Industrial Radiography Equipment Need for a review of the effectiveness of the implementation of ISO 3999? IAEA Technical Meeting Vienna, 23-27 June 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Barhale Procedure for Site Establishment
Advertisements

Hosted By: Atlanta, Ga. National Aerospace FOD Prevention, Inc. 25th National Aerospace FOD Prevention Conference 27 – 29 July 2004 Co-hosted By: Delta.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
Be prepared before it happens!! Have procedures and policies in place before you have to respond to a retrieval. Training- Have personnel that are.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Radiation Safety for Industrial Radiography Input for Recommendations Report by Richard van Sonsbeek Results from.
Gauges and well logging
Radiation Safety in Industrial Radiography
Inspection and Maintenance of Isotope Radiography Systems
Gauges and well logging
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
1 Regulatory Challenges During and Following a Major Safety or Security Event Muhammad Iqbal Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Presentation at General.
Responsible CarE® Employee health and Safety Code David Sandidge Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
Controlling Hazardous Energy
Radiation Safety Training for Industrial Radiography IAEA Technical Meeting Vienna, June 2014 Richard van Sonsbeek
SHE Code 4: Safety and Safe Use of Work Equipment
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Chapter 10. Quality Assurance Definition A system of activities whose purpose is to provide assurance that the overall.
Management of emergencies in industrial radiography
Industrial Radiography Basic Safety Requirements
1 Inspection and Testing Approved for Public Release.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Hazard Identification
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety Vienna, November 2012 Rules and responsibilities of the regulatory body Jiří Veselý, SONS, Czech republic.
Federal Aviation Administration Maintenance "Personal Minimums" Federal Aviation Administration DOT/FAA.
Maintenance "Personal Minimums"
Dr. Francisco Cesar Augusto Da Silva
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part II.
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Safety Reports Series No. 7 Lessons Learned from Accidents in Industrial Radiography Practical Radiation Safety.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Dr. Abraham Gregorio de Rosa,Sp.Rad Radiologist in HNGV Dili, Timor Leste 2 Perspectives on regulatory models.
Recent U.S. Events Regarding Industrial Radiographic Operations.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Technical Services.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Industrial Radiography Emergency Preparedness Day 5 – Lecture 8.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December.
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
Metrology & Accreditation – Their Role in the Global Market Presented at the 2009 NCSLI Conference San Antonio, Texas 30 July 2009 by Roxanne Robinson.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Industrial Radiography Equipment Need for a review of the effectiveness of the implementation of ISO 3999? IAEA Technical Meeting Vienna, June 2014.
Toolbox presentation: Approaches to hazard identification.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Need for a Regulatory program.
BY GAMINI SENANAYAKE.  Legislation applicable to staff and public Ionising radiation regulations 1999  Legislation applicable to patients – Ionising.
A LOOK AT AMENDMENTS TO ISO/IEC (1999) Presented at NCSLI Conference Washington DC August 11, 2005 by Roxanne Robinson.
Essential Requirements of Pool Management Companies

LOCKOOUT/TAGOUT THE ULTIMATE GOAL IS: To implement policies and procedures to prevent, as necessary, the release of hazardous energy from power sources--or.
Lock Out Tag Out (LOTO).
“Success in Safety”.
Training Course on Integrated Management System for Regulatory Body
Lock Out & Tag Out.
Module Planned exposure situations Public exposure (GSR Part 3)
Maintaining Safety Standards
Energy Control (Lockout/Tagout)
CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGIES (LOCKOUT / TAGOUT)
Maintaining Safety Standards
Competence Pack Guide to Assessment.
SOURCE PROJECTORS FOR INDUSTRIAL GAMMA RADIOGRAPHY IN FRANCE
Testing and tagging.
Safety and Security of Radiation Sources
Inspection and Testing
East Carolina University Compressed Gas Safety Training Program
From AS :   Part 4— Commissioning, operation and asset management
Control of Hazardous Energy
Competence Pack Guide to Assessment.
ESA's TEC Directorate Asset Management - Present and Future
Lock Out Tag Out.
Fertilizer Industry Safety Information Analysis and Sharing Program
Presentation transcript:

Industrial Radiography Equipment Need for a review of the effectiveness of the implementation of ISO 3999? IAEA Technical Meeting Vienna, 23-27 June 2014 Richard van Sonsbeek richard.vansonsbeek@applusrtd.com

Radiography Equipment at Applus RTD Make and type varies between Business Units / Countries Maintenance is done in-house and by third parties If maintenance is done in-house then the employees are trained and authorized by the manufacturer In the past RTD proposed and made several improvements of exposure devices based on the experience of use in the field which let to a reduction in the number of equipment malfunction | 2

Maintenance program items Equipment is subject to scheduled calibration / inspection routine (Quarterly) Radiographers inspect all equipment prior to use / daily and records are kept Any abnormal events are required to be forwarded to their RPO / Ops Managers, Typically equipment will be swapped out for maintenance or repair Electrical equipment is inspected and tagged “Fit for Use” as per schedule Monitoring equipment checked prior to mobilization to job Equipment history (inspections, repairs, problems, etc) is maintained via records | 3

Specifications Exposure Devices ISO 3999 5.4 Safety devices 5.4.1 Securing devices “It shall not be possible to lock the exposure container unless the source assembly is in the secured position” 5.4.2 Indications of secured position or not “The apparatus shall be designed such that it is possible to determine if the source holder is in the sercured position from a distance of at least 5 m.” 5.6 Source-assembly security “It shall be possible to connect or disconnect the source assembly from the end of the control cable without the use of any tool, …”

Safety / Securing Devices may fail /1 The bar is behind the key lock. When the guide tube is not connected, the key lock cannot be opened Over time, due to wear and tear, the “golden” part cannot be pushed away far enough by the guide tube.

Safety / Security Devices may fail /2 Selenium Gammamat Sometimes the lock only closes half way (1) Cause: Source assembly can be pulled back too far (2 vs. 4) Slider plate gets stuck behind source assembly (3) Possible Root Cause: Manufacturing not according to design specification Too much tolerance allowed Materials used during manufacturing are of lesser quality than materials used during endurance test 1 2 3 4

Underlying (Root) Causes? Design of Exposure Devices shall ensure continued operation under normal conditions of use. This shall be demonstrated by satisfactory performance of the tests indicated in clause 5.8 of ISO 3999. Are exposure devices always manufactured according to design specifications, e.g. with respect to the quality of used materials and tolerances in the production of its constituting parts? Do the tests sufficiently account for the conditions under which the devices are used in the field? Are end users sufficiently involved in determining the design criteria to make use of their knowledge and experience? What is their representation in the working group that drafts ISO 3999?

Consequences of failing safety devices Unsafe operations potentially leading to radiation incidents Source retrieval becomes more complicated, potentially leading to more severe consequences

What to do about this? Performance of Exposure Devices and their safety and securing devices under the conditions in which they are used in the field should be reviewed and evaluated Preferably by an independent party Perhaps via a study on behalf of the IAEA? Based upon this, the design criteria including relevant test (ISO 3999) and consequently the design for these devices, and their manufacturing could and should be improved

What to do further? Improving the dissemination of information Obviously on lesson learned from accidents in which equipment malfunctioning was a cause But also on other incidents and events that had the potential for becoming or contributing to and accident and in which equipment malfunctioning was a cause Setting up an international database and promote the industry to use it both by providing information and using it (per ISEMIR initiative)