Scott B. Capps, MSa, Ronald C. Elkins, MDb, David M. Fronk, MSa

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Resection of ascending aortic aneurysm without use of an interposition aortic graft John S. Ikonomidis, MD, PhD, FRCS(C), Abe DeAnda, MD, D.Craig Miller,

Advertisements

Max B. Mitchell, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Of mice and men and surgical transcatheter aortic valve insertion

Lost in translation The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Aortic valve replacement in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: Left ventricular ejection fraction matters Victor Dayan, MD, PhD, Philippe Pibarot,

Challenging homografts as the holy grail for aortic valve endocarditis

Ross operation: 16-year experience

Bigger valve size is not always better

New graft formulation and modification of the David reimplantation technique Thomas G. Gleason, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Form ever follows function

The Ross procedure is the procedure of choice for congenital aortic valve disease Zohair Al-Halees, MD, FRCSC, Frans Pieters, MD, Fatima Qadoura, MD,

Improved myocardial protection in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery with the assistance of port-access technology Shubjeet Kaur, MDa, Jorge Balaguer,

Malcolm O. Perry, MD, Richard Kempczinski, MD

Bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: One size fits all?

Surgeons, valve repair in severely unbalanced atrioventricular septal defect, and the emperor's new clothes David M. Overman, MD The Journal of Thoracic.

Bigger The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Pediatric pacemaker infections: Twenty years of experience

The lord of the rings Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD

The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology

Support Your Specialty

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients

Innovation and science: The future of valve design

It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…

Michele Gallo, MD, Gino Gerosa, MD

The aortic valve–sparing operation

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and surgical aortic valve replacement: Both excellent therapies J. James Edelman, MBBS(Hons), PhD, Vinod H. Thourani,

Torsten Doenst, MD, PhD, Markus Richter, MD

Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005 Scott D. Barnett, PhD,

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Nilto Carias de Oliveira, MD, Tirone E

Which is the “lord” of the aortic rings?

Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysms: Stabilizing the repair destabilizing the aortic valve? M. Sertaç Çiçek, MD, FACC The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

In search of the smoking gun in calcific aortic valve disease

Replicating the success of mitral valve repair in the aortic valve

Attachment disorder in thoracoabdominal surgery

Increase in size of the pulmonary autograft after the ross operation in children: Growth or dilation? Laszlo Solymar, MD, PhD, Göran Südow, MD, Daniel.

Commentary: Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: A high standard of comparison for transcatheter aortic valve implantation Aaron Martin, MD, Michael.

Commentary: Ongoing advancements in the understanding of tricuspid valve dynamics and functional geometry Daniel J.P. Burns, MD, MPhil The Journal of.

Commentary: Do the right thing! Ethical versus legal

The Ross procedure: Outcomes at 20 years

Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Sutureless valve implantation: Every detail counts

Biomaterials for heart valve replacement: Conjectures and refutations

Michael Mack, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The Mitroflow aortic valve: A past, present, and future illuminated

Shunt right or left? Decision 2016

Warfarin or aspirin after mitral valve repair: Why work harder?

Hans-Joachim Schäfers, MD

Concomitant replacement of the ascending aorta is free—for some

First nights, the adrenal axis, and steroids

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Keep it short and sweet Ian A. Makey, MD, Scott B. Johnson, MD

Severe tricuspid or mitral regurgitation in inoperable patients with aortic stenosis. Can we leave them alone? Juan A. Crestanello, MD The Journal of.

The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide

Permanent pacemaker insertion following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Not infrequent, not benign, and becoming predictable Craig M. Jarrett,

Another case of underprovision of mitral valve repair surgery: Lessons from the Veterans Affairs health system Anelechi C. Anyanwu, MD, David H. Adams,

Maral Ouzounian, MD, PhD, Amine Mazine, MD, MSc, Tirone E. David, MD

After neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, predicted pulmonary function may be reduced by 10% Benny Weksler, MD, MBA The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead

Toward a more rational approach in treating type B aortic dissection

Evaluating the best approach to treatment of aortic stenosis: The jury is still out Glen B. Taksler, PhD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Preoperative PFTs: The answer is blowing in the wind

Identifying risk factors: Challenges of separating signal from noise

Journal changes and initiatives

Descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: “Busted”

Edward Y. Chan, MD, Michael J. Reardon, MD

Zone zero thoracic endovascular aortic repair is all about “location, location, location” Kevin L. Greason, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

Paul Philipp Heinisch, MD, Thierry Carrel, MD

Presentation transcript:

Body surface area as a predictor of aortic and pulmonary valve diameter Scott B. Capps, MSa, Ronald C. Elkins, MDb, David M. Fronk, MSa The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages 975-982 (May 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70092-4 Copyright © 2000 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 A, Regression data for the male subgroup relating aortic valve diameter (n = 2993) to body surface area. The solid middle line represents the point estimates and the two dashed outer lines enclose the 95% confidence intervals. B, Regression data for the male subgroup relating pulmonary valve diameter (n = 3508) to body surface area. The solid middle line represents the point estimates and the two dashed outer lines enclose the 95% confidence intervals. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2000 119, 975-982DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70092-4) Copyright © 2000 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 A, Regression data for the female subgroup relating aortic valve diameter (n = 1643) to body surface area. The solid middle line represents the point estimates and the two dashed outer lines enclose the 95% confidence intervals. B, Regression data for the female subgroup relating pulmonary valve diameter (n = 1972) to body surface area. The solid middle line represents the point estimates and the two dashed outer lines enclose the 95% confidence intervals. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2000 119, 975-982DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(00)70092-4) Copyright © 2000 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions