Deepak Vayalambrone FRCOphth

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IN THE NAME OF GOD.
Advertisements

Biometry: Long & Short eyes Alireza Peyman, MD Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Posterior Corneal Changes after Refractive Surgery Dr. Tommy Chung Yan Chan Dr. Vishal Jhanji.
Eugene Ng, Arthur B. Cummings, Patrick P. Collins, Alexander V. Goncharov, Diana Bogusevschi, Chris Dainty, Michael C. Mrochen. The authors of this paper.
LASIK Aravind Eye Hospital, Tirunelveli. - Technological explosion in field of refractive surgery refractive surgery - 25 years later, 20 different refractive.
Optics 1----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics
Development of an Apple iPhone IOL Calculator Application for Cataract Surgery Rony Gelman, MD 1, Richard E. Braunstein, MD 1 1 Department of Ophthalmology,
IOL power calculation following keratorefractive surgery
Financial Disclosure I have a financial interest with the following companies: Abbott Medical Optics Alcon Calhoun Vision NuLens Optimedica Optivue  
IOLs & Biometry Alireza Peyman, MD Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
INTRA-OCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION IN POST- REFRACTIVE SURGERY ASIAN EYES USING THE HAIGIS-L FORMULA Dr Daphne Han, FRCS Dr Wei-Han Chua, FRCS Dr Peter.
Choosing the Proper Power for the IOL
IOL power calculation after refractive surgery A. Peyman, MD.
Personalised eye modelling for customised intraocular lens designs Matthew Sheehan, Eamonn O’Donoghue, Conor Sheil and Alexander Goncharov Photonics Ireland,
Refractive Lens Exchange. 2 How the eye works Light rays enter the eye through the clear cornea, pupil and lens. These light rays are focused directly.
REFRACTIVE ASPECTS OF CATARACT SURGERY. OPTICAL CORRECTIONS AFTER CATARACT EXTRACTION.
Hospital Based Pediatric eye services Furahini Godfrey BSc. (ed), MD, MMed. POFellow. Department of Ophthalmology. 08/04/11 Kilimanjaro Christian Medical.
Managing the Refractive “Surprise” After Toric IOL Placement Managing the Refractive “Surprise” After Toric IOL Placement Brad H Feldman, MD Derek DelMonte,
Hong Kong Eye Hospital Biometry Audit 2012 SN60WF IOL Dr. Rose Chan
Hong Kong Eye Hospital Ms Frenchy Chiu Dr Victoria Wong IOL master
Reanalysis of Refractive Growth in Pediatric Aphakia and Pseudophakia Susan Whitmer, MD 1 Aurora Xu 2 Scott McClatchey, MD 1,3,4 1 Naval Medical Center.
Biometric Accuracy in High Hypermetropes and Myopes
Phacoemulsification some Basic Ideas…
Sonia Yoo, MD 1 Fernanda Piccoli, MD 1 Artur Schmitt, MD 1 Takeshi Ide, MD 1 Tsontcho Ianchulev, MD 2 Authors have no financial interest in this subject.
Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD
EVALUATION OF REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES AFTER IOL IMPLANTATION
Jamie Ng, Marcus Tan, Lennard Thean National University Health System
Reproducibility of Optical Measurements in Pseudophakic eyes Using Double-Pass Measurement System St Thomas Hospital, London Anish Dhital, David Spalton,
Edmondo Borasio Moorfields Eye Hospital Dubai Results of BESSt 2 biometry and Borasio Myopic/Hyperopic Regression (BMR / BHR) IOL POWER CLUB – 9 th ANNUAL.
Partial Coherence Interferometry Failure Rate in a Teaching Hospital Leslie A. Wei 1,2, BA, Nickolaus P. Katsoulakis 2, MD, Theodoros Filippopoulos 3,
Sherman W. Reeves, MD, MPH 1,3,4 ; Jacob A. Kozisek, OD 1,2 ; Noumia Cloutier-Gill, OD 1,2 ; David R. Hardten, MD 1,2,3,4 Accuracy of Scheimpflug Imaging.
Kamal thakur 2 nd year bsc opto Nethradhama college of opto.
Financial Disclosure: Medical Director–Galilei R&D Consultant, Ziemer Group AG, Port, Switzerland Consultant & Territory Manager for.
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
Management of Astigmatism - An overview
Minimizing Risk in Visian ICL Implantation.
COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF OCULAR BIOMETRY USING A NEW NON-CONTACT OPTICAL LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETER David Goldblum 1,3, Kaspar Rohrer 1, Rudolf Waelti.
Simulated Experiments on IOL Power Calculation Using Anterior Segment OCT Dong Hyun Jo, M.D., 1,2 Mee Kum Kim, M.D., 1,2 Won Ryang Wee, M.D. 1,2 1 Department.
Sergio Kwitko, Diane Marinho, Samuel Rymer Ophthalmology Department - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto.
Kavita Gala David Spalton Mayank Nanavaty St Thomas’ Hospital , London
Intraocular Lens Outcomes: Comparison of Technologies and Formulas Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Storm.
Marilyn Watkins-Ramdin, COMT ROUB
Mumbaieyecarecornealasik.com.
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Eun Chul Kim, M.D. , Man Soo Kim,M.D.
Premium IOL May be one way to achieve the visual goals of selected patients I describe some pearls for premium IOL implantation to help ensure that we.
Management of Corneal Astigmatism with Toric IOLs: Optimizing Outcomes
Corneal Pachymetry in Prediction of Refraction After Cataract Surgery
Refractive outcomes of intraoperative wavefront aberrometry versus optical biometry alone for intraocular lens power calculation Zina Zhang MD1, Logan.
The authors have no financial interest.
Aug 11, 2017 Comparison of predictive accuracy on Partial coherence interferometry (PCI) and swpt-source optical coherence tomographry (SS-OCT) Choun-Ki.
Effect of Axial Length Measurement Method on Refractive Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Real World Comparison of Partial Coherence Interferometry and Immersion.
Hôpital Ophtalmique Universitaire
Nienke Visser, Tos T.J.M. Berendschot, Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts
Tamer M. El-Raggal, MD, PhD, FRCSEd Magrabi Eye Hospital, Cairo
MP Weikert, M Shirayama, L Wang, DD Koch
Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.
Samir I. Sayegh, MD, PhD, FACS 1
Aphakia and its correction
Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices
Poster Number: P90 Category: Intraocular Surgery (Cataract and Refractive) Optimization of IOL Power Calculation Constants: By Unit or by Surgeon? Nathaniel.
Naval Medical Center, San Diego
ASCRS 2008, Chicago Assessment of a triple procedure in patients with ICL-induced cataracts   ~ICLTM removal, phacoemulsification and     intraocular.
IN THE NAME OF GOD.
Factors Potentially Affecting the Accuracy of Methods to Calculate Effective Refractive Power After Keratorefractive Surgery Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR,
Biometry before catarct surgery
Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD
The authors have no financial interest
Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu
Presentation transcript:

Deepak Vayalambrone FRCOphth BIOMETRY Deepak Vayalambrone FRCOphth

it can be a bit overwhelming 20/02/2019

NOVEMBER 29 1949 St. Thomas Hospital London 20/02/2019

IOL as thick as natural lens Power of 24 D in water First ever IOL implant In a 49 y.o. nurse IOL as thick as natural lens Power of 24 D in water Resultant myopia of -18 D Due to higher R I of Perspex CQ. Biometry? ‘Ridley met John Pike, an optical scientist with Rayner in a parked car and ‘discussed’ the Implant’ 20/02/2019

Stewart Duke-Elder ‘’an ophthalmic surgeon's job is to take material out of the eye, not to put it in’’ Harold Ridley "I am the only man to have invented his own operation" 20/02/2019

Basic refraction based formula IOL power = 18 + 1.25 x refraction. i.e. Refraction = 0  IOL power 18 D. Binkhorst RD. Ophthalmic Surg. 1976 Fall;7(3):69-82 ‘’The rule is simple......careful history and an examination of old glasses and past refraction ...... When the basic refraction cannot be ascertained, capital errors may occur.’’ 20/02/2019

Lens power tables ‘’Ophthalmologists who do not own a personal computer will find the lens power table a valuable adjunct to their present repertoire of analytical skills’’. Estimates of primary implant power using an intraocular lens table. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1986 Jul;12(4):401-7 20/02/2019

The human eye Geometric thin lens optics not applicable Lens does not have a uniform RI Variable lens position Interplay of AL, K, Lens Power, RI of lens. 20/02/2019

The human eye 42 D 24 mm 18 D 20/02/2019

A few words on terminology Axial length Keratometry Anterior Chamber Depth Effective Lens Position Position of principal plane of IOL behind cornea 1st gen- constant of 4 mm 2nd gen- AL as a scaling factor Binkhorst 3rd gen- AL and K 4th gen- AL, K, pre-op ACD and LT 20/02/2019

Standardised pseudophakic eye 20/02/2019

Theoretical formulae IOL POWER = Required vergence in the plane of the IOL minus Effective power of the cornea in the same plane Problems Prediction of the Lens position Theoretical ‘thin lens’ Inaccuracy of Keratometry 20/02/2019

Theoretical formulae Thijssen Colenbrader Fyodorov Van der Heijde Binkhorst 20/02/2019

Regression formulae Post-op refractive results analysed Correction factors applied SRK formula IOL power= A- 2.5L – 0.9K A- constant reflecting and affected by position of lens angulation of haptics Lens shape L- axial length K- Corneal power 20/02/2019

II generation formulae AL and IOL position related SRK-2 and Binkhorst. Correction for longer and shorter eyes. Axial lengths < 20mm Al = A + 3 20mm to 21 mm Al = A + 2 21 mm to 22 mm Al = A + 1 22 mm to 24.5 mm Al = A >24.5 mm Al = A - 0.5 20/02/2019

Koch suggested classification of IOL formulae 1 Historical Refraction based 2 Regression analysis based SRK/ SRK II/ BINKHORST 3 Vergence formula based 2 variable Holladay 1, SRK-T, Hoffer-Q 3 variable Haigis, Ladas super formula 5 variable Barett Universal 2 7 variable Holladay-2 4 AI based Hill RBF, Clarke neural network 5 Ray tracing Okulix, Phacoptix

9 types of eyes* AXIAL LENGTH SHORT NORMAL LONG ANT. SEG SIZE LARGE Megalocornea + Axial Hypermetropia 0% Megalocornea 2% Large eye Buphthalmos Megalocornea+ axial myopia 10% Axial hypermetropia 80% Normal 96% Axial myopia 90% SMALL Small eye Nanophthalmos 20% Microcornea Microcornea+ axial myopia *Essential optics for the cataract and refractive surgeon. I ed 2007. JT Holladay 20/02/2019

Current state of play SRK-T is the most widely used (RCOphth recommended) Hoffer –Q for eyes shorter than 22 mm Barrett Universal 2 Good agreement with SRK- T when 3 variables used Changes when 5 variables are used Hill RBK Wang-Koch correction for high axial lengths Haigis-L for post LASIK eyes 85% of eyes expected to be within 1 D SE

Axial length measurement Ultrasonography Cornea to ILM- anatomic AL Partial coherence interferometry Cornea to photoreceptor- optical AL Swept source OCT Optical low coherence reflectometry

Keratometry Measure the anterior cornea Keratometers have a ‘central scotoma’ of 3.2 mm Post refractive surgery patients need correction If entering manually in the IOL Master- Check RI that the Keratometer uses. Contact lenses Discontinue RGP for 3 weeks Discontinue soft lenses for 1 week 1 D error  nearly 1 D error in post op ref 20/02/2019

It’s a bit like choosing a cereal….. IOLMaster 500 IOLMaster 700 AL scan Lenstar LS900 Aladdin/Aladdin LT Argos (Movu) Galilei G6

IOL MASTER 500 Gold standard of biometry Use 780 nm semiconductor diode laser- PCI Interference at tear film- cornea interface Interference at RPE AL accurately to within ±0.02 mm Inability to measure through dense cataract Tear film abnormalities can cause problems

IOL master 700 SS OCT - 2000 scans/s. Can identify unusual ocular geometry (e.g., crystalline lens tilt/decentration) More accurate than IOLmaster 500 Fixation check using the foveal pit The fixation check helps identify macular pathologies Telecentric K and distance-independent Restless patients, pupil size independent. Can perform biometry even through dense cataracts

Lenstar OLCR Superluminescent diode laser (820 nm) Keratometry- dual zone 1.63mm and 2.3 mm T cone – topography using Placido disc measured at 32 points Directly measures ACD Measures retinal thickness Hill RBF included Eye tracking Cannot measure through dense cataract AL range only upto 32 mm

Special circumstances Every other eye!

Refractive surgery-1 Standard ‘K’ 3.2 mm ‘central scotoma’ Measures outside central ablation zone Corneal standardised index of refraction (n=1.3375) invalid 1 - 2 r RK flattens both post and ant curves Ablative flattens ant curve 20/02/2019

Refractive surgery-2 Historical ‘K’ Spectacle correction Pre- LASIK 42.0 − 11.25 Post- LASIK 36.0 − 2.25 Assuming a vertex distance of 12 mm. Pre LASIK refraction at corneal plane= −9.91 D Post LASIK refraction at corneal plane= −2.19 D Amount of correction −2.19 − (− 9.91) = −2.19 + 9.91= 7.72 D Corrected K  42.0 – 7.72 = 34.28 D. Source: Intraocular Lens Power Calculations 2003. H. John Shammas 20/02/2019

Refractive surgery-3 Historical Refraction K Spectacle correction Pre- LASIK NOT AVAILABLE − 11.25 Post- LASIK 36.0 − 2.25 Assuming a vertex distance of 12 mm. Pre LASIK refraction at corneal plane= −9.91 D Post LASIK refraction at corneal plane= −2.19 D Amount of correction −2.19 − (− 9.91) = −2.19 + 9.91= 7.72 D Corrected K Post LASIK K − (0.23 x Correction at cornea) =36.0 – (0.23 x 7.72)= 34.22 D Source: Intraocular Lens Power Calculations 2003. H. John Shammas 20/02/2019

Refractive surgery-4 Clinically derived method Regression formula Shammas-2, Haigis-L K = (1.14 x KpostPRK) – 6.8 Used when historical data not available Disadvantage Does not relate to amount of correction by refractive surgery 20/02/2019

Refractive surgery-5 Contact lens method K Spectacle correction Pre- LASIK NOT AVAILABLE Post- LASIK 36.0 − 2.25 Refract eye Fit plano Rigid CL with known BC e.g. 41D Refract e.g. −8.75 D Difference added algebraically to BC 41+ [−8.75 D-(-2.25)]= 34.50D Source: Intraocular Lens Power Calculations 2003. H. John Shammas 20/02/2019

Refractive surgery-6 Other possible options Nomogram based assessment * 63% within 0.5D 84% within 1D 100% within 1.5D Better than ‘Historical method’ but..... Data from 19 eyes Lenstar Probably the best currently IOL master 700 Pentacam With correcting software Orbscan II Measures central1.5 mm 20/02/2019

Penetrating keratoplasty Triple procedure not ideal. Keratoplasty + Cataract extraction Planned Aphakic IOL later. 20/02/2019

PIGGY BACK IOL MYOPIC ERROR HYPERMETROPIC ERROR Implant power same as error HYPERMETROPIC ERROR Implant power 1.5 x error

Post vitrectomy Convex- plano PMMA lenses better? *117 eyes Biconvex IOLs could lose 1/3- ½ refractive effect *117 eyes 85% within 1 D Retro silicone space important if AL in supine position Myopic shift (Not OIL filled eyes) Ranges -0.50 to -0.86 from predicted refraction *Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Vol 243;10 / 2005 20/02/2019

Post Vitrectomy eyes Silicone oil Additional IOL power Change in AL on USG due to change in velocity Not an issue with LI techniques Hypermetropic shift with retained oil Degree of shift varies depending on IOL design Additional IOL power (Ns - Nv) / (AL - ACD) x 1,000 Ns – RI of Silicone oil.(14034) Nv- RI of vitreous. (1.336) 3.0 – 3.5 D additional power usually 20/02/2019

Royal college guidelines SRK/T and Holladay recommended SRK-1/ SRK-2 not to be used Post refractive surgery Corrected ‘K’ by one of the methods Use highest IOL power obtained Axial length Formula <22 mm Hoffer Q or SRK/T 22-24.5 mm SRK/T or Holladay or Haigis >24.6 mm SRK/T 20/02/2019

And finally Check the glasses! Surgeons need to customise constants Do focimetry on both lenses Surgeons need to customise constants For each IOL that they use Standard surgical technique Rhexis less than IOL size round Well centred 20/02/2019

Useful material http://www.doctor-hill.com Intraocular lens power calculations (Slack) H J Shammas. Royal College guidelines 20/02/2019

Thank you 20/02/2019