Joshua C. Black, Janet E. Choi, Sarah R. Lombardo, Michael Carey 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Advertisements

Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Repression by Groucho/TLE/Grg Proteins: Genomic Site Recruitment Generates Compacted Chromatin In Vitro and Impairs Activator Binding In Vivo  Takashi.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Kristina M. Johnson, Michael Carey  Current Biology 
Nucleosome Sliding via TBP DNA Binding In Vivo
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
E6 Oncoprotein Represses p53-Dependent Gene Activation via Inhibition of Protein Acetylation Independently of Inducing p53 Degradation  Mary C. Thomas,
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Transcriptional Activators Enhance Polyadenylation of mRNA Precursors
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Mediator-Regulated Transcription through the +1 Nucleosome
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
The Rpd3 Core Complex Is a Chromatin Stabilization Module
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Direct Interactions of OCA-B and TFII-I Regulate Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Transcription by Facilitating Enhancer-Promoter Communication  Xiaodi.
Shinya Takahata, Yaxin Yu, David J. Stillman  Molecular Cell 
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Vanessa Brès, Tomonori Yoshida, Loni Pickle, Katherine A. Jones 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
Ahmed H. Hassan, Kristen E. Neely, Jerry L. Workman  Cell 
The Human PAF1 Complex Acts in Chromatin Transcription Elongation Both Independently and Cooperatively with SII/TFIIS  Jaehoon Kim, Mohamed Guermah, Robert.
Volume 125, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 138, Issue 6, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 121, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Gaku Mizuguchi, Toshio Tsukiyama, Jan Wisniewski, Carl Wu 
A Transcription-Independent Role for TFIIB in Gene Looping
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Chromatin Disassembly Mediated by the Histone Chaperone Asf1 Is Essential for Transcriptional Activation of the Yeast PHO5 and PHO8 Genes  Melissa W Adkins,
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Christy J. Fryer, J.Brandon White, Katherine A. Jones  Molecular Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
A Minimal RNA Polymerase III Transcription System from Human Cells Reveals Positive and Negative Regulatory Roles for CK2  Ping Hu, Si Wu, Nouria Hernandez 
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

A Mechanism for Coordinating Chromatin Modification and Preinitiation Complex Assembly  Joshua C. Black, Janet E. Choi, Sarah R. Lombardo, Michael Carey  Molecular Cell  Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages 809-818 (September 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.018 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Immobilized Chromatin Template (A) The template bears five GAL4 binding sites upstream of the adenovirus E4 TATA box (G5E4T) flanked with nucleosome positioning sequences from the sea urchin 5S rRNA gene-separated EcoRI sites (RI). (B) Coomassie blue-stained SDS gel of recombinant octamers following gel filtration. Note that H2A and H2B comigrate in this gel system. (C) Validation of chromatin. Decreasing amounts of naked DNA (100%, 250 ng; 30%, 15%, 5%, and 2.5%), free chromatin (C), and chromatin immobilized on magnetic bead (CIT) were digested with EcoRI. The positions of naked 5S and G5E4T DNA, and mobility shifts induced by nucleosome occupancy, are indicated in the figure. (D) MNase analysis of chromatin. 32P-labeled, immobilized chromatin (250 ng) was subjected to MNase digestion for 10 min at room temperature with from 3 × 10−5 to 3 × 10−3 units of MNase. Molecular Cell 2006 23, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.018) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 GAL4-VP16-Directed Ordered Recruitment of Cofactors to Immobilized DNA and Chromatin (A) Schematic of immobilized template assay timeline. A 30 min activator binding period was followed by incubation with HeLa nuclear extract (NE) for 3, 10, or 30 min. A control reaction was performed in the absence of GAL4-VP16 for 30 min. (B) Immunoblots of proteins bound to immobilized DNA templates after incubation with HeLa NE. (C) Immunoblots of proteins bound to immobilized chromatin templates. (D) In vitro transcription occurs after PIC assembly is complete. DNA templates were incubated with HeLa NE as in (B), except that NTPs were added with the NE and transcription was allowed to proceed for the time indicated. Molecular Cell 2006 23, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.018) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mediator and p300 Cooperatively Bind DNA (A) Silver-stained gel of affinity purified human Mediator. (B) Silver-stained gel of purified His6-tagged p300. Autoradiograms show that His6-tagged p300 is functional for histone acetylation and autoacetylation in the presence of 3H-acetyl-CoA. (C) Cooperative binding of Mediator and p300 to immobilized templates. We show data only for MED23 subunit of Mediator; however, Mediator binding was also measured by blotting MED1, MED25, and CDK8 in all of our experiments and was consistent with MED23 (data not shown). (D) Cooperative binding of Mediator and p300 results in cooperative HAT activity. Purified Mediator, recombinant p300, and 3H-acetyl-CoA were coincubated with immobilized chromatin templates. Molecular Cell 2006 23, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.018) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Acetylation Dissociates p300 from GAL4-VP16-Mediator Complexes (A) Acetyl-CoA induces p300 dissociation from GAL4-VP16-Mediator. GAL4-V16-Mediator-p300 complexes were assembled on immobilized DNA templates as in Figure 3 (time 0). Complexes were incubated with or without 10 μM acetyl-CoA for the indicated times. (B) Acetylated p300 has significantly reduced affinity for GAL4-VP16-Mediator. p300 was preacetylated by incubation with 10 μM cold ac-CoA at 30°C (ac-p300). Increasing concentrations (7.5, 30, and 120 ng) of mock-treated p300 or preacetylated p300 (ac-p300) were incubated with GAL4-VP16 and Mediator on immobilized DNA templates. Autoacetylation of p300 was measured by immunoblot with an anti-acetyl lysine antibody (right panel). (C) Ac-p300 does not acetylate immobilized chromatin. (D) Ac-p300 retains HAT activity. Molecular Cell 2006 23, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.018) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Autoacetylation Induces a Conformational Change in the p300 HAT Domain (A) ATM-p300 does not autoacetylate. (B) Curcumin inhibits p300 HAT and autoacetylation activities. A HAT assay was performed using p300 with recombinant octamers in the presence of 3H-acetyl-CoA. (C) ATM-p300 does not dissociate in the presence of ac-CoA, but binding to immobilized template is blocked by Curcumin. (D) Curcumin prevents p300 from binding to GAL4-VP16-Mediator on immobilized template. Three hundred micromolar Curcumin or DMSO (Curcumin solvent) was preincubated with p300 where indicated. (E) Protease footprinting of p300, ac-p300, and Curcumin. Mock-treated, acetylated p300 (ac-p300), and Curcumin-treated p300 were incubated with Proteinase K (PK). Cleavage products at different intervals (45, 90, 180, and 240 s) were analyzed by immunoblotting. A plus sign indicates regions hypersensitive to PK when compared to untreated p300, while a minus sign indicates regions protected. Molecular Cell 2006 23, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.018) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Dissociation of p300 by Autoacetylation or Competition with TFIID Is Required for Transcription (A) TFIID competes with p300 for Mediator, which facilitates acetyl-CoA-dependent dissociation of p300 in an immobilized template assay. Purified Mediator (90 ng), recombinant p300 (90 ng), TFIIA (12 ng), or TFIID (1× = 30 ng, 5× = 150 ng) with or without 10 μM acetyl-CoA was incubated with immobilized chromatin templates as indicated. All panels are from the same experiment. (B) In vitro transcription. DNA was preincubated with GAL4-VP16, p300, ac-p300, mock-acetylated ATM-p300, Mediator, and TFIID (1 = 30 ng, 3 = 90 ng, and 10 = 300 ng), as indicated. (C) Timeline of chromatin transcription. (D) In vitro chromatin transcription. Following activator binding, acetylation, and remodeling, repression by ATM-p300 was assayed with the indicated cofactors: ATM-p300, ac-p300, TFIID, or Curcumin (300 μM). HeLa nuclear extract and NTPs were then added to initiate transcription. Molecular Cell 2006 23, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.018) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 ChIP Demonstrates p300 Dissociates prior to Accumulation of Transcript, while VP16 Remains Bound (A) ChIP of U2OS Tet-On cells induced with 1 μg/ml Dox for the indicated times. Immunoprecipitated DNA was analyzed by multiplex PCR with primers to the Tet-On luciferase promoter (Luc) or GAPDH promoter (GAP). Input corresponds to 3% of input chromatin. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of luciferase transcript level. RNA was isolated from U2OS Tet-On cells treated with Dox for the indicated times. cDNA levels of luciferase were normalized to β-actin at each time point, and fold induction was calculated compared to the uninduced samples. Error bars represent the standard deviation. (C) Model for transition from chromatin modification to PIC assembly. Initially, Mediator interacts with and recruits chromatin-remodeling complexes (i.e., p300). Following acetylation, p300 undergoes a conformational change and dissociates. Competition between TFIID and p300 for Mediator facilitates the dissociation. TFIID-Mediator then functions as a scaffold for assembly of GTFs and Pol II, allowing completion of PIC assembly. Molecular Cell 2006 23, 809-818DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2006.07.018) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions