Macroporous 3D scaffolds for studying MSC migration and differentiation within cartilage defects G. Plumton, I. Adjei, A. Martin-Pena, G.D. Palmer, B. Sharma Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Volume 24, Pages S162-S163 (April 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.320 Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 SEM Image of nanoporous and macroporoushydrogels. 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30% weight per volume gelatin microspheres (diamter 150–300 μm were suspended in solution to demonstrate variable porosity and architecture. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2016 24, S162-S163DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.320) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions
Figure 2. Luminosity at three time points of cell media containing secreted luciferase produced by transfected cells. No luminosity registered in the control groups without virus. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2016 24, S162-S163DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.320) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 Left: GFP fluorescing cells (green)in a macroporoushydrogel. Right: MSCs in a PEGDA hydrogel transduced with a lentiviral reporter construct, constitutively expressingtdTomato (red), and with GFP production linked to the Collagen 2 promoter. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 2016 24, S162-S163DOI: (10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.320) Copyright © 2016 Terms and Conditions