MAE 4291: SENIOR DESIGN Presentation Review October 6, 2008

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engineering Management & Distance Education Chi Epsilon Graduate Seminar December 2002 Available from
Advertisements

Keys to Success in Engineering Study
Amy Kindschi, Patrick Eagan, Paul Ross HOTS for Independent Reading and Research ASEE June 2008.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
ABET The Complete Report on Your Course. ABET OUTCOME CHECKLIST.
1. An ability to:  Understand the academic requirements you need to obtain your degree  Calculate your GPA  Prepare a draft schedule 2.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
Introduction to Engineering and Urban Planning How to be a Successful Engineer.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
HU113: Technical Report Writing
ABET Student Forum September 20, Review of the criterion Criterion 2: Objectives Criterion 3: Outcomes Criterion 5: Curriculum.
13/14 YEAR OLDS: SOCIAL & LANGUAGE Neatness an issue with appearance, not environment Feelings easily hurt Hang out in large groups, but starting to.
MANUFACTURING PROCESSES I IE 351 Lecture 1 Introduction to: »Class Operation, »Course Coverage, »Skill Expectations.
Michael A. Mackey, Ph.D. Dept. of Biomedical Engineering University of Iowa 51:085/51:178 BME Senior Design Class.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR (18 th -27 th November 2013) -MDR Deliverables clearly defined? -Individual team member MDR deliverables.
Case Study Assignment MTT Certification Exam. Graded on four-point scale Purpose – extent to which response addresses the components of the assignment.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Incorporating Engineering Standards in the Major Design Experience William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
Design of a Typical Course s c h o o l s o f e n g I n e e r I n g S. D. Rajan Professor of Civil Engineering Professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering.
CSE 1105 Week 1 CSE 1105 Course Title: Introduction to Computer Science & Engineering Classroom Lecture Times: Section 001 W 4:00 – 4:50, 202 NH Section.
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
HU113_Assignment31 HU113: Technical Report Writing Prof. Abdelsamie Moet Teaching Assistant: Mrs. Rana El-Gohary Fall 2012/13 Pharos University in Alexandria.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Proposed Course: ENG450: Multidisciplinary Design Bob Dennis.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
ECE Assessment Program Information for Teaching Assistants & Senior Tutors Information for Teaching Assistants & Senior Tutors.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Strategic Program Subgroup Meeting December 8, 2016
Continuous Program Improvement
Getting Prepared for the Webinar
Polices, procedures & protocols
Items in red require your input
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
MANUFACTURING PROCESSES I IE 351
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
ORAL UPDATE: WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 20
CTC/MTC 301 Professionalism
Items in red require your input
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Items in red require your input
MAE 4291 UPDATE AND HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT 4
MAE 3291: JUNIOR DESIGN Final Team List Design Showcase Requirements
Development of ABET Syllabus
SEPTEMBER 30 / OCTOBER 1 PRESENTATIONS
Assessment and Accreditation
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
MAE 3291: JUNIOR DESIGN Presentation Review April 7, 2008
MAE 4291: SENIOR DESIGN Presentation Review November 10, 2008
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Miller Date of Presentation: 1/18/2017
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Miller Date of Presentation: 1/18/2017
Keys to Success in Engineering Study
Introduction to Engineering Design II (IE 202)
MAE 3291: JUNIOR DESIGN Presentation Review April 14, 2008
Keys to Success in Engineering Study
Keys to Success in Engineering Study
Objectives & Outcomes Chuck Cone ERAU Oct 30, 2010.
Presentation transcript:

MAE 4291: SENIOR DESIGN Presentation Review October 6, 2008 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida Institute of Technology D. R. Kirk

JUNIOR DESIGN OVERALL PERFORMANCE (3-4.5 SCALE) PANTHER II PIFAS CHANNEL WING HPV GLXP COEUS ARES MAV 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

JUNIOR DESIGN FINAL RANKING PIFAS HPV Channel Wing Panther II COEUS ARES GLXP MAV 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

CHANNEL WING HPV COEUS MAV GLXP PANTHER II ARES PIFAS 1. Team goal, objectives, and specifications are clear and well thought out HPV MAV CHANNEL WING COEUS GLXP ARES PANTHER II PIFAS 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

CHANNEL WING HPV COEUS MAV GLXP PANTHER II ARES PIFAS 2. The team has a good understand of the overall project and the main sub-systems, i.e., they understand the complexity and underlying nature of their proposal. HPV MAV CHANNEL WING COEUS GLXP ARES PANTHER II PIFAS 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

CHANNEL WING HPV COEUS MAV GLXP PANTHER II ARES PIFAS 3. Modeling and calculations that are being attempted make sense at this point, i.e., is this what should be calculated at this point or are they ignoring something more important that should be addressed sooner. HPV MAV CHANNEL WING COEUS GLXP ARES PANTHER II PIFAS 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

4. Modeling and calculations are presented in sufficient detail. HPV MAV CHANNEL WING COEUS GLXP ARES PANTHER II PIFAS 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

CHANNEL WING HPV COEUS MAV GLXP PANTHER II ARES PIFAS 5. The team has presented sufficient evidence that the project or sub-system will succeed. HPV MAV CHANNEL WING COEUS GLXP ARES PANTHER II PIFAS 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

AVERAGE SCORE CHANNEL WING HPV COEUS MAV GLXP PANTHER II ARES PIFAS 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

FINAL RANKING End of Junior Design PIFAS HPV Channel Wing Panther II COEUS ARES GLXP MAV Mid-Term Fall Senior HPV Channel Wing ARES COEUS Panther II PIFAS GLXP MAV PDR Fall Senior FDR Spring Senior 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

SEPTEMBER 30 / OCTOBER 1 PRESENTATIONS Follow-up accountability on mid-term presentations: Fellow students will write down any questions during presentation regarding specific slides (make sure slides are numbered). Write down any question that you orally ask. Questions will be distributed to each team and each team will have one week to answer them. Answer what you feel are good questions Discuss why you think that bad questions are not appropriate or misunderstood Transcribe and address all questions and comments: Due Monday, October 13, 2008 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

WEDNESDAY LECTURE Hazard Analysis (§3.0) with Project Description due to Mr. Greg Peebles Guest Speaker: Mr. Frank Pagano, Boeing/KSC 3 reasons for guest speaker: Job opportunities for graduating seniors Topic that is of issue in industry/work place: communitcation and email ABET: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

DIFFICULT PROGRAM CRITERIA F: An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility. H: Have a broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context. I: Recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning. J: Knowledge of contemporary issues. Not enough to ‘teach’ these topics – must measure! How should we do this? Think of some assignments within the context of senior design to address F, H, I, and J. Mini in-class assignment for Wednesday’s guest lecture. 4/25/2019 MAE 4291

INDIVIDUAL HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT This homework assignment is based on the guest lecture by Mr. Frank Pagano on October 8, 2008, entitled: TEAMWORK AND COMMUNICATION: USE OF EMAIL IN THE AEROSPACE ENGINEERING WORKPLACE Answer the following questions (about 1 paragraph each): What are some items that you learned about effective email communication from the presentation? Specifically, how did this presentation provide new insights into your current and future ‘professional and ethical responsibilities’ when using email as a communication tool? How do you perceive the world of science and engineering is impacted by instantaneous, world-wide communication using email? For example, what do you perceive the global and societal impact of tools like email, internet, video conferencing, etc. to be. Effective communication over email is certainly a contemporary issue, and one that engineers of 10 or 20 years ago did not have to worry about. What are some other examples of contemporary issues that exist today which require unique approaches to communication? For example, how do you think PowerPoint, the internet, spreadsheets, etc., have helped and hindered effective communication? Suggest a few key points that can be extracted from the lecture that provide evidence for the need of an ability to engage in life-long learning. For example, how important is it to stay current and up to date on modern communication tools like email and video conferencing? How can you and your team employ some of the lessons from the lecture in your email communications that are related to senior design? 4/25/2019 MAE 4291