDING SOYBEANS
Exploratory Research in Corn
Using Fertilizers AG-BAS-9-g, SB4
Nitrogen-Phosphorous-Potassium Macro Nutrients
Grid Soil sampling.
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
Sorghum Opportunities
Growing crops without soil
Cotton Sensor Research Update
Lesson 4 – Fertilizing Soils
Soil Fertility for Wine Grapes
Fertilizer Decisions Trial Nutrient Responses
Precision Sensing Extension Workshop January 8, 2008
THE FERTILIZER INDUSTRY
EVOLUTION OF NITROGEN REFERENCE STRIPS
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
Evaluation of Midseason UAN Application Depth in Winter Wheat
Soil Fertility Research and Education Advisory Board Meeting, Friday, May 18, 2018 Building 615, Agronomy Experiment Station Stillwater, OK Agenda.
Keith Martin, Josh Coltrain and Jeri Geren
Development of Cotton N Fertilization Algorithms, Southern USA
Poultry Litter FERTILIZER CALCULATOR
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
2008 Product Trial Treatment Preplant N lb/ac Preplant P (DAP) lb/ac
REGIONAL NUE WINTER WHEAT TRIAL
Manure’s Fertility Value
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Corn Algorithm Comparisons, NUE Workshop
In-Field Soil Sampling
Jamie long, C.C.A. Josh Gunther, C.C.A.
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.407
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502
Experiment #601 Long-term Top-Dress N Trial Stillwater, OK
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.406
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.222
Agronomy Research Station Established 1892
The Effects of Precipitation on Corn Yields
In-field Experiment.
Fertilizer Price: per lb of N
Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University Dept Plant and Soil Sciences
Fertilizer Calculations
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.407
Presentation transcript:

Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502 North Central Experiment Station Established 1970 TRT Pre-plant N rate (lb N / ac) Pre-plant P rate (lb P2O5 / ac) Pre-plant K rate (lb K2O / ac) 1.* 2.* 40 60 3.* 20 4.* 5.* 6.* 80 7.* 100 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 60 (Sul-Po-Mag) N applied as 46-0-0 (Urea) P applied as 0-46-0 (Triple Super Phosphate) K applied as 0-0-60 (Potash) * - YP plot Location: Lahoma 36°23'15.64"N, 98° 6'31.17"W S W N E Plot size: 16’ x 60’ Alley: 20’ Total Trial Area: 224’ x 300’ OBJECTIVE: To study fertilizer nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in winter wheat. In recent years, this study has also been used to develop yield potential models and yield predictions through sensor based technologies. 1, 2 – Harvest Sequence Number 1, 2 – Treatment Number 1 , 2 – Soil Sample Sequence Number 300 4 5 12 13 20 21 28 29 36 37 44 45 52 53 Rep 4 3 6 10 2 7 1 8 14 9 11 240 43 46 47 48 49 50 51 54 55 56 220 3 6 11 14 19 22 27 30 35 38 43 46 51 54 Rep 3 1 2 7 9 12 5 13 4 8 10 160 29 31 32 33 34 36 37 39 40 41 42 140 2 7 10 15 18 23 26 31 34 39 42 47 50 55 Rep 2 4 8 3 1 11 13 12 14 6 9 5 80 16 17 19 20 21 22 24 25 27 28 60 1 8 9 16 17 24 25 32 33 40 41 48 49 56 Rep 1 2 4 6 14 10 5 7 12 3 13 11 64 80 96 112 128 144 160 176 192 208 224