IR Summary M. Sullivan For

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.
Advertisements

Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
1 Super-B Factory Scenarios John Seeman Assistant Director PPA Directorate SLAC SLUO Meeting September 11, 2006.
MAC Review December 13-15, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee meeting December 13-15,
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 IR Upgrade M. Sullivan 1 PEP-II Interaction Region Upgrade M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory Workshop Hawaii.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.
Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B.
SuperB Meeting, May 2008 Status of the magnetic design of the first quadrupole (QD0) for the SuperB interaction region S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole.
IR summary M. Sullivan Nov. 3, 2011 JLAB MEIC IR workshop.
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2004 PEP-II IR M. Sullivan 1 Interaction Region of PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC MDI workshop January 6-8, 2005.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
Interaction Region Issues M. Sullivan for the EIC User Group Meeting Jan. 6-9, 2016.
Cherrill Spencer, SLAC. MDI Workshop Jan '05 1 Impact of Crossing Angle Value on Magnets near the IP Overview of several unusual quadrupole designs that.
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
SLAC Accelerator Development Program: SuperB Mike Sullivan OHEP Accelerator Development Review January 24-26, 2011.
ILC IP SR and PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC IR engineering workshop IRENG07 Sept 17-21, 2007.
Joint Belle SuperB Background Meeting Feb 9 – 10, 2012 SuperB SR bkgds 1 SR Backgrounds in SuperB M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni,
Initial Study of Synchrotron Radiation Issues for the CEPC Interaction Region M. Sullivan SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory for the CEPC14 Workshop.
SuperB Meeting XVII May 28 – June 2, 2011 IR design status 1 IR Design Status and Update M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
SuperB Gen meeting Oct 5-9, 2009 IR Interface 1 IR Interface Issues M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni, P. Raimondi, et al.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
M Sullivan SuperB Workshop Elba, Italy May 31 - Jun 3, 2008
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting
MDI Issues M. Sullivan For
M. Sullivan SuperB General Meeting Perugia, Italy June 15-20, 2009
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
The Interaction Region
SuperB General Meeting XI
M. Sullivan SuperB XIII June 1-4, 2010 Elba, Italy
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
The MDI at CEPC Dou Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Huamin Qu, Jianli Wang, Manqi Ruan, Qinglei Xiu, Sha Bai, Shujin Li, Weichao Yao, Yanli Jin, Yin Xu, Yiwei Wang,
IR Summary M. Sullivan SuperB General Meeting XII
E. Paloni, S. Bettoni, R. Pantaleo, M Biagini, et al.
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
2nd Workshop on a Super B-Factory INFN-LNF, Frascati, Italy
The IR beam pipe M. Sullivan For
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
IR Design Update M. Sullivan For
Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory
Accelerator Overview M
IR Summary M. Sullivan For
CEPC main ring magnets’ error effect on DA and MDI issues
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Local double ring MDI Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
IR Summary M. Sullivan For
Summary of Washington DOE Review
IR Lattice with Detector Solenoid
Super-B Accelerator Overview
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni,
SuperB Accelerator Overview
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
IR Beam Transport Status
Summary of the FCCee IR Workshop Jan 2017 at CERN
Energy Changes and the IR
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit
IR/MDI requirements for the EIC
SR Background Update for JLEIC
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

IR Summary M. Sullivan For M. Boscolo, K. Bertsche, E. Paoloni, S. Bettoni, F. Bosi, P. Fabbricatore, S. Farinon, N. Carmignani, P. Raimondi, M. Biagini, P. Vobly, I. Okunev, A. Novokhatski, S. Weathersby, R. Cenci, A. Perez, et al. SuperB General Meeting XVII La Biodola, Isola d’Elba, Italy May 28 - June 2, 2011

Outline Current IR design Beam backgrounds QD0 (and QF1) Vibration budget and control MDI issues (in case Eugenio missed something) and the next steps in the design Summary

Present Parameters (V12 lattice)

Parameters used in the IR designs Parameter HER LER Energy (GeV) 6.70 4.18 Current (A) 1.89 2.45 Beta X* (mm 26 32 Beta Y* (mm 0.253 0.205 Emittance X (nm-rad) 2.00 2.46 Emittance Y (pm-rad) 5.0 6.15 Sigma X (m) 7.21 8.87 Sigma Y (nm) 36 36 Crossing angle (mrad) +/- 30

General IR Design Features Crossing angle is +/- 30 mrads Cryostat has a complete warm bore Both QD0 and QF1 are super-conducting PM in front of QD0 Soft upstream bend magnets Further reduces SR power in IP area BSC to 30 in X and 100 in Y (7 fully coupled) SR scanned to 20 in X and 45 in Y

Air-Core “Italian” Design The shared QD0 and QF1 parts of the VP design are the air-core design The QD0 and QF1 are parallel to the detector axis Then we have the same field strengths and the LER and HER pieces are the same strength as the VP design

Air core “Italian” QD0, QF1

SR backgrounds No photons strike the physics window We trace the beam out to 20 X and 45 Y The physics window is defined as +/-4 cm for a 1 cm radius beam pipe Photons from particles at high beam sigmas presently strike 7-10 cm downstream of the IP However, the highest rate on the detector beam pipe comes from points that are a little farther away This is true for both the vanadium permendur and the air-core design

Beam Backgrounds Manuela Boscolo gave us an update on beam related backgrounds BGB Touschek Coulomb She mentioned that radiative Bhabhas and 2 photon e+e- production are the primary luminosity backgrounds In summary the backgrounds are under control

Collimator settings are about 25-35 

Radiative Bhabhas We had a presentation on backgrounds from radiative bhabhas from Alejandro Perez A great deal of work has gone into simulating the beam line components Magnetic fields but not yet material Some “hot spots” have been identified and more work is needed to see how these might be reduced

Current IR Analysis Status SR backgrounds are under control However need to extend the SR beam scan out to at least 25 and check that the high sigma particle density is high enough SR power inside the cryostats looks manageable Also preliminary look at SR energy penetration Beam-gas, Touschek and Coulomb backgrounds are under control Collimator location ranges are about 25-35 Beta functions are reasonable Vibration control has been studied Preliminary designs for solenoid compensation completed Magnetic fields (Bertsche) Lattice corrections (Nosochkov)

QD0 Work is continuing toward building a prototype QD0 magnet (Eugenio’s talk) Pasquale Fabbricatore and Stefania Farinon from Genoa are helping us design real magnets and cryostats This is a major step forward. The design needs to be shaken down with just this type of work.

E. Paoloni

QD0 Field simulation We had a very interesting presentation on the modeling of the QD0 field by Nicola Carmignani This is a sophisticated simulation and will be very useful for developing more detailed dynamic aperture studies and the effect of the final focus elements on the dynamic aperture From Nicola’s presentation

From Nicola’s presentation Bz By Bx

Vibration Control for the FF and Measurements of the Tor Vergata Site Ground Motion We had two very nice presentations on vibration control and measurements Kirk Bertsche showed further analysis of the FF vibrations Laurent Brunetti showed new data on ground motion measurements at Tor Vergata (John’s talk)

Vibration control for the FF Kirk Bertsche refined his analysis of the vibration issues for the final focus magnets and what we need to achieve in motion control to keep the beams in collision – he now includes tolerances for the rest of the ring One primary conclusion is that the Tor Vergata site is better than the Frascati site for vibration control at the IP In addition, it has occurred to him that the source points for the synchrotron people may turn out to have the most stringent stability requirements – this should be checked

MDI and IR issues Cryostat size W shielding Rapid access Vibration control Cryostat supports SVT supports SVT services and signals These are all inter-related as general MDI issues

IR Permanent magnet design details QD0 and QF1 design details QD0H and QF1H Panofsky style design details Anti-solenoid design details Vacuum cooling, BPMs and assembly

Summary We have a design that is flexible and has good: SR backgrounds Beam backgrounds Lattice functions Beam apertures The design options are: Vanadium Permendur for QD0 and QF1 Parallel air-core dual quads for QD0 and QF1 Both designs include additional vanadium permendur Panofsky quads on the HER

Summary (2) The IR design demonstrates robustness We have two separate QD0 designs The direction of the beams can be either way with a weak preference for the incoming beams to be from the outside rings due to the location of the SR power on the cryostat beam pipe The design has good beam energy flexibility Tau-charm threshold should be rechecked Different boost values

Summary (3) Good progress is being made on the design of the QD0 A prototype of the air-core design is being built This will test the feasibility of the air-core design Design details are encouraging a redesign of the IR – trying to maintain our overall parameter set An overall vibration control design is being developed for the FF magnets. The measurements of the Tor Vergata site are very encouraging and the fact that the beams tend to move together with QD0 motion has significantly loosened the vibration tolerance requirements on cryostat motion

Conclusions The IR design is now getting feedback from design details As engineering concerns are uncovered we will have to make modifications to the design but I believe this design has the room and robustness to respond to these demands