Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Advertisements

Anthony R. Gendall, Yaron Y. Levy, Allison Wilson, Caroline Dean  Cell 
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
Spatial Auxin Signaling Controls Leaf Flattening in Arabidopsis
RNA-directed transcriptional gene silencing in plants can be inherited independently of the RNA trigger and requires Met1 for maintenance  Louise Jones,
PCS1 functions in gametogenesis and embryogenesis.
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
A MAPKK Kinase Gene Regulates Extra-Embryonic Cell Fate in Arabidopsis
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Annexin5 Is Essential for Pollen Development in Arabidopsis
MicroRNA Regulation of NAC-Domain Targets Is Required for Proper Formation and Separation of Adjacent Embryonic, Vegetative, and Floral Organs  Allison.
Arabidopsis Transcription Factor Genes NF-YA1, 5, 6, and 9 Play Redundant Roles in Male Gametogenesis, Embryogenesis, and Seed Development  Jinye Mu,
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Xiaofeng Cao, Steven E. Jacobsen  Current Biology 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
The Mouse Spo11 Gene Is Required for Meiotic Chromosome Synapsis
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages (May 2004)
Efrat Avigad Laron, Emil Aamar, David Enshell-Seijffers 
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
John F. Golz, Emma J. Keck, Andrew Hudson  Current Biology 
WEREWOLF, a MYB-Related Protein in Arabidopsis, Is a Position-Dependent Regulator of Epidermal Cell Patterning  Myeong Min Lee, John Schiefelbein  Cell 
HUA1 and HUA2 Are Two Members of the Floral Homeotic AGAMOUS Pathway
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 13, Pages (July 2005)
Mobile 24 nt Small RNAs Direct Transcriptional Gene Silencing in the Root Meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana  Charles W. Melnyk, Attila Molnar, Andrew.
Volume 18, Issue 24, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
NRGA1, a Putative Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier, Mediates ABA Regulation of Guard Cell Ion Channels and Drought Stress Responses in Arabidopsis  Chun-Long.
Volume 19, Issue 15, Pages (August 2009)
BRCA2 Is Required for Homology-Directed Repair of Chromosomal Breaks
FLS2 Molecular Cell Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages (August 2003)
The PHANTASTICA Gene Encodes a MYB Transcription Factor Involved in Growth and Dorsoventrality of Lateral Organs in Antirrhinum  Richard Waites, Harinee.
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (July 1996)
DNA Topoisomerase VI Is Essential for Endoreduplication in Arabidopsis
A Novel Class of MYB Factors Controls Sperm-Cell Formation in Plants
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
The Arabidopsis Transcription Factor AtTCP15 Regulates Endoreduplication by Modulating Expression of Key Cell-cycle Genes  Li Zi-Yu , Li Bin , Dong Ai-Wu.
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (May 2008)
CARPEL FACTORY, a Dicer Homolog, and HEN1, a Novel Protein, Act in microRNA Metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana  Wonkeun Park, Junjie Li, Rentao Song,
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
HP1 Is Essential for DNA Methylation in Neurospora
Physcomitrella patens Auxin-Resistant Mutants Affect Conserved Elements of an Auxin- Signaling Pathway  Michael J. Prigge, Meirav Lavy, Neil W. Ashton,
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Targeted Stimulation of Meiotic Recombination
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (July 2008)
MicroRNA Binding Sites in Arabidopsis Class III HD-ZIP mRNAs Are Required for Methylation of the Template Chromosome  Ning Bao, Khar-Wai Lye, M.Kathryn.
Control of PHERES1 Imprinting in Arabidopsis by Direct Tandem Repeats
Doris Wagner, Elliot M. Meyerowitz  Current Biology 
Arabidopsis RPA2: A Genetic Link among Transcriptional Gene Silencing, DNA Repair, and DNA Replication  Taline Elmayan, Florence Proux, Hervé Vaucheret 
Wang Long , Mai Yan-Xia , Zhang Yan-Chun , Luo Qian , Yang Hong-Quan  
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 891-901 (December 2003) Imprinting of the MEA Polycomb Gene Is Controlled by Antagonism between MET1 Methyltransferase and DME Glycosylase  Wenyan Xiao, Mary Gehring, Yeonhee Choi, Linda Margossian, Hong Pu, John J. Harada, Robert B. Goldberg, Roger I. Pennell, Robert L. Fischer  Developmental Cell  Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 891-901 (December 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00361-7

Figure 1 Effect of dme and dme Suppressor Mutations on Seed Viability Siliques were dissected and photographed 14 days after self-pollination. The scale bars represent 0.5 mm. Arrows indicate aborted seeds. Siliques shown in (D) and (E) were F1 progeny from a self-pollinated plant heterozygous for DME/dme-1 and heterozygous for the dme suppressor (line 1424 described in Experimental Procedures). (A) Wild-type silique. (B) Heterozygous DME/dme-1 silique. (C) Silique is heterozygous for DME/dme-1 and heterozygous for the dme suppressor mutation. (D) Silique is heterozygous for DME/dme-1 and homozygous for the dme suppressor mutation. (E) Silique is homozygous for the dme suppressor mutation. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 891-901DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00361-7)

Figure 2 dme Suppressor Mutations Reside in the MET1 Gene (A) Map-based cloning of a dme suppressor mutant allele. The position of the MET1 gene relative to SSLP molecular markers, and the number of recombinants between the dme suppressor (met1-5) and molecular markers, are shown. (B) Position of met1 alleles relative to conserved domains in the MET1 protein. The MET1 amino-terminal regulatory domain includes a nuclear localization signal (NLS), a sequence for targeting MET1 enzyme to DNA replication foci, a plant-specific acidic region of glutamic and aspartic acid residues, and lysine/glycine repeats by which the regulatory domain is fused to the catalytic domain. The catalytic domain has eight of ten conserved motifs found in prokaryotic DNA methyltransferases (Posfai et al., 1989). The codon (UGG) for tryptophan at position 436 was mutated to a stop codon in the met1-6 (UAG) and met1-8 (UGA) mutant alleles. met1-5 and met1-7 missense mutations altered the amino acid sequence in conserved motifs VIII and IX, respectively. (C) Comparison of motif VIII and motif IX domains among DNA methyltransferases. The positions of the met1-5 and met1-7 mutations in the conserved motifs are shown. M. HhaI, Haemophilus haemolyticus methylase (GenBank accession number P05102); MTase, Bacillus subtilis phages φ3T DNA methyltransferase (accession number CTBPPT); MmDnmt1, Mus musculus DNA methyltransferase 1 (accession number P13864); HsDNMT1, Homo sapiens DNA methyltransferase 1 (accession number NP_001370); AtMET1, Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methyltransferase 1 (accession numbers AT5G49160 and AF139372). (D) The met1-5 and met1-6 mutations result in genome hypomethylation. DNA was isolated from seedlings and digested with HpaII, blotted, and hybridized to a probe complementary to the 180 base pair centromere repeats (Kankel et al., 2003). Seedlings were homozygous for the indicated mutant alleles. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 891-901DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00361-7)

Figure 3 Developmental Abnormalities in Homozygous dme-1 met1-6 Plants Heterozygous DME/dme-1 MET1/met1-6 plants were self-pollinated, F1 homozygous dme-1 met1-6 plants were self-pollinated, and phenotypes of F2 homozygous dme-1 met1-6 plants were analyzed. (A) Siliques from wild-type and homozygous dme-1 met1-6 plants. wt, wild-type. The scale bar represents 2 mm. (B) Dissected homozygous dme-1 met1-6 silique showing ovule converted to leaf-like (lel) structures connected by a funiculus (f) to the placenta. The scale bar represents 0.5 mm. (C) Scanning electron micrograph of homozygous dme-1 met1-6 ovules converted to leaf-like structures with stigmatic papilla (sp). The scale bar represents 50 μm. (D) Flower (fl) emerging from a mature homozygous dme-1 met1-6 silique (sl). The scale bar represents 2 mm. (E) Influorescence shoot (in) with cauline leaves (cl) and flowers (fl) emerging from a mature dme-1 met1-6 silique (sl). The scale bar represents 2 mm. (F) Generation of primary (1°sl), secondary (2°sl), and tertiary (3°sl) siliques in a dme-1 met1-6 homozygous plant. The scale bar represents 2 mm. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 891-901DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00361-7)

Figure 4 MET1 and DME Genes Antagonistically Regulate MEA RNA Accumulation RNA was isolated from developing floral buds (stage 1–12) and open flowers (stage 13). The approximate level of MEA RNA was determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR as described (Choi et al., 2002). Floral stages are as described (Bowman, 1994). Plants were homozygous for the indicated mutant alleles. WT, wild-type. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 891-901DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00361-7)

Figure 5 MET1 and DME Genes Antagonistically Regulate MEA Promoter Activity The GFP and chlorophyll fluorescence was converted to green and red, respectively. (A–C) Fluorescence micrographs of stage 12 ovules. Arrows point to central cells. The genotype of the plant is shown above the fluorescence micrographs. The scale bars represent 0.04 mm. (D–F) Fluorescence micrographs of seeds photographed 24 hr after a cross with wild-type pollen. The genotype of the pistil donor is shown above the fluorescence micrographs. The scale bars represent 0.16 mm. (G–I) Fluorescence micrographs of seeds photographed 90 hr after a cross with wild-type pollen. The genotype of the pistil donor is shown above the fluorescence micrograph. The scale bars represent 0.32 mm. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 891-901DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00361-7)

Figure 6 Pattern of DNA Methylation in the MEA Promoter Percentage of CpG (A) and non-CpG (B) methylation in three regions of the MEA promoter isolated from wild-type and met1-6 mutant seeds. (C) shows converted and nonconverted CpG sites in the sequenced clones in the three regions. Methylated and unmethylated cytosines are indicated by black and white circles, respectively. Number of sequences is relative to the translation start site of MEA. Developmental Cell 2003 5, 891-901DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00361-7)