Cardiovascular and Metabolic Responses During Functional Electric Stimulation Cycling at Different Cadences Ché Fornusek, PhD, Glen M. Davis, PhD Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages 719-725 (April 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.035 Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 Performance and cardiorespiratory responses of the 9 subjects during passive and FES cycling at 3 pedaling cadences. Displayed are (A) heart rate, (B) V̇o2, and (C) cardiac output. Results are plotted every 5 minutes as means ± SE. Some SE bars have been omitted for clarity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2008 89, 719-725DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.035) Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Gross ME during FES cycling by the 9 subjects at 3 pedaling cadences. Results were plotted every 5 minutes as means ± SE. *ME30 significantly greater (P<.05); †ME15 significantly lower; ‡significant difference between all 3 pedaling cadences. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2008 89, 719-725DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.035) Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 Left quadriceps So2 during passive and FES cycling by the 9 subjects at 3 pedaling cadences. Results were plotted every 5 minutes as means ± SE. Some SE bars have been omitted for clarity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2008 89, 719-725DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.035) Copyright © 2008 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions