Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marcello Arsura, Min Wu, Gail E Sonenshein  Immunity 
Advertisements

Paula M. Alepuz, Aleksandra Jovanovic, Vladimir Reiser, Gustav Ammerer 
Volume 132, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (July 2005)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Proliferation, Cell Cycle Exit, and Onset of Terminal Differentiation in Cultured Keratinocytes: Pre-Programmed Pathways in Control of C-Myc and Notch1.
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Sue Ann Krause, Joseph V. Gray  Current Biology 
Dietmar E. Martin, Alexandre Soulard, Michael N. Hall  Cell 
Antonia Lopez-Girona, Junko Kanoh, Paul Russell  Current Biology 
Jaehoon Lee, Robyn D. Moir, Kerri B. McIntosh, Ian M. Willis 
Sp1 Is Required for Glucose-Induced Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse Vesicular Glutamate Transporter 2 Gene  Tao Li, Liqun Bai, Jing Li, Suzu Igarashi,
A DNA Damage Response Pathway Controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 Complex
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Sue Ann Krause, Joseph V. Gray  Current Biology 
Volume 136, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Decreased Growth Inhibitory Responses of Squamous Carcinoma Cells to Interferon-γ Involve Failure to Recruit cki Proteins into cdk2 Complexes  Beth L.
Coordinate Regulation of Bacterial Virulence Genes by a Novel Adenylate Cyclase- Dependent Signaling Pathway  Matthew C. Wolfgang, Vincent T. Lee, Meghan.
Shelley Chu, Ira Herskowitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Ashton Breitkreutz, Lorrie Boucher, Mike Tyers  Current Biology 
Yph1p, an ORC-Interacting Protein
Positive-Feedback Loops as a Flexible Biological Module
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Upregulation of Tenascin-C Expression by IL-13 in Human Dermal Fibroblasts via the Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt and the Protein Kinase C Signaling Pathways 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Exportin 1 (Crm1p) Is an Essential Nuclear Export Factor
Positive or Negative Roles of Different Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Pho85-Cyclin Complexes Orchestrate Induction of Autophagy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae 
Keratinocyte growth factor promotes goblet cell differentiation through regulation of goblet cell silencer inhibitor  Dai Iwakiri, Daniel K. Podolsky 
The TOR and EGO Protein Complexes Orchestrate Microautophagy in Yeast
FRAP DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Mediates a Late Signal Transduced from Ultraviolet-Induced DNA Damage  Daniel B. Yarosh, Nicholas Bizios, Jeannie Kibitel,
Linking the Rb and Polycomb Pathways
Sir2 Blocks Extreme Life-Span Extension
The Arrest of Secretion Response in Yeast
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages (April 2002)
Irene Saugar, Alberto Jiménez-Martín, José Antonio Tercero 
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (June 2006)
Terunao Takahara, Tatsuya Maeda  Molecular Cell 
Essential Role of TGF-β Signaling in Glucose-Induced Cell Hypertrophy
TOR signaling regulates microtubule structure and function
Temporal Regulation of Salmonella Virulence Effector Function by Proteasome- Dependent Protein Degradation  Tomoko Kubori, Jorge E. Galán  Cell  Volume.
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Stress-Induced Phosphorylation of S
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Rsk1 mediates a MEK–MAP kinase cell survival signal
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Marcello Arsura, Min Wu, Gail E Sonenshein  Immunity 
Control of Lte1 Localization by Cell Polarity Determinants and Cdc14
Lawrence M. Pfeffer, Andrzej T. Slominski 
Sir2 Blocks Extreme Life-Span Extension
Vidhya Ramachandran, Khyati H. Shah, Paul K. Herman  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 1-7 (October 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
A Direct HDAC4-MAP Kinase Crosstalk Activates Muscle Atrophy Program
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (November 2008)
Condensin and Hmo1 Mediate a Starvation-Induced Transcriptional Position Effect within the Ribosomal DNA Array  Danni Wang, Andres Mansisidor, Gayathri.
Van Q. Nguyen, Carl Co, Kaoru Irie, Joachim J. Li  Current Biology 
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 1607-1613 (December 2003) TOR and PKA Signaling Pathways Converge on the Protein Kinase Rim15 to Control Entry into G0  Ivo Pedruzzi, Frédérique Dubouloz, Elisabetta Cameroni, Valeria Wanke, Johnny Roosen, Joris Winderickx, Claudio De Virgilio  Molecular Cell  Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 1607-1613 (December 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00485-4

Figure 1 Rim15 Is Required for Entry into G0 following TOR Inactivation by Rapamycin (A) DNA content determined by flow cytometry; (B) Northern analysis of indicated genes; (C) glycogen levels (visualized after exposure for 1 min to iodine vapor); and (D) trehalose levels of exponentially growing (OD600 < 0.5) wild-type (JK9-3da; gray bars) and isogenic rim15Δ (IP11; open bars) mutant cells following treatment with rapamycin (0.2 μg ml−1) for the times indicated. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1607-1613DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00485-4)

Figure 2 Transcriptional Activation of Rim15-Controlled Genes following TOR Inactivation Does Not Depend on Known PP2A TOR Effectors and Is Negatively Regulated By PKA SSB1, SSA3, HSP26, and HSP12, or DAL5, PUT1, PYC1, and CIT2 transcript levels were determined in cells growing exponentially at 30°C (tap42-11 mutant at 24°C) on rich medium and treated with rapamycin (0.2 μg ml−1) for the times indicated. The decrease in SSB1 transcript level was used as internal control for rapamycin function. Strains used in (A) were wild-type (SP1), ras2Δ (IP16), and bcy1Δ (T16-11A); in (B) pka− yak1Δ (CDV80-2D) and pka− rim15Δ (CDV80-15A); in (C) wild-type (JK9-3da), sit4Δ (TS64-1a), and tap42-11 (TS54-5a); in (D) wild-type (W303-1A) and rim15Δ (CDV115); and in (E) wild-type (W303-1A), rim15Δ (CDV115), and pph21Δ pph22Δ (YP0607WH). In order to visualize the strong differences between expression of genes in wild-type and pph21Δ pph22Δ cells, Northern blots in (E) were all equally exposed, but for a shorter time than in all other experiments. Strains used in individual panels are isogenic. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1607-1613DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00485-4)

Figure 3 TOR and Sch9 but Not PKA Control Nuclear Localization of Rim15 (A) Localization of GFP-Rim15 in rim15Δ/rim15Δ cells (IP37) carrying a control plasmid (YEp213), a plasmid expressing the rapamycin-resistant TOR1-1 allele, or a plasmid expressing the dominant active RAS2Val19 allele. Cells were grown on SD-medium, treated for 30 min with rapamycin (+rap) or the drug vehicle alone (−rap), and visualized by fluorescence microscopy. DNA was stained with DAPI. (B) Localization of GFP-Rim15 and Msn2-myc9 in a cdc35Δ pde2Δ rim15Δ triple mutant (CDV177-3C). Cells were grown in SD-medium containing 5 mM cAMP (+) and then shifted for 30 min to the same medium without cAMP (−). Msn2-myc9 was detected by indirect immunofluorescence. (C) Rim15 is hyperphosphorylated upon rapamycin treatment. GST-Rim15 from rim15Δ/rim15Δ (IP37), sit4Δ (YPA5H), and sch9Δ (TVH301) cells that were untreated (−) or treated (+) for 20 min with rapamycin was detected by immunoblotting. Whole-cell extracts were incubated with alkaline phosphatase (± phosphatase inhibitors). (D) Localization of GFP-Rim15 in sit4Δ rim15Δ (FD6) and sch9Δ rim15Δ (RJ201) cells. For details see (A). (E) SSB1, SSA3, HSP26, and HSP12 transcript levels were determined in cells growing on rich medium and treated with rapamycin for the times indicated. Strains used were wild-type (W303-1A), sch9Δ (TVH301), rim15Δ (CDV115), and sch9Δ rim15Δ (RJ201). In all experiments, cells were grown exponentially prior to rapamycin treatment (2 μg ml−1 for GFP-Rim15 localization studies and 0.2 μg ml−1 for all other experiments). Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1607-1613DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00485-4)

Figure 4 Glucose Limitation Triggers Hyperphosphorylation and Nuclear Accumulation of Rim15, followed by Induction of Rim15-Dependent SSA3 Transcription (A) Diploid rim15Δ/rim15Δ (IP37) cells carrying a GFP-RIM15 construct were grown in a batch culture on SD-medium and, at the times indicated by the numbered arrows, samples were withdrawn for glucose assays and OD600 determinations (left panel), as well as for GFP-Rim15 localization studies (right panel). Numbers in the right panel refer to the times indicated by the numbered arrows in the left panel. (B) Glucose-limitation-induced SSA3 transcript levels in wild-type (KT1960) cells. Numbers refer to the times and corresponding glucose concentrations indicated by the numbered arrows in (A), left panel. (C) Wild-type strain VW1 expressing Rim15-myc13 was grown in a batch culture and samples were withdrawn for immunodetection of Rim15-myc13 at different time points. Numbers refer to the times and corresponding glucose concentrations indicated by the numbered arrows in (A), left panel. (D) TOR, via a Sit4-independent mechanism, and Sch9 promote cytoplasmic retention and/or nuclear exclusion of the PKA target Rim15. Arrows and bars denote positive and negative interactions, respectively. Notably, in exponentially growing cells, the cytoplasm hosts low levels of Bcy1 and hence primarily free, active PKA, while the inactive PKA/Bcy1 holoenzyme appears predominantly in the nucleus (Griffioen et al., 2000). Consequently, PKA-mediated inhibition of Rim15 activity is presumably lower in the nucleus than in the cytoplasm. Gray symbols denote low activity levels of the corresponding proteins. TOR and Sch9, according to the simplest interpretation of our results, control Rim15 localization via two different mechanisms. Sch9 may impinge directly or indirectly on Rim15 localization. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1607-1613DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00485-4)