The AXL Receptor Is a Sensor of Ligand Spatial Heterogeneity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UV as an Amplifier Rather Than Inducer of NF-κB Activity
Advertisements

Masahiro Ueda, Tatsuo Shibata  Biophysical Journal 
Dual Modes of Cdc42 Recycling Fine-Tune Polarized Morphogenesis
Variance-Mean Analysis in the Presence of a Rapid Antagonist Indicates Vesicle Depletion Underlies Depression at the Climbing Fiber Synapse  Kelly A.
Qian Xu, Wan-Chen Lin, Rebecca S. Petit, Jay T. Groves 
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages e13 (May 2018)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Stress Signals, Mediated by Membranous Glucocorticoid Receptor, Activate PLC/PKC/GSK-3β/β-catenin Pathway to Inhibit Wound Closure  Ivan Jozic, Sasa Vukelic,
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
Dimers Probe the Assembly Status of Multimeric Membrane Proteins 
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
CDK5 Serves as a Major Control Point in Neurotransmitter Release
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Andreas Hilfinger, Thomas M. Norman, Johan Paulsson  Cell Systems 
Lea Goentoro, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Agata Witkowska, Reinhard Jahn  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Positive-Feedback Loops as a Flexible Biological Module
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Dual Modes of Cdc42 Recycling Fine-Tune Polarized Morphogenesis
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Qian Xu, Wan-Chen Lin, Rebecca S. Petit, Jay T. Groves 
Quantifying the Interaction between EGFR Dimers and Grb2 in Live Cells
Arvind Govindarajan, Inbal Israely, Shu-Ying Huang, Susumu Tonegawa 
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Timescales of Inference in Visual Adaptation
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Transcription Factors Modulate c-Fos Transcriptional Bursts
Nuclear Trapping Shapes the Terminal Gradient in the Drosophila Embryo
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Essential Role of TGF-β Signaling in Glucose-Induced Cell Hypertrophy
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2005)
Signaling from the Living Plasma Membrane
Protein Kinase D Inhibitors Uncouple Phosphorylation from Activity by Promoting Agonist-Dependent Activation Loop Phosphorylation  Maya T. Kunkel, Alexandra C.
NGF Signaling from Clathrin-Coated Vesicles
Volume 133, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Modeling of the RAG Reaction Mechanism
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Tunable Signal Processing in Synthetic MAP Kinase Cascades
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Mobility of Synaptic Vesicles in Different Pools in Resting and Stimulated Frog Motor Nerve Terminals  Michael A. Gaffield, Silvio O. Rizzoli, William.
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
Aip1 Destabilizes Cofilin-Saturated Actin Filaments by Severing and Accelerating Monomer Dissociation from Ends  Ambika V. Nadkarni, William M. Brieher 
Small, Mobile FcɛRI Receptor Aggregates Are Signaling Competent
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 11, Issue 13, Pages (July 2001)
Fine Details of IGF-1R Activation, Inhibition, and Asymmetry Determined by Associated Hydrogen /Deuterium-Exchange and Peptide Mass Mapping  Damian Houde,
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
William J. Galush, Jeffrey A. Nye, Jay T. Groves  Biophysical Journal 
Sandeep Kumar, Alakesh Das, Amlan Barai, Shamik Sen 
Presentation transcript:

The AXL Receptor Is a Sensor of Ligand Spatial Heterogeneity Aaron S. Meyer, Annelien J.M. Zweemer, Douglas A. Lauffenburger  Cell Systems  Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 25-36 (July 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.06.002 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Systems 2015 1, 25-36DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2015.06.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 AXL Phosphorylation Response Is Complex and Distinct across Timescales, and It Requires Gas6-PtdSer Interaction for Robust Response (A) Diagram of AXL-Gas6 interaction. Receptor and ligand interact through a high-affinity (brown, Ig1) and low-affinity (blue, Ig2) binding interface. These interactions, only mediated through the SBHD domain, lead to receptor dimerization with no receptor-receptor ectodomain interactions. However, through previously unknown mechanisms, PtdSer interaction via the Gla domain is known to be important to receptor activation. The structural aspects of TAM receptor-ligand interaction are thought to be shared among all three TAM receptors and two ligands, although AXL lacks measurable binding to Protein S. (B and C) ELISA-based quantitative measurement of AXL phosphotyrosine and total abundance upon treatment with indicated concentrations of Gas6 at 0–10 min (B) or 4 hr (C). (D) Measurement of phosphotyrosine and total AXL in warfarin-treated A549 cells upon stimulation with ΔGla Gas6 for 1 or 4 hr. Red line shows corresponding response measured upon stimulation with full-length Gas6 in (C). ∗p < 0.05 (significant change from untreated control), Student’s t test. RU, relative units. (E) Measurement of phosphotyrosine AXL in warfarin-treated A549 cells upon stimulation with 1.25 nM ΔGla Gas6 over 10 min. Red line shows corresponding response measured upon stimulation with full-length Gas6 in (D). Error bars indicate SE of triplicate measurement. Cell Systems 2015 1, 25-36DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2015.06.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A Reaction Model of AXL Signaling Integrates Structural and Kinetic Understanding (A) Diagram of the AXL reaction model. Trafficking is not shown. Binding reactions occur identically with internalized and surface species. (B) Model of AXL trafficking. Receptor expression occurs constitutively. Endocytosis occurs at a basal and activation-dependent rate. Recycling and degradation occur at prescribed rates, with a sorting fraction to determine which occurs. fx is 1 for phosphorylated species and felse for all other species. Some parameters were fit within their indicated range (red), while others were constrained by detailed balance (green) or assumptions (black). (C) Measurements compared with simulations from all parameter fits within 5% likelihood of the optimal fit. RU, relative units. (D) Parameter values observed in all fits with a relative likelihood within 5% that of the optimal fit. (E) Sum-of-squared error for the best-fit parameter sets in which species D1 is either active or inactive. Cell Systems 2015 1, 25-36DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2015.06.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 A PtdSer-Independent and a Reaction-Diffusion Model Indicate that Local Receptor Concentration Is Rate Limiting for Robust Activation (A) The relative fraction of activated receptor upon variation of each reaction parameter. Response is shown for stimulation with 10 nM Gas6 for 4 hr. (B) Fractional vacancy of Ig1- (red) and Ig2 (black)-binding sites based on fit or measured affinities at equilibrium. The bars above indicate the range of ligand concentrations tested in experiments. Each black line indicates a distinct parameter set. (C) Schematic of the finite differencing model. Diffusion was allowed within a radially symmetric region of interest. Peak Gas6 amount was held constant while varying spatial profiles of concentration. Spatial inhomo. param., spatial inhomogeneity parameter; AU, arbitrary units. (D) Average and peak concentration for differing Gas6 spatial profiles. (E) Modeling output for AXL phosphotyrosine density at the peak point of Gas6 (r = 0) at 30 min with respect to varied Gas6 concentration profiles. Autocrine Gas6 levels and AXL expression were set to A549 levels. D indicates distinct diffusion coefficients specified in length units of the region of interest. (F) Modeling output for overall AXL phosphotyrosine under identical conditions. (G) Modeling output of surface species abundance at 30 min under identical conditions. Cell Systems 2015 1, 25-36DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2015.06.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Spatially Localized Ligand Presentation Underlies Robust Autocrine AXL Activation (A) Immunofluorescence of AXL localization with or without warfarin treatment. (B) Quantification of mean AXL immunofluorescence intensity (left) and the fraction of pixels 5-fold above mean AXL intensity under each condition. Error bars indicate Tukey plots. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). (C) Cumulative distribution of AXL staining pixel intensities for BT549 cells with (green) or without (black) warfarin treatment. Both the intensity and remaining cumulative distribution density axes are presented on a log scale for ease of visualization. (D) Coimmunoprecipitation of AXL and Gas6 in MDA-MB-231 cells in the presence or absence of warfarin. Asterisk in lower blot marks the expected size of Gas6. Cell Systems 2015 1, 25-36DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2015.06.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Validation of the Spatial AXL Signaling Model (A) Measurements of AXL pan-pY in MDA-MB-231 (top) and A549 (bottom) upon stimulation with PtdSer-containing vesicles in the presence of 0.25 nM Gas6. 1× and 1/10× lipid concentrations correspond to 100 μg/ml and 10 μg/ml of lipid, respectively. (B) Measurement of cell-associated Gas6 with A549 cells stimulated with Gas6 in the presence or absence of lipid. Inset shows amount of Gas6 quantified with or without cells present for the 1.25 nM Gas6 condition. RU, relative units. (C) Measurement of AXL phosphorylation at 10 min in BT-549 cells in response to 1.25 nM Gas6 with or without warfarin pretreatment and with or without the Gla domain present in the exogenous ligand. (D) Diagrammatic explanation of the basis for a biphasic response with respect to lipid concentration. At low concentrations of PtdSer-containing lipid, receptor partitions into local regions, resulting in robust activation. At very high lipid concentrations, PtdSer interaction is ubiquitous. Thus, even though receptor partitions into PtdSer-interacting regions, this does not result in high local receptor density. (E) Prediction and measurement of AXL phosphorylation at 30 min with varying amounts of PtdSer-containing vesicles and 0.25 nM Gas6. (F) Phosphotyrosine immunofluorescence (top) of MDA-MB-231 cells starved and stimulated with polystyrene beads coated with BSA or Gas6, and quantification of the immunofluorescence (bottom, n > 10). Cells were stimulated for 30 min prior to fixation. Error bars indicate the SE of triplicate measurements, unless indicated otherwise. Cell Systems 2015 1, 25-36DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2015.06.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Model for Efficient Activation of AXL Signaling In the low Gas6 regime, the low-affinity site is insufficient for receptor dimerization and activation by ligand. In the presence of a high, uniform concentration of Gas6, occupation of the low-affinity site acts as a competitive inhibitor, since the A12 species is unable to dimerize with itself. Only with presentation of localized Gas6 is strong receptor activation observed, driven by diffusional influx of receptors from regions of low Gas6 concentration. This provides the appropriate localized signal for function of the receptor as a marker for PtdSer exposure. Cell Systems 2015 1, 25-36DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2015.06.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions