Designing Photoswitchable Peptides Using the AsLOV2 Domain

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Advertisements

Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Structural Basis for Substrate Selectivity of the E3 Ligase COP1
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Adding Specificity to Artificial Transcription Activators
Marcel Zimmermann, Julian D. Hegemann, Xiulan Xie, Mohamed A. Marahiel 
Peter Chien, Robert A. Grant, Robert T. Sauer, Tania A. Baker 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Multivalent Recruitment of Human Argonaute by GW182
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Unbiased Proteomic Profiling Strategy for Discovery of Bacterial Effector Proteins Reveals that Salmonella Protein PheA Is a Host Cell Cycle Regulator 
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Structure-Guided Design of Fluorescent S-Adenosylmethionine Analogs for a High- Throughput Screen to Target SAM-I Riboswitch RNAs  Scott F. Hickey, Ming C.
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (December 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Beena Krishnan, Lila M. Gierasch  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Engineered Domain Swapping as an On/Off Switch for Protein Function
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
An RNA Aptamer that Induces Transcription
Sanjay B. Hari, Ethan A. Merritt, Dustin J. Maly  Chemistry & Biology 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e2 (December 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Kevin M. Marks, Michael Rosinov, Garry P. Nolan  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Protein Misfolded Oligomers: Experimental Approaches, Mechanism of Formation, and Structure-Toxicity Relationships  Francesco Bemporad, Fabrizio Chiti 
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Structural Basis for Substrate Selectivity of the E3 Ligase COP1
Methods for the Elucidation of Protein-Small Molecule Interactions
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Pratistha Ranjitkar, Amanda M. Brock, Dustin J. Maly 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Structural Insight into BLM Recognition by TopBP1
Designing Chimeric LOV Photoswitches
Ca2+ Regulation of Gelsolin Activity: Binding and Severing of F-actin
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Discovery of Antagonist Peptides against Bacterial Helicase-Primase Interaction in B. stearothermophilus by Reverse Yeast Three-Hybrid  Laurence Gardiner,
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 11, Pages (January 2019)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Jianchao Li, Haiyang Liu, Manmeet H. Raval, Jun Wan, Christopher M
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (March 2004)
Characterization of a Specificity Factor for an AAA+ ATPase
Joshua J. Sims, Robert E. Cohen  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Designing Photoswitchable Peptides Using the AsLOV2 Domain Oana I. Lungu, Ryan A. Hallett, Eun Jung Choi, Mary J. Aiken, Klaus M. Hahn, Brian Kuhlman  Chemistry & Biology  Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 507-517 (April 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.02.006 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Chemistry & Biology 2012 19, 507-517DOI: (10. 1016/j. chembiol. 2012 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 General Design Strategy for Caging Peptides Using the AsLOV2 Domain Photoswitches are designed as sequence chimeras between the AsLOV2 Jα helix and the peptide to be caged. Residues that are important to AsLOV2-Jα interactions (cyan), important to peptide-target interaction (purple), important to both interactions (red), and residues that are important to neither interaction (white) are identified and mutated accordingly. Irradiation unfolds the Jα helix, and the peptide can bind its target. Chemistry & Biology 2012 19, 507-517DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.02.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Design of LOV-ipaA and LOV-SsrA Peptide Photoswitches (A) Sequence alignment of AsLOV2-Jα, ipaA, and LOV-ipaA. Jα sequence (blue), ipaA sequence (purple), chimera sequence (cyan), and designed residues (red) are indicated. (B) Sequence alignment of AsLOV2-Jα helix, SsrA peptide, and three LOV-SsrA designs—LOV-SsrAC, LOV-SsrAN, and LOV-SsrAM. Jα helix sequence (blue), SsrA sequence (orange), chimera sequence (cyan), designed positions (black), and helix-stabilizing mutations (pink) are indicated. (C) Model of LOV-ipaA with residues colored as in (A). Residues N538, I539, A542, and A543 K544 (cyan) as well as residues N537, K541, D545, V546 (purple), and I540 (red) are shown as sticks. (D) Model of LOV-SsrAC with residues colored as in (B). Residues A528 and E538 (pink) as well as residues A542 and A543 (cyan) and N544, D545, E546, N547, and Y548 (orange) are shown as sticks. See also Figure S1. Chemistry & Biology 2012 19, 507-517DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.02.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Measurement of Rates and Affinities of LOV-ipaA Binding to Vinculin (A) Schematic of fluorescence polarization competition assay is shown. TAMRA-labeled ipaA (ipaA∗) is bound to vinculin D1 subdomain (vinD1). Vinculin dissociates from the complex with rates k-1 and k1 and binding affinity KD1. LOV-ipaA (LOVipaA) binds vinculin with rates kon and koff and affinity KD2. Fluorescence polarization decreases as the fraction of TAMRA-ipaA bound to vinculin decreases. (B and C) Fraction of TAMRA-ipaA bound to vinculin over time with varying concentrations of LOV-ipaA titrated in the dark and (C) under blue light. (D and E) Surface plasmon resonance measurements and first-order binding fit of LOV-ipaA L514K L531E C450A pseudodark and (E) LOV-ipaA L514K L531E I532E A536E pseudolit mutants. See also Figure S2. Chemistry & Biology 2012 19, 507-517DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.02.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Competitve Binding of LOV-SsrA to SspB in Blue Light and in Darkness (A and B) Competitive binding assay of LOV-SsrAC (A) or LOV-SsrAN (B) to an equilibrium solution of SspB and 5(6)TAMRA-SsrA. 5(6)TAMRA-SsrA becomes unbound as LOV-SsrA competes for SspB binding. Binding to SspB was measured immediately after illumination with blue light (open circles) and after return to dark state (closed circles). (C) Reversible binding of LOV-SsrAC to SspB. A single titration point from the fluorescence polarization competition assay was repeatedly irradiated with blue light (blue bar = 60 s) and reversion to dark-state equilibrium was monitored by polarization. See also Figure S3 and Table S1. Chemistry & Biology 2012 19, 507-517DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.02.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Binding of LOV-ipaA to Full-Length Vinculin Is Measured through an Actin Cosedimentation Assay (A) Full-length vinculin, LOV-ipaA, and polymerized actin are incubated 1 hr at room temperature. Vinculin that is bound to LOV-ipaA will bind polymerized actin. The mixture is centrifuged at 150,000 g, pelleting polymerized actin and all vinculin bound to it out of solution. (B and C) SDS-PAGE gel of LOV-ipaA C450A and (C) LOV-ipaA I532E A536E actin cosedimentation assay with vinculin. Molar ratios from 1:0 to 1:50 vinculin:LOV-ipaA were used. Supernatant (S) and pellet (P) fractions are shown side by side. Apparent binding affinity curves of fraction of vinculin bound to actin versus concentration of LOV-ipaA are plotted below. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. See also Table S2. Chemistry & Biology 2012 19, 507-517DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.02.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 LOV-ipaA Is Used as a Light-Inducible Heterodimerization Tool (A) LOV-ipaA L623A is linked to the GAL4 activation domain (AD), whereas vinculin D1 (vinD1) is linked to GAL4 binding domain (BD). Irradiation with blue light brings AD-LOV-ipaA into proximity to BD-vinD1, allowing for GAL-induced expression of reporter genes LacZ, MEL1, HIS2, and ADE2. (B) LacZ expression is quantified. β-galactosidase activity of S. cerevisiae-mated strains containing BD and AD linked proteins, as specified, is shown. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. (C) S. cerevisiae-mated strains containing BD-vinD1 and AD-LOV-ipaA mutants, as indicated, are grown in dark or blue light conditions on SD plates. Difference in levels of transcription of MEL1, HIS3, and ADE2 in dark- versus lit-state conditions is seen. See also Figure S4. Chemistry & Biology 2012 19, 507-517DOI: (10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.02.006) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions