Local Regulation of Homeostasis Favors Chromosomal Instability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Cell cycle: Mitosis
Advertisements

The Rate of Concentration of the stationary distribution of a Markov Chain on the Homogenous Populations. Boris Mitavskiy and Jonathan Rowe School of Computer.
Natalia Komarova (University of California - Irvine) Somatic evolution and cancer.
BRCA Mutations and Breast Cancer Ruth Phillips and Patty Ashby.
MIGRATION  Movement of individuals from one subpopulation to another followed by random mating.  Movement of gametes from one subpopulation to another.
Evolutionary Graph Theory. Uses of graphical framework Graph can represent relationships in a social network of humans E.g. “Six degrees of separation”
1 Evolutionary Change in Nucleotide Sequences Dan Graur.
Review: Cancer Modeling
Karyotyping Cancer.
Allan Balmain, Hiroki Nagase  Trends in Genetics 
MIGRATION Movement of individuals from one subpopulation to another followed by random mating. Movement of gametes from one subpopulation to another followed.
Cancer – a disease of many mutations
p53 function and regulation in normal cells and cancer cells
Intro to microbial evolution
CANCER.
Jingkui Wang, Marc Lefranc, Quentin Thommen  Biophysical Journal 
Regulation of the Cell Cycle & Cancer
Slit-Robo Cancer Cell Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 1-2 (July 2003)
Timing Is Everything: Brca2 and p53 Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer
Focus on colon cancer Cancer Cell
K. Lenhard Rudolph, Daniel Hartmann, Oliver G. Opitz  Gastroenterology 
The Multifaceted Role of the Intestinal Microbiota in Colon Cancer
Gerry P. Crossan, Juan I. Garaycoechea, Ketan J. Patel  Cell Stem Cell 
BIOLOGY 12 Cancer.
Gene Dysregulations Driven by Somatic Copy Number Aberrations-Biological and Clinical Implications in Colon Tumors  Manny D. Bacolod, Francis Barany 
The BRCA1 suppressor hypothesis: An explanation for the tissue-specific tumor development in BRCA1 patients  Stephen J Elledge, Angelika Amon  Cancer.
Speciation: Down the bottleneck?
Cell signaling and cancer
MIGRATION Movement of individuals from one subpopulation to another followed by random mating. Movement of gametes from one subpopulation to another followed.
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Cancer.
Genome-wide Profiling in AML Patients Relapsing after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation  Miguel Waterhouse, Dietmar Pfeifer, Milena Pantic,
Volume 148, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Evolutionary Genetics: A Piggyback Ride to Adaptation and Diversity
Plant genetics: Unlocking the secrets of self-incompatibility
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
New Views into the Genetic Landscape of Metastatic Breast Cancer
The p27Kip1 tumor suppressor gene: Still a suspect or proven guilty?
Environmental Carcinogenesis
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Stem Cell Heterogeneity and Plasticity in Epithelia
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Biomedical Technology
Reprogramming Enhancers to Drive Metastasis
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
High Frequency of Loss of Heterozygosity on Chromosome Region 9p21–p22 but Lack of p16INK4a/p19ARF Mutations in Greek Patients with Basal Cell Carcinoma.
Colocalization of Multiple DNA Loci: A Physical Mechanism
Michael M. Desai, Daniel S. Fisher, Andrew W. Murray  Current Biology 
Antigen-Presenting Cells: Professionals and amateurs
Inflammation-Associated Cancer Development in Digestive Organs: Mechanisms and Roles for Genetic and Epigenetic Modulation  Tsutomu Chiba, Hiroyuki Marusawa,
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Timing Is Everything: Brca2 and p53 Mutations in Pancreatic Cancer
Tumor Metabolism: MAGE-A Proteins Help TRIM Turn Over AMPK
Gene Dysregulations Driven by Somatic Copy Number Aberrations-Biological and Clinical Implications in Colon Tumors  Manny D. Bacolod, Francis Barany 
Genetic Damage and Mutation
Biomedical Technology
Andrew E. Blanchard, Chen Liao, Ting Lu  Biophysical Journal 
NF1 Tumor Suppressor Gene Function
Constitutional Mutations of the hSNF5/INI1 Gene Predispose to a Variety of Cancers  Nicolas Sévenet, Eammon Sheridan, Daniel Amram, Pascale Schneider,
Mutations and aneuploidy
Under Pressure: Stromal Fibroblasts Change Their Ways
Lineage compartments in Drosophila
All Roads Lead to the Ribosome
Immunity, Inflammation, and Cancer
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Searching for leukemia stem cells—Not yet the end of the road?
Cancer: The Transforming Power of Cell Competition
Single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis can distinguish different genetic mechanisms that lead to loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Single nucleotide.
Anthony N. Imbalzano, Stephen N. Jones  Cancer Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Local Regulation of Homeostasis Favors Chromosomal Instability Franziska Michor, Yoh Iwasa, Natalia L Komarova, Martin A Nowak  Current Biology  Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 581-584 (April 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00172-6

Figure 1 Processes and Rates (A) Cancer initiation via a tumor suppressor (TSP) gene with or without chromosomal instability (CIN). The mutation rate per gene is given by u. The rate of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in normal and CIN cells is given by p0 and p, respectively. We have p >>p0. CIN mutations are acquired at a rate of uc. (B) If the mutation rate is small, u << 1/N, then compartments of size N are almost always homogeneous, that is they contain only a single type of cell. In this case, the evolutionary dynamics of cancer initiation can be formulated as a stochastic process, which describes transitions among compartments. A wild-type compartment, TSP+/+, mutates to a TSP+/− compartment at a rate of 2u. Without CIN, the TSP−/− compartment is reached at a rate of N(u + p0)ρ(a). The transition from the TSP+/+ and TSP+/− states to the corresponding states with CIN happen at a rate of Nucρ(r). In CIN compartments, the TSP+/− state gives rise to the TSP−/− state at a rate of N(u + p)ρ(a), which is much faster than all other rates. In addition, there are two “tunnels” [23, 30]. The first one originates from the chromosomally stable TSP+/− state and occurs at a rate of Nucrp/(1 − r)ρ(ar). It is important only if Nrp/(1 − r)ρ(ar) >> 1. The second one starts from a chromosomally unstable TSP+/+ state and takes place at a rate of 2Nupρa. It is important only if Npρa >> 1. Current Biology 2003 13, 581-584DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00172-6)

Figure 1 Processes and Rates (A) Cancer initiation via a tumor suppressor (TSP) gene with or without chromosomal instability (CIN). The mutation rate per gene is given by u. The rate of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in normal and CIN cells is given by p0 and p, respectively. We have p >>p0. CIN mutations are acquired at a rate of uc. (B) If the mutation rate is small, u << 1/N, then compartments of size N are almost always homogeneous, that is they contain only a single type of cell. In this case, the evolutionary dynamics of cancer initiation can be formulated as a stochastic process, which describes transitions among compartments. A wild-type compartment, TSP+/+, mutates to a TSP+/− compartment at a rate of 2u. Without CIN, the TSP−/− compartment is reached at a rate of N(u + p0)ρ(a). The transition from the TSP+/+ and TSP+/− states to the corresponding states with CIN happen at a rate of Nucρ(r). In CIN compartments, the TSP+/− state gives rise to the TSP−/− state at a rate of N(u + p)ρ(a), which is much faster than all other rates. In addition, there are two “tunnels” [23, 30]. The first one originates from the chromosomally stable TSP+/− state and occurs at a rate of Nucrp/(1 − r)ρ(ar). It is important only if Nrp/(1 − r)ρ(ar) >> 1. The second one starts from a chromosomally unstable TSP+/+ state and takes place at a rate of 2Nupρa. It is important only if Npρa >> 1. Current Biology 2003 13, 581-584DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00172-6)

Figure 2 The Effect of Compartment Size on the Frequency of CIN Small compartments reduce the rate of inactivation of TSP genes without CIN but increase the rate of TSP inactivation via CIN. At the optimum compartment size, there can be a substantial probability that CIN precedes TSP inactivation as a first step toward cancer. Mutation in nc genes gives rise to CIN. Chromosomally unstable cells have a relative growth rate r and an LOH rate of p. Introduce the rate constants Rx = X(t)/(u2t2), Ry = Y(t)/(u2t2), and R = Rx + Ry. Rx, Ry, and R denote, respectively, the rate constant of cancer initiation without CIN, with CIN, and in total. The probabilities X(t) and Y(t) are given in the text. The parameter values are nc = 50, u = 10−7, p0 = 10−7, p = 10−2, a = 10, and r = 0.8 in (A) and r = 0.5 in (B). Current Biology 2003 13, 581-584DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00172-6)

Figure 3 Fixation Probability with and without CIN Cells with an inactivated TSP gene (red) have a selective advantage. Such cells have a high probability to take over both small and large compartments. After the takeover, there are fewer mutated cells in small compartments than in large compartments, and this reduces the risk of further tumor progression. Here, we suppose the mutation is contained within the boundaries of the compartment. Hence, small compartments are more effective in containing the accumulation of cells with mutations in TSP genes. CIN cells (yellow) normally have a selective disadvantage. Since random drift is important in small compartments, there is still a certain probability that CIN mutations will be fixed. In large compartments, this probability is negligible. Consider, for example, a CIN mutation that reduces fitness by 20%. In a compartment of N = 4 cells, its probability of fixation is 0.17. In a compartment of N = 40 cells, its probability of fixation is 3 × 10−5. Current Biology 2003 13, 581-584DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00172-6)

Figure 4 The Risk of Cancer Initiation as a Function of the Compartment Size CIN mutations can differ in the rate at which they occur, ui, their selective cost, ri, and the rate of LOH they induce, pi. The probability that a compartment contains only TSP−/− cells with CIN at time t is now given by Y2t = 2ut2 ∑ni=1 uiFi. The parameter Fi can be interpreted as a “fitness factor” of CIN mutation i. It is given by . The figure shows the fitness factor, Fi, for various CIN mutations as a function of the compartment size, N. The parameter values pi and ri are given in the figure. Inactivation of the first TSP via CIN mutations with a low selective cost and a high rate of LOH is best contained by the smallest possible compartment size, N = 1. For other CIN mutations, there is an intermediate optimum for the compartment size. The other parameter values are u = 10−7 and a = 10. Current Biology 2003 13, 581-584DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00172-6)