Cytoplasmic ATR Activation Promotes Vaccinia Virus Genome Replication

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 63, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Advertisements

RhoD Inhibits RhoC-ROCK-Dependent Cell Contraction via PAK6
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
ASF1a Promotes Non-homologous End Joining Repair by Facilitating Phosphorylation of MDC1 by ATM at Double-Strand Breaks  Kyung Yong Lee, Jun-Sub Im, Etsuko.
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
F11L-Mediated Inhibition of RhoA-mDia Signaling Stimulates Microtubule Dynamics during Vaccinia Virus Infection  Yoshiki Arakawa, João V. Cordeiro, Michael.
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (October 2015)
SMARCAD1 Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination Are Required for Resection during DNA Double-Strand Break Repair  Sharmistha Chakraborty, Raj K. Pandita,
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
UV-Induced RPA1 Acetylation Promotes Nucleotide Excision Repair
Distinct but Concerted Roles of ATR, DNA-PK, and Chk1 in Countering Replication Stress during S Phase  Rémi Buisson, Jessica L. Boisvert, Cyril H. Benes,
Oocytes Progress beyond Prophase in the Presence of DNA Damage
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Wenqi Wang, Nan Li, Xu Li, My Kim Tran, Xin Han, Junjie Chen 
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Coupling of Homologous Recombination and the Checkpoint by ATR
SMARCAL1 Resolves Replication Stress at ALT Telomeres
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Activation of DNA Damage Response Signaling by Condensed Chromatin
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
SUMO-2 Orchestrates Chromatin Modifiers in Response to DNA Damage
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages e5 (March 2018)
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages e9 (November 2017)
Shane M. Harding, Jonathan A. Boiarsky, Roger A. Greenberg 
Septins Regulate Actin Organization and Cell-Cycle Arrest through Nuclear Accumulation of NCK Mediated by SOCS7  Brandon E. Kremer, Laura A. Adang, Ian.
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 21, Pages (November 2015)
SUMO-2 Orchestrates Chromatin Modifiers in Response to DNA Damage
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (March 2018)
Inhibitor Mediated Protein Degradation
F11L-Mediated Inhibition of RhoA-mDia Signaling Stimulates Microtubule Dynamics during Vaccinia Virus Infection  Yoshiki Arakawa, João V. Cordeiro, Michael.
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (August 2017)
Sara K. Donnelly, Ina Weisswange, Markus Zettl, Michael Way 
New Histone Incorporation Marks Sites of UV Repair in Human Cells
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Urtzi Garaigorta, Francis V. Chisari  Cell Host & Microbe 
Poxviral B1 Kinase Overcomes Barrier to Autointegration Factor, a Host Defense against Virus Replication  Matthew S. Wiebe, Paula Traktman  Cell Host.
Cellular 5′-3′ mRNA Exonuclease Xrn1 Controls Double-Stranded RNA Accumulation and Anti-Viral Responses  Hannah M. Burgess, Ian Mohr  Cell Host & Microbe 
Vaccinia Virus F11 Promotes Viral Spread by Acting as a PDZ-Containing Scaffolding Protein to Bind Myosin-9A and Inhibit RhoA Signaling  Yutaka Handa,
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
DNA Damage Foci at Dysfunctional Telomeres
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Sangeet Lal, Corey Raffel  Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics 
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Two Distinct Modes of ATR Activation Orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1
Sirt6 Promotes DNA End Joining in iPSCs Derived from Old Mice
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Marek Adamowicz, Jelena Vermezovic, Fabrizio d’Adda di Fagagna 
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Mahesh Ramamoorthy, Susan Smith  Cancer Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Single-Stranded DNA Orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR Switch at DNA Breaks
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Yun-Gui Yang, Tomas Lindahl, Deborah E. Barnes  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Cytoplasmic ATR Activation Promotes Vaccinia Virus Genome Replication Antonio Postigo, Amy E. Ramsden, Michael Howell, Michael Way  Cell Reports  Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 1022-1032 (May 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.025 Copyright © 2017 The Francis crick Institute Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 19, 1022-1032DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.025) Copyright © 2017 The Francis crick Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Vaccinia Induces a Cytoplasmic ATR/ATM-Dependent DNA Damage Response (A) Analysis of pSQ/TQ immunoreactivity (green) reveals phosphorylation of ATR/ATM substrates in response to infection with the Western Reserve (WR) strain of vaccinia virus at the indicated time post-infection or UV irradiation. The graph shows the quantitation of cells with cytoplasmic pSQ/TQ immunoreactivity. (B) Immunoblot analysis shows H2AX is phosphorylated in HeLa cells in response to UV irradiation, but not vaccinia infection. (C) Combined inhibition of ATM and ATR blocks vaccinia-induced cytoplasmic pSQ/TQ immunoreactivity. (D) Immunoblot analysis demonstrates that vaccinia induces phosphorylation of Chk1 and Chk2. Cell fractionation demonstrates that ATR and Chk1 are phosphorylated in the cytoplasm. (E) Analysis of pSQ/TQ immunoreactivity in cells infected for 4 hr and treated with the indicated inhibitors. All error bars represent SEM from three independent experiments in which a minimum of 200 cells were counted, with ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Scale bars, 20 μm. Cell Reports 2017 19, 1022-1032DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.025) Copyright © 2017 The Francis crick Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 ATR Activation Is Independent of Viral Genome Uncoating (A) Immunoblot analysis reveals that cycloheximide (CHX) and the proteasome inhibitor MG-132, but not AraC, inhibit both RPA Ser33 phosphorylation and late viral protein expression (F13). (B) Quantitative immunofluorescence analysis reveals that MG-132 inhibits vaccinia-induced cytoplasmic pSQ/TQ immunoreactivity (green). (C) Quantitative immunofluorescence analysis reveals that loss of D5 does not inhibit vaccinia-induced cytoplasmic pSQ/TQ immunoreactivity or expression of I3. All error bars represent SEM from three independent experiments in which a minimum of 200 cells were counted, with ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.005, and ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Scale bars, 20 μm. Cell Reports 2017 19, 1022-1032DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.025) Copyright © 2017 The Francis crick Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 ATR and Chk1 Are Required for Vaccinia Genome Replication (A) Immunoblot analysis demonstrates that ATR (ATRi VE-821), but not ATM (ATMi KU55633), inhibits late (F13 and A27), but not early (H5), viral protein expression 8 hr post-infection. (B) Immunofluorescence analysis of cells infected for 8 hr reveals that ATRi inhibits expression of RFP-A3, a late viral core protein. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) ATRi inhibits viral production 8 hpi. (D) Quantification of viral genome copy number in cells infected for 6 hr in the presence of AraC or ATRi 1 hr pre- (−1) or post- (+1) infection. Both AraC and ATRi inhibit expression of F13 (late), but not H5 (early). (E) Removal of AraC 4 hr post-infection in the presence, but not absence, of ATRi reduces genome replication and late (F13, A27), but not early (H5), viral protein expression. (F) Removal of AraC 4 hr post-infection in the presence of the indicated inhibitors reduces genome replication and late gene expression. All error bars represent SEM from three independent experiments, with ∗∗∗p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Cell Reports 2017 19, 1022-1032DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.025) Copyright © 2017 The Francis crick Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 RPA2 Recruitment of ATR Mediates Cytoplasmic Genome Replication (A) Analysis of F13 expression and virus growth in ATR- and RPA2-depleted HeLa cells 8 hr post-infection. (B) Immunofluorescence images reveal RPA is recruited to viral factories 8 hr post-infection (arrowheads). Quantitation of subcellular localization of RPA shows nuclear depletion of RPA2 during infection. (C) Immunoblot analysis of fractionated cells reveals that vaccinia increases the level of RPA2, ATR, and Ku70 in the cytoplasm 8 hr after infection. (D) Immunoblot analysis of whole-cell extracts reveals vaccinia induces phosphorylation of Ser33 of RPA2 from 4 hr post-infection. Immunofluorescence images showing pRPA2 (Ser33) co-localizes with viral factories 4 hr post-infection (green). (E) Immunofluorescence analysis of CldU incorporation after AraC washout reveals HAMNO treatment suppresses DNA replication and viral factory formation (arrowheads). (F) HAMNO inhibits viral genome replication, as well as late viral gene expression 12 hpi. All error bars represent SEM from three independent experiments, with ∗∗∗p < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. Scale bars, 20 μm. Cell Reports 2017 19, 1022-1032DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.025) Copyright © 2017 The Francis crick Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Viral Genomes Recruit Replisome-Associated RPA2 and Activate ATR (A) Immunofluorescence analysis of cells infected for 4 hr reveals a reduced incorporation of CldU (green) into developing viral factories in cell treated with siRNA against ATR, RPA2, Rhino, and INTS7. (B) Rhino is re-localized from the nucleus to the cytoplasm after infection, while INTS7 co-localizes with viral DNA factories 8 hr post-infection (arrowheads). (C) Immunoblot analysis of GFP-Trap pull-downs on cells infected with GFP-H5 virus for 5 hr. (D) Knockdown of ATR and TOPBP1 reduces incorporation of CldU (green) into developing viral factories. (E) Immunoblot analysis of GFP-Trap pull-downs on cells infected with GFP-H5 virus for 5 hr in the presence of AraC or after lysates were treated with DNase I. Scale bars, 20 μm. Cell Reports 2017 19, 1022-1032DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.025) Copyright © 2017 The Francis crick Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Viral Genomes Recruit Replisome-Associated RPA2 (A) Immunofluorescence analysis reveals that RPA co-localizes with H5, I3, and E9 on viral genomes in cells infected for 6 hr in the presence of AraC. Scale bars, 20 μm. (B) Immunoblot analysis of GFP-Trap pull-downs from cells infected for 5 hr with GFP-H5 virus reveals that RPA, but not I3, associates with the viral replisome components E9 and H5. (C) Immunoblot analysis of GFP-Trap pull-downs performed on lysates from U2-OS-GFP-RPA cells infected for 5 hr with WR reveals that RPA, but not I3, associates with the viral replisome. Cell Reports 2017 19, 1022-1032DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.025) Copyright © 2017 The Francis crick Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 PCNA Is Required for Viral DNA Replication (A) Immunofluorescence analysis reveals that infection with WR decreases the level of GFP-PCNA in the nucleus. Immunoblot analysis shows a corresponding increase of PCNA in the cytoplasm. (B) Inhibition of PCNA (PCNAi) reduces genome replication and late viral protein expression (F13 and A27), but early viral protein expression (H5) after AraC washout appears unaffected. Error bars represent SEM from three independent experiments, with ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. (C) Immunoblot analysis of GFP-Trap pull-downs reveals GFP-PCNA associates with E9, but not RPA. (D) Immunofluorescence analysis of CldU incorporation reveals loss of PCNA impedes DNA replication and viral factory formation. (E) Immunofluorescence analysis of cells infected for 5 hr reveals that loss of PCNA abolishes co-localization of E9 with GFP-H5 on replicating and replication-inhibited (+AraC) viral factories (yellow arrowheads). Scale bars, 20 μm. Cell Reports 2017 19, 1022-1032DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.025) Copyright © 2017 The Francis crick Institute Terms and Conditions