Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Advertisements

Fig. 7 Localization of the element(s) responsible for the transcriptional suppression by PPAR-γ. A, Rat VSMCs were transfected with either −1969/+104-luc,
Figure 5. Both IDs Are Capable of Functionally Interacting with the TR on Positive TREs CV-1 cells were cotransfected with 1.7 μg of LYS (A) PAL (B), or.
From: Involucrin Expression in the Corneal Epithelium: An Essential Role for Sp1 Transcription Factors Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci ;46(9):
by Bimal K. Ray, Arvind Shakya, James R. Turk, Suneel S
by Kumar Kotlo, Douglas E. Hughes, Victoria L. M
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2010)
Large Hepatitis Delta Antigen Modulates Transforming Growth Factor-β Signaling Cascades: Implication of Hepatitis Delta Virus–Induced Liver Fibrosis 
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Blocking Sp1 Transcription Factor Broadly Inhibits Extracellular Matrix Gene Expression In Vitro and In Vivo: Implications for the Treatment of Tissue.
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 117, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
The homeodomain protein Cdx2 regulates lactase gene promoter activity during enterocyte differentiation  Rixun Fang, Nilda A. Santiago, Lynne C. Olds,
Zara E Khan, Timothy C Wang, Guanglin Cui, Alfred L Chi, Rod Dimaline 
P16INK4a Promoter mutations are frequent in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and PSC-associated cholangiocarcinoma  Makiko Taniai, Hajime Higuchi,
Histone deacetylase 3 associates with and represses the transcription factor GATA-2 by Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masayuki Towatari, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Fumihiko Hayakawa,
Volume 135, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Volume 138, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 121, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Mutation of a Nuclear Respiratory Factor 2 Binding Site in the 5′ Untranslated Region of the ADSL Gene in Three Patients with Adenylosuccinate Lyase Deficiency 
Increased Expression of Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 6 Stimulates Hepatocyte Proliferation During Mouse Liver Regeneration  Yongjun Tan, Yuichi Yoshida,
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2010)
Cdx1 and Cdx2 expression during intestinal development
Istvan Arany, Judit K. Megyesi, Jane E.B. Reusch, Robert L. Safirstein 
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Dragony Fu, Kathleen Collins  Molecular Cell 
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Jason Park, Stephanie Schulz, Scott A. Waldman  Gastroenterology 
Adam C Bell, Adam G West, Gary Felsenfeld  Cell 
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 115, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 124, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Epididymal Cysteine-Rich Secretory Protein 1 Encoding Gene Is Expressed in Murine Hair Follicles and Downregulated in Mice Overexpressing Hoxc13  Ron.
Volume 122, Issue 7, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Regulation of CSF1 Promoter by the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Leslie A. Bruggeman, Scott H. Adler, Paul E. Klotman 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 127, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages (October 2000)
Defining the Regulatory Elements in the Proximal Promoter of ΔNp63 in Keratinocytes: Potential Roles for Sp1/Sp3, NF-Y, and p63  Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara.
Bart A. Jessen, Marjorie A. Phillips, Robert H. Rice 
Endogenous GATA Factors Bind the Core Sequence of the tetO and Influence Gene Regulation with the Tetracycline System  David J. Gould, Yuti Chernajovsky 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Keiji Miyazawa, MSc, Akio Mori, MD, PhD, Hirokazu Okudaira, MD, PhD 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages 381-387 (August 1998) Misexpression of the pancreatic homeodomain protein IDX-1 by the Hoxa-4 promoter associated with agenesis of the cecum  R.Scott Heller, Doris A. Stoffers, Mehboob A. Hussain, Christopher P. Miller, Joel F. Habener  Gastroenterology  Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages 381-387 (August 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70204-5 Copyright © 1998 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Diagram of the DNA plasmid containing the Hoxa-4 promoter driving IDX-1 DNA expression. The Hoxa-4 promoter (4.1 kb) was fused with 0.64 kb of the rat β-globin slice sequence, the full-length IDX-1 cDNA, in which an internal EcoRI site had been changed without altering the coding sequence of the protein, and the 0.52-kb rat β-globin poly(A) signal. Gastroenterology 1998 115, 381-387DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70204-5) Copyright © 1998 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Gross analysis of wild-type and transgenic mice. (A) Two 4-week-old nontransgenic (left) and transgenic H30 (right) mice. At 4 weeks of age, the transgenic mice are visibly smaller than wild-type mice. Already at this age, the eyelid abnormality is visible. (B and C) Closer examination of older (B) wild-type and (C) H30 mouse. Eyelid epithelium revealed a thicker, inflamed eyelid in the H30 mice. (D and E) Upon histological sectioning of the eyelid epithelium (stained with hematoxylin), it was observed that H30 mice had a greatly increased number of hair follicles. Gastroenterology 1998 115, 381-387DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70204-5) Copyright © 1998 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Linear-range PCR of genomic DNA prepared from Hoxa-4/IDX-1 transgenic mice. The copy number of transgenes in mouse strains 30 and 47 with cecal agenesis are considerably higher than in strains 29 and 70, which do not have cecal agenesis. Gastroenterology 1998 115, 381-387DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70204-5) Copyright © 1998 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Analysis of the lower gastrointestinal tract of wild-type and transgenic mice. (A) Complete absence of the cecum in H30 mice. Gross evaluation of the gastrointestinal tract of wild-type (WT) and H30 mice revealed complete absence of the cecum (arrow in wild-type). (B and C) Lower-magnification photographs of the luminal surface of the ileal-cecal-colonic region revealed a greatly reduced number of epithelial folds in transgenic mice compared with wild-type (the interfold distances are indicated between the arrows). (D and E) Histological section of the ileal-cecal region revealed a normal ileal cecal valve (data not shown), but (E) the epithelium located distal to the valve of H30 mice had a mixture of cecal-like epithelium (short wide villi) and a few very long villi characteristic of the ileum. Gastroenterology 1998 115, 381-387DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70204-5) Copyright © 1998 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Interactions of IDX-1 with Cdx-2 inhibit transactivation of the sucrase-isomaltase promoter. (A) Electromobility shift assay of Cdx-2 interaction with proximal G1 promoter element of the glucagon gene that binds Cdx-2. Nuclear extracts were prepared from Cos-7 cells transfected with Cdx-2 expression vector. Nuclear extracts (10 μg) of Cos cells were incubated with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides composed of the G1 element in the proximal promoter of the rat glucagon gene22 either alone or with GST, GST–IDX-1, or 1 μL of preimmune (Pi) or 1 μL of anti IDX-1 antiserum (diluted 1:5), after which DNA-protein complexes were resolved by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. Two complexes of Cdx-2 are formed with the G1-containing oligonucleotide probe. (B) Addition of increasing amounts of GST–IDX-1 leads to an increase in the formation of a higher-molecular-weight Cdx-2/IDX-1 complex. Asterisk indicates nonspecific complex. (C) GST-pulldown assay showing in vitro protein-protein interaction of Cdx-2 and IDX-1. In vitro–translated Cdx-2 is pulled down by GST–IDX-1, but not by GST-C/EBPβ. The known interaction of C/EBPβ and CHOP was used as positive control for the assay.30 (D) Functional inhibition of the transactivating properties of Cdx-2 on the sucrase-isomaltase promoter by IDX-1. BHK-21 cells were cotransfected with 5 μg of −100–base pair sucrase-isomaltase footprint 1 (SIF1)–luciferase reporter plasmid and 1.5 μg of Cdx-2 and IDX-1 expression vectors. Transfected DNA was kept constant by adding empty expression vector to a total of 8 μg. Gastroenterology 1998 115, 381-387DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70204-5) Copyright © 1998 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Interactions of IDX-1 with Cdx-2 inhibit transactivation of the sucrase-isomaltase promoter. (A) Electromobility shift assay of Cdx-2 interaction with proximal G1 promoter element of the glucagon gene that binds Cdx-2. Nuclear extracts were prepared from Cos-7 cells transfected with Cdx-2 expression vector. Nuclear extracts (10 μg) of Cos cells were incubated with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides composed of the G1 element in the proximal promoter of the rat glucagon gene22 either alone or with GST, GST–IDX-1, or 1 μL of preimmune (Pi) or 1 μL of anti IDX-1 antiserum (diluted 1:5), after which DNA-protein complexes were resolved by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. Two complexes of Cdx-2 are formed with the G1-containing oligonucleotide probe. (B) Addition of increasing amounts of GST–IDX-1 leads to an increase in the formation of a higher-molecular-weight Cdx-2/IDX-1 complex. Asterisk indicates nonspecific complex. (C) GST-pulldown assay showing in vitro protein-protein interaction of Cdx-2 and IDX-1. In vitro–translated Cdx-2 is pulled down by GST–IDX-1, but not by GST-C/EBPβ. The known interaction of C/EBPβ and CHOP was used as positive control for the assay.30 (D) Functional inhibition of the transactivating properties of Cdx-2 on the sucrase-isomaltase promoter by IDX-1. BHK-21 cells were cotransfected with 5 μg of −100–base pair sucrase-isomaltase footprint 1 (SIF1)–luciferase reporter plasmid and 1.5 μg of Cdx-2 and IDX-1 expression vectors. Transfected DNA was kept constant by adding empty expression vector to a total of 8 μg. Gastroenterology 1998 115, 381-387DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70204-5) Copyright © 1998 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Interactions of IDX-1 with Cdx-2 inhibit transactivation of the sucrase-isomaltase promoter. (A) Electromobility shift assay of Cdx-2 interaction with proximal G1 promoter element of the glucagon gene that binds Cdx-2. Nuclear extracts were prepared from Cos-7 cells transfected with Cdx-2 expression vector. Nuclear extracts (10 μg) of Cos cells were incubated with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides composed of the G1 element in the proximal promoter of the rat glucagon gene22 either alone or with GST, GST–IDX-1, or 1 μL of preimmune (Pi) or 1 μL of anti IDX-1 antiserum (diluted 1:5), after which DNA-protein complexes were resolved by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. Two complexes of Cdx-2 are formed with the G1-containing oligonucleotide probe. (B) Addition of increasing amounts of GST–IDX-1 leads to an increase in the formation of a higher-molecular-weight Cdx-2/IDX-1 complex. Asterisk indicates nonspecific complex. (C) GST-pulldown assay showing in vitro protein-protein interaction of Cdx-2 and IDX-1. In vitro–translated Cdx-2 is pulled down by GST–IDX-1, but not by GST-C/EBPβ. The known interaction of C/EBPβ and CHOP was used as positive control for the assay.30 (D) Functional inhibition of the transactivating properties of Cdx-2 on the sucrase-isomaltase promoter by IDX-1. BHK-21 cells were cotransfected with 5 μg of −100–base pair sucrase-isomaltase footprint 1 (SIF1)–luciferase reporter plasmid and 1.5 μg of Cdx-2 and IDX-1 expression vectors. Transfected DNA was kept constant by adding empty expression vector to a total of 8 μg. Gastroenterology 1998 115, 381-387DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70204-5) Copyright © 1998 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Interactions of IDX-1 with Cdx-2 inhibit transactivation of the sucrase-isomaltase promoter. (A) Electromobility shift assay of Cdx-2 interaction with proximal G1 promoter element of the glucagon gene that binds Cdx-2. Nuclear extracts were prepared from Cos-7 cells transfected with Cdx-2 expression vector. Nuclear extracts (10 μg) of Cos cells were incubated with 32P-labeled oligonucleotides composed of the G1 element in the proximal promoter of the rat glucagon gene22 either alone or with GST, GST–IDX-1, or 1 μL of preimmune (Pi) or 1 μL of anti IDX-1 antiserum (diluted 1:5), after which DNA-protein complexes were resolved by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. Two complexes of Cdx-2 are formed with the G1-containing oligonucleotide probe. (B) Addition of increasing amounts of GST–IDX-1 leads to an increase in the formation of a higher-molecular-weight Cdx-2/IDX-1 complex. Asterisk indicates nonspecific complex. (C) GST-pulldown assay showing in vitro protein-protein interaction of Cdx-2 and IDX-1. In vitro–translated Cdx-2 is pulled down by GST–IDX-1, but not by GST-C/EBPβ. The known interaction of C/EBPβ and CHOP was used as positive control for the assay.30 (D) Functional inhibition of the transactivating properties of Cdx-2 on the sucrase-isomaltase promoter by IDX-1. BHK-21 cells were cotransfected with 5 μg of −100–base pair sucrase-isomaltase footprint 1 (SIF1)–luciferase reporter plasmid and 1.5 μg of Cdx-2 and IDX-1 expression vectors. Transfected DNA was kept constant by adding empty expression vector to a total of 8 μg. Gastroenterology 1998 115, 381-387DOI: (10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70204-5) Copyright © 1998 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions