Volume 15, Issue 21, Pages (November 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RNA-Regulated TRA-1 Nuclear Export Controls Sexual Fate
Advertisements

A Robust Network of Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways Governs Genome Integrity during C. elegans Development  Daphne B. Pontier, Marcel Tijsterman 
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
A Conserved Chromatin Architecture Marks and Maintains the Restricted Germ Cell Lineage in Worms and Flies  Christine E Schaner, Girish Deshpande, Paul.
Laurel B. Bender, Ru Cao, Yi Zhang, Susan Strome  Current Biology 
David J. Katz, T. Matthew Edwards, Valerie Reinke, William G. Kelly 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
A Family of Zinc-Finger Proteins Is Required for Chromosome-Specific Pairing and Synapsis during Meiosis in C. elegans  Carolyn M. Phillips, Abby F. Dernburg 
Caenorhabditis elegans TAC-1 and ZYG-9 Form a Complex that Is Essential for Long Astral and Spindle Microtubules  Martin Srayko, Sophie Quintin, Anne.
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
LET-418/Mi2 and SPR-5/LSD1 Cooperatively Prevent Somatic Reprogramming of C. elegans Germline Stem Cells  Stéphanie Käser-Pébernard, Fritz Müller, Chantal.
Volume 26, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Rapid De Novo Centromere Formation Occurs Independently of Heterochromatin Protein 1 in C. elegans Embryos  Karen W.Y. Yuen, Kentaro Nabeshima, Karen.
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Nikhila S. Tanneti, Kathryn Landy, Eric F. Joyce, Kim S. McKim 
The Survivin-like C. elegans BIR-1 Protein Acts with the Aurora-like Kinase AIR-2 to Affect Chromosomes and the Spindle Midzone  Elizabeth K. Speliotes,
Sequential Protein Recruitment in C. elegans Centriole Formation
3′ UTRs Are the Primary Regulators of Gene Expression in the C
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Jingjing Zhang, Zhaowei Tu, Yoshinori Watanabe, Hiroki Shibuya 
Transcription in the Absence of Histone H3.2 and H3K4 Methylation
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
A Component of C. elegans Meiotic Chromosome Axes at the Interface of Homolog Alignment, Synapsis, Nuclear Reorganization, and Recombination  Florence.
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (October 2014)
Xuehong Xu, Bruce E. Vogel  Current Biology 
Mara Schvarzstein, Andrew M. Spence  Developmental Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e5 (November 2018)
RNA-Regulated TRA-1 Nuclear Export Controls Sexual Fate
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
P granules Current Biology
Cell-Nonautonomous Regulation of C. elegans Germ Cell Death by kri-1
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Meiosis: Checking Chromosomes Pair up Properly
The C. elegans Glycopeptide Hormone Receptor Ortholog, FSHR-1, Regulates Germline Differentiation and Survival  Saeyoull Cho, Katherine W. Rogers, David S.
Sex Chromosome Inactivation: The Importance of Pairing
Polo Kinases Establish Links between Meiotic Chromosomes and Cytoskeletal Forces Essential for Homolog Pairing  Sara Labella, Alexander Woglar, Verena.
S. Chodagam, A. Royou, W. Whitfield, R. Karess, J.W. Raff 
Volume 94, Issue 3, Pages (August 1998)
Fertility and Germline Stem Cell Maintenance under Different Diets Requires nhr- 114/HNF4 in C. elegans  Xicotencatl Gracida, Christian R. Eckmann  Current.
Shunji Nakano, Bruce Stillman, H. Robert Horvitz  Cell 
Scott A. Barbee, Alex L. Lublin, Thomas C. Evans  Current Biology 
Florence Couteau, Monique Zetka  Developmental Cell 
Epigenetic Transitions in Germ Cell Development and Meiosis
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 20, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 23, Pages (December 2010)
Jessica L. Feldman, James R. Priess  Current Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Junko Kanoh, Mahito Sadaie, Takeshi Urano, Fuyuki Ishikawa 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 17, Issue 17, Pages (September 2007)
Histone Variants in Metazoan Development
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Transcriptional and Developmental Functions of the H3
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Hsin-Yen Wu, Sean M. Burgess  Current Biology 
Salvador-Warts-Hippo Signaling Promotes Drosophila Posterior Follicle Cell Maturation Downstream of Notch  Cédric Polesello, Nicolas Tapon  Current Biology 
Julio Vazquez, Andrew S Belmont, John W Sedat  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (May 2005)
Masamitsu Fukuyama, Ann E. Rougvie, Joel H. Rothman  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 18, Pages (September 2008)
Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation
Presentation transcript:

Volume 15, Issue 21, Pages 1972-1978 (November 2005) EGO-1, a Putative RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase, Is Required for Heterochromatin Assembly on Unpaired DNA during C. elegans Meiosis  Eleanor M. Maine, Jessica Hauth, Thomas Ratliff, Valarie E. Vought, Xingyu She, William G. Kelly  Current Biology  Volume 15, Issue 21, Pages 1972-1978 (November 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.049 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 EGO-1 Activity Is Required for H3K9me2 Accumulation on Unpaired Chromosomes and Chromosomal Fragments during Meiosis Each panel shows meiotic nuclei stained with DAPI to visualize DNA or polyclonal anti-H3K9me2 antibody. ego-1 null alleles are used in all cases (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Photographs are oriented with distal tissue to the left. (A) Wild-type (wt) male pachytene cells contain a bright focus of H3K9me2 staining associated with the condensed X chromosome. Weaker staining is visible on autosomes. H3K9me2 staining rapidly decreases as cells exit pachytene and start to condense as primary spermatocytes (also see Figure S1). In ego-1 mutant males, the condensed X chromosome is distinct in DAPI-stained preparations but fails to accumulate a bright focus of H3K9me2 staining (arrows). This result is consistent with previous work showing that condensation of the male X can occur in the absence of H3K9me2 enrichment [1]. Weak H3K9me2 staining is visible on all chromosomes. We note that occasional ego-1 nuclei had one or more brighter foci of staining that did not seem to localize to the X, suggesting that EGO-1 activity may also prevent inappropriate H3K9me2 accumulation on autosomes. (B) him-8 and ego-1/+;him-8 pachytene cells have two bright foci of H3K9me2 staining, corresponding to the unpaired regions of the X chromosomes (arrows). In some nuclei, these regions are not adjacent. Paired autosomes have weaker staining, as in wild-type. In contrast, the bright foci of H3K9me2 staining are not evident in ego-1;him-8 pachytene cells. (C) ego-1/+;sDp3 animals have 1–2 bright foci of H3K9me2 staining in pachytene cells (arrows). Two foci result when partial pairing occurs between the left end of sDp3 and the left end of an intact chromosome III, leaving a portion of sDp3 and a portion of the other chromosome III unpaired. In contrast, ego-1;sDp3 pachytene cells lack the bright H3K9me2 foci on both sDp3 and the unpaired region of the intact chromosome III. (D) Both dcr-1/+ and dcr-1 males have a bright focus of H3K9me2 staining in pachytene cells that corresponds to the tightly condensed X chromosome (arrows). Weaker staining is associated with autosomes. Current Biology 2005 15, 1972-1978DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.049) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 H3K9me2 Accumulation on Extrachromosomal, Multicopy Transgenes Is Defective in ego-1 but Not in dcr-1 Mutants Each panel shows a portion of the meiotic germline from a strain carrying the repetitive extrachromosomal array, ex7291. (A) ex7291 is visible in DAPI-stained preparations of both ego-1/+ and ego-1 tissue (see insets; arrows indicate extrachromosomal array). A bright focus of H3K9me2 staining, corresponding to ex7291, is visible in ego-1/+ (arrows) but not ego-1 tissue. (B) A bright focus of H3K9me2 staining, corresponding to ex7291, is visible in both dcr-1/+ and dcr-1 tissue. Scale bar equals 20 μm; inset scale bar equals 5 μm. Current Biology 2005 15, 1972-1978DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.049) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ego-1 Interacts Genetically with him-17 Each panel shows one hermaphrodite gonad arm at 24 hr post-L4 stage. Asterisk indicates distal end of each arm. TZ, “transition zone” containing germ cells in early meiotic prophase (leptotene-zygotene stages). ego-1 and him-17 null alleles are shown (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Animals were raised at 20°C. (A) The wild-type germline includes distal mitotic cells, meiotic cells, and oocytes in diakinesis stage of meiosis. Sperm are present at the proximal end (although most are out of the plane of focus). (B) Organization of the him-17 germline is normal. (C) Overall organization of the ego-1 germline is normal, although some nuclei are enlarged, the leptotene-zygotene region is expanded, and oocytes are small. (D) The ego-1;him-17 germline is small and lacks oocytes. Sperm nuclei are irregular in size (inset). Current Biology 2005 15, 1972-1978DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.049) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Two Models for the Role of EGO-1 in Silencing Unpaired DNA during Meiosis (A and B) Unpaired DNA (A) associates with and (B) is transcribed by a DNA-dependent RNA polymerase that is not active on paired DNA. HIM-17 may participate in this process. (C) EGO-1 binds to the RNA and recruits chromatin modifiers, e.g., histone methyltransferase (HMTase), to the region. RHA-1 may function in an RdRC-like complex with EGO-1 at this step. HMTase may directly bind to EGO-1 for its recruitment. Alternatively, EGO-1 generates dsRNA, which then triggers assembly of a RITS-like complex. RITS-like activity then recruits HMTase. (D) The end result of the EGO-1-RNA association is accumulation of H3K9me2 modifications preferentially on the unpaired DNA. Current Biology 2005 15, 1972-1978DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2005.09.049) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions