Scotland, United Kingdom

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Extending the external costs framework Prof. Anil Markandya University of Bath External costs of energy and their internalisation in Europe Dialogue with.

Advertisements

Josephine K Musango ERC Colloquium 31 July Introduction The goal of technology assessment is to generate policy options for societal problems Can.

“Sustainable agriculture”: what is it? Tim Benton UK Champion for Global Food Security & Professor of Ecology, University of Leeds

EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Spatially explicit negotiation of ecosystem service synergies and trade-offs Tim Pagella 1, Bethanna Jackson.

The tradeoffs between water savings and GHG emissions in irrigated agriculture Shahbaz Mushtaq, Tek Maraseni, and Kate Reardon Smith Australian Centre.

ECOTOURISM IN KENYA. Background The name of the project is called ‘Propoor Tourism’ Propoor tourism is an enlightening, participatory travel experience.

Economics of Land Degradation Initiative Richard J. Thomas ELD Scientific coordinator United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health.

1 BETTER-iS: Biofuel Evaluation for Tanzanian Technological Efficiency using Renewables – integrated Strategies Assessing Crop Production Potential for.

Ecosystems – Joining things up in floodplains Cranfield University: Joe Morris, Tim Hess, Peter Leeds-Harrison, Paul Trawick, Helena Posthumus, Quentin.

Andes (Latin America). Current situation – Very high inequity indexes and high natural resources degradation rates – Water and Land tenure conflicts:

Environmental flows in Europe Mike Acreman. Green and pleasant land? Thames basin 10,000 km mm rainfall 15 million people significant water stress.

Results: Test-run in the Willamette Basin Some areas provide higher levels of services than others. The agriculture and timber maps show dollar values—high.

Research European Commission FP6-ERA.ppt15/10/01 1 Requests in the fields of Sustainable development: multifunctionality, agriculture, forestry Pierre.

David Essaw Centre for Ecological Economics and Water Policy Research University of New England David Essaw Centre for Ecological Economics and Water Policy.

Advisory group update – September 2013 Development of the second river basin management plans Sustainable water management for the benefit of Scotland’s.

Robinwood Project Hydrogeology Report for Wales Tim Pagella, Brian Reynolds, David Norris, Morag McDonald and Fergus Sinclair.

Tradeoff Analysis and Minimum-Data Modeling John Antle Jetse Stoorvogel Workshop on Adaptation to Climate Change, Nairobi September

Scaling and Delivery What activities? What approaches? What methods and or tools? Day – 1 ET-2012-Review Planning Participants.

Integrating Spatial Information for Community-Based Management of a Hillside Watershed J.C. Luijten 1, E.B. Knapp 2, J.W. Jones 1 1 University of Florida,

Water Framework Directive and the SRDP Jannette MacDonald Land Unit, SEPA.

1 Integrated Water Resources Management Training Course Overview p.p. 0.1.

Capacity needs for managing mining impacts on rivers Neil McIntyre 1, Alan Woodley 1,2, Natasha Danoucaras 1, Neil Coles 3 1. Sustainable Minerals Institute,

Introduction to SEPA The Scottish Environment Agency For CaSPr Waste Workshop Glasgow 19 October 2006 Claudette Hudes NetRegs Team Leader.

Water Framework Directive An Introduction David Whiles Anglian River Basin Manager.

Economic, Social and Environmental Benefits Better Planning and Operational Decisions in Water Management Decision Making Capacity and Institutions; Stakeholder.

1.What do you think IWRM is? Consider principles of IWRM, processes, purpose and write one thing on each cardConsider principles of IWRM, processes, purpose.

Roadmap to Improving Farm Efficiency and Profitability Setting the Scene Brian Ervine, Environmental Policy, DARD.

AGRICULTURE AND THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE ANALYSIS Russell Todd.

Sub-basin Management Plans for the Freshwater Pearl Mussel Dr E. Sides, J Ryan, Dr A O’Connor, Dr Colin Byrne Department of Environment, Heritage and Local.

Our Water Environment James Humphrys Area Manager – Solent & South Downs.

Well-governed fisheries sector Abundant fisheries resources Healthy environment and habitats Increased jobs, profits, and improved economy Improved human.

WagriCo UK Launch, Dorchester 5 May 2006 Tackling Diffuse Pollution: an integrated approach to improving water quality Bob Harris Environment Agency.

Kingston Maurward College Dorchester 5 May 2006 WAgriCo - UK Project Launch.

Update on the implementation of the first plans Pilot catchments & the restoration plan Priority catchments WEF Local measures River basin districtPercentage.

Water associations in Estonia (185) ha- ca 10% of drainage commonly used ditches km.

Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment

The second River Basin Management Plans and implementation of fish barriers measures Jenny Davies RBMP coordinator June 2017.

International Livestock Research institute

INFORMATION INTEGRATION &

Aditya Sood, Marc Jeuland, Maksud Bekchanov, David Wiberg

Improving the economic and environmental performance of a New Zealand hill country pastoral catchment M.B. Dodd, M.E. Wedderburn, T.G. Parminter AgResearch,

Environmental Science: Toward a Sustainable Future Richard T. Wright

Ecological evaluation Urban River Enhancement Scheme

Environmental policies in Europe

WAgriCo An NFU Perspective

A Guide to SDG Interactions: from Science to Implementation

Yorkshire Integrated Catchment Solutions Programme (iCASP)

Water Quality Acquisition Systems in Australia

Modelling farmer decision-making about ecosystem services (ES)

RESULTS FROM THE INNOVATION LAB FOR SMALL SCALE IRRIGATION

Innovate. Improve. Grow. WEAVER: HEXAPOD ROBOT WITH 5DOF LIMBS FOR NAVIGATING ON UNSTRUCTURED TERRAIN.

Masters Module PLANNING AND MANAGING THE USE OF SPACE FOR AQUACULTURE

River Basin Management Planning

Project logo SIM4NEXUS Duration:

Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning

Monitoring, assessing and classifying the environment

Bioenergy and the broader bioeconomy

Preparing a River Basin Management Plan WFD Characterisation Manager

A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s Water Resources

The Benefits & Drawbacks of Growth

LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive

LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive

WWT Water Scotland Conference talk 2018

Management of farmland in Natura 2000 Ideas for a first outline

Implementing the 2030 Agenda in the Asia- Pacific region, January 2019, Shanghai Institutional arrangements to facilitate coherence in sustainable.

Aquaculture: part of the problem or part of the solution?

UK experience of Programmes of Measures

Water Scotland Conference 2018

Dr Lyndsey Dodds Celtic Seas Partnership Project Manager

Presentation transcript:

Scotland, United Kingdom Using novel stakeholder engagement methods to identify land and water management pressures across catchments. Kathleen Stosch Scotland, United Kingdom IWA Diffuse Pollution Conference 2018

Promote integrated decision-making across multiple stakeholder groups Aims Quantify stakeholder understanding of ecosystem service benefits, trade-offs & conflict Promote integrated decision-making across multiple stakeholder groups

Trade-off analysis survey Responses by 43 stakeholders from: Environmental regulator staff Catchment scientists Farm advisors Water industry staff Spey South Esk Ayr

Linear Exponential decay Threshold curve Logistic decay

Agricultural intensity Mean responses – curve chosen by stakeholders (+ 1 standard error) Environmental regulators Catchment scientists high 1 Farm advisors good 0.8 Water industry staff 0.6 Ecological status moderate 0.4 poor 0.2 bad 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Agricultural intensity

Mean responses – threshold curve (+ 1 standard error) Environmental regulators Catchment scientists Farm advisors high 1 Water industry staff 0.8 0.6 Ecological status 0.4 0.2 bad 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Agricultural intensity

Mean responses – threshold curve (+ 1 standard error) Environmental regulators Catchment scientists Farm advisors high 1 Water industry staff 0.8 0.6 Ecological status 0.4 0.2 bad 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Agricultural intensity

Mean responses – threshold curve (+ 1 standard error) Environmental regulators Catchment scientists Farm advisors high 1 Water industry staff 0.8 0.6 Ecological status 0.4 0.2 bad 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Agricultural intensity

Differences in placement between stakeholder group responses

Conclusions Our novel stakeholder participatory method allowed us to: Quantify differences in stakeholder preferences and understanding within a trade-off Reveal potential sources of conflict and synergies between stakeholder groups May be used as a tool to: Facilitate understanding and decision-making across stakeholder groups Reduce misconceptions & aid cooperation between stakeholders

Acknowledgements @KathleenStosch David Oliver Nils Bunnefeld Richard Quilliam The Hydro Nation Team @KathleenStosch