TGn Selection Procedure Straw Polls

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /460r0 Submission July 2001 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson TGg Chairs Guidance on Technical Selection Procedure Matthew B. Shoemake.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0173r0 Submission January 2015 Edward Au (Marvell Semiconductor)Slide 1 NG60 SG January 2015 Closing Report Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /800r2 Submission July 2004 Donald Eastlake 3rd, MotorolaSlide 1 Mesh Networking Task Group Process Donald E. Eastlake 3 rd
Doc.: IEEE r0 Submission November 2002 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGg Chairperson IEEE TGg Chairs Status Update Matthew B. Shoemake TGg Chairperson.
Doc.: IEEE /1058r1 TGs Process September 2004 Donald Eastlake 3rd, Motorola LaboratoriesSlide 1 Mesh Networking Task Group Process Donald E. Eastlake.
Doc.: IEEE /1384r3 Submission November 2004 Donald Eastlake, 3 rd, MotorolaSlide 1 Mesh Networking Task Group Process Donald E. Eastlake 3 rd.
TGn Chair’s Status Update
TG 1 March Session Closing Report
Task Group G Report January 17, 2003
IEEE TGa Project Timeline
IEEE TGw March Agenda Date: Authors: May 2008
Requirements Discussion
Mesh Networking Task Group Process
IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
TGn Closing Report – July ‘05
IEEE Task Group G Status Update
– Proposed change to Operations Manual – access to members area
HT SG PAR Proposal Colin Lanzl Aware, Inc.
TGg Report to WG September 22, 2000
TGn Closing Report September 2003
SG4a Project Timeline January 2003 doc.: IEEE /056r0
TGn Closing Report Sept /1081 r2
IEEE Task Group G Adopted Agenda for January 2001 Session
TGn Overview Portland, Oregon, US July 2004
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
TGg Final Report to the WG July 13, 2001
– Proposed change to Operations Manual – access to members area
TGn Closing Report Nov /1512 r0
TGac Status and Timeline
IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Task Group N Procedural Planning May 10, 2004
TGn Closing Report November 2003
HRb SG Status Report to Working Group
SG4a Project Timeline January 2003 doc.: IEEE /056r0
SG4a Project Timeline January 2003 doc.: IEEE /056r0
SG4a Project Timeline Interest Group ‘a’ Activities Aug 03
TGn Chair’s Status Update
TG3a Project Timeline Jan03 Session #22 Mar03 Session #23
TGn Closing Report – November 05
TGn Closing Report September 2003
Options for TGaa Proposal Selection Procedures
IEEE TGg Chairs Status Update
IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
IEEE Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D. IEEE Chairperson
IEEE TGg Chairs Status Update
TGn Chair’s Status Update
Motion to a Start High Throughput Study Group
Proposal for TGac Selection Procedure
TGg Report to the IEEE Working Group
IEEE Task Group G Adopted Agenda for January 2001 Session
IEEE SGa Project Timeline
Selection Procedure for TGai
Matthew B. Shoemake, Chairperson HRbSG
Hilton Portland & Executive Tower
TGn Overview Portland, Oregon, US July 2004
Jon Edney, InTalk Dan Harkins, Trapeze Jesse Walker, Intel
TGs Process, March Date: Author: March 2009 March 2009
Task Group G Report January 17, 2003
Mesh Networking Task Group Process
HRb SG Status Report to Working Group
HRb SG Status and Information
IEEE Task Group G Report to the IEEE WG
Fixed Inter Frame Spacing for BRP in ay
TGg Report to the IEEE Working Group
Task Group N Schedule March 15, 2004
IEEE Task Group G Report to IEEE Working Group
Mesh Networking Task Group Process
– Proposed change to Operations Manual – access to members area
80 MHz Channelization Date: Authors: July 2010 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

TGn Selection Procedure Straw Polls July 2003 TGn Selection Procedure Straw Polls Matthew B. Shoemake, Ph.D. m.b.shoemake@ieee.org July 25, 2003 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGn Chair Elect

Proposal for Reaching Consensus on a Selection Procedure July 2003 Proposal for Reaching Consensus on a Selection Procedure July 2003 session: Beginning discussion of selection procedure Take straw polls to determine member thinking Based on straw polls, direct IEEE 802.11n Chair Elect to draft procedure Conference calls: Hold two conference calls just before the September 2003 session to review and refine the draft selection procedure Confirmed meetings: August 27, 2003 at 8am PT/11am ET September 3, 2003 at 8am PT/11am ET September 2003 Session: IEEE 802.11n Chair to provide report on status of draft selection procedure IEEE 802.11n Task Group to review, modify and consider adoption of official selection procedure Matthew B. Shoemake, TGn Chair Elect

July 2003 Straw Polls (1/5) Results of the straw polls to be used to draft the IEEE 802.11n Selection Procedure. Should 802.11n define Functional Requirements that must be met for proposal consideration: YES/NO Result: 101/3 Should 802.11n define Comparison Criteria that must be addressed/answered for a proposal to be considered: YES/NO Result: 94/5 Shall the selection procedure call for all proposals to be strictly classified as MAC proposals or PHY proposals? YES/NO Result: 2/119 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGn Chair Elect

Straw Polls (2/5) Assuming the following definitions: July 2003 Straw Polls (2/5) Results of the straw polls to be used to draft the IEEE 802.11n Selection Procedure. Assuming the following definitions: Complete Proposal - a proposal that meets all the requirements of the PAR and the Functional Requirements Partial Proposal - a proposal that does not contradict the functional requirements or requirements of the PAR but alone does not meet all of the Functional Requirements and requirements of the PAR. Example: A packet aggregation proposal alone would not meet the 100 Mbps PAR requirements, but likewise may not violate any requirement of the PAR. Should the Selection Procedure: Allow for only introduction of “complete proposals” - 6 Allow for only introduction of “partial proposals” - 1 Allow for introduction of “complete proposals” and “partial proposals” - 120 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGn Chair Elect

July 2003 Straw Polls (3/5) Results of the straw polls to be used to draft the IEEE 802.11n Selection Procedure. What should be used as a baseline for the 802.11n Selection Procedure? 802.11g Selection Procedure - 3 802.15.3a Selection Procedure - 36 Indifferent - 36 Other - 9 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGn Chair Elect

July 2003 Straw Polls (4/5) Results of the straw polls to be used to draft the IEEE 802.11n Selection Procedure. Should the 802.11n Selection Procedure incorporate a “low hurdle” vote: YES/NO Results: 87/1 If so, what should the low hurdle level be? Greater than 20 % - 11 Greater than 25 % - 62 Other - 20 Should the procedure include a Panel Q&A session? YES/NO Results: 101/8 Should the procedure timeline target be: Initial presentations made in January 2004 with low hurdle vote in March 2004 and subsequent procedure steps continuing in May 2004 - 44 Other - 58 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGn Chair Elect

Straw Poll (5/5) When shall the group be able to change the procedure? July 2003 Straw Poll (5/5) Results of the straw polls to be used to draft the IEEE 802.11n Selection Procedure. When shall the group be able to change the procedure? Shall require a vote of at least 75% of the members to change the selection procedure - 64 Shall require a vote of at least 50% of the members to change the selection procedure - 10 Other - 8 Matthew B. Shoemake, TGn Chair Elect

July 2003 Background Matthew B. Shoemake, TGn Chair Elect

Previously Used Selection Procedures: 802.11g July 2003 Previously Used Selection Procedures: 802.11g 802.11g procedure drew from the 802.11b procedure 802.11g procedure has been leveraged by 802.11h and 802.15.3a Selection Procedure (11-00-209r3): http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/11/Documents/DocumentHolder/0-209.zip Functional Requirements (11-00-210r4) must be met to be considered by the TGg Comparison Criteria (11-00-211r9) are questions that must be answered by each proposer to be considered by TGg No scoring system and members free to vote at will Issue with 802.11g procedure: Step 19 was not very clear, and at a critical stage of the process, there were varying interpretations of the process 802.15.3a attempted to fix this problem Matthew B. Shoemake, TGn Chair Elect

Previously Used Selection Procedures: 802.15.3a July 2003 Previously Used Selection Procedures: 802.15.3a IEEE 802.15.3a built on 802.11g procedure and has attempted to plug holes and remove any ambiguities Selection Procedure (doc. 15-03-41): http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/15/pub/2003/Jan03/03041r7P802-15_TG3a-Down-Selection-Voting-Procedure.doc Added very clear flow chart for procedure IEEE 802.15.3a procedure includes: “Technical Requirements” (doc. 15-03-30) “Selection Criteria” (doc. 15-03-31) Low hurdle vote: > 20% Matthew B. Shoemake, TGn Chair Elect