Impact of GP reminders on follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology: a before–after study in Danish general practice by Bettina Kjær Kristiansen, Berit Andersen,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Primary care consultation behaviours of long-term, adult survivors of cancer in the UK by Nada F Khan, Eila Watson, and Peter W Rose BJGP Volume 61(584):

Advertisements

Recognising Kawasaki disease in UK primary care: a descriptive study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink by Abigail Moore, Anthony Harnden, and.

by Gillian C Hall, Louise E Tulloh, and Robert M R Tulloh

Prevalence of drug–herb and drug–supplement interactions in older adults: a cross-sectional survey by Taofikat B Agbabiaka, Neil H Spencer, Sabina Khanom,

Impact of GP reminders on follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology: a before–after study in Danish general practice by Bettina Kjær Kristiansen, Berit Andersen,

Patients’ preferences for GP consultation for perceived cancer risk in primary care: a discrete choice experiment by Katriina L Whitaker, Alex Ghanouni,

Exposure to domestic violence and abuse and consultations for emergency contraception: nested case-control study in a UK primary care dataset by Joni Jackson,

Presenting symptoms of children with cancer: a primary-care population-based study by Jette Møller Ahrensberg, Rikke Pilegaard Hansen, Frede Olesen, Henrik.

Prescribing tamoxifen in primary care for the prevention of breast cancer: a national online survey of GPs’ attitudes by Samuel G Smith, Robbie Foy, Jennifer.

by Hugh Alberti, Hannah L Randles, Alex Harding, and Robert K McKinley

Impact of antibiotics for children presenting to general practice with cough on adverse outcomes: secondary analysis from a multicentre prospective cohort.

by Narinder Chana, Talya Porat, Cate Whittlesea, and Brendan Delaney

Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial by Brian McKinstry, Janet Hanley, David Heaney, Lucy McCloughan,

Volume ():bjgpnov fletcher-fl-p

Volume ():bjgpJul Matheson-FL-P

Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data by Gary A Abel, Silvia C Mendonca,

by Ben Jackson, Michelle Marshall, and Susie Schofield

Doctors record higher blood pressures than nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis by Christopher E Clark, Isabella A Horvath, Rod S Taylor, and John.

Prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences in blood pressure for different primary care populations: systematic review and meta-analysis by Christopher.

Volume ():bjgpoct marshall-fl-p

Signs and symptoms for diagnosis of serious infections in children: a prospective study in primary careCommentary by Ann Van den Bruel, Bert Aertgeerts,

by Claire Blacklock, Tanya Ali Haj-Hassan, and Matthew J Thompson

The future of the NHS and general practice

by Silvia C Mendonca, Gary A Abel, and Georgios Lyratzopoulos

Patient involvement in diagnosing cancer in primary care: a systematic review of current interventions by Jane Heyhoe, Caroline Reynolds, Alice Dunning,

Clinical presentation and microbiological diagnosis in paediatric respiratory tract infection: a systematic review by Hannah V Thornton, Peter S Blair,

Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data by Gary A Abel, Silvia C Mendonca,

Developing patient reference groups within general practice: a mixed-methods study by Jane Smiddy, Joanne Reay, Stephen Peckham, Lorraine Williams, and.

by Gillian Rice, Jenny Ingram, and Jacques Mizan

by Ruth Victoria Pritchett, Amanda J Daley, and Kate Jolly

by William Hamilton, Deborah J Sharp, Tim J Peters, and Alison P Round

Impact of GP direct-access computerised tomography for the investigation of chronic daily headache by Graeme C Simpson, Kirsten Forbes, Evelyn Teasdale,

GPs' classification of headache: is primary headache underdiagnosed?

Nursing consultations and control of diabetes in general practice: a retrospective observational study by Trevor Murrells, Jane Ball, Jill Maben, Mark.

by Robin Chatterjee, Tim Chapman, Mike GT Brannan, and Justin Varney

Caring for people living with, and beyond, cancer: an online survey of GPs in England by Fiona M Walter, Juliet A Usher-Smith, Suresh Yadlapalli, and Eila.

Corneal ulcers in general practice

by Pauline Williams, Peter Murchie, and Christine Bond

by Mark Hann, and Hugh Gravelle

Patterns of regional variation of opioid prescribing in primary care in England: a retrospective observational study by Luke Mordecai, Carl Reynolds, Liam.

Predictive values of referrals for transient ischaemic attack from first-contact health care: a systematic review by Rebecca Kandiyali, Daniel S Lasserson,

Expectations for consultations and antibiotics for respiratory tract infection in primary care: the RTI clinical iceberg by Cliodna AM McNulty, Tom Nichols,

Pointers to earlier diagnosis of endometriosis: a nested case-control study using primary care electronic health records by Christopher Burton, Lisa Iversen,

Depth of the patient–doctor relationship and content of general practice consultations: cross-sectional study by Samuel William David Merriel, Christopher.

by Iain Colthart, Niall Cameron, Brian McKinstry, and David Blaney

Lost to the NHS: a mixed methods study of why GPs leave practice early in England by Natasha Doran, Fiona Fox, Karen Rodham, Gordon Taylor, and Michael.

by Ali Albasri, Suman Prinjha, Richard J McManus, and James P Sheppard

by Paul Baughan, Jennifer Keatings, and Bill O'Neill

by Kath Checkland BJGP Volume 57(534):56-63 January 1, 2007

by Jasmine Pawa, John Robson, and Sally Hull

Diagnostic accuracy of GPs when using an early-intervention decision support system: a high-fidelity simulation by Olga Kostopoulou, Talya Porat, Derek.

Volume ():bjgpJul Brant-FL-P

by Fay Bradley, Elizabeth Seston, Ceinwen Mannall, and Chris Cutts

Lyme disease and Bell’s palsy: an epidemiological study of diagnosis and risk in England by Lilli Cooper, Michael Branagan-Harris, Richard Tuson, and Charles.

Impact of primary care funding on secondary care utilisation and patient outcomes: a retrospective cross-sectional study of English general practice by.

BJGP Volume 55(518): September 1, 2005

Impact of travel time and rurality on presentation and outcomes of symptomatic colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional cohort study in primary care by Peninah.

Encouraging adolescents to contact their GP: a community-based trial

Use of multiple inflammatory marker tests in primary care: using Clinical Practice Research Datalink to evaluate accuracy by Jessica Watson, Hayley E Jones,

by Edward G Tyrrell, Denise Kendrick, Kapil Sayal, and Elizabeth Orton

Missed opportunities: mental disorder in children of parents with depression by Robert Potter, Becky Mars, Olga Eyre, Sophie Legge, Tamsin Ford, Ruth Sellers,

by Nada F Khan, Sian E Harrison, and Peter W Rose

by Abigail Moore, Anthony Harnden, and Richard Mayon-White

Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Si Si, John R Moss, Thomas R Sullivan, Skye S Newton, and.

by Joanna Broad, Sue Wells, Roger Marshall, and Rod Jackson

Setting goals with patients living with multimorbidity: qualitative analysis of general practice consultations by Charlotte Salter, Alice Shiner, Elizabeth.

by John Robson, Kate Homer, Zaheer Ahmed, and Sotiris Antoniou

Primary Care Outcomes Questionnaire: psychometric testing of a new instrument by Mairead Murphy, Sandra Hollinghurst, Sean Cowlishaw, and Chris Salisbury.

Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary.

Trends in the epidemiology of smoking recorded in UK general practice

Presentation transcript:

Impact of GP reminders on follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology: a before–after study in Danish general practice by Bettina Kjær Kristiansen, Berit Andersen, Flemming Bro, Hans Svanholm, and Peter Vedsted BJGP Volume ():bjgp17X691913 July 17, 2017 ©2017 by British Journal of General Practice

Flow chart of number of cervical cytologies Flow chart of number of cervical cytologies. aWomen without a unique Danish civil registration number. bUnknown diagnosis or potential uncertainty about follow-up recommendations. c Diagnosis formed according to information available from the authors upon r... Flow chart of number of cervical cytologies. aWomen without a unique Danish civil registration number. bUnknown diagnosis or potential uncertainty about follow-up recommendations. c Diagnosis formed according to information available from the authors upon request. Bettina Kjær Kristiansen et al. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp17X691913 ©2017 by British Journal of General Practice

Proportion of cervical cytologies without follow-up before and after implementation of reminders, stratified by follow-up recommendation.a aFirst vertical line is the time point for recommended follow-up. Proportion of cervical cytologies without follow-up before and after implementation of reminders, stratified by follow-up recommendation.aaFirst vertical line is the time point for recommended follow-up. Second vertical line is the time point when a reminder was generated for the after group. Follow-up recommendations within 3 months (needing to consult a gynaecologist) had a GP reminder 1 month after recommended date of follow-up (that is, after 4 months), whereas recommendations for follow-up in 3, 6, or 12 months had a GP reminder 3 months after date of recommended follow-up (that is, after 6, 9, or 15 months). Bettina Kjær Kristiansen et al. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp17X691913 ©2017 by British Journal of General Practice

GP variations in cervical cytology follow-up proportions. GP variations in cervical cytology follow-up proportions. Proportions of 1692 GP practices before, and 1943 GP practices after, listed according to proportion of women with follow-up. Observation of follow-up adherence ended 6 months after a GP reminder was generated to the after group. This entailed 7 months after recommended date of follow-up for women with a ’recommendation for follow-up within 3 months’, and 9 months for women with a ’recommendation for follow-up in 3, 6, or 12 months’. Bettina Kjær Kristiansen et al. Br J Gen Pract doi:10.3399/bjgp17X691913 ©2017 by British Journal of General Practice