Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

3-Dimensional structure of membrane-bound coagulation factor VIII: modeling of the factor VIII heterodimer within a 3-dimensional density map derived by.
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
by Alexey Dementiev, Abel Silva, Calvin Yee, Zhe Li, Michael T
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Crystal structure of mammalian purple acid phosphatase
Crystal structure of Omp32, the anion-selective porin from Comamonas acidovorans, in complex with a periplasmic peptide at 2.1 Å resolution  K Zeth, K.
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 3, Issue 11, Pages (November 1995)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 1996)
The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosyl asparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum  Gillian E Norris, Timothy J Stillman, Bryan.
Crystal Structure at 2.8 Å of an FcRn/Heterodimeric Fc Complex
A Model for Arrestin’s Regulation: The 2
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structure of an Inactive Akt2 Kinase Domain
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 1995)
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
The Hydroxynitrile Lyase from Almond
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Mammalian Microsomal Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenase
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
E.Radzio Andzelm, J Lew, S Taylor  Structure 
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of Sialoadhesin in Complex with 3′ Sialyllactose at 1.85 Å Resolution  A.P. May, R.C. Robinson, M. Vinson,
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Crystal Structure of a Polymeric Immunoglobulin Binding Fragment of the Human Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor  Agnes E. Hamburger, Anthony P. West,
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure and Dimerization of a Soluble Form of B7-1
Crystal Structure of the Human Neuropilin-1 b1 Domain
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 1996)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Electrostatic activation of Escherichia coli methionine repressor
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages 755-766 (August 1994) Crystal structure of the extracellular region of the human cell adhesion molecule CD2 at 2.5å resolution  Dale L Bodian, E.Yvonne Jones, Karl Harlos, David I Stuart, Simon J Davis  Structure  Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages 755-766 (August 1994) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X

Figure 1 Electron density maps contoured at 1σ displayed with the current model. (a) 3.5 å solvent flattened SIRAS map showing parts of strands A and G of domain 2 and the disulphide-bonded Cys115 and Cys179. (b) Representative region of a 2.5 å 2Fo– Fc map showing the same view as in (a). (c) Electron density for Asn65 and N-linked GlcNAc from a 2.5å 2Fo– Fc omit map computed with the sugar omitted from the model. (d) Portion of a 2.5å 2Fo– Fc map showing density for the BC loop of domain 1, residues 20– 29. A trace of the backbone of domain 1 is shown in orange, with the GFCC′C″ face of the domain pointing to the right. Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 1 Electron density maps contoured at 1σ displayed with the current model. (a) 3.5 å solvent flattened SIRAS map showing parts of strands A and G of domain 2 and the disulphide-bonded Cys115 and Cys179. (b) Representative region of a 2.5 å 2Fo– Fc map showing the same view as in (a). (c) Electron density for Asn65 and N-linked GlcNAc from a 2.5å 2Fo– Fc omit map computed with the sugar omitted from the model. (d) Portion of a 2.5å 2Fo– Fc map showing density for the BC loop of domain 1, residues 20– 29. A trace of the backbone of domain 1 is shown in orange, with the GFCC′C″ face of the domain pointing to the right. Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 1 Electron density maps contoured at 1σ displayed with the current model. (a) 3.5 å solvent flattened SIRAS map showing parts of strands A and G of domain 2 and the disulphide-bonded Cys115 and Cys179. (b) Representative region of a 2.5 å 2Fo– Fc map showing the same view as in (a). (c) Electron density for Asn65 and N-linked GlcNAc from a 2.5å 2Fo– Fc omit map computed with the sugar omitted from the model. (d) Portion of a 2.5å 2Fo– Fc map showing density for the BC loop of domain 1, residues 20– 29. A trace of the backbone of domain 1 is shown in orange, with the GFCC′C″ face of the domain pointing to the right. Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 1 Electron density maps contoured at 1σ displayed with the current model. (a) 3.5 å solvent flattened SIRAS map showing parts of strands A and G of domain 2 and the disulphide-bonded Cys115 and Cys179. (b) Representative region of a 2.5 å 2Fo– Fc map showing the same view as in (a). (c) Electron density for Asn65 and N-linked GlcNAc from a 2.5å 2Fo– Fc omit map computed with the sugar omitted from the model. (d) Portion of a 2.5å 2Fo– Fc map showing density for the BC loop of domain 1, residues 20– 29. A trace of the backbone of domain 1 is shown in orange, with the GFCC′C″ face of the domain pointing to the right. Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 2 Structure of human sCD2. (a) Stereo drawing of the Cα backbone with every tenth residue numbered. The figure was produced with the program XOBJECT (M. Noble, unpublished program). (b) Ribbon drawing. Strands for domains 1 and 2 are labeled following the convention for IgSF V-set and C2-set domains, respectively. The view is similar to that in (a) (Figure drawn with MOLSCRIPT [53].) Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 3 Sequence comparison of human and rat sCD2. Structurally equivalent residues are aligned and sequence identities boxed. Every tenth residue of each sequence is numbered. Glycosylated asparagines are white on a black background, and the linker region between domains is shown in grey. Bars represent β-sheet residues. ‡ marks residues buried in the head-to-head interaction observed in the human sCD2 crystals.§ identifies residues comprising the inter-domain interface of human sCD2. The equivalent residues are involved in the head-to-head interaction and inter-domain interface of rat sCD2. Arg70 also contributes to the inter-domain interface in the rat structure; its human equivalent (Thr75) is too short to participate. Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 4 Comparison of Cα traces of human and rat sCD2 crystal structures. (a) Superposition of domains 1 (b) Superposition of domains 2. Human sCD2 is in green and rat sCD2 is in yellow (copy 1) and red (copy 2). Side chains of disulnnphide bonded cysteines are displayed. Domains were aligned individually by least squares superposition of structurally equivalent residues as described in Materials and methods. (c) Comparison of the angles between IgSF domains of human sCD2 (pink) and the two copies of rat sCD2 (cyan and yellow). Orthogonal views are shown. Structures are superimposed on domain 2. Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 4 Comparison of Cα traces of human and rat sCD2 crystal structures. (a) Superposition of domains 1 (b) Superposition of domains 2. Human sCD2 is in green and rat sCD2 is in yellow (copy 1) and red (copy 2). Side chains of disulnnphide bonded cysteines are displayed. Domains were aligned individually by least squares superposition of structurally equivalent residues as described in Materials and methods. (c) Comparison of the angles between IgSF domains of human sCD2 (pink) and the two copies of rat sCD2 (cyan and yellow). Orthogonal views are shown. Structures are superimposed on domain 2. Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 4 Comparison of Cα traces of human and rat sCD2 crystal structures. (a) Superposition of domains 1 (b) Superposition of domains 2. Human sCD2 is in green and rat sCD2 is in yellow (copy 1) and red (copy 2). Side chains of disulnnphide bonded cysteines are displayed. Domains were aligned individually by least squares superposition of structurally equivalent residues as described in Materials and methods. (c) Comparison of the angles between IgSF domains of human sCD2 (pink) and the two copies of rat sCD2 (cyan and yellow). Orthogonal views are shown. Structures are superimposed on domain 2. Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 5 Residues of the inter-domain contact region. The Cαbackbone of human sCD2 is displayed in white with side chains of residues buried in the interface (marked by § in Figure 3) coloured green. Thr75 is also displayed since its rat equivalent, Arg70, participates in the interface. The structure of copy 1 of rat sCD2 (cyan and yellow) is superimposed on the human structure by least squares fitting of the linker region. The view is similar to that in Figure 2. Figure produced with INSIGHT II (Biosym Technologies, Inc.). Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 6 Residues implicated in the interaction between CD2 and CD58. The GFCC′C″ face of domain 1 is shown in CPK representation. (a) Residues that have been mutated and tested for their effect on CD58 binding. Projecting residues whose mutation disrupted ligand binding substantially are coloured red and those whose mutation had little or no effect on binding are coloured green. Mutations affecting glycosylation sites are omitted. Mutants represented are: D32A, K34A or D, E36R, K41A, K43A, M, N, E, Q, or T, Q46L, P, or E, R48A, K51A, K82A, Y86D or C, D87H, V, or A, G90E, K91A, N92A, V93A, L94S which reduced the capacity of human CD2 to bind CD58, and D20N, E50K, E52K, K55L, E56K, K57S, K61E, K89N which did not. (b) Residues buried in the head-to-head contact, marked by ‡ in Figure 3, are shown in pink. Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 7 Electrostatic potential of human (left) and rat (right) sCD2. (a) GFCC′C″ faces of domain 1. (b) Complete extracellular regions. Regions of positive potential are coloured blue, negative regions red, and neutral regions white. The magnitude of the potential is indicated by the intensity of the colour. Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 7 Electrostatic potential of human (left) and rat (right) sCD2. (a) GFCC′C″ faces of domain 1. (b) Complete extracellular regions. Regions of positive potential are coloured blue, negative regions red, and neutral regions white. The magnitude of the potential is indicated by the intensity of the colour. Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 8 Head-to-head interaction observed in the sCD2 crystals. (a) Orthogonal views of the Cα backbone of human sCD2 (green) and its symmetry-related mate (blue) compared with symmetry-related molecules of rat sCD2 copy 1 (yellow) and copy 2 (red). Structures are superimposed on domain 1 of one molecule of human sCD2. (b) Close-up of the interacting GFC′C″ faces of human sCD2 and its symmetry-related mate. Main chain hydrogen bonds between Gly90 and Lys43 of human sCD2 (green lines) are superimposed on the Cα backbone of human sCD2 (purple). Side chains of Phe54 and Tyr86 of human sCD2 and its symmetry-related mate are displayed as green sticks. The equivalent residues and hydrogen bonds for both copy 1 and copy 2 of rat sCD2 (yellow and red, respectively) are superimposed (without their symmetry-related mates). The two-fold axis is perpendicular to the page. The figure was drawn using INSIGHT II (Biosym Technologies, Inc.). (c) Residues of human sCD2 buried in the head-to-head interaction observed in the crystal. Side chains of arginine and lysine residues are displayed in blue, aspartic acid and glutamine side chains in red, and others in white. The Cα positions of Phe54, Tyr86, and Gly90 are highlighted in purple on the Cα trace of human sCD2 (green). The Cα backbone of the symmetry-related mate is shown in yellow. The view is the same as that in (b). Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 8 Head-to-head interaction observed in the sCD2 crystals. (a) Orthogonal views of the Cα backbone of human sCD2 (green) and its symmetry-related mate (blue) compared with symmetry-related molecules of rat sCD2 copy 1 (yellow) and copy 2 (red). Structures are superimposed on domain 1 of one molecule of human sCD2. (b) Close-up of the interacting GFC′C″ faces of human sCD2 and its symmetry-related mate. Main chain hydrogen bonds between Gly90 and Lys43 of human sCD2 (green lines) are superimposed on the Cα backbone of human sCD2 (purple). Side chains of Phe54 and Tyr86 of human sCD2 and its symmetry-related mate are displayed as green sticks. The equivalent residues and hydrogen bonds for both copy 1 and copy 2 of rat sCD2 (yellow and red, respectively) are superimposed (without their symmetry-related mates). The two-fold axis is perpendicular to the page. The figure was drawn using INSIGHT II (Biosym Technologies, Inc.). (c) Residues of human sCD2 buried in the head-to-head interaction observed in the crystal. Side chains of arginine and lysine residues are displayed in blue, aspartic acid and glutamine side chains in red, and others in white. The Cα positions of Phe54, Tyr86, and Gly90 are highlighted in purple on the Cα trace of human sCD2 (green). The Cα backbone of the symmetry-related mate is shown in yellow. The view is the same as that in (b). Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)

Figure 8 Head-to-head interaction observed in the sCD2 crystals. (a) Orthogonal views of the Cα backbone of human sCD2 (green) and its symmetry-related mate (blue) compared with symmetry-related molecules of rat sCD2 copy 1 (yellow) and copy 2 (red). Structures are superimposed on domain 1 of one molecule of human sCD2. (b) Close-up of the interacting GFC′C″ faces of human sCD2 and its symmetry-related mate. Main chain hydrogen bonds between Gly90 and Lys43 of human sCD2 (green lines) are superimposed on the Cα backbone of human sCD2 (purple). Side chains of Phe54 and Tyr86 of human sCD2 and its symmetry-related mate are displayed as green sticks. The equivalent residues and hydrogen bonds for both copy 1 and copy 2 of rat sCD2 (yellow and red, respectively) are superimposed (without their symmetry-related mates). The two-fold axis is perpendicular to the page. The figure was drawn using INSIGHT II (Biosym Technologies, Inc.). (c) Residues of human sCD2 buried in the head-to-head interaction observed in the crystal. Side chains of arginine and lysine residues are displayed in blue, aspartic acid and glutamine side chains in red, and others in white. The Cα positions of Phe54, Tyr86, and Gly90 are highlighted in purple on the Cα trace of human sCD2 (green). The Cα backbone of the symmetry-related mate is shown in yellow. The view is the same as that in (b). Structure 1994 2, 755-766DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(94)00076-X)