Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang  Cell Systems 
Advertisements

Dynamic epigenetic enhancer signatures reveal key transcription factors associated with monocytic differentiation states by Thu-Hang Pham, Christopher.
Chromatin Control of Developmental Dynamics and Plasticity
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 3-5 (January 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
by Holger Weishaupt, Mikael Sigvardsson, and Joanne L. Attema
Anna Kloc, Mikel Zaratiegui, Elphege Nora, Rob Martienssen 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Steven J. Petesch, John T. Lis  Cell 
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
SAGA Is a General Cofactor for RNA Polymerase II Transcription
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (October 2011)
Latent Regulatory Potential of Human-Specific Repetitive Elements
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 60, Issue 4, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 9-22 (January 2013)
Fine-Resolution Mapping of TF Binding and Chromatin Interactions
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2016)
Fine-Resolution Mapping of TF Binding and Chromatin Interactions
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Genome-Wide Epigenetics
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages e6 (April 2017)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Human Promoters Are Intrinsically Directional
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Dynamic Regulation of Nucleosome Positioning in the Human Genome
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e6 (December 2017)
Destabilizing Heterochromatin: Does Swi6/HP1 Make the Choice?
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Polycomb Protein Ezh1 Promotes RNA Polymerase II Elongation
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (September 2013)
Functional and Mechanistic Diversity of Distal Transcription Enhancers
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Divergent Transcription from Active Promoters
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Occupying Chromatin: Polycomb Mechanisms for Getting to Genomic Targets, Stopping Transcriptional Traffic, and Staying Put  Jeffrey A. Simon, Robert E.
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
A Role for Mammalian Sin3 in Permanent Gene Silencing
Xiaoshu Chen, Jianzhi Zhang  Cell Systems 
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 147, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Systematic Study of Nucleosome-Displacing Factors in Budding Yeast
Georgina Berrozpe, Gene O. Bryant, Katherine Warpinski, Mark Ptashne 
Lack of Transcription Triggers H3K27me3 Accumulation in the Gene Body
Presentation transcript:

Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 901-911 (September 2010) H2A.Z Maintenance during Mitosis Reveals Nucleosome Shifting on Mitotically Silenced Genes  Theresa K. Kelly, Tina Branscombe Miranda, Gangning Liang, Benjamin P. Berman, Joy C. Lin, Amos Tanay, Peter A. Jones  Molecular Cell  Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 901-911 (September 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.026 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Genome-wide Analysis by ChIP-Seq Shows that H2A.Z Localization Is Maintained during Mitosis and Preferentially Marks +1 Nucleosomes of Active Genes, which Shift Upstream to Occupy the TSS during Mitosis, Shrinking the NDR (A) H2A.Z ChIP-seq reads from G0/G1 and M phase cells were aligned to the Human Genome. A low-resolution example (A) demonstrates that global H2A.Z localization is similar during G0/G1 and M phase. Significant H2A.Z signal is found at the TSSs of expressed (∗) genes but less so at silent (§) genes. In addition, H2A.Z is also present at regions that do not correspond to known TSS (†). (B) Well-positioned +1 nucleosomes of active genes shift upstream to occupy the TSS during mitosis. The size of the shift is promoter specific, resulting in a broad peak during M phase (dashed ovals). (C) Genes that are not expressed or expressed at low levels contain little H2A.Z during both M phase and G0/G1. Forward and reverse reads (solid and dashed lines, respectively) correspond to orientation to the genome. Reads were normalized to the number of promoters analyzed. TSS in (B) and (C) are indicated by yellow lines. Molecular Cell 2010 39, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 H2A.Z-Containing Nucleosomes Upstream and Downstream of TSSs of Active Genes Generate a NDR that Is Shortened during Mitosis (A) Average coverage statistics for each H2A.Z profile covering 1000 bp upstream and downstream of known transcription start sites (UCSC). Clusters reveal strong nucleosomal phasing in the G0/G1 data, with nucleosomes detected on one or two sides of a strong NDR at the TSS. The mitotic profiles show a weaker NDR and shifted average position of the +1 and −2 nucleosomes. (B) High-resolution examples of nucleosome sliding from cluster 1 (WFS1) and cluster 4 (DDX17) demonstrate promoter specificity in the size of the shift, while the height of the peaks indicate that within an individual promoter, the nucleosomes are well positioned during both G0/G1 and M phase. p16 (cluster 7) and MYOD1 (cluster 11), which are silenced by DNA methylation, do not contain H2A.Z at their promoters. (C) Gene expression of representative genes from clusters 1 and 4, WFS1 and DDX17, respectively, show that expression is decreased during mitosis, while genes that do not contain H2A.Z, p16 and MYOD1, are not expressed regardless of cell cycle stage. (D) The size distribution of the NDRs is shown as distance between the −2 and +1 H2A.Z nucleosomes in the G0/G1 (green) and M (red) conditions. The percentage of promoters is plotted along the y axis and the distance between the −2 and +1 H2A.Z nucleosomes is on the x axis. There is clear compaction of the NDR in clusters showing H2A.Z presence during M phase. A.U., arbitrary units. Molecular Cell 2010 39, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The +1 Nucleosomes on the GRP78 and WFS1 Promoters Shift Upstream to Occupy the TSS during Mitosis, Coinciding with Decreased Gene Expression (A–F) Black and white circles indicate methylated (accessible) and unmethylated (inaccessible) CpG sites, respectively. Orange highlights M.SssI-inaccessible regions that can accommodate a nucleosome (>146 bp). The well-positioned nucleosome after the TSS of GRP78 (A) and WFS1 (D) during G0/G1 shifts upstream to occupy the TSS during mitosis (B and E) in T24 cells. Nucleosome occupancy at the TSS is anticorrelated with expression (C and F). The percentage of promoter replicas that contained a nucleosome at the TSS (gold bar) is plotted along with GRP78 expression (maroon bar). Expression bars are relative to GAPDH expression and represent the mean +SEM of three independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2010 39, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Nucleosome Occupancy at TSSs of the Mitotically Expressed PLK1 Promoter Does Not Change During the Cell Cycle (A and B) Black and white circles indicate methylated (accessible) and unmethylated (inaccessible) CpG sites. Orange highlights M.SssI-inaccessible regions that can accommodate a nucleosome (>146 bp). Green and blue highlight M.SssI-inaccessible regions that mark E2F and TBP binding sites, respectively. The +1 nucleosome of the PLK1 promoter is positioned after the TSS during G0/G1 (A) and M phase (B). (C) While nucleosome occupancy at the TSS of PLK1 is similar during G0/G1 and M phase, expression is restricted to M phase. The percentage of promoter replicas that contained a nucleosome at the TSS (gold bar) is plotted along with PLK1 expression (maroon bar). Expression bars are relative to GAPDH expression and represent the mean +SEM of three independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2010 39, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Nucleosome Occupancy at TSSs of Promoters Silenced by Methylation Does Not Change during the Cell Cycle (A and B) p16 is methylated in T24 cells. Black and white circles indicate endogenously methylated and unmethylated CpG sites. (C and D) Black and white circles indicate M.CviPI accessible (methylated) and inaccessible (unmethylated) GpC sites. Pink highlights M.CviPI inaccessible regions that can accommodate a nucleosome (>146 bp). The p16 promoter is inaccessible during G0/G1 (C) and M phase (D). (E) Nucleosome occupancy is high at the TSS of p16 during G0/G1 and M phase, and expression is not detected. The percentage of promoter replicas that contained a nucleosome at the TSS (gold bar) is plotted along with p16 expression (maroon bar). Expression bars are relative to GAPDH expression and represent the mean +SEM of three independent experiments. Molecular Cell 2010 39, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The GRP78 Promoter Has Differential Nucleosome Positioning, Unique Complements of DNA Binding Proteins, and Histone Modifications in Mitotic and G0/G1 Chromatin (A) H3 ChIP confirms that there is a change in nucleosome occupancy during mitosis. (B) Acetylation of H3 and H2A.Z are decreased during M phase, relative to G0/G1, while H3K4me3 and H2A.Z are maintained and H3S10 phosphorylation is increased. The extremely low level of H3K27me3 (data not shown) is unchanged during the cell cycle. Bars in (B) indicate ChIP signal from M phase chromatin (R5.2) expressed as fold change relative to G0/G1 chromatin (R3.3). (C) Pol II, NF-Y, and TBP binding is significantly reduced during mitosis. Paired t test was performed (∗, p value < 0.05). Bars represent mean +SEM of at least six ChIPs. Arrows in schematic indicate NF-Y and TBP binding sites. Molecular Cell 2010 39, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Depiction of Nucleosome Sliding on the GRP78 Promoter During G0/G1, the +1 nucleosome is positioned just after the TSS, allowing for TBP, NF-Y, and Pol II binding at the TSS. This nucleosome contains the H2A.Z variant, which is acetylated. H3 is acetylated and lysine 4 is trimethylated. During mitosis, the +1 nucleosome shifts to cover the TSS, and transcription factor and Pol II binding are lost. The nucleosome loses H3 and H2A.Z acetylation while maintaining the H2A.Z variant and H3K4me3 and acquiring the mitosis-specific phosphorylation of serine 10 of H3. Molecular Cell 2010 39, 901-911DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.026) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions