Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (April 2016)
Advertisements

Masahiro Ueda, Tatsuo Shibata  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
R. Andrew Marshall, Colin Echeverría Aitken, Joseph D. Puglisi 
Kirill B. Gromadski, Marina V. Rodnina  Molecular Cell 
Reverse Translocation of tRNA in the Ribosome
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Phage Mu Transposition Immunity: Protein Pattern Formation along DNA by a Diffusion- Ratchet Mechanism  Yong-Woon Han, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Molecular Cell 
Andrey V. Zavialov, Vasili V. Hauryliuk, Måns Ehrenberg  Molecular Cell 
Volume 155, Issue 3, Pages (October 2013)
Laura Lancaster, Harry F. Noller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 157, Issue 7, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Human Argonaute 2 Has Diverse Reaction Pathways on Target RNAs
Volume 113, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Chimeras Reveal a Single Lipid-Interface Residue that Controls MscL Channel Kinetics as well as Mechanosensitivity  Li-Min Yang, Dalian Zhong, Paul Blount 
GroEL Mediates Protein Folding with a Two Successive Timer Mechanism
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages (May 2011)
Stop Codon Recognition by Release Factors Induces Structural Rearrangement of the Ribosomal Decoding Center that Is Productive for Peptide Release  Elaine.
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
The Dynamics of SecM-Induced Translational Stalling
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Kinetic Discrimination of tRNA Identity by the Conserved Motif 2 Loop of a Class II Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase  Ethan C. Guth, Christopher S. Francklyn 
Hani S. Zaher, Rachel Green  Molecular Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
John D. Leonard, Geeta J. Narlikar  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
A Model for How Ribosomal Release Factors Induce Peptidyl-tRNA Cleavage in Termination of Protein Synthesis  Stefan Trobro, Johan Åqvist  Molecular Cell 
GroEL Mediates Protein Folding with a Two Successive Timer Mechanism
Jingyi Fei, Pallav Kosuri, Daniel D. MacDougall, Ruben L. Gonzalez 
Different aa-tRNAs Are Selected Uniformly on the Ribosome
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Direct Observation of Single MuB Polymers
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Susanne Bechstedt, Gary J. Brouhard  Developmental Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Francis D. Appling, Aaron L. Lucius, David A. Schneider 
Mechanism of Force Generation of a Viral DNA Packaging Motor
Yasunori Aizawa, Qing Xiang, Alan M. Lambowitz, Anna Marie Pyle 
Dynamic Recognition of the mRNA Cap by Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF4E
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Jinzhong Lin, Matthieu G. Gagnon, David Bulkley, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Sequence-Dependent Elongation Dynamics on Macrolide-Bound Ribosomes
Caught on Camera: Intermediates of Ribosome Recycling
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 155, Issue 3, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (September 2016)
The Pathway of HCV IRES-Mediated Translation Initiation
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Multiple Parallel Pathways of Translation Initiation on the CrPV IRES
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
mRNA Helicase Activity of the Ribosome
Modeling of the RAG Reaction Mechanism
Accurate Translocation of mRNA by the Ribosome Requires a Peptidyl Group or Its Analog on the tRNA Moving into the 30S P Site  Kurt Fredrick, Harry F.
Sequence of Steps in Ribosome Recycling as Defined by Kinetic Analysis
How Initiation Factors Maximize the Accuracy of tRNA Selection in Initiation of Bacterial Protein Synthesis  Ayman Antoun, Michael Y. Pavlov, Martin Lovmar,
Joana Pinto Vieira, Julien Racle, Vassily Hatzimanikatis 
Inhibition of Msh6 ATPase Activity by Mispaired DNA Induces a Msh2(ATP)-Msh6(ATP) State Capable of Hydrolysis-Independent Movement along DNA  Dan J. Mazur,
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Ribosomal translocation: EF-G turns the crank
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 161-172 (July 2017) Post-termination Ribosome Intermediate Acts as the Gateway to Ribosome Recycling  Arjun Prabhakar, Mark C. Capece, Alexey Petrov, Junhong Choi, Joseph D. Puglisi  Cell Reports  Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 161-172 (July 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.028 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 20, 161-172DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.028) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental Setup (A) In all experiments, 30S preinitiation complexes (PIC) containing Cy3B-30S, fMet-tRNAfMet, and IF2-GTP is immobilized on the surface of the ZMW wells through biotinylated mRNAs. The reaction is started by delivery of BHQ-2-50S, Phe-TC, EF-G, and Cy5-RF1 or Cy5-RF2. (B) Structure of RF2-bound 70S ribosome (Korostelev et al., 2008) showing the C-terminal fluorescent labeling position (C367). (C) Bottom: representative trace of Cy3B- and BHQ-2-labeled ribosome translating in the presence of Phe-TC, EF-G, and Cy5-RF. Top: schematic of translation, with ribosome states linked to fluorescence signals in the trace. Delivery of reagents results in initiation through 50S subunit joining (shown by quenching of green Cy3B signal), followed by one round of elongation (reported by a cycle of low and high Cy3B intensities), then binding of Cy5-RF during termination (shown by red Cy5 signal, see also Figure S1). Departure of Cy5-RF after peptide release correlates with ribosome rotation, presenting a post-termination rotated-state intermediate (highlighted in gray). Cy5-RF can rebind to this intermediate to induce ribosome rotation back to non-rotated state. RRF and EF-G bind to this post-termination rotated ribosome to catalyze 50S subunit dissociation. The boxed area shows the mRNA sequences used in these experiments. Cell Reports 2017 20, 161-172DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.028) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RF Rebinding Inhibits 70S Ribosome Disassembly after Termination (A) Schematic describing the two competing pathways from the post-termination rotated-state intermediate in the absence of any recycling factors. The observed rate of disappearance (kobs) of this intermediate is equal to the sum of the rates of the two competing pathways: RF rebinding (kpostRF,on[RF]) and spontaneous 50S subunit dissociation (k50S,off). (B) Representative trace highlighting the post-termination rotated states. (C) Post-synchronization of post-termination rotated state dwell times depict an exponential decay of post-termination rotated state population. This distribution was fit to a single-exponential equation to obtain kobs. (D) Plot of kobs as a function of [RF2]. The slope and y-intercept of the least-squares linear fit to the plot represent the RF-rebinding rate (kpostRF,on) and 50S subunit dissociation rate (k50S,off), respectively. Error bars represent SD. Cell Reports 2017 20, 161-172DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.028) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 RRF and EF-G Block RF Rebinding and Catalyze Subunit Disassembly (A) Percentage of ribosomes showing RF rebinding at 0.05 and 1 μM EF-G as a function of [RRF]. (B) Percentage of ribosomes showing RF rebinding at 0, 1, and 20 μM RRF as a function of [EF-G]. (C) Subunit disassembly time at 0.05, and 1 μM EF-G as a function of [RRF]. Subunit disassembly time is defined as the mean dwell time of the post-termination rotated state before 50S subunit dissociation. Error bars represent SEM. (D) Subunit disassembly time at 1 and 20 μM RRF plotted as a function of [EF-G]. Error bars represent SEM. Cell Reports 2017 20, 161-172DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.028) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 EF-G Binds to RRF-Bound Ribosome to Catalyze Subunit Disassembly by GTP Hydrolysis (A) Representative trace of 50 nM Cy5-EF-G-GTP experiment in the presence of 20 μM RRF (and 10 nM wild-type RF2, 50 nM Phe TC, and 100 nM BHQ-2) showing Cy5-EF-G pulses during elongation and recycling. During recycling, Cy5-EF-G binds to the post-termination rotated state and is correlated with 50S subunit dissociation (boxed area). (B) Post-synchronization of subunit disassembly signal and Cy5-EF-G(GTP) occupancy in the presence of RRF as boxed in (A). (C) Representative trace showing multiple rapid pulses of unproductive Cy5-EF-G(GTP) binding to the post-termination rotated state in the absence of RRF. (D) Representative trace showing long occupancy of Cy5-EF-G(GDPNP) to the rotated state both in presence and absence of RRF. FRET is observed between Cy5-EF-G and Cy3B-30S. (E) Mean dwell time of Cy5-EF-G pulses in the presence or absence of 20 μM RRF and different guanine nucleotides (G-ntd): GTP or GDPNP. Error bars represent SEM. Cell Reports 2017 20, 161-172DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.028) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 IF3 Binds to 30S-tRNA-mRNA Complex to Induce tRNA Departure, followed by 30S Subunit Dissociation (A) Representative trace showing that the Cy5.5-tRNAPhe does not depart in the presence of 1 μM RRF and 500 nM EF-G without IF3. Cy5.5-tRNAPhe presence is necessary for the observed reversibility of 50S subunit dissociation and Cy5-RF2 rebinding. See also Figure S7A. (B) Mean lifetime of Cy5.5 fluorescence decreases in the presence of 1 μM IF3. Error bars represent SEM. (C) Representative trace showing that BHQ-2-50S subunit dissociation is followed by sequential departures of the Cy5.5-tRNAPhe and Cy3B-30S subunit in the presence of 1 μM RRF, 500 nM EF-G, and 1 μM IF3. Inset: delay between 50S subunit dissociation and tRNA departure (blue line) and delay between tRNA departure and 30S subunit dissociation (orange line) are highlighted. See also Figure S7B. (D) Mean tRNA departure time, defined as the delay time between 50S subunit dissociation and tRNA departure (blue), is dependent on IF3 concentration. Mean 30S subunit departure time, defined as the delay time between tRNA departure and 30S subunit dissociation (orange), is independent of IF3 concentration. Error bars represent SEM. Cell Reports 2017 20, 161-172DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.028) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Complete Model of Ribosome Recycling Post-termination rotated-state 70S intermediate is the substrate for RRF and EF-G to bind and catalyze subunit disassembly. Although EF-G can bind to both RRF-free and RRF-bound 70S complex, RRF and EF-G must bind sequentially to catalyze subunit disassembly. After 50S subunit dissociation, IF3 binds to the remaining 30S complex to induce P-site tRNA dissociation, followed by spontaneous dissociation of 30S subunit from the mRNA. The numerical values of the kinetic parameters here are presented in Table 1. Cell Reports 2017 20, 161-172DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.028) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions