Rik van der Kant, Lawrence S.B. Goldstein  Developmental Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trafficking and processing of APP  and  -secretase.
Advertisements

Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Hepatitis C Virus NS5A Protein–A Master Regulator?
Interactions between Autophagy Receptors and Ubiquitin-like Proteins Form the Molecular Basis for Selective Autophagy  Vladimir Rogov, Volker Dötsch,
Acid Test: Lipid Antigens Get into the Groove
Hepatitis C Virus NS5A Protein–A Master Regulator?
F. Gisou van der Goot, Jean Gruenberg  Developmental Cell 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
HOPX: The Unusual Homeodomain-Containing Protein
Structure-Based Reassessment of the Caveolin Signaling Model: Do Caveolae Regulate Signaling through Caveolin-Protein Interactions?  Brett M. Collins,
α1-Adrenoceptor Subtype Selectivity and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
The BCL-2 Family Reunion
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 9-21 (October 2011)
Great Expectations for PIP: Phosphoinositides as Regulators of Signaling During Development and Disease  Lara C. Skwarek, Gabrielle L. Boulianne  Developmental.
Yee-Ming Chan, Yuh Nung Jan  Neuron 
Going Forward with Retromer
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Smads “Freeze” When They Ski
Progress in Molecular Genetics of Heritable Skin Diseases: The Paradigms of Epidermolysis Bullosa and Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum  Jouni Uitto, Leena Pulkkinen,
Toward a Molecular Structure of the Eukaryotic Kinetochore
Neurodevelopment on Route p63
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Arne Schreiber, Sebastian Fischer, Thorsten Lang  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 137, Issue 7, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
From ER to Eph Receptors: New Roles for VAP Fragments
Shedding Light on Mammalian Microautophagy
Disruption of Axonal Transport and Neuronal Viability by Amyloid Precursor Protein Mutations in Drosophila  Shermali Gunawardena, Lawrence S.B. Goldstein 
iRhoms: ERADicating the Messenger in Growth Control Signaling
The C. elegans SYS-1 Protein Is a Bona Fide β-Catenin
Calnexin Controls the STAT3-Mediated Transcriptional Response to EGF
Nat. Rev. Neurol. doi: /nrneurol
Orientational Preferences of Neighboring Helices Can Drive ER Insertion of a Marginally Hydrophobic Transmembrane Helix  Karin Öjemalm, Katrin K. Halling,
Notch Signaling: The Core Pathway and Its Posttranslational Regulation
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Sorting Out Presenilins in Alzheimer’s Disease
Structural Basis for the EBA-175 Erythrocyte Invasion Pathway of the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum  Niraj H. Tolia, Eric J. Enemark, B. Kim Lee.
RAS Proteins and Their Regulators in Human Disease
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
The P2X7 Receptor in Infection and Inflammation
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Functional Diversity and Regulation of Different Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase (IRAK) Family Members  Sophie Janssens, Rudi Beyaert  Molecular.
Coats, Tethers, Rabs, and SNAREs Work Together to Mediate the Intracellular Destination of a Transport Vesicle  Huaqing Cai, Karin Reinisch, Susan Ferro-Novick 
David C. Gershlick, María Lucas  Current Biology 
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Yee-Ming Chan, Yuh Nung Jan  Neuron 
Renal albumin absorption in physiology and pathology
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Michael J. Clague, Han Liu, Sylvie Urbé  Developmental Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 71, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Functional Diversity and Regulation of Different Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase (IRAK) Family Members  Sophie Janssens, Rudi Beyaert  Molecular.
Effects of PS1 Deficiency on Membrane Protein Trafficking in Neurons
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Another niche for Notch
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Guilty as charged Cancer Cell
Different dimerisation mode for TLR4 upon endosomal acidification?
APP processing and the formation of Aβ peptide.
Design Principles of Protein Biosynthesis-Coupled Quality Control
Two Tales (Tails) of SAMHD1 Destruction by Vpx
Novel pharmacological strategies to treat cystic fibrosis
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Exosomes and Ectosomes in Intercellular Communication
Hildegard Büning, Arun Srivastava 
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Cellular Functions of the Amyloid Precursor Protein from Development to Dementia  Rik van der Kant, Lawrence S.B. Goldstein  Developmental Cell  Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 502-515 (February 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.022 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Domain Organization and Tissue Expression of the APP Family Proteins (Left) A schematic diagram depicting major domains in the longest APP isoform (APP770). The APP ectodomain (671AA) is much larger than the transmembrane and intracellular domain regions of APP. The PM is in gray. (Top right) Schematic depiction of major domains in the APP-protein family members APLP1 and APLP2 and two major APP splice variants (APP695 and APP770). The predominant tissue expression profile for these proteins is shown below. (Bottom right) Genetic interactions of the different APP family proteins in mice. Developmental Cell 2015 32, 502-515DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.022) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Interactions at the APP C Terminus (A) Depicted is the C99 fragment of APP with pathogenic mutations in red, protective mutations in purple, and mutations with unknown pathogenicity in green. The figure depicts different phosphorylation sites in the intracellular domain of APP as well as the caspase-cleavage and isomerization site. In green is the domain involved in Pin1 and Go binding, while in yellow and red are, respectively, the YENPTY and YKFFE domains required for binding to other interaction proteins. Binding of many of these proteins has been shown to be phosphorylation dependent. Numbering is based on APP770. The table depicts APP-dependent cellular processes in which the CTF-interacting proteins are involved. (B) Alignment of the intracellular C-terminal tails of APP, APLP1, and APLP2 showing high sequence homology between the members of this family. APLP1 is most divergent, as it does not have the Pin1 binding motif and has a change of charge from positive (K) to negative (E) flanking the domain involved in G0-protein binding. Developmental Cell 2015 32, 502-515DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.022) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 APP Proteolytic Products and Intracellular Trafficking of APP (A) Overview of the proteolytic products of APP generated by different cleavage events. The products generated in the amyloidogenic (initial cut by β-secretase) versus non-amyloidogenic (initial cut by α-secretase) pathway only differ in 16 amino acids (bottom). Mutations are depicted, numbering based on APP770. (B) APP trafficking and processing. APP is synthesized in the ER (a) and trafficked via the TGN (b) to the PM (c) or endosomes (d). Full-length APP can be endocytosed from the PM (1) or cleaved by the α-secretase (2) to release sAPPα in the extracellular environment as well as generating C83 that is also endocytosed. In the EE, full-length APP is cut by the β-secretase generating C99 and soluble APPβ (3). Full-length APP and soluble APP fragments generated in the endosome might be recycled to the PM via recycling endosomes (RE) (4) or can be trafficked toward late endosomes (LEs) (5). In the LEs, these fragments can subsequently be sorted toward the TGN (6), exocytosed (7), or further trafficked to the lysosome for degradation (8). Cutting of C99 and C83 by the γ-secretase might occur in the TGN, the LE, or in both compartments, therefore possibly releasing Aβ and P3 either via the secretory pathway or via exocytosis. Cutting by the γ-secretase also releases the AICD that can translocate to the nucleus (9). Developmental Cell 2015 32, 502-515DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.022) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A Detailed Overview of APP Residues Involved in FAD and Cholesterol Binding Schematic representation of amino acids in APP, numbering based on APP770. Secretase cleavage sites are indicated (with B’ is a minor β-secretase site). The γ-secretase can cleave at multiple positions, giving rise to Aβ fragments with different lengths, as shown in the left. An extracellular domain in the ectodomain of APP—adjacent to the transmembrane domain—was recently shown to fold back into the PM and to be important for cholesterol interactions. Membrane insertion has also been shown for the extreme C terminus of APP. The PM is in gray. Developmental Cell 2015 32, 502-515DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.022) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions