Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peter L. Lee, Yuefeng Tang, Huawei Li, David A. Guertin 
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages (December 2015)
Ling Yang, Ping Li, Suneng Fu, Ediz S. Calay, Gökhan S. Hotamisligil 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Grzegorz Sumara, Olga Sumara, Jason K. Kim, Gerard Karsenty 
Volume 155, Issue 2, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
PARP-2 Regulates SIRT1 Expression and Whole-Body Energy Expenditure
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Antidiabetic Effects of IGFBP2, a Leptin-Regulated Gene
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Protection against High-Fat-Diet-Induced Obesity in MDM2C305F Mice Due to Reduced p53 Activity and Enhanced Energy Expenditure  Shijie Liu, Tae-Hyung.
Antidiabetic Effects of IGFBP2, a Leptin-Regulated Gene
Heat Shock Transcription Factor 1 Is a Key Determinant of HCC Development by Regulating Hepatic Steatosis and Metabolic Syndrome  Xiongjie Jin, Demetrius.
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Cold-Inducible SIRT6 Regulates Thermogenesis of Brown and Beige Fat
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e7 (August 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Knockdown of NPY Expression in the Dorsomedial Hypothalamus Promotes Development of Brown Adipocytes and Prevents Diet-Induced Obesity  Pei-Ting Chao,
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (October 2018)
High-Fat Diet Triggers Inflammation-Induced Cleavage of SIRT1 in Adipose Tissue To Promote Metabolic Dysfunction  Angeliki Chalkiadaki, Leonard Guarente 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Circadian Dysfunction Induces Leptin Resistance in Mice
EBF2 Determines and Maintains Brown Adipocyte Identity
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Mice with AS160/TBC1D4-Thr649Ala Knockin Mutation Are Glucose Intolerant with Reduced Insulin Sensitivity and Altered GLUT4 Trafficking  Shuai Chen, David.
Cbx4 Sumoylates Prdm16 to Regulate Adipose Tissue Thermogenesis
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Lipin, a lipodystrophy and obesity gene
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Xu-Yun Zhao, Siming Li, Guo-Xiao Wang, Qi Yu, Jiandie D. Lin 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Adipose Fatty Acid Oxidation Is Required for Thermogenesis and Potentiates Oxidative Stress-Induced Inflammation  Jieun Lee, Jessica M. Ellis, Michael J.
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
ASXL2 Regulates Glucose, Lipid, and Skeletal Homeostasis
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 1-10.e7 (January 2019)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Transcriptional Control of Brown Fat Determination by PRDM16
Presentation transcript:

Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 77-87 (January 2009) The Nuclear Orphan Receptor COUP-TFII Plays an Essential Role in Adipogenesis, Glucose Homeostasis, and Energy Metabolism  Luoping Li, Xin Xie, Jun Qin, George S. Jeha, Pradip K. Saha, Jun Yan, Claire M. Haueter, Lawrence Chan, Sophia Y. Tsai, Ming-Jer Tsai  Cell Metabolism  Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 77-87 (January 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.12.002 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 COUP-TFII+/− Mice Display Reduced Adiposity (A) The photograph depicts the appearance of the 3-month-old COUP-TFII+/+ and COUP-TFII+/− mice (top) and gross morphology of BAT and epididymal WAT (EWAT) (bottom). (B) Body weight of 3-month-old COUP-TFII+/+ (black box, n = 7) and COUP-TFII+/− (gray box, n = 7) mice fed a normal chow. (C) H&E staining of paraffin-embedded EWAT and BAT sections. The upper scale bar shown is equal to 20 μm and applicable to the top four sections; the lower scale bar shown is equal to 100 μm and applicable to the bottom two sections. (D) One side of whole mount EWAT each was collected from COUP-TFII+/+ and COUP-TFII+/− mice, respectively, and completely homogenized in a 0.5 ml RIPA buffer. Picture was taken after the samples were centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000 rpm. COUP-TFII+/− mice had much less lipid accumulation in EWAT than the control (top layer). (E) COUP-TFII+/− mice have similar food intake (gray box, n = 7) to COUP-TFII+/+ mice (black box, n = 7). (F) MRI analysis revealed that COUP-TFII+/− mice (gray box, n = 7) have less fat mass and are leaner than COUP-TFII+/+ mice (black box, n = 7). (G) Real-time PCR analysis of cyclophilin A gene number in EWAT genomic DNA from both COUP-TFII+/+ (black box, n = 7) and COUP-TFII+/− (gray box, n = 7) mice. Data in (B) and (E)–(G) represent mean ± SEM ∗ p < 0.05; † p < 0.005. Cell Metabolism 2009 9, 77-87DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.12.002) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 COUP-TFII Is Required for Adipocyte Differentiation In Vivo (A) Real-time PCR analysis of the mRNA expression of COUP-TFII and the adipogenic transcription factors PPARγ and C/EBPα in EWAT collected from COUP-TFII+/+ mice at different developmental stages. Expression levels of each gene were normalized to the levels of the 18S rRNA (n = 6). (B) X-gal staining of histological sections of EWAT taken from different ages of COUP-TFII-LacZ knockin mice. The scale bar shown equals 50 μm and is applicable to all sections. (C) Oil red O staining of frozen sections of EWAT from COUP-TFII+/+ and COUP-TFII+/− mice at different ages. The scale bar shown equals 50 μm and is applicable to all sections. (D) Real-time PCR analysis of adipocyte marker genes and transcription factors. RNAs were isolated from EWAT of COUP-TFII+/+ (black box) and COUP-TFII+/− (gray box) mice. Expression levels of each gene were normalized to the levels of the 18S rRNA (n = 7). Data in (A) and (D) indicate mean ± SEM ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; ‡ p < 0.001; § p < 0.0005. (E) ChIP analysis of COUP-TFII binding to a PGC-1α promoter at the promoter region 2 kb upstream of transcriptional initiation site (top) and at the second intron region (bottom), which served as a control. Cell Metabolism 2009 9, 77-87DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.12.002) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 COUP-TFII Is Necessary for Adipocyte Differentiation from 3T3-L1 Cells and Embryonic Fibroblasts (A) Western blot analysis of COUP-TFII and PPARγ expression during differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells. Cells were harvested at the indicated times. Arrowhead indicates positions of bands corresponding to PPARγ. (B) 3T3-L1 cells were transfected with COUP-TFII-siRNA (COUP-TFII) or control siRNA (Ctrl). Expression of COUP-TFII and PGC-1α in cells 8 hr and 1 day after induction were analyzed by western blot (left). siRNA knockdown 3T3-L1 cells were induced to differentiate. Cells were stained with oil red O on day 8 (right). (C) 3T3-L1 cells transfected with a control plasmid (Ctrl) or one expressing COUP-TFII (OE). Expression of COUP-TFII in cells was analyzed by western blot (left). COUP-TFII overexpression in cells was subsequently induced to differentiate. Cells were stained with oil red O on day 8 (right). (D) Impaired adipocyte differentiation in COUP-TFII-null MEFs. Immunoblot analysis of COUP-TFII in MEFs prepared from COUP-TFIIflox/flox and ROSA26CRE-ERT2/+, COUP-TFIIflox/flox embryos is shown. Cells were harvested 2 days after having been cultured in DMEM with or without 1 μM 4OH-TM (left). MEFs were induced to differentiate, and cells were stained with oil red O on day 8 (right). (E) COUP-TFII negatively regulates Wnt10b expression. Real-time PCR analysis of COUP-TFII and Wnt10b expressions in COUP-TFII knockdown 3T3-L1 cells are shown at left. Expression levels of each gene were normalized to the levels of the 18S rRNA (n = 3). Western blot analysis of molecules in Wnt signaling pathway are shown in the middle. ChIP analysis of COUP-TFII binding to Wnt10b promoter at the promoter region 1.8 kb upstream of the transcriptional initiation site (top row) and at the second intron region (bottom row), which was served as a control (right), is shown. Data indicate mean ± SEM ∗∗ p < 0.01, § p < 0.0005. Cell Metabolism 2009 9, 77-87DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.12.002) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 COUP-TFII+/− Mice Have Improved Glucose Homeostasis (A) Plasma glucose, insulin, adiponectin, cholesterol, NEFA, and triglyceride levels in 3-month-old COUP-TFII+/+ (black box, n = 11) and COUP-TFII+/− (gray box, n = 11) mice in the fed and fasted overnight states. ∗ p < 0.05; † p < 0.005; § p < 0.0005. (B) Oil red O staining of histological sections of liver taken from 3-month-old COUP-TFII+/+ and COUP-TFII+/− mice fed with normal chow. The red staining indicates neutral lipids. The scale bar shown equals 20 μm and is applicable to all sections. (C) Glucose tolerance test and insulin tolerance test on 3-month-old COUP-TFII+/+ (filled circle, n = 7) and COUP-TFII+/− (opened circle, n = 7) mice. ∗ p < 0.05; ∗∗ p < 0.01; † p < 0.005. (D) Following an overnight fast, 3-month-old COUP-TFII+/+ (black box, n = 4) and COUP-TFII+/− (gray box, n = 5) mice were subjected to a conscious hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Basal glucose production is shown at left, whole-body glucose disposal rate during hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp is shown in the middle, and muscle (soleus and gastrocnemius) and WAT glucose uptake during the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp is shown at right. ∗ p < 0.05. Data in (A), (C), and (D) represent mean ± SEM. Cell Metabolism 2009 9, 77-87DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.12.002) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 COUP-TFII+/− Mice Are Resistant to High-Fat Diet-Induced Obesity (A) Body weight gain of COUP-TFII+/+ (filled circle, n = 9) and COUP-TFII+/− (opened circle, n = 8) mice fed a high-fat diet. Eight-week-old mice were fed a high-fat diet for 12 weeks. Body weight was measured weekly. ∗ p < 0.05. (B) MRI analysis of body fat and lean content in COUP-TFII+/+ (black box, n = 9) and COUP-TFII+/− (gray box, n = 8) mice after 12 weeks of high-fat feeding. ‡ p < 0.001. (C) Glucose tolerance test and insulin tolerance test on COUP-TFII+/+ (filled circle, n = 9) and COUP-TFII+/− (opened circle, n = 8) mice after 12 weeks of high-fat feeding. ∗ p < 0.05; † p < 0.005; § p < 0.0005. (D) The photograph depicts the appearance of COUP-TFII+/+ and COUP-TFII+/− mice after 12 weeks of high-fat feeding (top left); exposed ventral view of the mice revealed much less WAT mass in COUP-TFII+/− mice (bottom left), much less BAT and EWAT in COUP-TFII+/− mice (top right), and gross morphology of the liver (bottom right). Paler BAT and liver color of COUP-TFII+/+ mice indicated higher lipid accumulation in these organs. (E) Oil red O staining of the liver collected from COUP-TFII+/+ and COUP-TFII+/− mice. The scale bar shown equals 50 μm and is applicable to all sections. (F) Locomotion activity was measured in COUP-TFII+/+ (black box, n = 6) and COUP-TFII+/− (gray box, n = 6) mice under a high-fat diet with the VersaMax Animal Activity Monitoring System. Shown is the average movement during the monitoring period. ∗∗ p < 0.01. Data in (A)–(C) and (F) represent mean ± SEM. Cell Metabolism 2009 9, 77-87DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.12.002) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 COUP-TFII+/− Mice Have Increased Energy Expenditure (A) Oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide generation (VCO2) analyzed by indirect calorimetry in COUP-TFII+/+ (filled circle, n = 8) and COUP-TFII+/− (open circle, n = 8) mice. ∗∗ p < 0.01; † p < 0.005; ‡ p < 0.001; § p < 0.0005. (B) Heat generation of COUP-TFII+/+ (black box, n = 8) and COUP-TFII+/− (gray box, n = 8) mice. ‡ p < 0.001. (C) Respiratory exchange ratio of COUP-TFII+/+ (black box, n = 8) and COUP-TFII+/− (gray box, n = 8) mice. ∗∗ p < 0.01. (D) Immunoblots of EWAT (in triplicate) extracts for COUP-TFII, PGC-1α, UCP1, and other structural mitochondrial markers. Tissues were collected from COUP-TFII+/+ and COUP-TFII+/− mice. (E) Transmission electron microscopy revealed mitochondria in the WAT (bottom) and BAT (top) from COUP-TFII+/+ and COUP-TFII+/− mice. Scale bar for BAT equals 1 μm; scale bar for the WAT equals 500 nm. (F) Comparison of mitochondrial volume densities from WAT of COUP-TFII+/+ (black box) and COUP-TFII+/− (gray box) depicted in (E) (n = 20 micrographs per group). § p < 0.0005. (G) Real-time PCR analysis of PRDM16 and CIDEa expression in EWAT collected from COUP-TFII+/+ (black box, n = 5) and COUP-TFII+/− (gray box, n = 5) mice that have been treated with CL316243 for 6 days. Data in (A)–(C), (F), and (G) represent mean ± SEM. Cell Metabolism 2009 9, 77-87DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.12.002) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions