Learning Team Administrative Burden reduction for citizens

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Advertisements

European Union | European Regional Development Fund Zooming in Interreg Europe National Info Day 12 May 2015, Paris Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer.
Integrating e-government in simplification strategy the Dutch case Milan Jansen 20 June 2007.
The SCM – main issues, advantages and challenges of quantification of administrative costs Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public.
Peer Review of E-Government in Arab countries by Marco Daglio, Administrator, Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate.
The Dutch Presidency Priorities and timeframe Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations EUPAN DG-meeting 3 & 4 December 2015 in Luxembourg The Dutch.
Simplification of administrative procedures: the Administrative Effort Index (AEI - IEB) MINISTRY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIONS SPAIN 1 María Ángeles Martínez,
49 th DG Meeting EGOVERNMENT Lisbon, December.
SZW Balance Model Ben van den Brande Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment (SZW) EUPAN Helsinki, 11 april 2008.
CJM as tool for finding noticeable improvement Results pilot on moving house.
Measuring and reducing administrative burdens in EU agriculture CAP Simplification Stakeholder Conference October 2006 Jenny McInnes Department for Environment,
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CLUE final conference, 24 September 2014, Turin EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Johanna.
Presidency Priorities of the Czech Republic in Better Regulation
The Group of Directors and Experts of Better Regulation (DBR)
GIFT and IBP Pilot PROJECT on PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
EPAN – Lisbon ad hoc group Welcome - Agenda Introduction
EUPAN eGOV WG Finnish Presidency Second Semester 2006
Brussels, 15 September 2009.
Czech Republic Petr Fejtek Administrative Advisor Ministry of Interior.
Slovenia Matija Kodra Consultant Ministry of Public Administration.
CLOE: A successful pilot project
ITALY Roberto Pizzicannella Maria Giulia Cosentino
The French Presidency of the European Union July – December 2008 IPSG working group - EUPAN Directorate General for State Modernisation.
EUPAN DG-Troika 3rd May 2007, Berlin Medium-Term Programme (MTP)
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education
Activities of the Human Resources Working Group
Better Regulation State of Affairs
eGovernment Working Group
City programme in the Netherlands
Troika Directors General Meeting Prague, 24 February 2009
SPAIN MERCEDES RUBIO PASCUAL Deputy Director of Better Regulation
Olli-Pekka Rissanen HRWG, Helsinki 11th September 2006
Germany Thomas Nehring Better regulation unit Federal Chancellery.
Portuguese Presidency
Portuguese Presidency
Malta Marisa Scerri Associate Consultant
Merlijn van Rijswijk, Marcel Kleijn et al
PORTUGUESE PRESIDENCY OF THE COUNCIL OF THE EU
Cross-border Administrative Burdens Citizens
EGOVERNMENT WG Troika Secretariat 26 November, 2007.
Olli-Pekka Rissanen Troika Secretariat, Helsinki 17th July 2006
DG Troika – 26 October – Portugal
Proposal: Set-up of Interest group and Roundtable
EGOVERNMENT WG Sintra, 22, 23 October Conclusions.
EUPAN HANDBOOK.
Approach of AB Citizens learning team
Second Meeting of the EUPAN Troika Secretariat
Learning Team Administrative Burden Reduction for citizens
EPAN – DG Troika secretariat Innovative Public Services
Evaluation of training European Administrative School
Preparing Ministerial Recommendations for the Medium-Term Programme (MTP)
The role of an EC Representation in informing the public – experience in Hungary TELLING THE STORY NOVEMBER 2007, BRUSSELS Communication.
Innovative Public Services Group Meeting eGovernment Working Group
Belgium Kris Blancke Attaché Chancery of the Prime Minister
Renata Zatler, M.Sc. January, 2008
Finland Counsellor Johanna Nurmi Special Adviser Olli-Pekka Rissanen
Austria Theresia Niedermüller Michael Kallinger Policy Advisor
Troika Secretariat - 2nd Meeting
Customer Satisfaction Measurement in European Public Administrations
EUPAN Troika Secretariat 26 March 2007, Berlin MidTermProgramme (MTP)
eGOV – status September 2009
EUPAN DG-Troika 3rd May 2007, Berlin Medium-Term Programme (MTP)
E-GOVERNMENT WG MEETING
Innovative Public Services Group Meeting eGovernment Working Group Dr
STRUCTURE AND METHODS OF CO-OPERATION
Ministerial Declaration
Ministerial Declaration
EPAN – DG Meeting Innovative Public Services
Matija KODRA Ministry of Public Administration
Merlijn van Rijswijk, Marcel Kleijn et al
Presentation transcript:

Learning Team Administrative Burden reduction for citizens Proceedings John Kootstra Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations The Netherlands

Outline Background Goal Approach Participation Output Conclusions

Background Increasing political attention for AB reduction, but citizen’s focus lacks Need for informal co-operation on this issue Appeal for horizontal co-operation within EUPAN network

Goal To look into methodologies to benchmark, bench learn and exchange European best practices in the field of reducing administrative burdens for citizens with special focus on high impact administrative burdens Exchange experience and gain practical knowledge to measure burdens and to identify possible improvements and actions for simplification

Approach Identifying methods to measure AB citizens (quantitative and qualitative way) Selection high impact services and methodologies for national pilots Comparing services Drawing lessons for improving service delivery and reducing administrative burden

Approach (continued) Learning team open for members EUPAN working groups and AB experts from countries Active participation members Chairmanship rotates each meeting, continuity in secretariat Four meetings tentatively planned.

Participation 18 countries, Europe wide

Output Report on national approaches (presented) Inventory of methods and appreciation (sept) Manual of SCM citizens (sept) Pilots (commitment UK, B, F, NL)

Conclusions AB citizens often not specific goal Aspect of broader AB programme different heading: e.g. simplification, modernisation AB citizens hardly measured Egovernment closely related to AB Importance to connect quantitative objectives to perceived improvements Need for SCM citizens manual

Thank you for your attention Questions?? John.kootstra@minbzk.nl