Experrt Judgment short course, NIA 15,16 April 2008

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What can Statistics do for me? Marian Scott Dept of Statistics, University of Glasgow Statistics course, September 2007.
Advertisements

General Statistics Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) 1. Directly measure the variable. - referred.
Basic Optimization Problem Notes for AGEC 641 Bruce McCarl Regents Professor of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M University Spring 2005.
Environmental Risk Analysis
Environmental Health: Risk Assessment and Risk Management Michael Brody, PhD Senior Environmental Scientist 2 December 2011 Almaty, Kazakhstan.
WELCOME THE 12 TH ANNUAL MARCES/MSDE CONFERENCE: Value Added Modeling and Growth Modeling with Particular Application to Teacher and School Effectiveness.
Task Force on Health Recent results - Particulate matter Michal Krzyzanowski TFH Chair Head, Bonn Office European Centre for Environment and Health WHO.
General Statistics Ch En 475 Unit Operations. Quantifying variables (i.e. answering a question with a number) Each has some error or uncertainty.
U.S. EPA DISCLAIMER EPA strongly cautions that these study results should not be used to draw conclusions about local exposure concentrations or risk.
Introduction to Risk Analysis in Healthcare Farrokh Alemi Ph.D. Professor of Health Administration and Policy College of Health and Human Services, George.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Stephen G. CECCHETTI Kermit L. SCHOENHOLTZ Understanding Risk Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Stakeholder Preference Modeling with Probabilistic Inversion Roger M. Cooke Resources for the Future Dept Math, TU Delft June 16, 2011.
TEACHING STATISTICS CONCEPTS THROUGH STOCK MARKET CONTEXTS Larry Weldon Simon Fraser University.
Environmental Science Chapter 2 – Scientific Tools Test Review
Copernicus Institute Universiteit Utrecht Taking uncertainty on board in decision making The example of adaptation to climate change.
Basic principles on Risk Communication Cristiana Salvi Information and Outreach Unit Special Programme on Health and Environment WHO Regional Office for.
Benefit: Cost Ratio David Pannell School of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Western Australia.
Part 1d: Exposure Assessment and Modeling Thomas Robins, MD, MPH.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
A summary lecture on two long-lived eruptions, and how we as scientists might respond to such events.
Futron Corporation 2021 Cunningham Drive, Suite 303 Hampton, Virginia Phone Fax Results You Can Trust Assessing.
Using Expert Elicitation to Attribute Foodborne Illness to Food Consumption Sandra Hoffmann, Paul Fischbeck, and Alan Krupnick FSIS Public Meeting: Attributing.
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
Rosemarie Bernabe, PhD Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care Patient representatives’ contributions to the benefit-risk assessment tasks of.
AMBIGUITY 2 day short course on Expert Judgment Roger Cooke Resources for the Future Dept. Math, Delft Univ. of Technology April 15, UNCERTAINTY.
Risk management Here’s my section for risk management! ~ Christopher Thornton.
Presentation on Livermore Lab Site 300 Superfund Cleanup Peter Strauss, Environmental Scientist, PM Strauss & Assoc. Community-Wide Meeting on
Effective Time Management
Linear Algebra Review.
Consumer Decision Making
The treatment of uncertainty in the results
Chapter 6 Inferences Based on a Single Sample: Estimation with Confidence Intervals Slides for Optional Sections Section 7.5 Finite Population Correction.
Making Marketing Decisions
“Analytical Tools and Data Collection” Workshop April 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Roman Ladus Session 6 Measuring Impacts 1.
THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
NURS3030H NURSING RESEARCH IN PRACTICE MODULE 7 ‘Systematic Reviews’’
Benefit: Cost Ratio.
Evaluating Cumulative Impacts: The Value of Epidemiology
Statistical Core Didactic
PM 512 The Customer In The Project Process April 18,1998
What’s Reasonable About a Range?
Emina Herovic, Ph.D. Candidate University of Kentucky
Please rate and review on TES.com
Test Validity.
Sustainability.
General principles in building a predictive model
Expert elicitation Jouni Tuomisto THL.
7 How to Decide Which Variables to Manipulate and Measure Marziyeh Rezaee.
Session II: Reserve Ranges Who Does What
Environmental Risk Assessment
Chapter 1 Science Test Notes
Using expert knowledge elicitation to quantify uncertainty
Gerd Kortemeyer, William F. Punch
REMOTE SENSING Multispectral Image Classification
University of South Florida
ASSESSING THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCE OF POTENTIAL MAJOR ACCIDENTS
Disseminating statistical data by short quantified sentences of natural language Miroslav Hudec Faculty of Economic Informatics, University of Economics.
An overview of methods and an illustration on a Philippine case
Expert Judgment short course, NIA 15,16 April 2008
Evaluating Cumulative Impacts: The Value of Epidemiology
Principles of Science and Systems
Lesson Overview 1.1 What Is Science?.
BEC 30325: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
Forum on the strategies for the management and development of contaminated sites in Taiwan Shian-chee Wu October 25, 2007.
DeveloPING/ DeveloPED Countries
Strategies for Integrated Human and Ecological Assessment
Lesson Overview 1.1 What Is Science?.
Defining Reference Conditions Setting Class Boundaries
Nutrition Interventions to Improve Quality of Care
Presentation transcript:

Experrt Judgment short course, NIA 15,16 April 2008 UNCERTAINTY 3: Bumper Stickers for Expert Judgment AMBIGUITY Roger Cooke Resources for the Future Dept. Math, Delft Univ. of Technology April 15,16 2008 INDECISION

1. Expert Judgment is NOT Knowledge Scientific method – NOT EJ methods - produces agreement among experts EJ is for quantifying ....not removing..... uncertainty. Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

2. Experts CAN quantify uncertainty as subjective probability Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3 TU DELFT Expert Judgment database 45 applications (anno 2005): # experts variables elicitations Nuclear applications 98 2,203 20,461 Chemical & gas industry 56 403 4,491 Groundwater / water pollution / dike ring / barriers 49 212 3,714 Aerospace sector / space debris /aviation 51 161 1,149 Occupational sector: ladders / buildings (thermal physics) 13 70 800 Health: bovine / chicken (Campylobacter) / SARS 46 240 2,979 Banking: options / rent / operational risk 24 119 4,328 Volcanoes / dams 231 673 29079 Rest group 19 762 TOTAL 521 3688 67001

Including 6700 calibration variables Study Variables of interest calibration variables Dispersion Far-field dispersion coeff’s Near-field tracer exper’ts Environmental transport Transfer coeff’s Cumulative concentrations Dose-response models Human dose response Animal dose response Investment pricing Quarterly rates Weekly rates PM2.5 Long term mortality rates Short term mortality ratio’s Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

Calibration questions for PM2.5 RESS-PM25.pdf In London 2000, weekly average PM10 was 18.4 μg/m3. What is the ratio: # non-accidental deaths in the week with the highest average PM10 concentration (33.4 μg/m3)  Weekly average # non-accidental deaths. 5% :_______ 25%:_______ 50% :_______ 75%:________95%:________ Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

3. Experts confidence does NOT predict performance Very informative assessors may be statistically least accurate PM25-Range-graphs.doc Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

4. Experts are sometimes well calibrated AMS-OPTION-TRADERS-RANGE-GRAPHS.doc realestate-range graphs.doc Sometimes not GL-invasive-species-range-graphs.doc Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

5. Experts sometimes agree Dispersion-USNRC-EU-RANGE-GRAPHS.doc And sometimes don’t Campy-range-graphs.doc Earlyhealth-USNRC-EU-Range-graphs.doc Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

6. Classical model usually works, but not always All experts, and all combinations can be bad: Soil-animal-USNRC-EU-range-graphs.doc Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

7. We CAN do better than equal weighting RESS-TUDdatabase.pdf Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

Out-of-sample Validation RESS_response2comments.pdf Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3 13 studies with  14 seed vbls, split, initialize on one half, predict other half

8. Citation-based (social network) weights do NOT perform better RESS-SocNet&Likelwgts.pdf Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

9. Experts like performance assessment Ask them Aspinall_mvo_exerpts.pdf, Aspinall et al Geol Soc _.pdf , Aspinall & Cooke PSAM4 3-9.pdf, SparksAspinall_VolcanicActivity.pdf Separate scientific assessment of uncertainty from decision making Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

Experrt Judgment short course, NIA 15,16 April 2008 Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3 “ In the first few weeks of the Montserrat crisis there was perhaps, at times, some unwarranted scientific dogmatism about what might or might not happen at the volcano, especially in terms of it turning magmatic and explosive. The confounding effects of these diverging, categorical stances were then compounded for a short while by an overall diminution in communication between scientists and the various civil authorities. The result was a dip in the confidence of the authorities in the MVO team and, with it, some loss of public credibility; this was not fully restored until later, when a consensual approach was achieved. “ Aspinall et al The Montserrat Volcano Observatory: its evolution, organization, rôle and activities.

10. The choice is NOT whether to use EJ; but: do it well or do it badly? “NASA must always strive for the highest level of accomplishment, to exceed the expectations of the Nation, and to do what is right...”(Return to Flight task group p.14) Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3

Lets have another break Ambiguity Indecision Uncertainty 3