Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Advertisements

Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 64, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (September 2018)
An active renal crystal clearance mechanism in rat and man
Volume 79, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 79, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 83, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 61, Issue 2, (February 2002)
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Actin cytoskeleton in ischemic acute renal failure
FR improves renal recovery and decreases inflammation and fibrosis after renal ischemia reperfusion injury  Jerome Cau, MD, Frederic Favreau, PhD,
Volume 79, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Vitamin E attenuates crystal formation in rat kidneys: Roles of renal tubular cell death and crystallization inhibitors  H.-S. Huang, J. Chen, C.-F. Chen,
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Experimental ischemia–reperfusion: biases and myths—the proximal vs
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 63, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Ischemic and non-ischemic acute kidney injury cause hepatic damage
Volume 61, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 72, Issue 3, Pages (August 2007)
Yongji Wang, Megan L. Borchert, Hector F. DeLuca  Kidney International 
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 67, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 74, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Kenji Kasuno, Hajime Nakamura, Takahiko Ono, Eri Muso, Junji Yodoi 
Volume 73, Issue 12, Pages (June 2008)
Renal L-type fatty acid-binding protein mediates the bezafibrate reduction of cisplatin- induced acute kidney injury  K. Negishi, E. Noiri, R. Maeda, D.
Resistance to ischemic acute renal failure in the Brown Norway rat: A new model to study cytoprotection  David P. Basile, Deborah Donohoe, X.I.A. Cao,
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 63, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
The L1 cell adhesion molecule is a potential biomarker of human distal nephron injury in acute tubular necrosis  Y. Allory, V. Audard, P. Fontanges, P.
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Post-conditioning by a short administration of desflurane reduced renal reperfusion injury after differing of ischaemia times in rats  D. Obal, K. Rascher,
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
T cells as mediators in renal ischemia/reperfusion injury
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Recapitulation of phylogeny by ontogeny in nephrology
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Delayed administration of darbepoetin or erythropoietin protects against ischemic acute renal injury and failure  D.W. Johnson, B. Pat, D.A. Vesey, Z.
Volume 72, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
A sphingosine-1-phosphate type 1 receptor agonist inhibits the early T-cell transient following renal ischemia–reperfusion injury  L.-W. Lai, K.-C. Yong,
Transplantation of developing metanephroi into adult rats
Presentation transcript:

Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 601-611 (August 1999) Differences in osteopontin up-regulation between proximal and distal tubules after renal ischemia/reperfusion  Veerle P. Persy, Walter A. Verstrepen, Dirk K. Ysebaert, Kathleen E. De Greef, Marc E. De Broe  Kidney International  Volume 56, Issue 2, Pages 601-611 (August 1999) DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00581.x Copyright © 1999 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Animal data. (A) Experimental setup. Rats were randomly assigned to either the uninephrectomy or the ischemia group. Figures represent the number of animals used in each time group. Additionally, the left kidneys of three normal rats were examined to evaluate the effects of uninephrectomy on tubular morphology and OPN expression of the contralateral kidney. (B) Body weight in nephrectomized control (○) and nephrectomy + ischemia (•) rats. The animals in the ischemia group showed postoperative anorexia during approximately three days. They lost weight throughout the study period, but because of the method of paired feeding, no significant differences in body weight occurred between both groups. (C) Serum creatinine. Uninephrectomy resulted in a slight, but not significant, rise in serum creatinine on day 2. Kidney ischemia/reperfusion caused a significant increase in serum creatinine, already present 24 hours after reperfusion and lasting for several days, with serum creatinine returning to normal on day 7. Kidney International 1999 56, 601-611DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00581.x) Copyright © 1999 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Tubular morphology showing (□) normal, () damaged or (▪) regenerating tubules. Uninephrectomy does not induce morphological signs of damage or regeneration. Kidney ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) causes the most severe injury in proximal tubules (PTs) of the outer stripe of the outer medulla (OSOM), with maximal damage 24 hours after reperfusion, followed by a regeneration process, which is not yet complete at the end of the study period. PTs of the cortex are also maximally damaged 24 hours after reperfusion, but the extent of the damage is significantly less than in PTs of the OSOM. Distal tubules (DTs) show very limited damage after kidney I/R, and morphological signs of regeneration in DTs could not be assessed (for statistical significances, see text). Kidney International 1999 56, 601-611DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00581.x) Copyright © 1999 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Osteopontin (OPN) expression. OPN scores are: (□) 0 (negative); () 1 (<50%); () 2 (>50%); (▪) 3 (100%). In the nephrectomy group, a fraction of distal tubules (DTs), not significantly different of that in normal rats (data not shown), show OPN expression, whereas proximal tubules (PTs) in this group show almost no OPN expression. After I/R, DTs show a rapid and sustained increase in OPN expression. PTs in the outer stripe of the outer medulla (OSOM) show a delayed onset of OPN expression, remaining largely OPN negative during kidney injury and becoming highly OPN positive during morphological regeneration. PTs of the cortex show the same delay in OPN expression as PTs of the OSOM, but the fraction of OPN-positive tubules remains much lower (for statistical significances, see text). Kidney International 1999 56, 601-611DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00581.x) Copyright © 1999 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Photomicrographs. (A) Normal outer stripe of the outer medulla (OSOM). Proximal tubules (PTs) showing a continuous epithelium with a prominent PAS-positive brush border (normal control, magnification ×250). (B) Damaged OSOM. OSOM at the moment of maximal morphological damage, 24 hours after reperfusion, with PTs showing desquamation of cells (1) and total tubular necrosis (2). Distal tubules (DTs) are mostly undamaged (3) and show prominent osteopontin (OPN) expression. The arrow indicates a damaged DT (magnification ×250). (C) Regenerating OSOM. At the moment of maximal morphological regeneration, five days after reperfusion, regenerating PTs show a flat epithelium with large nuclei protruding into the lumen (1) or display various stages of restoration of cytoplasmic volume (2). Notice the expression pattern of OPN, which is vesicular in the center of the cell in PT with normal morphology (arrow) and shows an additional apical staining in regenerating tubules and tubules that are restoring their brush border (arrowhead; magnification ×250). (D) Morphology at day 10. At the end of the study period, normal morphology is partially restored (1; PT with normal morphology), but regeneration is still ongoing (2; regenerating tubules). OPN expression is still high in regenerating PT (magnification ×250). (E) OPN expression in PT. OPN expression in PT is confined to a number of perinuclear, vesicle-like structures (arrows; magnification ×1000). (F) OPN expression in DTs. OPN staining in DTs is prominent at the apical cell side (arrows; magnification ×800). Kidney International 1999 56, 601-611DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00581.x) Copyright © 1999 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Osteopontin (OPN) scores to determine the function level of tubular morphology. OPN scores are: (□) 0 (negative); () 1 (<50%); () 2 (>50%); (▪) 3 (100%). Proximal tubules (PTs) of the outer stripe of the outer medulla (OSOM) mostly remain OPN negative when morphologically damaged, but become highly OPN positive when showing morphological signs of regeneration. Thus, OPN expression in PTs of the OSOM is associated with morphological regeneration. Distal tubules (DTs) show substantially increased OPN expression without major morphological damage. Kidney International 1999 56, 601-611DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00581.x) Copyright © 1999 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions