Robert A. Harris, Paul Graham, Thomas S. Collett  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Advertisements

Thomas Andrillon, Sid Kouider, Trevor Agus, Daniel Pressnitzer 
Blur and Disparity Are Complementary Cues to Depth
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (April 2011)
Attention Narrows Position Tuning of Population Responses in V1
Merging of Long-Term Memories in an Insect
Matthew Collett, Paul Graham, Thomas S. Collett  Current Biology 
Backward Masking and Unmasking Across Saccadic Eye Movements
A Source for Feature-Based Attention in the Prefrontal Cortex
Liangtang Chang, Qin Fang, Shikun Zhang, Mu-ming Poo, Neng Gong 
Araceli Ramirez-Cardenas, Maria Moskaleva, Andreas Nieder 
Matthew Collett, Thomas S. Collett, Mandyam V. Srinivasan 
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
Honeybee Vision: In Good Shape for Shape Recognition
Thomas Andrillon, Sid Kouider, Trevor Agus, Daniel Pressnitzer 
Timothy C. Roth, Aaron R. Krochmal  Current Biology 
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Coding of the Reach Vector in Parietal Area 5d
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Ants use the panoramic skyline as a visual cue during navigation
Real-Time Visualization of Neuronal Activity during Perception
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Hongbo Yu, Brandon J. Farley, Dezhe Z. Jin, Mriganka Sur  Neuron 
Spatial Coding of the Predicted Impact Location of a Looming Object
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Blur and Disparity Are Complementary Cues to Depth
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Chimeric Synergy in Natural Social Groups of a Cooperative Microbe
Rapid Innate Defensive Responses of Mice to Looming Visual Stimuli
Serial Dependence in the Perception of Faces
Homing Ants Get Confused When Nest Cues Are Also Route Cues
Modality-Independent Coding of Spatial Layout in the Human Brain
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Dynamics of a Memory Trace: Effects of Sleep on Consolidation
Spatial Coding of the Predicted Impact Location of a Looming Object
The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation  Joshua B. Julian, Jack Ryan, Roy H. Hamilton,
Georg B. Keller, Tobias Bonhoeffer, Mark Hübener  Neuron 
Opposite Effects of Recent History on Perception and Decision
Neuronal Response Gain Enhancement prior to Microsaccades
Thomas S Collett, Paul Graham  Current Biology 
The Normalization Model of Attention
Evidence of episodic-like memory in cuttlefish
Visual Scene Perception in Navigating Wood Ants
Humans Have an Expectation That Gaze Is Directed Toward Them
Volume 26, Issue 22, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Category Selectivity in the Ventral Visual Pathway Confers Robustness to Clutter and Diverted Attention  Leila Reddy, Nancy Kanwisher  Current Biology 
Keith A. May, Li Zhaoping, Paul B. Hibbard  Current Biology 
When Correlation Implies Causation in Multisensory Integration
Daniela Vallentin, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
The Perception and Misperception of Specular Surface Reflectance
Insect Navigation: How Flies Keep Track of Their Snack
Sound Facilitates Visual Learning
Social Information Signaling by Neurons in Primate Striatum
How Navigational Guidance Systems Are Combined in a Desert Ant
Selective Imitation in Domestic Dogs
David A. McVea, Keir G. Pearson  Current Biology 
A Visual Sense of Number
Gaby Maimon, Andrew D. Straw, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
Nonvisual Motor Training Influences Biological Motion Perception
Visual Motion Induces a Forward Prediction of Spatial Pattern
Animal navigation: Birds as geometers?
Perceptual Organization of Sound Begins in the Auditory Periphery
Visual Crowding Is Correlated with Awareness
Liangtang Chang, Qin Fang, Shikun Zhang, Mu-ming Poo, Neng Gong 
Head-Eye Coordination at a Microscopic Scale
Motion-Induced Blindness and Motion Streak Suppression
Presentation transcript:

Visual Cues for the Retrieval of Landmark Memories by Navigating Wood Ants  Robert A. Harris, Paul Graham, Thomas S. Collett  Current Biology  Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 93-102 (January 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.068 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Arena and Landmarks Ants were trained with either (A) a two-edged landmark or (B) a one-edged gradient landmark. Ants were placed in a starting pot at the center of the arena. They then walked to a sucrose reward placed at the landmark's base. (C) Ratio of black to white pixels across the three experimental gradients. The slopes of the steep and plateau gradients were identical, with the plateau offset by 40 cm of solid black. The physical width of each stimulus was 120 cm. Further details are in the Experimental Procedures. Current Biology 2007 17, 93-102DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.068) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Routes of Ants during Their Approach to Training Landmarks (A–D) The left of each panel shows, for a given training condition, the mean route. Here and in the other figures, the error bars give standard errors. The columns of histograms in each panel show, for successive 15 cm bins during the approach, the retinal position of the left edge of the stimulus (left) and the ants' fixation point on the landmark (right). The histograms were calculated from every recorded frame within the 15 cm bin. In this and the following figures, N is the number of recorded ants, and n is the number of recorded paths. (A) Food at left edge of a shallow gradient (N = 22, n = 295). (B) Food 10 cm inset from left edge of a shallow gradient (N = 44, n = 838). (C) Food placed at the left edge of a 40-cm-wide wall (N = 28, n = 175). (D) Food 10 cm inset from the left edge of the wall (N = 71, n = 243). Current Biology 2007 17, 93-102DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.068) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Tests for Multiple Memories and Different Retrieval Cues (A) Simulated routes generated when the left edge of a gradient is held in a single retinal position over the whole route. The fixed positions (7°–56°) correspond to single snapshots stored on the direct route at 80, 40, 19, and 7 cm from the goal. (B–F) Mean routes (solid lines) and simulated routes (dashed lines) for different landmark heights and distances. Ants were trained to an 82-cm-high left gradient placed 80 cm from the start and were subsequently tested with either an 82- or a 40-cm-high gradient placed at 30 cm from the starting location. (B) Mean route with training landmark (N = 34, n = 223). (C) Tests with the landmark 30 cm from start. The mean route combines data from tests with 40- and 82-cm-high gradients (N = 44, n = 59). The simulated route supposes that ants set their initial direction with the left edge placed 7° to the left of their midline. (D) Mean path, as in (C). Simulated path with distance from start controlling the retrieval of desired edge positions. (E and F) Mean path from tests with 82-cm-high ([E] N = 35, n = 116) or 40-cm-high ([F], N = 9, n = 43) gradient at 30 cm from the start. Paths are simulated with apparent height controlling the retrieval of desired edge positions. Current Biology 2007 17, 93-102DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.068) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Ants Trained with the Shallow Gradient (A) Mean routes of ants trained to find food 10 cm from the left edge of the shallow gradient and tested with a narrower (steep) or wider (plateau) gradient (shallow, N = 16, n = 308; steep, N = 14, n = 70; plateau, N = 14, n = 87). (B) Mean routes of ants trained to find food at the left edge of the shallow gradient and tested with steep and plateau gradients (shallow, N = 10, n = 209; steep, N = 9, n = 52; plateau, N = 9, n = 34). (C–E) Different numbers of memories were used for simulating routes to the three gradients. Desired edge positions are retrieved according to the apparent width of the landmark. Current Biology 2007 17, 93-102DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.068) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Individual Routes of Ants Trained with the Shallow Gradient (A and B) Individual, mean, and simulated paths of two ants. (A) Routes similar to the population mean (shallow, n = 35; steep, n = 8; plateau, n = 10) and (B) routes when training was consistently biased to the right of the population mean (shallow, n = 30; steep, n = 6; plateau, n = 8). Simulated paths are generated from a look-up table of memories based on the individual's mean training route. Current Biology 2007 17, 93-102DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.068) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Ants Trained to Two-Edged Landmarks (A–F) Mean and simulated routes after training to a 40-cm-wide two-edged landmark. (A and B) Ants trained to food 10 cm in from the left edge. (A) Tests with left-edge gradients (steep, N = 16, n = 70; shallow, N = 16, n = 65; plateau, N = 16, n = 82). (B) Tests with right-edge gradients (steep, N = 21, n = 60; shallow, N = 15, n = 62; plateau, N = 24, n = 66). (C and D) Ants trained to food at the left edge and tested with right-edge gradients. (C) Mean routes of the population (training, N = 16, n = 143; steep, N = 17, n = 64; shallow, N = 15, n = 58). (D) Mean routes of an idiosyncratic ant (training, n = 14; steep, n = 6, shallow n = 5), with routes to right-edge gradients simulated from three snapshots. (E) Experimental and simulated paths of ants trained to a 40-cm-wide landmark and tested with an 80-cm-wide landmark (40 cm, N = 23, n = 262; 80 cm, N = 22, n = 98). (F) Mean and simulated routes of two idiosyncratic individuals (40 cm, n = 11 and 8; 80 cm, n = 5 and 4). Current Biology 2007 17, 93-102DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.068) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions