WRKY20 dual sgRNA approach.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Target gene gRNA NameTarget sequence / PAM*Restriction Enzyme Young Seedling Albino (YSA)gYSAGCGCGCCACCTCGGCCGAAG / CGGSfiI Phytoene desaturase (PDS) gPDS-1†CGTCCAACCCATTCCTCTGC.
Advertisements

Simple-Sequence Length Polymorphisms
SBT Unique Selling Points
Alternative Splicing of a Novel Glycophorin Allele GPHe(GL) Generates Two Protein Isoforms in the Human Erythrocyte Membrane by Cheng-Han Huang, Olga O.
by Samuel D. Perli, Cheryl H. Cui, and Timothy K. Lu
Dan Ding, Kaiyuan Chen, Yuedan Chen, Hong Li, Kabin Xie 
In vivo optimization of the tagging approach using the Act5C model locus and flow cytometry-based quantification of the Act5C-GFP tagging success. In vivo.
by Fawwaz Yassin, Sheldon P. Rothenberg, Sreedhar Rao, Marilyn M
Polymorphisms within glutathione S-transferase genes (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1) and risk of relapse in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia:
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing of PML in human cell lines.
Molecular Diagnosis of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Using Next- Generation Sequencing  Adrian Y. Tan, Alber Michaeel, Genyan Liu, Olivier.
Stacks simulation results.
Strategy for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in ΔEx50 mice
Relationship between Genotype and Phenotype
Correction of a Genetic Disease in Mouse via Use of CRISPR-Cas9
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
lgc-35 (L324S) CRISPR-Cas9-RNP genotyping and Mendelian segregation.
The ETS-CRE array identifies genomic sequences specifically cobound by CREB1 and GABPα. The ETS-CRE array identifies genomic sequences specifically cobound.
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Expanding the Scope of CRISPR/Cpf1-Mediated Genome Editing in Rice
Volume 171, Issue 2, Pages e8 (October 2017)
USH2A Gene Editing Using the CRISPR System
Supplemental Figure 3 A B C T-DNA 1 2 RGLG1 2329bp 3 T-DNA 1 2 RGLG2
Molecular cloning of pms916 salt hypersensitive T-DNA mutant.
Structure of the GM2A Gene: Identification of an Exon 2 Nonsense Mutation and a Naturally Occurring Transcript with an In-Frame Deletion of Exon 2  Biao.
RNA-Guided Genome Editing in Plants Using a CRISPR–Cas System
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Simultaneous Reprogramming and Gene Correction of Patient Fibroblasts
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
SINE insertion in exon 2 of the ATP1B2 gene (ATP1B2:c.130_131ins227).
A Comprehensive Analysis of Recently Integrated Human Ta L1 Elements
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (November 2014)
Genome-wide binding sites of OsMADS1 and the distribution of binding sites in different regions of annotated genes. Genome-wide binding sites of OsMADS1.
Volume 153, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Mutagenesis through Cas9/sgRNA-induced HDR
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Col max1-1 max3-9 max4-11 Atd14-1 max2-4 ein2-5 ein3-1 eil1-3 0 day
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Identification of the GCS1 ortholog in Gonium pectorale.
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Southern blot analysis of ΔpksP mutant generated in the Af293 background. Southern blot analysis of ΔpksP mutant generated in the Af293 background. (A)
Deletion of Srf with a skeletal muscle-specific Cre transgene.
Generation of heterozygous mutations with the CRISPR-Cas9 system.
Flowering-time QTL in crosses of Lz-0 with Ler and Col.
Sampling locations and IDs for accessions sequenced in this study.
Inactivation of the Dp1 locus.
Mutation in pycr1a exon 3 disrupts predicted exonic splicing enhancers
Organization of TCAST elements within T
Fig. 1. Generation of WNK3 knockout mice
The sh339 and qmc554 alleles of gfi1b.
(A) yellow cDNA comparison among wild-type and ch mutants
Fig. 4 Gene disruption via chip.
Fig. 6. F1 trβ mutants accomplish natural metamorphosis.
Amplicon sequencing analysis of on-target sites in trβ crispants
Volume 171, Issue 2, Pages e8 (October 2017)
A two-step method to flexibly engineer the fly genome.
Multiplexed Mutagenesis Using the Csy4 System in Tomato Protoplasts.
Editing and reconstitution of CPAR2_
Structure of the IFL1 Gene and the Nature of the Mutations in the ifl1 Alleles.(A) A schematic representation of the exon and intron organization of the.
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages (November 2018)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Fig. 1 Exon 44–deleted DMD patient iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes express dystrophin after CRISPR-Cas9–mediated genome editing. Exon 44–deleted DMD patient.
Construction of sgRNA expression cassette.
Keratinocyte-specific disruption of the Stat3 gene by the Cre-LoxP system. Keratinocyte-specific disruption of the Stat3 gene by the Cre-LoxP system. A,
Genome-Edited Triple-Recessive Mutation Alters Seed Dormancy in Wheat
Schematic representation of the HPV genome, highlighting the regions important in PCR-based HPV analysis. Schematic representation of the HPV genome, highlighting.
Knock-in of the rpl42-P56Q mutation using the split-ura4 system.
Fig. 3 Genome editing of the MSTN gene.
Presentation transcript:

WRKY20 dual sgRNA approach. WRKY20 dual sgRNA approach. A, genomic structure of WRKY20 and location of the sgRNAs. Dark green boxes designate exons; light green boxes, UTRs; solid lines, introns. B, PCR analysis of T1 lines. Leaf genomic DNA of 2 batches (A and B) of 20 chimeric T1 plants was PCR amplified. The expected size of the WT WRKY20 amplicon is indicated as well as the expected size of the deletion of 247 bp between Cas9 cut sites. Four continued T1 lines having one T-DNA locus are highlighted with green boxes. C, Cas9 PCR for the four continued lines in T2 generation. Putative Cas9 null-segregants are indicated with green boxes. D, Cas9 null-segregants were genotypes for WRKY20. The selected lines A15-8 (wrky2-1 wrky20-1) and B2-5 (wrky2-1 wrky20-2) are boxed. E, Sequence alignment of the simultaneously targeted loci for Col-0 and alleles wrky20-1 and wrky20-2. PAMs are highlighted, the Cas9 cut sites indicated with triangles. Deleted bases are indicated with dashed lines. The reading frame is marked. Laurens Pauwels et al. G3 2018;8:2603-2615 ©2018 by Genetics Society of America