Global Elemental Maps of the Moon: The Lunar Prospector Gamma-Ray Spectrometer by D. J. Lawrence, W. C. Feldman, B. L. Barraclough, A. B. Binder, R. C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact Cratering Dating Nathan Marsh. Relative Dating Simple but not as informative Measures the crater densities (craters per square kilometer) Generally.
Advertisements

Mapping Earth’s Surface
+ Craters in Younger Lunar Mare Units Seen in LROC NAC Images Hallie Gengl Mark Robinson Ernest Bowan-Ciscneros Reinhold Povilaitis Space Grant Symposium.
Thicknesses of and Primary Ejecta Fractions in Basin Ejecta Deposits Larry A. Haskin and William B. McKinnon Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences,
Mapping Earth's Surface Review and Assessment Answers
The Moon Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 13.
Malapert Mountain as a Lunar Outpost Paul Lowman Planetary Geodynamics Lab Title Slide.
Unraveling the History of the Moon
Lunar Observations of Changes in the Earth’s Albedo (LOCEA) Alexander Ruzmaikin Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology in collaboration.
PSRDPSRD presents A Farside Geochemical Window into the Moon Dewar area Thorium concentrations are highest on.
Latitude and Longitude
Earth Science System Energy Constructive Force Destructive Force
2.1 Latitude and Longitude
The Sun. OUR STAR 34 Earth days to rotate at Poles 25 Earth days to rotate at Equator.
Chapter 3 Test Review.
Solar spectrum, J. W. Draper 1840 John W. Draper ( ) Henry Draper ( ) Courtesy of Smithsonian Institution.
Using Maps and Globes.
EXPLORING THE EARTH.
Chapter 3 Models of Earth.
Chapter 3 Section 1- Finding Locations on Earth
Development and evaluation of Passive Microwave SWE retrieval equations for mountainous area Naoki Mizukami.
Chapter 11: Section 3 Exploring Earth’s Moon. The First First Spacecraft: Luna (Russian) First to take pictures 1959 When was Sputnik Launched?
Models of the Earth Chapter 3. Ch03\80017.html.
Page 1 HEND science after 9 years in space. page 2 HEND/2001 Mars Odyssey HEND ( High Energy Neutron Detector ) was developed in Space Research Institute.
Topographic Maps  Two-dimensional representation of a Three-dimensional surface.  Coordinate systems  Latitude/Longitude (spherical)  Universal Transverse.
MOON.
Locating Positions on the Earth’s Surface
EPITHERMAL FLUX DEPRESION AND PSR IN SHOEMAKER CRATER V.V.Shevchenko 1, I.G.Mitrofanov 2, E.A.Kozlova 1, A.A. Shangaraev 1, and the LEND Science Team 1.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
Measuring Latitude and Longitude. Absolute Location Exact location –Determined by measuring latitude & longitude –Latitude always written first (Latitude,
The Science of Map Making.  Separates the Earth into 2 halves a) Northern Hemisphere b) Southern Hemisphere.
Arecibo Radar Mapping of the Lunar Poles: A Search for Ice Deposits by N. J. S. Stacy, D. B. Campbell, and P. G. Ford Science Volume 276(5318):
Randy L. Korotev, Ryan A. Zeigler, & Bradley L. Jolliff Do we have a
Topographic & Geologic Maps Plus: Latitude and Longitude!
EARTH SCIENCE 6 th Grade. The Earth System  System: a group of parts that work together as a whole.  Energy allows Earth to work as a system as it moves.
Review Game #5. Match to description Scale Absolute Location Latitude Lines Longitude Lines Relative Location Map Distortion Mercator Robinson Polar.
 Cartography – science of mapmaking  Equator circles Earth halfway between the north and south poles ◦ Separates Earth into 2 equal halves (hemispheres)
Ice At the Moon - How the Moon Mineralogy Mapper on Chandrayaan-1 Will Help Noah E. Petro NASA Goddard Space Flight Center March 4 th, 2009.
Maps and Globes are Models of Earth Section 1.2. Maps and Globes A map is a flat model of the surface of the Earth It is the “Bird’s eye view” of an area.
Earth Science Chapter 2. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $100 Earth’s.
Projection Identification
Chapter 11: The Sun-Earth-Moon System
Mapping Chapter 2.
Chapter 3 Models of the Earth
Key Vocabulary Eclipse Vocabulary Annular eclipse Annulus Penumbra
A Sample from an Ancient Sea of Impact Melt
How do maps help us model the Earth?
FOLLOWING THE ASTRONAUTS
Mapping Our World Cartography What is the equator? Latitude
03/30/16 The moon has much lower average density than Earth or the other terrestrial planets & almost no core. It’s a lot like Earth’s mantle.
Water on Mars Dirty Ice or Icy Dirt?
Chapter 3 Models of the Earth
Unit 1 Structure of the Earth
Mark J. Costello, Chhaya Chaudhary  Current Biology 
A Bacterium That Can Grow by Using Arsenic Instead of Phosphorus
Two-Dimensional Substructure of MT Receptive Fields
Age Rules The ages of rocks from the lunar highlands vary widely, making it difficult to test ideas for early lunar differentiation and crust formation.
Mapping Our World.
Improved Gravity Field of the Moon from Lunar Prospector
by Asaf Inbal, Jean Paul Ampuero, and Robert W. Clayton
by W. R. Binns, M. H. Israel, E. R. Christian, A. C. Cummings, G. A
Fig. 6 Relation between Q and other impact indicators.
Mapping Earth’s Surface
Fluxes of Fast and Epithermal Neutrons from Lunar Prospector: Evidence for Water Ice at the Lunar Poles by W. C. Feldman, S. Maurice, A. B. Binder, B.
The Mars Pathfinder Atmospheric Structure Investigation/Meteorology (ASI/MET) Experiment by J. T. Schofield, J. R. Barnes, D. Crisp, R. M. Haberle, S.
by W. R. Binns, M. H. Israel, E. R. Christian, A. C. Cummings, G. A
by Naoki Uchida, Takeshi Iinuma, Robert M
by Andreas Keiling, Scott Thaller, John Wygant, and John Dombeck
Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of earthquake density derived from a catalog spanning 93 nights of the LB Array data set. Spatial distribution of earthquake.
Presentation transcript:

Global Elemental Maps of the Moon: The Lunar Prospector Gamma-Ray Spectrometer by D. J. Lawrence, W. C. Feldman, B. L. Barraclough, A. B. Binder, R. C. Elphic, S. Maurice, and D. R. Thomsen Science Volume 281(5382):1484-1489 September 4, 1998 Published by AAAS

Figure 1 LP gamma-ray spectra plotted as number of counts per 32 s versus energy. LP gamma-ray spectra plotted as number of counts per 32 s versus energy. The top panel shows an average of all 356,691 gamma-ray spectra collected during the first 5 months of the mission. Because more spectra have been taken at the lunar poles, the counts in the all-moon spectrum are weighted toward the poles. The bottom panel shows spectra taken for two different lunar regions. The plot for the Imbrium Region is the average of 2694 spectra taken from 30°W to 10°W and 20°N to 40°N within Mare Imbrium. This region is known for being rich in basalts and KREEP-rich material. The plot labeled Joule Region is the average of 2677 spectra taken from 150°W to 130°W and 15°N to 30°N. The Joule crater (located at 145°W, 25°N) is located in the lunar highlands which are mainly anorthositic. D. J. Lawrence et al. Science 1998;281:1484-1489 Published by AAAS

Figure 2 (top). (top). Color-coded map of the log of the thorium counting rate as measured by the LP GRS. The bottom panel shows a Mercator projection for latitudes of 45°S to 45°N, and the top panel shows stereographic projections for latitudes of 45° to 90° at the north and south poles. The data are binned into equal area pixels that have a size of 5° latitude by 5° longitude at the equator. Contours of albedo data taken from Clementine data (11) are shown for latitudes between 70°S and 70°N. D. J. Lawrence et al. Science 1998;281:1484-1489 Published by AAAS

Figure 4 Lunar nearside and farside orthographic maps of the log of the thorium counting rate. Lunar nearside and farside orthographic maps of the log of the thorium counting rate. The nearside map is centered on Mare Imbrium and the farside map is centered on the antipode to Mare Imbrium. The color scale and albedo contours are the same as Fig. 2. This projection shows that the farside thorium maximum is close to the antipode of the local minimum within Mare Imbrium. D. J. Lawrence et al. Science 1998;281:1484-1489 Published by AAAS

Figure 5 The highlands thorium distribution as a function of distance from the Imbrium impact point from the LP GRS data (closed circles) and the model curves of Haskin (14). The highlands thorium distribution as a function of distance from the Imbrium impact point from the LP GRS data (closed circles) and the model curves of Haskin (14). The highlands regions for the LP data in this figure were selected using Clementine albedo data (11). The upper and lower model curves are based on the largest (485 km) and smallest (335 km) estimation of the Imbrium transient crater and are calculated as the percentage of primary material ejected from Imbrium. Because the LP data are counts and not absolute abundances, the data have been slightly scaled to fall between the Haskin curves in the range of less than 1500 km. D. J. Lawrence et al. Science 1998;281:1484-1489 Published by AAAS

Figure 6 Plot of potassium counting rate versus thorium counting rate as measured by the LP GRS. D. J. Lawrence et al. Science 1998;281:1484-1489 Published by AAAS

Figure 7 Plot of measured LP thorium counting rate versus derived soil abundances in parts per million (ppm) for various landing sites. Plot of measured LP thorium counting rate versus derived soil abundances in parts per million (ppm) for various landing sites. The soil measurements are taken from the data set of Korotev (16) who tabulated extreme high and low values for each Apollo site (no ranges were given for the Luna data because the samples were all taken from a single core). Although the symbols are plotted at the midpoint values between the extremes, they do not necessarily represent the average value for the site. The LP measurements are taken from the 150 by 150 km pixel covering each landing site. The uncertainty of the LP measurements due to counting statistics is approximately the size of the plotting symbols. The symbols for the different landing sites are as follows: ×, Apollo 11; □, Apollo 12; •, Apollo 14; ♦, Apollo 15; ▴, Apollo 16; ○, Apollo 17; +, Luna 16; ⋄, Luna 20; ▪, Luna 24; ⊗, maximum LP thorium counting rate. D. J. Lawrence et al. Science 1998;281:1484-1489 Published by AAAS

Figure 8 Map of the iron counting rate as measured by the LP GRS Figure 8 Map of the iron counting rate as measured by the LP GRS. The projections and albedo contours are the same as forFigs. 2 and 3. Map of the iron counting rate as measured by the LP GRS. The projections and albedo contours are the same as forFigs. 2 and 3. D. J. Lawrence et al. Science 1998;281:1484-1489 Published by AAAS