“US Army Precision Fires”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Air Force Core Functions
Advertisements

Physical Attack IW-140 College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education.
The Persian Gulf War Operation DESERT STORM. 2 Overview  Background to the Conflict Iraqi threats  The Plan of Attack Concept of Operations Five Strategic.
F/A-18E/F SUPER HORNET BLOCK II MULTI-YEAR PROCUREMENT
United States Air Force: Air Doctrine – Air and Space Superiority Objective: Comprehend how the United States Air Force is structured in terms of missions.
Air Armament Symposium
Combat Air Operations.
The American Military Experience The Principles of War Wayne E. Sirmon, M.A.Ed., M.A. Military Science & History Departments University of South Alabama.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Supporting Expeditionary Aerospace Force (EAF) Getting lighter, leaner, and more responsive Col.
XMSF and The Road Ahead CAPT Michael Lilienthal, MSC, USN Director Defense Modeling and Simulation Office XMSF Early Adopters’ Workshop.
PM CAS: Mission and Vision
Naval Weapons Systems Introduction to Naval Weapons.
JOINT FIRES AND EFFECTS TRAINER SYSTEM (JFETS). We currently rely on service component schools to inform on service capabilities, and train component.
Precision Strike Association Deputy Product Manager for Excalibur
JAVELIN.
Overview Understand the evolution and change to American aviation strategy between Vietnam and Operation Desert Storm Know how military aviation and national.
Precision Effects v. Precision Munitions
Iraq & Air Power The Commentator’s View Sir Timothy Garden Centre for Defence Studies King’s College London.
POLISH CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT FOR ARMOURED AND MECHANISED FORCES
Air Force Strategy to Resources
20 th ISMOR COL Jeff Appleget TRAC-WSMR 28 August 2003 Future Combat System (FCS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) Metrics for Transformation.
Presented To: Precision Strike Association Annual Programs Review Presented To: Precision Strike Association Annual Programs Review Presented By: LTC Bill.
By CPT Robert L. Crabtree
MASTER GUNNER COURSE TERMINAL LEARNING OBJECTIVE : TO IDENTIFY AND DEFINE ALL STEPS REQUIRED FOR ENGAGEMENT EXECUTION AS PART OF THE ENGAGEMENT PROCESS.
National Training Center
Authorized for Public Release IAW SPR dtd RDML MARK R. MILLIKEN Navy International Program Office.
Authorized for Public Release IAW SPR dtd RDML Mark R. Milliken Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy, International Programs (DASN IP)
Fires Center of Excellence MG David D. Halverson Infantry Warfighting Conference September 2010.
U.S. Air Force “ Above All” Founded in 1947 The mission of the U. S. Air Force is to fly, fight and win... in air, space, and cyberspace.
Smart Bombs – Precision Guided Weapons
Employment Considerations: Considerations at the Outset of Combat
Army Aviation in MOUT.
AUSA 2016 Global Force Symposium and Exposition 15 – 17 March 2016
Causes and Effects of 20 th Century Wars IB Paper 2 Topic 11.
Strategic Leadership session 5
U.S. Army RDE Command (Prov) - Supporting the Objective Force -
The Russian Way of War TEFOR G-27
Stopping the Reinvasion of the Baltic States
Name of the idea Description and Military Application Maturity
AF NL Force Integration
Name of the idea Description and Military Application Maturity
PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE MISSILES AND SPACE
THE ART OF WAR.
US Marine Corps
Combat Air Operations.
Machine guns.
To view animation on PC: hit F5
How did weapons develop in the 20th century?
How far did the Invasion of Iraq of 2003 reflect modern warfare?
Joint Protection of the Sea Base
Limited Objective Experiment 3
Air Armament Center (AAC)
Provide an Overview of FM Doctrine (FM 1-06)
Force Packaging.
Recommended Initiatives
Why hitting your target is not always good.
EXCALIBUR.
20 Years of DOT&E What Have We Learned & How Can We Make It Better
The Battle of Jutland By: John Froman, Dyuthi Nair, Kellen Hoke, and Adam Callahan.
Army Non-lethal Requirements
Today achievement points will be awarded for…
Defence Procurement in Finland
Turning Points of the War
Weapons of the Great War
The Emerging Quality Value Proposition
California Cadet Corps Curriculum on Military Knowledge
Air Armament Symposium
Weapons of the Great War
Joint Vision 2020.
CHEMICAL AGENTS CHOKING AGENTS – CG, DP.
Presentation transcript:

“US Army Precision Fires” BG(P) Jeff Sorenson

AGENDA Precision Fires – Why and Why Not? Misconceptions Target Acquisition Equipment Programs Key Planning Studies Underway Challenges Road Ahead

PRECISION MUNITIONS -- WHY? All-weather, terrain, and operational environment engagement capability that reduces operational risk by providing immediate responsive fires and scalable effects Minimize collateral damage, especially in urban settings; allows for discriminating use of force Reduce number of rounds needed to defeat targets at all ranges (same CEP at any range) Reduce logistics footprint and force burden Essential to fulfill objectives of Transformation and Joint opns Compliment -- not replace – unguided or ‘dumb’ munitions

PRECISION MUNITIONS – WHY NOT? Not every target needs to be destroyed – suppression, masking, or harassing fire is often needed to shape the battle Unaffordable – if chasing too many programs with limited resources Insufficient numbers – if they become the weapon of choice Dependent on sensor system data, rapidly passed networked information, especially when addressing fleeting targets PGM technology is developing ahead of doctrine and infrastructure – modernizing weapons without modernizing doctrine may lead to ineffective use of PGMs

MISCONCEPTIONS A replacement for unguided munitions – but “dumb” is still good A leap-ahead advantage – but temporary since eventually precision will proliferate and put our own forces at risk Leads to quick victory – but the enemy does not always behave the way we think we would Technology Will Save Us… -- PGMs are not a replacement for sound tactics or strategy (do not confuse the ways and means of war with its end) -- PGMs as the ‘silver bullet’ – but weapons break; human error; enemy countermeasures; not a replacement for doctrine, tactics, or the human element (leadership; will to win; luck)

CIRCULAR ERROR PROBABLE (CEP) 10 km 15 km 20 km 25 km 30 km 95m 112m 139m 273m 10m 132m 69m Excalibur CEP M549A1 CEP (1/2 hr MET) M107 CEP (1/2 hr MET) Aim Point Circular Error Probable (CEP) - the radius of a circle within which 50% of the projectiles fired will impact. 35 km 40 km 97m

JOINT FIRES CAPABILITIES Long Range Precision Strike Variety of: - Targets - Dwell Times - Effects Long Range Precision Strike Range Shaping Fires >300km Destructive Fires at Depth 300km Air Interdiction 150-180km Fires to Isolate 100km (LAM) Attack AVN TLAM ATACMS Fires to Protect 70km 40-50km (PAM) 30-40km Close Support Fires Naval Gunfire UCAV FCS Cannon W/Excalibur GMLRS Close Air Support 7-12km PAM/LAM FCS Mortar Responsiveness for Close Fight

PRECISION MUNITIONS (Fielded & Developmental) FIELDED PRODUCTION SYSTEMS: TOW 2B JAVELIN HELLFIRE variants -- SAL (K, M, or N) and LONGBOW (L) ATACMS Block IV – Quick Reaction Unitary (QRU) SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPMENT OR S&T: PEO AMMO: PEO MISSILES and SPACE: Excalibur LOSAT Viper Strike PGMM CKEM NLOS LS -- PAM MRM APKWS NLOS LS -- LAM CCF JCM MTHEL GMLRS