Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 1004-1011 (September 2003) The quality of life and cost utility of home nocturnal and conventional in-center hemodialysis Philip A. Mcfarlane, Ahmed M. Bayoumi, Andreas Pierratos, Donald A. Redelmeier Kidney International Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 1004-1011 (September 2003) DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00157.x Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Confidence interval ellipses (5%, 50%, and 95%) for the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of home nocturnal versus conventional in-center hemodialysis and 2500 bootstrap ICER iterations. Cost-effectiveness ceiling = $50,000. Kidney International 2003 64, 1004-1011DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00157.x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Net monetary benefit (NMB) individual patient dispersion with λ = $100,000. Abbreviations are: IHD, in-center hemodialysis; HNHD, home nocturnal hemodialysis. Kidney International 2003 64, 1004-1011DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00157.x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Acceptability curve for home nocturnal hemodialysis. Kidney International 2003 64, 1004-1011DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00157.x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions