Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Darren M Brown, Erkki Ruoslahti  Cancer Cell 
Advertisements

FOG-1 represses GATA-1-dependent FcϵRI β-chain transcription: transcriptional mechanism of mast-cell-specific gene expression in mice by Keiko Maeda, Chiharu.
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
In Vivo Mechanisms of Vaccine-Induced Protection against HPV Infection
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
The Interferon-Inducible MxB Protein Inhibits HIV-1 Infection
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Yu-Hsin Chiu, Jennifer Y. Lee, Lewis C. Cantley  Molecular Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Cellular DDX21 RNA Helicase Inhibits Influenza A Virus Replication but Is Counteracted by the Viral NS1 Protein  Guifang Chen, Chien-Hung Liu, Ligang.
Knockdown of Myosin Va Isoforms by RNAi as a Tool to Block Melanosome Transport in Primary Human Melanocytes  Mireille Van Gele, Barbara Geusens, Anne-Marie.
Rui Pedro Galão, Suzanne Pickering, Rachel Curnock, Stuart J.D. Neil 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Activation of the Innate Signaling Molecule MAVS by Bunyavirus Infection Upregulates the Adaptor Protein SARM1, Leading to Neuronal Death  Piyali Mukherjee,
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Brian Yordy, Norifumi Iijima, Anita Huttner, David Leib, Akiko Iwasaki 
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2011)
The Nogo Receptor NgR1 Mediates Infection by Mammalian Reovirus
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
B Cell Receptor Activation and Chemical Induction Trigger Caspase-Mediated Cleavage of PIAS1 to Facilitate Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation  Kun Zhang,
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Darren M Brown, Erkki Ruoslahti  Cancer Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Phospholipid Scramblase 1 Mediates Type I Interferon-Induced Protection against Staphylococcal α-Toxin  Miroslaw Lizak, Timur O. Yarovinsky  Cell Host.
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (November 2006)
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription  Chia-Hsin.
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
The Actin-Bundling Protein Palladin Is an Akt1-Specific Substrate that Regulates Breast Cancer Cell Migration  Y. Rebecca Chin, Alex Toker  Molecular.
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Urtzi Garaigorta, Francis V. Chisari  Cell Host & Microbe 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA Exonuclease Xrn1 Controls Double-Stranded RNA Accumulation and Anti-Viral Responses  Hannah M. Burgess, Ian Mohr  Cell Host & Microbe 
Vaccinia Virus F11 Promotes Viral Spread by Acting as a PDZ-Containing Scaffolding Protein to Bind Myosin-9A and Inhibit RhoA Signaling  Yutaka Handa,
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages e4 (October 2017)
PU.1 Expression Delineates Heterogeneity in Primary Th2 Cells
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Inhibition of NF-κB in cancer cells converts inflammation- induced tumor growth mediated by TNFα to TRAIL-mediated tumor regression  Jun-Li Luo, Shin.
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 631-641 (November 2016) ICAM-5/Telencephalin Is a Functional Entry Receptor for Enterovirus D68  Wei Wei, Haoran Guo, Junliang Chang, Yingzi Yu, Guanchen Liu, Nannan Zhang, Stephen H. Willard, Shu Zheng, Xiao-Fang Yu  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 631-641 (November 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.013 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 631-641DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Enterovirus D68 Binds Specifically to ICAM-5 (A) Induction of CPEs by EV-D68 in various cell lines. +, more than 50% cell death in virus-infected cultures; −, no observed cell death in virus-infected cultures compared with uninfected cultures. (B) Detection of endogenous ICAM-1 and ICAM-5 mRNA in HEK293T cells and RD cells. Levels of ICAM-1 and ICAM-5 mRNA in HEK293T and RD cells were assessed by qRT-PCR using ICAM-1- or ICAM-5-specific primers. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA was used as an internal control. (C) The immunoglobulin domains are depicted as half circles, and extra- and intra-cellular orientations are indicated by NH2 and COOH on the protein chains, respectively. Red lines indicate the regions of ICAM-1 or ICAM-5 fragments used in this study. N-glycosylation sites on domain 1 (D1) of each ICAM molecule were labeled by green markers. The regions targeted by the shRNA or siRNA are labeled by blue lines. (D) Amino acid sequence alignment of D1 of ICAM-1 and ICAM-5. Amino acids in ICAM-1 that are required for rhinovirus binding are boxed. (E) Schematic of the virion capture assay for the detection of interaction between EV-D68 and ICAM-5. (F) EV-D68 viruses were mixed with 0.1, 1, or 5 μg ICAM-5-Fc or 5 μg Ig-Fc soluble protein at 4°C for 1 hr. Subsequently, 50 μL protein G agarose (Roche) was mixed with each sample for 2 hr. Samples were then washed twice with PBS, and RNA was extracted for qRT-PCR to detect captured EV-D68 RNA. Here and in all other qRT-PCR assays, error bars denote SEM; ANOVA test, n = 3; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 631-641DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 ICAM-5 Is Essential for EV-D68 Infection (A) Stable silencing of ICAM-5 expression. HEK293T cells were transduced with retroviral vectors expressing a control shRNA or an ICAM-5-specific shRNA. Levels of ICAM-5 mRNA in the transduced HEK293T cells were assessed by qRT-PCR using ICAM-5-specific primers. GAPDH mRNA was used as an internal control. The relative level of ICAM-5 mRNA in the control HEK293T cells was set to 100%. (B) Silencing of ICAM-5 expression attenuates EV-D68 replication. HEK293T cells expressing a control shRNA or an ICAM-5-specific shRNA were infected with EV-D68 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.5. Cells were harvested 0, 6, 12, and 24 hr post-infection, and RNA samples were analyzed by qRT-PCR to detect EV-D68 RNA. The non-specific signal for EV-D68 RNA at 0 hr post-infection was set to 1. (C) Silencing of ICAM-5 expression inhibits EV-D68-induced CPEs. Transduced HEK293T cells were infected with equal amounts of EV-D68. 72 hr post-infection, cells were imaged via light microscopy. (D–F) Soluble ICAM-5 inhibits EV-D68 virus infection in permissive cells. EV-D68 viruses were incubated with control-Fc or ICAM5-Fc soluble proteins for 2 hr before infection. Soluble ICAM-5 inhibits EV-D68 viral RNA (vRNA) accumulation (D), viral titers (E), and EV-D68-induced CPEs (F) in HEK293T cells. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 631-641DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 EV-D68 Replicates Efficiently in Vero Cells Expressing ICAM-5 (A) Generation of Vero cells expressing ICAM-5. Vero cells were transduced with a control CDH or an ICAM-5 expression vector using lentiviral transduction systems. Levels of ICAM-5 mRNA (left) were assessed by qRT-PCR using ICAM-5-specific primers. GAPDH mRNA was used as an internal control. The level of ICAM-5 mRNA in control Vero-CDH cells was set to 1. Immunoblot analysis indicates the expression of ICAM-5 proteins (right) in stably transduced Vero-ICAM-5 but not control Vero-CDH cells. (B) Cell surface expression of ICAM-5 in transduced Vero-ICAM-5 cells. Vero-ICAM-5 and control Vero-CDH cells were separately incubated with 1 μg/ml anti-ICAM-5 goat antibody (R&D) for 2 hr and then incubated for 1 hr with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated donkey anti-goat IgG secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were washed three times and then analyzed by flow cytometry. (C) Vero-ICAM-5 and Vero-CDH cells were infected with EV-D68 at an MOI of 0.5. Cells were harvested 6 and 12 hr post-infection. RNA samples were analyzed by qRT-PCR to detected EV-D68 RNA. GAPDH mRNA was used as a control. The signal for the EV-D68 RNA in Vero-CDH cells 6 hr post-infection was set to 1. (D) Relative binding of EV-D68 to Vero-ICAM5 cells. Vero-ICAM5 and Vero-CDH cells were incubated with diluted EV-D68 at 4°C for 2 hr. EV-D68 vRNA of bound viruses was measured by using quantitative real-time RT-PCR. The experiments were done in triplicate. (E) Detection of EV-D68-induced CPE. Vero-ICAM-5 or control Vero-CDH cells were infected with equal amounts of EV-D68, and the CPE was imaged via light microscopy. (F) Determination of infectious viral titers in the culture supernatants of EV-D68-infected Vero-ICAM-5 (purple columns) or Vero-CDH (green columns) cells. (G) Soluble ICAM-5 inhibits EV-D68 virus infection. Vero-ICAM-5 cells were treated with different amounts of ICAM-5-Fc, ICAM-1-Fc, or Ig-Fc and subsequently infected with equal amounts of EV-D68. Cell-associated viral RNA was detected by qRT-PCR 6 hr after infection. The levels of the housekeeping gene GAPDH were used as a control. The level of EV-D68 RNA in the infected Vero-ICAM-5 cells in the presence of 10 μg/mL Ig-Fc control was set to 100%. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 631-641DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 EV-D68 Infection of Primary Cells Is Inhibited by Soluble ICAM-5 Proteins (A) The soluble ICAM-5 fragment inhibits EV-D68 virus infection in primary human bronchial epithelial cells. EV-D68 viruses were incubated with control-Fc or ICAM5-Fc soluble protein for 2 hr before infection. EV-D68 RNA from infected cell samples was determined by qRT-PCR. The levels of the housekeeping gene GAPDH were used as an internal control. The level of EV-D68 RNA in the infected cells treated with Ig-Fc control was set to 100%. Non-specific adsorption of EV-D68-associated RNA with non-permissive Vero cells was used as a negative control. (B) The soluble ICAM-5 fragment inhibits EV-D68 virus infection in primary rat neurons. (C) Schematic of the newborn mouse infection assay for the detection of EV-D68 replication in brain tissue. (D) Soluble ICAM-5 inhibits EV-D68 virus infection in vivo. EV-D68 viruses were incubated with control-Fc or ICAM5-Fc soluble protein for 2 hr before cerebral injection into newborn mice. EV-D68 RNA from the infected tissue was collected at various time points as indicated and determined by qRT-PCR. The level of the mouse housekeeping gene GAPDH was used as an internal control. The level of EV-D68 RNA in the infected tissue treated with the Ig-Fc control was set to 100%. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 631-641DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Cell Surface Sialic Acid Has a Crucial Role in EV-D68 Infection (A–C) HEK293T cells or A172 cells treated with NA or control buffer were infected with EV-D68 viruses. Virus titers (A) and EV-D68-induced CPE in NA-treated HEK293T cells (B) or A172 cells (C) were determined 48 hr post-infection. (D–F) NA-treated Vero-ICAM5 and Vero-CDH cells were challenged by EV-D68 viruses. Virus titers (D) and EV-D68-induced CPE in NA-treated Vero-CDH cells (E) or Vero-ICAM5 cells (F) were determined at 48 hr post-infection. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 631-641DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Asn54-Linked Glycan Is Critical for ICAM-5-Mediated EV-D68 Infection (A) Vero cells stably expressing ICAM-5 wild-type (WT), N54A, or N74A were infected with EV-D68 viruses. Viral titers were measured 48 hr post-infection. (B) Relative binding of EV-D68 to Vero-ICAM5 cells. Vero-ICAM5 WT, Vero-ICAM5 N54A, or Vero-ICAM5 N74A cells were incubated with diluted EV-D68 at 4°C for 2 hr. EV-D68 RNA of bound viruses was measured by real-time qRT-PCR. The experiments were done in triplicate (top). Also shown are immunoblotting results of ICAM5 WT, N54A, and N74A (bottom). (C) Detection of EV-D68-induced CPE. Vero-ICAM-5 WT or mutants were infected with equal amounts of EV-D68, and CPE was imaged via light microscopy. (D) Subcellular location of ICAM-5 WT and N54A protein. Vero-ICAM5 WT cells and Vero-ICAM5 N54A cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with a mouse anti-ICAM5 antibody followed by a secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-mouse antibody. The nuclei were stained with DAPI. The cells were examined by deconvolution microscopy. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 631-641DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 ICAM-5 Is a Functional Receptor for Circulating EV-D68 Strains (A) Effect of neuraminidase treatment on EV-D68 infection. RD cells treated with NA or control buffer were infected with the EV-D68 viruses Fermon, MO, or KY. EV-D68-induced CPE was determined at 48 hr post-infection. (B) Effect of neuraminidase treatment on EV-D68 infection. RD cells treated with NA or control buffer were infected with the EV-D68 viruses Fermon, MO, or KY. The levels of EV-D68 RNA in the infected cells were assessed by qRT-PCR 3 hr after infection. The level of GAPDH mRNA was used as an internal control. The level of EV-D68 RNA in virus-infected control RD cells was set to 100%. (C) Induction of CPE by circulating MO or KY strains of EV-D68 in Vero-ICAM-5 cells. (D and E) ICAM-5 expression enhances EV-D68 MO or KY infection. Vero cells expressing ICAM-5 or ICAM-1 or CDH control cells were challenged with EV-D68 MO or KY separately. The levels of EV-D68 RNA in the infected cells were assessed by qRT-PCR 6 hr after infection with MO (D) or KY (E). The level of GAPDH mRNA was used as an internal control. The background level of EV-D68 RNA in virus-infected Vero-CDH cells was set to 1. (F and G) Inhibition of EV-D68 replication by soluble ICAM-5-Fc. EV-D68 viruses were incubated with ICAM-5-Fc, ICAM-1-Fc, or Ig-Fc control protein for 1 hr before viral infection. Cell-associated EV-D68 RNA was determined at various time points after infection. The level of GAPDH mRNA was used as an internal control. The background level of EV-D68 RNA in Vero-ICAM-5 cells treated with Ig-Fc at 0 hr post-infection was set to 1. Cell Host & Microbe 2016 20, 631-641DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2016.09.013) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions