The Procedure for Amending the Application under § 1.121 Presented by Margaret W. Stevens, Head Supervisory Legal Instruments Examiner 703-305-3608;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhanced First Action Interview (EFAI) Pilot Program
Advertisements

Key Decision Points in the PCT System
Amendments to the Regulations and other practice changes - July 1, 2009 Declaration under Article 14(4) Form of claim amendments Filing of sequence listings.
Welcome to eDMR This PowerPoint presentation is designed to show eDMR users how to login and begin using the eDMR system.
Patents e-Filing Update Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership November 15, 2001.
Colorado Secretary of State e-FILING COLORADO ADMINISTRATIVE RULES CODE OF COLORADO REGULATIONS ONLINE PORTAL FOR e-FILING AND RULE ACCESS Colorado Secretary.
Image File Wrapper (IFW) – Final Rule
1 Pre-Appeal Brief Conference (with Demo) By: Bennett Celsa Jean Witz Kathleen Bragdon TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialists.
The Examination Process
First Action Interview Pilot Program Overview. Pilot Program Objectives Promote personal interviews prior to issuance of a first Office action on the.
New Filing Procedures: Filing Business Documents Online Tom Riley, Assistant Secretary of State Business Services Division (601)
1 NEW PRE-APPEAL BRIEF CONFERENCE PRACTICE OVERVIEW & TIPS FOR PRACTICE November Off. Gaz. Pat. Office, Vol. 2 (July 12, 2005)
Incorporation by Reference
Step by Step Guide for Regulations S HELLY B EZANSON K ELLY O FFICE OF G ENERAL C OUNSEL S EPTEMBER 5, 2012.
1 of 61 EHBs v2.0 Overview Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Presented To: Grantees EHBs version 2.0 – Overview for Grantees.
Michael Neas Supervisor Office of PCT Legal Administration
CPIT 102 CPIT 102 CHAPTER 1 COLLABORATING on DOCUMENTS.
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations MPU Review of International Application.
Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting October 8, 2002 William F. Smith Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION AVECO July 14 – 18, 2014 Centralized Certification.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION The Fully Developed Claims Program Compensation Service Training Staff November 2013.
Filing Compliant Reexam Requests Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit Andy Kashnikow SPE, Central Reexamination Unit June, 2010.
Enhanced First Action Interview (EFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.
TC1600 Appeals Practice Jean Witz, Appeals Specialist.
© 2010 Blackboard Inc. All rights reserved. Blackboard Learn 9.1 SafeAssign.
July 8, Enhanced Examination Timing Control Robert A. Clarke Deputy Director Office of Patent Legal Administration
Handling Mega Applications Gary Jones SPE, Art Unit 1655 and 1656 (703)
Appellate Procedure and Petition Practice By: Michael A. Leonard II.
Slide 1 of 39 Welcome to GSA’s Vendor and Customer Self Service (VCSS) course Section 5: Statement and Dispute Navigation This presentation is compliant.
Filing a Patent Application: Procedures and Tips
DO NOT INCLUDE THIS SLIDE WITH SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS 2014 NKBA B.C. Design Competition Digital Entry Packet Questions? Contact
Appeal Practice Refresher Office of Patent Training.
1 Electronic Filing System United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Full First Action Interview (FFAI) Pilot Program Wendy Garber Tech Center Director, 2100 United States Patent & Trademark Office.
July 18, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818/P.L ) Topic: Patent Fees Office of Patent Legal.
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
Recent Patent-Related Rule Making and Changes in USPTO Practice
June 16 th & 23 rd 2015 Webinar Training Field Staff and Industry Rural Development.
Preparation and processing of in-session documents.
By: Farzad Dadgari Soil and Environmental Specialist SWHISA.
Submitting Claims in the ESEA Application Title I Parts A, C, D Title II Part A Title III Part A.
November 29, Global Intellectual Property Academy Advanced Patents Program Kery Fries, Senior Legal Advisor Mark Polutta, Senior Legal Advisor Office.
The Online Submission Process: Guidelines and Training for Authors Marlowe H. Smaby, Michael R. Smith, Cleborne D. Maddux.
1 LAW DIVISION PATENT DIVISION TRADEMARK & DESIGN DIVISION ACCOUNTING & AUDITING DIVISION YUASA AND HARA LAW, PATENT, TRADEMARK & DESIGN and ACCOUNTING.
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
Post-Grant & Inter Partes Review Procedures Presented to AIPPI, Italy February 10, 2012 By Joerg-Uwe Szipl Griffin & Szipl, P.C.
Election of Species Joseph K. McKane SPE, Art Unit 1626 April 27, 2004.
1 Rules of Practice Before the BPAI in Ex Parte Appeals 73 Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008) Effective December 10, Fed. Reg (June 10, 2008)
CCHD Grant Application Using the Online System. Sign In to the Online System Enter you complete address If this is your first time using CCHD’s.
Claims and Continuations Final Rule Overview Briefing for Examiners 1.
Tutorial Contents Text Cut/Paste & Format OhioLINK ETD Home UT ETD Home ETD Entry Form UT Grad School University Libraries ETD Guide OhioLINK Electronic.
3 rd Party Participation Bennett Celsa TC 1600 QAS.
FY09 Restriction Petition Update; Comparison of US and National Stage Restriction Practice Julie Burke TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialist
USPTOUSPTO 1 Image File Wrapper (IFW) Processing Paula Hutzell Practice Specialist, TC 1600 (571)
January 25, Notice of Proposed Rule Making Proposed Changes to Practice for Continuing Applications, Requests for Continued Examination Practice,
USPTO Madrid Protocol Seminar on Tips for Filing International Applications and Maintaining International Registrations Miscellaneous Issues October 23,
ACCESSING AND UTILIZING THE PROVIDER PORTAL MEDICAL AUTHORIZATION UNIT 1.
PATENT OFFICE PROSECUTION
Lesson 9 Sharing Documents
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
INSTRUCTIONS TO COMPLETE 2017 POOL RE MEMBER DATA RETURN
PATENT LAW TREATY Gena Jones Senior Legal Advisor
Welcome.
Third Party Pre-Issuance Submissions Under AIA
Subject Matter Eligibility
ONLINE FILING Updates and Review
How to submit your coursework
Presentation transcript:

The Procedure for Amending the Application under § Presented by Margaret W. Stevens, Head Supervisory Legal Instruments Examiner ; Gary L. Kunz, SPE, Art Unit ;

§ 1.121(b) - Amendment by Replacement Paragraph/Section How to make amendments to the specification: Submit a clean (with no underlining or bracketing) amended paragraph/section with an instruction to substitute it for the pending paragraph/claim (See FORMAT Slide) Identify the pending paragraph/section to be replaced by any clear instruction (e.g., paragraph [0045], the paragraph beginning on page x, line y; the 3rd full paragraph on p.3, etc.) Also submit a marked-up version of the prior pending paragraph/section with all changes (relative to the prior paragraph) shown by any conventional comparison system

§ 1.121(b) - Amendment by Replacement Paragraph/Section How to make amendments to the specification (cont.): The text of any added (new) or deleted paragraph does not have to be presented in any marked-up version (with underlining and bracketing); an indication that the paragraph has been added or deleted is sufficient, e.g., The paragraph beginning at p. 2, line 6, has been deleted. A substitute specification may be submitted for extensive amendments, but it must comply with § 1.125

§ 1.121(c) - Amendment by Replacement Claims How to make amendments to the claims: Submit a clean (with no underlining and bracketing) amended claim with an instruction to substitute it for the pending claim with the same number; also submit a marked-up version of the prior pending claim with all changes shown by any conventional comparison system (See FORMAT Slide) Any new or canceled claim does not have to be in marked-up version; an indication that claim X is new or claim Y was canceled is sufficient Both the clean amended claim and the marked-up version should have the same expression: amended, twice amended, etc., in parentheses after claim number

§1.121(c)(3) - Amendment by Replacement Claims How to make amendments to the claims (cont.): A clean set of all pending claims with the same numbers as the pending claims being re-presented can be submitted at any time (provided the requirements of §§ and are met) This submission will be construed as directing the cancellation of all previous versions of the re-presented claims The absence of an accompanying marked up version constitutes an assertion that the claim has not been changed relative to the immediate prior version

§ 1.121(c) - Amendment by Replacement Claims How to make amendments to the claims (cont.): A claim may be canceled by an instruction (e.g., cancel claim 3) A canceled claim can be reinstated only by re-presentation of the complete text of the claim with a new claim number

FORMAT SLIDE Recommended Format for Submitting Amendments with Replacement Paragraphs/Sections/Claims The following FORMAT is recommended for the amendment portion of the amendment paper: –First: A clean version of each replacement paragraph/section/claim along with clear instructions for entry –Second: Starting on a separate page, all appropriate remarks/arguments, 37 CFR and MPEP 714 –Third: starting on a separate page, a marked-up version entitled: Version with markings to show changes made

Amendment by Replacement Paragraphs/Claims 37 CFR 1.121(g) Examiners Amendment Practice To encourage continued use of current examiners amendment practice in order to expedite prosecution, and reduce applicant filings of formal amendments to incorporate agreed upon changes: At the time of allowance, examiners will not be required to provide either a clean version or a separate marked-up version of paragraph(s) or claim(s) amended by an examiners amendment Amendment(s) to paragraph(s)/claim(s) in an examiners amendment can be made by instruction to insert/delete specific word(s)

Amendment by Replacement Paragraphs/Claims 37 CFR 1.121(g) Examiners Amendment Practice (cont.) A clean version of a paragraph/claim, or a portion of a paragraph/claim, submitted by applicant in a fax or may be printed and incorporated into an examiners amendment. A copy of the entire fax or should be printed and made of record as an attachment to the examiners amendment. The examiner should mark the fax or attachment requested (in the same area as entry instructions are marked), then initial, so as to not cause a reduction of any patent term adjustment (37 CFR 1.704(c)(8)). As the attachment is made a part of the examiners amendment, it does not get a separate PALM code. This precludes it from causing a reduction in any patent term adjustment. The electronic version of any submission will not be saved once printed version becomes part of the application record.

Amendment Practice 37 CFR HOW TO TREAT NON-COMPLIANT AMENDMENTS: For non-compliant preliminary or non-final amendment, LIE should send Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment Form to applicant For non-compliant after-final amendment, examiner should handle via advisory action; do not use Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment Form Examiner may not waive clean version requirement; examiner may approve entry without marked-up version if its absence does not impede continuation of examination

§ Substitute Specification Substitute specification must be submitted in clean form and must be accompanied by marked up version showing changes Paragraphs should be numbered as per § 1.52(b)(6) to facilitate amendment practice (§ 1.121); not necessary to show numbers as changes in marked up version