Project Status Review May 13-15, 2008

LCLS Project Status Review Focus and drivers Construction Safety

LCLS Installation and Commissioning Time-Line First Light in FEE Early Science program start First Light in FEH LTU/Und/Dump Install PPS Cert. LTU/Dump FEE/NEH Install X-Rays in NEH FEH Hutch BO CD-4 (7/31/2010) PEP-II run ends FEH Install now J F M A M J J A A S O N D J F M A A M M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J 2008 2009 2010 Down PPS Near Hall Operations Linac/BC2 Commissioning Re-commission Inj/BC2 to SL2 LTU/Und Comm. NEH Operations/ Commissioning FEE Comm.

We Focus On Two Near Term Objectives Complete the next “140 days” of Turner led construction activities safely while simultaneously installing the undulators and other elements of equipment. Minimize installation rework or construction progress interferences. Transition quickly from a "Turner operated" site to an entirely "LCLS Operated" site. Achieve Science in ’09 Objective – In the next 15 months deliver: The integrated early science portfolio, user community outreach, policy definitions and administration, integrated SLAC/LCLS infrastructure and business systems, Routine LCLS accelerator and laser operations, and ultimately Be fully ready for 500 – 1000 hours of beam time access

We Focus On Two Near Term Objectives Complete the next 140 days of Turner led construction activities safely while simultaneously installing the undulators and other elements of equipment. Minimize installation rework or construction progress interferences. Transition quickly from a "Turner operated" site to an entirely "LCLS Operated" site.

PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCE Through 31 October 2007 DART Rate Total Project Hours 1.4 M Hours worked SubContractors 322 K Hours worked 6 DART Incident 1 Days Away 1 Total Recordable Case LCLS Collaboration 1.1 M Hours worked 2 DART Injuries 20 Days without DART 147 Days without Days Away Note: Injury rates based on 200 K hours (100 man years) of effort.

PROJECT SAFETY EXPERIENCE 29 March 2008 DART Rate Total Project Hours 1.73 M Hours worked LCLS Collaboration 1.27 M Hours worked 2 DART Incidents None in past 24 months LCLS Sub-Contractors 108 K Hours worked No Injuries TCCo 348 K Hours Worked 8 DART Incidents CF Managed Work MMF, Sector 20, Research Yard Demotion, Substation 522, etc, are examples of contracted work managed by CF. Their results speak for themselves. The management of these sub-contractors was not without issues, but the issues were identified and addressed by the CF UTRs in an effective manner. John Galayda set the tone early in the management of sub-contracted work by personally reviewing the UTR work planning packages and insisting on resubmissions until he was satisfied that they understood the details of the work and the level of oversight expected of the UTRs. Project UTRs and Installation managers have the implementation and enforcement of construction safety as a condition of employment. Technical Systems Installation The management of the technical systems installation, beginning with the injector and continuing to today, has been accomplished with a work planning & control process the project developed. The process relies on installation manager ownership of safety planning The process relies heavily on the ISM 5 Core Functions TCCo’s performance is causing us alarm GC Managed Work and details of the LCLS stewardship of the contractor safety will be addressed in the CF breakout. However, at a high level lets take a look at what LCLS Management has been doing to address the problem. Note: Injury rates based on 200 K hours (100 man years) of effort.

CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES Safety Performance – Last 30 Days Turner Construction senses they are “over the hump” Injury rate increases (DART rate above national average) Turner personnel and trade personnel changes / fines levied Tunnel contractor begins to de-mobilize Oversight Findings: Serious injuries (shoulder and hand) Actions: Work Activity stopped. Trade and Management personnel changes made Safety statistics reviewed – ISM focus on “Perform the Work” inadequate Letter to Turner Corporate

CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES What must we do differently? Plan for joint observation and monitoring of the work – while maintaining Turners performance obligation. Review of JSA / Pre-task meeting notes Attendance at each Pre-task meeting (Turner augmented by CF UTRs) Monitor Specific trade contractors or activities for safe work practices Minimize site distractions Consolidate tour planning and routes Focus on field management and awareness We own site safety and will maintain safe progress