Janet Fulks, ASCCC, Bakersfield College;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Credit by Exam: Time for a Revolution? Erika Endrijonas, Oxnard College Don Gauthier, Los Angeles Valley College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College Barry.
Advertisements

Accreditation Update COLLEGE of Alameda Spring 2015.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
2010 ASCCC Curriculum Institute Santa Clara Marriott July 8-10, 2010 The Basic Map: Course Outlines High quality course outlines are the foundations of.
THE ASSESSMENT TWO-STEP: It’s more than a line dance.
Prerequisites and Content Review ASCCC Curriculum Committee July 2011.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
Syllabus Design and Resources, Part 1
16 OCTOBER 2015 JOACHIN ARIAS, SLO COORDINATOR EDWARD PAI, DEAN OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation.
Integrated Planning = Reacting, Reflecting, Recharging.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Institutional Effectiveness at CPCC DENISE H WELLS.
Minimum Qualifications for Faculty in the California Community Colleges May 5, 2016 CTE Leadership Academy Pre-Conference Session John Stanskas, ASCCC.
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
CURRICULUM and public documents
Lead-Off Batter: Applying New Accjc standards
Vision Statement: Career and Technical Education in Arizona adds so much value to the lives of its citizens and the state’s economy that every parent and.
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
College Academic Vocabulary
Accreditation Self-Study
Hot Topics in Distance Education
Explaining and Communicating Faculty Purview over Curriculum to Board Members and External Stakeholders Larry Galizio, Community College League of California.
Course credit hour definition (7.13)
Creating and Revising Curriculum: The Role of Program Review
Program Review and Integrated Planning: A Conversation About Data
Surviving an Accreditation Visit and other accreditation hot topics
Undergraduate Teaching Assistants (UTAs)
Curriculum & Accreditation: You Can Get There from Here
Why Consider Becoming a Teacher?
Curriculum and Accreditation
October 9, 2015 Daniel Wanner, Los Angeles City College
Stephanie Curry, Reedley College Jarek Janio, Santa Ana College
Curriculum and Accreditation
Program Review 2.0 Training: SLO Assessment Participation Module
Stephanie Curry—Reedley College Alice Taylor—West Los Angeles College
SLOs and Course Objectives
Effective Practices in Accreditation: Standard I Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity Stephanie Curry—Reedley College.
Curriculum Institute, July 13, 2018, 3:45 – 5:00
Faculty Role in AP Credit
Faculty Promotions Information Meeting
Accreditation and curriculum
Prerequisites and Content Review
Program Review Driving Curricular Revisions
On Time….On Task and On a Mission!!
Rebecca Eikey, ASCCC Area C Representative
Berkeley City College Accreditation Follow-up Report Update
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Faculty Leadership and the Role of the ASCCC
Consideration of Core Outcomes for Strategic Plan
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Competency Based Education
Creating Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Faculty Leadership Institute, June 17, 2017, Sacramento Sheraton
The Course Outline of Record
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
Your Senate & Curriculum Issues
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
SLOs, Curriculum, and Other Things that Shape Your Classroom
Craig Rutan, Accreditation and Assessment Committee Chair
Physical Therapist Assistant Program School of Science, Health, and Criminal Justice Fall 2016 Assessment Report Curriculum Coordinator: Deborah Molnar.
Curriculum Coordinator: Janet Parcell Mitchell January 2016
Standard II Randy Beach, ASCCC South Representative Stephanie Droker, Vice-President, ACCJC Deborah Wulff, Vice-President of Academic Affairs, Cuesta College,
Curriculum and Distance Education
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
CURRICULUM AND ACCREDITATION
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Presentation transcript:

Awarding Course and Program Credit Based on Student Attainment of Learning Outcomes Janet Fulks, ASCCC, Bakersfield College; Ginni May, Treasurer ASCCC, Sacramento City College SLO Symposium Jan 25, 2019 Santa Ana

Description ACCJC Standard II.A.9 requires that course credit, degrees, and certificates are awarded based on attainment of learning outcomes. How does your college meet this standard?  Do you know?  How do you (or your college) document evidence of meeting the standard and translate that work into professional development across the institution?  Join us as we discuss and explore the ways in which colleges are meeting this standard. Have attendees jot down some responses… Then move into the next slides by taking a look at some of the ACCJC Standards around SLOs.

ACCJC Eligibility Requirements for Accreditation (June 2014) https://accjc.org/wp-content/uploads/Eligibility-Requirements-Adopted-June-2014.pdf

Concern about “attendance versus learning” Inside Higher Ed Hour by Hour by Paul Fain Sept 2012 (https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/09/05/credit- hour-causes-many-higher-educations-problems-report-finds) The credit hour was not designed to measure or validate learning If we give credit based on time…how do we reject transfer units from other colleges or experience or exams. Learning outcomes derived from the important fact that going to college or a class or training needed to have a significant affect on the participant – measured as a learning outcome. Just attending does not equate to learning. More complications ensue when we check for integrity – we call our units learning outcomes based on time, but do not credit other colleges based upon units or time alone. How do you credit other learning environments and other college credit at your school?

Title 5 §55050 Credit by Examination (a) The governing board of each community college district shall adopt and publish policies and procedures pertaining to credit by examination in accordance with the provisions of this section; (b) The governing board may grant credit to any student who satisfactorily passes an examination approved or conducted by proper authorities of the college. Such credit may be granted only to a student who is registered at the college and in good standing and only for a course listed in the catalog of the community college; and (c) The nature and content of the examination shall be determined solely by faculty in the discipline who normally teach the course for which credit is to be granted;

Learning versus Seat-time Some colleges have experimented with credit by competency-based education Current learning opportunities are broader, more diverse and accessible than ever in history Performance-based credit Competencies are applied to “direct assessment” Now the problem is the test (assessment) From A ‘Disruptive’ Look at Competency-Based Education By Louis Soares Posted on June 7, 2012, 9:00 am https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-postsecondary/reports/2012/06/07/11680/a-disruptive-look-at-competency-based-education/

ASCCC paper Awarding Credit Where Credit is Due: Effective Practices for the Implementation of Credit by Exam (Spring 2014) Credit by exam is a viable way for students to earn college credit. Discipline faculty must be the ones to determine the courses for which credit by exam is available and the means of assessing student mastery of the course content, objectives, and outcomes. Credit by exam is a particularly useful tool for students who have already mastered college course content through previous non-collegiate experiences such as work, life experiences, or military training. Finally, in helping students reach their goals and attain success, it is critical to create pathways whether to four-year institutions, careers, or better jobs, and credit by exam is one possible option. https://www.asccc.org/sites/default/files/Awarding%20Credit%20Where%20Credit%20is%20Due.pdf

ACCJC Standard I SLOs: Key to Mission, Quality, Institutional Effectiveness and Integrity… I.B.1 The institution demonstrates a sustained, substantive and collegial dialog about student outcomes, student equity, academic quality, institutional effectiveness, and continuous improvement of student learning and achievement. I.B.2 The institution defines and assesses student learning outcomes for all instructional programs and student and learning support services. (ER 11) I.B.5 The institution assesses accomplishment of its mission through program review and evaluation of goals and objectives, student learning outcomes, and student achievement. Quantitative and qualitative data are disaggregated for analysis by program type and mode of delivery. I.B.1 – Does your institution really do this? I.B.2 – It is pretty easy to determine whether or to what degree your college does this. I.B.5 – Whew! This one is not so easy…

ACCJC Standard 2 SLOs: Foundational Component of Learning Assessment… II.A.3 The institution identifies and regularly assesses learning outcomes for courses, programs, certificates and degrees using established institutional procedures. The institution has officially approved and current course outlines that include student learning outcomes. In every class section students receive a course syllabus that includes learning outcomes from the institution’s officially approved course outline. II.A.9 The institution awards course credit, degrees and certificates based on student attainment of learning outcomes. Units of credit awarded are consistent with institutional policies that reflect generally accepted norms or equivalencies in higher education. If the institution offers courses based on clock hours, it follows Federal standards for clock-to-credit-hour conversions. (ER 10) II.A.3 – Requires SLOs on CORs, just like Title 5 requires Objectives; on the CORs means they define the standards to what the student is learning II.A.9 – Spells it out – Students receiving course credit, degrees, or certificates are attaining the learning outcomes.

Activity - Homework With a partner or two: Describe how you assess the SLOs in your course Describe how you assess SLOs for degrees or certificates (if you know…) Thinking about your assessment processes that you just described: Do you think it was clear to your partner(s) how course, degree, or certificate credit is based on attainment of the SLOs? Would “it” be clear to your students? Get a temperature check on the room and invite folks to share their responses, if they are comfortable.

Faculty Data on Using the Syllabus for SLOs When asked about assessment of student learning outcomes, most faculty had a similar method of communication to students: the syllabus. However, the assessment of those student learning outcomes varied widely from instructor to instructor. Some faculty use weekly quizzes while others simply stated they assess those outcomes without students knowing they’re doing it. In other words, they use the end of term grades to determine whether SLOs were met. Some specific assessment strategies faculty noted include: Mapping of SLOs by each chapter of the required textbook Requiring student self-evaluation using a pre- and post-assessment method Prompting students with questions like, “why do you think you’re learning this?” and “how do you plan to make it useful? Janet – where did this come from?

Sample Syllabus statement Course Assessment Activities Students in this course will be asked to participate in a variety of course assessment activities. Some of these activities will occur periodically throughout the semester and will not be graded. The goal is to gather evidence to determine whether the course is accomplishing the defined learning outcomes. Some of these activities will assess your own learning skills and some will address teaching strategies; ultimately these assessment activities will contribute to improving the course, enhancing student understanding about learning, and determining whether students are accomplishing the student learning outcomes required to successfully pass the course.

Course Level SLO Assessment Possible methods… Map assessments of student learning with SLOs: Graded Homework Exams Quizzes Projects Papers Other… Create “weighting of assessments” so that students must “pass” all SLOs to pass the class. Discuss and share how this could be done… If degree and certificate SLOs are assessed through mapping with course SLO assessments, then this method would take care of it.

Grading vs. Assessment of Learning Outcomes: What’s the difference? “Assessment of learning can and should rely on or relate to grades, and so far as they do, grades can be a major source of data for assessment. To use grades as the basis for learning outcomes: Decomposed grades into the learning outcomes components and indicators of other behaviors Grades must be based on clearly articulated criteria that are consistently applied and represent learning outcomes Separate or weight grades indicating final, major components of knowledge and skills VillaNova University -https://www1.villanova.edu/content/dam/villanova/vital/vitalinks/gradingvsassessmentoflearningoutcomessheridan.pdf Carnegie Melon University https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/basics/grading-assessment.html

A Process to Convert Grading to Measure Outcomes – not all work is equal Process to convert to Outcomes grading Developmental Final Formative Summative Informal Formal Process Product Sample Weighting for Grading Review/Foundational versus Ultimate Steps versus Assimilated Unpolished, Casual versus Completed Practice versus End Result, Performance Number Assessment Type and Value Total Points 3 Exams @ 100pts (SLOs 1,2,3,4,5) 300 1 Final @ 200 pts. (SLOs 3,4,5) 200 Skills Test (SLOs 1,2) 20 7 Quizzes @ 10pts (lowest dropped) (SLOS 1,2,3,4,5) 70 Short Reports @10 pts. Each (SLOS 1,2,3,4,5) Case Studies @ 30 (SLOs 3,4,5) 90 Projects @ 50 pts. (SLOs 4,5) 50 Final Skills test (SLOS 1,2) Final Team project   Total Points Possible 1000

Questions and Comments

Additional Resources ACCC paper Awarding Credit Where Credit is Due: Effective Practices for the Implementation of Credit by Exam (Spring 2014) https://www.asccc.org/sites/default/files/Awarding%20Credit%20Where%20Credit%20is%20Due.pdf Resolution 09.05 F08 Ensuring the Integrity of Credit by Exam Processes Rostrum Issues Regarding Academic Credit for Veterans and Military Service Members: Doing What Is Best for Students December 2012 Kawaguchi and Short https://asccc.org/content/issues-regarding-academic- credit-veterans-and-military-service-members-doing-what-best ACCJC Eligibility Requirements for Accreditation https://accjc.org/wp-content/uploads/Eligibility- Requirements-Adopted-June-2014.pdf ACCJC Accreditation Standards 2014 https://accjc.org/wp-content/uploads/Accreditation-Standards_- Adopted-June-2014.pdf Grading Versus Assess of Learning Outcomes: What’s the Difference? (VillaNova University) https://www1.villanova.edu/content/dam/villanova/vital/vitalinks/gradingvsassessmentoflearningoutcomesshe ridan.pdf Carnegie Melon University What is the difference between assessment and grading? Carnegie Melon University https://www.cmu.edu/teaching/assessment/basics/grading-assessment.html