Procurement of NDM profiling data

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PN UNC Workgroup 20/9/11 Requirements Definition to Delivery.
Advertisements

Application of User Pays Principles to Existing Service Lines 22nd November 2006.
144A – Calculation of Value at Risk (VAR) Simon Trivella – 24 th May 2007 Distribution Workstream.
Reasonable Endeavours Claims Distribution Workstream MOD231 16/12/08.
Energy Networks Association Root cause solution for unregistered sites / MPRN creation David Mitchell 1 st November 2013.
1 Project Nexus Market Differentiation Topic Workgroup 14 th & 15 th July 2009.
Project Nexus Workgroup 9 th September Background During detailed design a number of areas have been identified that require clarification with.
Copyright National Grid Metering NGM Daily Meter Reads UNC RG 0175.
1 Smart Metering Portfolio DCC Day 1 Project Smart Metering Portfolio Focus Group Project Update Thursday 06 th June 2013.
Draft Review Proposal 175 Encouraging Participation in the elective DM Regime Phil Broom 25 October 2007.
“Introduction of a New Shipper Obligation in Relation to the Procurement of Gas Below the Gas Safety Monitors” Transmission Workstream 4 th Jan 2007 Chris.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
User Emergency Contact Details Simon Trivella –28 th May 2009 Distribution Workstream.
Demand Estimation Sub-Committee Climate Change Datasets - update 22 nd September 2014.
Modification proposal 0073 ‘Revision to the Notice Period regarding the implementation of changes to Transportation charges’ Transmission Workstream, 2.
PN UNC Workgroup Settlement topic 4 th October 2011.
Draft Modification Proposal: Population and Maintenance of Market Sector Code within Sites & Meters Simon Trivella –25 th February 2010 Distribution Workstream.
Datalogger / DMV Modification Proposals - Summary Simon Trivella – 26 th August 2010 Distribution Workstream - Elexon U P D A T E.
1 Smart Metering Foundation Stage February Agenda File Format Changes for Effective Switching Back Population Approach for Effective Switching.
1 UNC Review Group 175 – Encouraging Participation in the Elective Daily Metered Regime 26 th June 2008.
MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime 28 May 2009 Code User Pays Services.
Draft Modification Proposal: Population and Maintenance of Market Sector Code within Sites & Meters Simon Trivella –26 th November 2009 Distribution Workstream.
IGT and Shipper Workgroup meeting 28 th February 2011.
FGO: ASA Service Line Review
Transmission Workstream 7th Dec 2006 Chris Logue
Distribution workstream 29th January 2009
Supply Point Register 7th December 2011
Supply Point Register 21st November 2011
Supply Point Register 10th January 2012
Transitional Exit Capacity Proposals -Update
Transmission Workstream February 2009
Datalogger / DMV Modification Proposals - Summary
Exit Capacity User Commitment – Transmission Workstream update
Simon Trivella – February 2007 Distribution Workstream
Transmission Workstream 4th July 2007
UIG Task Force Progress Report
Action 0002: Meter Error Notifications
Meter Status Table Providing timely opening reads is an obligation to the confirming shippers. However where the confirming shipper fails to meet this.
XRN Construction of a Meter Reading where a Converter and AMR is recorded OR where a Meter with Conversion capability is fitted v2 DWG 28/06/2018.
Revised registration for unregistered sites
Reconciliation of Shipper and Supplier Theft Data – April 2018 PAC
Change Management Committee – June 2019 Update
Distribution Workstream UNC Modification 0224 Draft UKLink Implementation Summary Responses 26th February 2009.
Simon Trivella – 22nd May 2008 Distribution Workstream
CSEPs Reconciliation Proposals
Theft on Shipper-less Sites
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
The Necessary Criteria for a UNC Modification Proposal
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
MOD 258A Demand Estimation Sample Point – Shipper Report.
Proposer: Colette Baldwin – E.ON Panel Date: 21st August 2014
UNC Modification Proposal 0362
Release 2 Scope Business Benefit Review
Distribution Workgroup 8 August 2012 Joanna Ferguson
Topic raised at July 2009 Distribution Workstream
Mod 124 Steve Nunnington.
XRN Construction of a Meter Reading where a Converter and AMR is recorded DSG 18/06/2018 DWG 28/06/2018.
Datalogger / DMV Modification Proposals - Summary
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
PN UNC Workgroup (Settlement topic)
Modification proposal 330
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Modification Proposal 115 – ‘Correct Apportionment of NDM Error’
Proposer: Debbie Brace Panel Date: 20th March 2014
Evaluation.
MOD 640 INVOICING VALIDATION RULES
Modification Proposal 255 – LSP Objection Rates
Gas Customer Forum Project Nexus xoserve update (as of 19th July 2010) 26th July 2010 Final.
MOD Proposal 0224 Facilitating the use of AMR in the Daily Metered Elective Regime Distribution Workstream Update Following Completion of Analysis 23rd.
xoserve Services XOSERVE SCOPE Sites Register Maintenance Shipper
Presentation transcript:

Procurement of NDM profiling data Simon Trivella – 24th June 2010 Distribution Workstream - Elexon

Background / Drivers Mod 258A allows DNs to procure data rather than install dataloggers Xoserve collect data for profile groups 1 and 2 using centralised process Increase in AMR and new supplier obligation increases the number of devices attached to meters resulting in: More options for obtaining data More cases of devices being disconnected resulting in lost data and therefore data not being usable Networks could consider seeking to procure data from third parties to supplement data from currently installed dataloggers Shippers, Suppliers, MAMs, AMR providers, customers If this approach was cost effective and reliable then this could become the way networks satisfy their UNC obligations

Delivery options Requirements Options 12-13 months data required (to allow for Easter) Data provider would warrant that it had permission for the data to be used for profiling Data provider would be responsible for providing data that satisfied the agreed criteria Options Risk for incomplete data set or complete dataset that fails xoserve validation could be allocated in different ways between network and data provider Format in which data provided could be strictly defined or have to satisfy more general requirements These options will affect costs incurred by data provider and networks/xoserve and therefore whether this is a cost effective approach

Discussion points Is there sufficient data and interest for this approach to be sensible now? Are there data protection issues over providing this data? We would welcome any comments on the options and views on the balance of risk and cost

Procurement of NDM profiling data Simon Trivella – 24th June 2010 Distribution Workstream - Elexon