A Universal Property of Axonal and Dendritic Arbors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Simple Linear Regression.
Advertisements

Maturation of a Recurrent Excitatory Neocortical Circuit by Experience-Dependent Unsilencing of Newly Formed Dendritic Spines  Michael C. Ashby, John T.R.
Morphological Substrates for Parallel Streams of Corticogeniculate Feedback Originating in Both V1 and V2 of the Macaque Monkey  Farran Briggs, Caitlin W.
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Signal, Noise, and Variation in Neural and Sensory-Motor Latency
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
A Sparse Object Coding Scheme in Area V4
Value Representations in the Primate Striatum during Matching Behavior
Ian M. Finn, Nicholas J. Priebe, David Ferster  Neuron 
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Retinal Representation of the Elementary Visual Signal
Sheng Li, Stephen D. Mayhew, Zoe Kourtzi  Neuron 
Dynamic Processes Shape Spatiotemporal Properties of Retinal Waves
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Volume 140, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Anomalous Diffusion in Purkinje Cell Dendrites Caused by Spines
Implicit Attentional Selection of Bound Visual Features
Responses of Collicular Fixation Neurons to Gaze Shift Perturbations in Head- Unrestrained Monkey Reveal Gaze Feedback Control  Woo Young Choi, Daniel.
Motor Learning Is Optimally Tuned to the Properties of Motor Noise
Cortical Mechanisms of Smooth Eye Movements Revealed by Dynamic Covariations of Neural and Behavioral Responses  David Schoppik, Katherine I. Nagel, Stephen.
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
José Vergara, Natsuko Rivera, Román Rossi-Pool, Ranulfo Romo  Neuron 
Jianing Yu, David Ferster  Neuron 
Hippocampal “Time Cells”: Time versus Path Integration
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
A General Principle of Neural Arbor Branch Density
Volume 88, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Ramana Dodla, Charles J. Wilson  Biophysical Journal 
Caleb E. Strait, Tommy C. Blanchard, Benjamin Y. Hayden  Neuron 
Neuronal Selectivity and Local Map Structure in Visual Cortex
Medial Axis Shape Coding in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex
A Universal Property of Axonal and Dendritic Arbors
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Morphological Substrates for Parallel Streams of Corticogeniculate Feedback Originating in Both V1 and V2 of the Macaque Monkey  Farran Briggs, Caitlin W.
H. Sadeghi, D.E.T. Shepherd, D.M. Espino  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
Segregation of Object and Background Motion in Visual Area MT
Greg Schwartz, Sam Taylor, Clark Fisher, Rob Harris, Michael J. Berry 
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Franco Pestilli, Marisa Carrasco, David J. Heeger, Justin L. Gardner 
Origin and Dynamics of Extraclassical Suppression in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus of the Macaque Monkey  Henry J. Alitto, W. Martin Usrey  Neuron  Volume.
Seasonal Encoding by the Circadian Pacemaker of the SCN
Daniel E. Winkowski, Eric I. Knudsen  Neuron 
Inhibitory Actions Unified by Network Integration
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Does Neuronal Synchrony Underlie Visual Feature Grouping?
Tiago Branco, Kevin Staras, Kevin J. Darcy, Yukiko Goda  Neuron 
Multiple Running Speed Signals in Medial Entorhinal Cortex
Dario Maschi, Vitaly A. Klyachko  Neuron 
Volume 58, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
The Decrease in the Presynaptic Calcium Current Is a Major Cause of Short-Term Depression at a Calyx-Type Synapse  Jianhua Xu, Ling-Gang Wu  Neuron  Volume.
Rheological Analysis and Measurement of Neutrophil Indentation
Supervised Calibration Relies on the Multisensory Percept
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e6 (August 2018)
Farran Briggs, W. Martin Usrey  Neuron 
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Daniela Vallentin, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Orientation Selectivity Sharpens Motion Detection in Drosophila
Honghui Zhang, Andrew J. Watrous, Ansh Patel, Joshua Jacobs  Neuron 
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
The Postsaccadic Unreliability of Gain Fields Renders It Unlikely that the Motor System Can Use Them to Calculate Target Position in Space  Benjamin Y.
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Supratim Ray, John H.R. Maunsell  Neuron 
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Steven C. Leiser, Karen A. Moxon  Neuron 
Direction-Selective Dendritic Action Potentials in Rabbit Retina
Rony Azouz, Charles M. Gray  Neuron 
Encoding Light Intensity by the Cone Photoreceptor Synapse
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

A Universal Property of Axonal and Dendritic Arbors Joseph Snider, Andrea Pillai, Charles F. Stevens  Neuron  Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 45-56 (April 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.013 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Separability Test for the Two-Dimensional Dendritic and Axonal Arbors Data from goldfish and zebrafish retinotectal axonal arbors (n = 79) and retinal ganglion cell dendritic arbors (n = 76). (A) An arbor density function estimated by summing the arbor's segment lengths in each box of a grid (6 × 6) covering a goldfish retinotectal arbor shown beneath the estimated density. Length indicated on axis in microns. (B) Double logarithmic plot of the product moment (mk, k = 0,2…20) as a function of the product of the separated moments (mxkmyk). Squares are for axonal arbors, and circles (obscured by the density of data points) are dendritic arbors. The equality line (top, slope = 1) and a least-squares line fitted to all 1705 data points from 155 arbors (slope = 0.966 ± 0.001) can be seen extending past the cloud of data points. (C) Frequency histogram of slope for log(mk) versus log(mxkmyk), calculated by least-squares, for each of the 79 retinotectal arbors. (D) Frequency histogram as in (C) for 76 retinal ganglion cell dendritic arbors. Neuron 2010 66, 45-56DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.013) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Properties of the Arbor Density Function of Two-Dimensional Axonal and Dendritic Arbors (A) Double logarithmic plot comparing of the size of arbors measured by their convex hull area (units: μm2), with arbor size measured by the product of the arbor standard deviations in the x and y directions (units: μm2). Squares represent data from 79 axonal arbors and circles from 76 dendritic arbors. Least-squares line has a slope = 1.013 ± 0.017 and intercept 1.135 ± 0.047. (B) Plot of log(mk) as a function of log(σx σy) for k = 0,2…20. Circles for dendritic arbors and squares for axonal arbors. Each arbor provides a single point for each k for a total of 1705 data points on the graph. Straight lines superimposed on data points are from least-squares fits. (C) Slopes of least-squares fits to log(mk) as a function of log(σx σy) for moment orders (k) with k = 0,1…20. 95% confidence intervals are just visible for the last four data points; for other data points, the 95% confidence intervals are smaller that the radius of the plotting symbols. The straight line superimposed on data points has a slope of 1.005 ± 0.0001 and an intercept of 0.546 ± 0.002 determined by a least-squares fit. (D) Intercepts of regression lines in (B) as a function of moment order. Error bars are 95% confidence intervals. The smooth curve through the points is what would be predicted from a Gaussian arbor density function truncated at a circular boundary at 1.95 standard deviations from the center of the arbor. The upper smooth line is the prediction of a Gaussian truncated at a circular boundary at 2.95 standard deviations, and the lower smooth line is the prediction of an arbor density function, normalized to have the observed arbor standard deviation, with a constant density inside a circular boundary. Neuron 2010 66, 45-56DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.013) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Separability Test for Three-Dimensional Axonal and Dendritic Arbors from Mammalian Neurons (A) Double logarithmic plot of the product moments (mk) as a function of the product of separated moments (mxkmykmzk) for k = 0,2,…20. The plot is based on data from 1091 neocortical axonal and dendritic arbors (squares) and 521 hippocampal arbors (both axonal and dendritic plot symbols are obscured because the graph contains 18,590 data points). Three straight lines have been fitted to the data and can be seen extending from the cloud of data points. The upper line has a slope = 1. A regression line, fitted to the data from hippocampal cells and constrained to pass through the origin, has a slope of 0.975 ± 0.0004 and appears in the middle. The lowest regression line, with a slope of 0.942 ± .0003, was fitted to the neocortical data points. (B) Frequency histogram of slopes fitted to log(mk) as a function of log(mxkmykmzk) for 521 individual hippocampal arbors with k = 0,2…20. (C) Frequency histogram, as in (B), from 1091 neocortical arbors. Neuron 2010 66, 45-56DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.013) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Test for Self-Similarity of Three-Dimensional Mammalian Arbors (A) Double logarithmic plot of mk as a function of σx σy σz for 1091 neocortical and 521 hippocampal arbors (both axonal and dendritic) for k = 0,2…20. Each of the 1612 arbors provided a data point for each k. Straight lines are least-squares fits, one for each value of k. (B) Plots of slopes of regression lines fitted to log(mk) as a function of log(σx σy σz) for the arbors represented in (A) with k = 0,1,2,….20. 95% confidence intervals for each slope is less than the radius of the plot symbol. The regression line plotted over the data points has a slope = 1.035 ± 0.001 and an intercept = 0.332 ± 0.011. (C) Intercepts of the regression lines that appear in (A) as a function of moment order. The error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. The line through the data points is predicted from a Gaussian arbor density function that is truncated at 1.7 standard deviations. For comparison, the predictions of a Gaussian arbor density function truncated at 2.7 standard deviations (top smooth line) and an arbor density function (normalized to have the observed intercept for k = 2) with constant density inside a spherical boundary. Neuron 2010 66, 45-56DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.013) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions