A BYU Civil and Environmental Engineering Capstone Project by: Charles Connors, Andrew Luna, and Jonathon Archer Parallel Engineering Seattle Temple: Bearing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Shearing Stresses in Beams and Thin-Walled Members
Advertisements

Sample Problem 4.2 SOLUTION:
Beam Design Beam Design Civil Engineering and Architecture
Design of Steel Flexural Members
Concrete Construction Part 1
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures
Composite Beams (cont’d)
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT BEAM
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT Reinforced Concrete Slabs
Chp12- Footings.
Modeling of Composite Steel Floors Using GT STRUDL
Reinforced Concrete Design-8
Lecture 9 - Flexure June 20, 2003 CVEN 444.
CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering
Advanced Flexure Design COMPOSITE BEAM THEORY SLIDES
ANALYSIS OF TWO-WAY SLABS WITH BEAMS
Reinforced Concrete Flexural Members
Shear and Diagonal Tension
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
CEA UNIT 3 TERMS & DEFINITIONS. BEAM A structural member, usually horizontal, that carries a load that is applied transverse to its length.
Chp-6:Lecture Goals Serviceability Deflection calculation
ONE-WAY SLAB. ONE-WAY SLAB Introduction A slab is structural element whose thickness is small compared to its own length and width. Slabs are usually.
Chp.12 Cont. – Examples to design Footings
Section 3 design of post-tensioned components for flexure Developed by the pTI EDC-130 Education Committee lead author: trey Hamilton, University of.
Wall Form Design Example (Continued)
Design of Tension Members
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
Design of Tension Members
BEARING OR CRUSHING Bearing Stresses (Compression Perpendicular to the Grain) Allowable stresses for compression perpendicular to the grain are available.
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
Slab Design.
Reinforced Concrete Design II
Footings.
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
Composite Beams and Columns
University of Palestine
BEAMS AND COLUMNS.
Reading Structural Drawings
Reinforced Concrete Design
BEAMS AND COLUMNS PRESENTED BY K.ROSHIN RUKSHANA.
Jurg Conzett – Traversina Bridge
FOOTINGS. FOOTINGS Introduction Footings are structural elements that transmit column or wall loads to the underlying soil below the structure. Footings.
Chapters Project title : Hirbawi Center A building lies in the east side of Tulkarm, this building consists of five stories of ( m 2 ) A building lies.
1 Design and drawing of RC Structures CV61 Dr. G.S.Suresh Civil Engineering Department The National Institute of Engineering Mysore Mob:
Structural Design of Movenpick Hotel
Umm Al-Qura University Department of Civil & Structural Engineering 1 Design of reinforced concrete II Design of Flat Slab Floors Lecture (3)
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement
BEAMS: Beams are structural members that can carry transverse loads which produce bending moments & shear force. Girders: Main load carrying members into.
Beam Design Beams are designed to safely support the design loads.
CESL Hotel Unique – Toronto Chris O’Brien Eric Fraser Scotia Mabury
Practical Design of PT Buildings
Look first at Out of Plane Loads Need to account for openings
PCI 6 th Edition Lateral Component Design. Presentation Outline Architectural Components –Earthquake Loading Shear Wall Systems –Distribution of lateral.
Kenneth O’Neill Experimental Investigation of Circular Concrete Filled Steel Tube Geometry on Seismic Performance.
Building Construction
Dr Badorul Hisham Abu Bakar
An-Najah National University Faculty of Engineering
786 Design of Two Way floor system for Flat Plate Slab
Outline: Introduction: a ) General description of project b) Materials
(i) proper arrangement of reinforcing bars and
Lecture 39 - Design of Two-Way Floor Slab System
FOR 5TH SEMESTER DIPLOMA IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
786 Design of Two Way Floor System for Slab with Beams
Design Ribbed and Flat Slabs
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT Reinforced Concrete Slabs
An Najah National University Submitted to : Dr.Munther Diab .
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم RaRami Abu Baker An- Najah National University
Presentation transcript:

A BYU Civil and Environmental Engineering Capstone Project by: Charles Connors, Andrew Luna, and Jonathon Archer Parallel Engineering Seattle Temple: Bearing Column Replacement

Where is the column we are replacing?

Existing Condition The column is currently located in a less than ideal spot.

The Problem The chapel in the baptistry of the LDS Seattle Temple has large column in the center of the view to the font. View from the chapel Existing Condition

Proposed Solution #1: Short Span Our proposed solution is to move the column load out to two smaller columns six feet in from the outside walls. View from the chapel Fourth Points

Proposed Solution #2: Long Span The column might also be supported by a much heavier beam that would span from wall to wall. View from the chapel Full Span

Short Span 3D View

Column Loads The un-factored loads on the structure are: Dead:135.7 kips Live:81.5 kips Snow:2.3 kips Rain:12 kips Earthquake (-Y):1557 kips Earthquake (+Y):1387 kips A shear wall above the column is imposing very large earthquake loads. These loads obviously govern our design. Calculations of these loads are shown on the following slides.

Seismic Loading Based on the pertinent seismic design criteria, we calculated and distributed a base shear force. The base shear force approximates the effects of a seismic event on the building.

Diaphragm Distribution Based on the stiffness of the individual wall segments, the earthquake forces were distributed to each of the walls. The diaphragm was assumed to be rigid and torsional moments were included in the analysis. The shear wall in question had a maximum shear force of 475 kips.

Shear Wall Overturning Moment The compression/tension reactions required to prevent the shear wall from overturning are calculated to be 1557 kips. By summing moments about bottom right corner; Total earthquake effects are: Using Load combinations #5&6 our total column forces are:

Beam Analysis Using software, we designed possible beams to carry the loads that would be exerted at the location where the column comes down from above. The beam was modelled as simply supported with point loads at the middle.

Beam Options PROPOSED SOLUTION #1: SHORT SPAN Beam Length:13 ft. Beam Depth:26.5 in. Beam Weight:5.4 kips. Service Load Deflection:0.04 in. Deflection ratio:L/3900 PROPOSED SOLUTION #2: LONG SPAN Beam Length:29 ft. Beam Depth:26.5 in. Beam Weight:23 kips. Service Load Deflection:0.281 in. Deflection ratio:L/1200

Existing Column to Beam Connection Our calculations showed that the existing column was limited in its tensile strength. Using the tensile capacity of the existing rebar we established a conservative value for the maximum uplift that could be transferred to the beam. Assuming the rebar could possibly sustain a stress of 1.25fy (ACI 318). Uplift capacity of existing column Uplift capacity of new column

Existing Column to Beam Connection A connection with adequate tension capacity was designed to connect the new beam to the existing column from above.

Steel Column Possible column shapes are shown: W14X82Width: 10.1 W12X79Width: 12.1 W10X77Width: 10.2 HSS12X12X5/8Width: 12 HSS14X5/8Width: 14 HSS10X10X5/8 Width: 10 (with 5ksi concrete fill)

Baseplate Design

Foundation Column & Footing Column Size: 24 in. X 24 in. X 12 ft. Footing Size: 7.0 ft. X 7.0 ft. X 2 ft. 3 in.

Foundation Column Cross Section: 24 in. X 24 in. Use (8) No. 11 bars Ties: No. 22 in. O.C.

Footing Area: 7 ft. X 7 ft. Thickness: 2 ft. 3 in. No. 6 8 in. O.C. Plan ViewSection View

Removing Existing Wall Foundation

Constructability – Long Span (29ft.) The long beam option cannot be maneuvered into place without significant changes to the laundry room. Removing walls adjoining the engineers offices is not an option because they contain concrete shear walls. Baptistry

Constructability – Short Span (13ft.) The shorter beam option can be maneuvered into place simply by moving the large tables in the laundry room. It is also 16 kips lighter.

Cost Estimate - Short Span CategoryCostMan Hours Demolition & Protection$51, Concrete$53, Metals$77, Openings & Finishes$51, Fire Suppression, Plumbing, HVAC, & Electrical$34, Earthwork$166, Total$434,

Questions?