PRAGMATICS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conversational Implicature (Based on Paltridge, chapter 3)
Advertisements

Language and communication What is language? How do we communicate? Pragmatic principles Common ground.
1 MODULE 2 Meaning and discourse in English COOPERATION, POLITENESS AND FACE Lecture 14.
EL1101E WEEK 10: PRAGMATICS Group members: Elaine Ong Ong Min Thakshayeni Skanthakumar Jeannie Poon.
Lecture Six Pragmatics.
1 Introduction to Linguistics II Ling 2-121C, group b Lecture 10 Eleni Miltsakaki AUTH Spring 2006.
PSY 369: Psycholinguistics Some basic linguistic theory part3.
Introduction to linguistics II
Pragmatics.
Chapter 7 Pragmatics and discourse analysis. Outline 1. Pragmatics: meaning and contexts 2. Speech act 3. Presupposition 4. Deitics 5. Discourse and Analysis.
Semantics 3rd class Chapter 5.
PRAGMATICS.
Various Definitions of Pragmatics. Morristhe study of the relations of signs to interpreters (1938) deals with the origin, uses, and effects of signs.
+ 1. Pragmatics. - What is pragmatics? - Context 2. Speech acts. - direct speech acts - indirect speech acts.
Communicative competence and cross-cultural pragmatic issues.
Chapter 6 Pragmatics. 6.1 Introduction Review of semantics  Meaning in lg.  words Mothervs.Mother-in-law  sentence: in, am, I, T-shirt, today.
Overview of Discourse Analysis 1. Pragmatics and Politeness Theory ( ) 2. Ethnography of Speaking ( ) 3. Interactional Sociolinguistics ( )
Welcome to the workshop ! ELT Lesson Planning and Curriculum Design: Emphasis on Communication TESL Ontario 2008 Conference Iryna Lenchuk
Schneider: Discourse1 CHAPTER 12: DISCOURSE READ 656 Dr. Schneider.
HYMES (1964) He developed the concept that culture, language and social context are clearly interrelated and strongly rejected the idea of viewing language.
Pragmatics.
Language Use. Pragmatics Revisited Deborah Tannen’s (1990) Research Men (hierarchy, competition) Women (connecting, cooperation) Grice’s Maxims 1) quality.
Presentation about pragmatic concepts Implicatures Presuppositions
The one with the fake party SooJung Choi HyunKyung On.
PRAGMATICS.
UNIT 2 - IMPLICATURE.
Discourse and pragmatics. Meaning and context situational context background knowledge context co-textual context.
ADRESS FORMS AND POLITENESS Second person- used when the subject of the verb in a sentence is the same as the individual to.
Discourse Analysis The Negotiation of Meaning Systemic and Schematic Knowledge. People make sense of written or spoken text according to the world they.
(Based on Paldtridge, chapter 3) Conversational Implicature.
PRAGMATICS. SCHEDULE May 14: Yule ch. 1, 2 and 3 May 16: Yule ch. 4, 5 and 6 May 21: Yule ch. 7, 8 and 9 May 22: Seminar EXAM Thursday; May 31,
Implicature. I. Definition The term “Implicature” accounts for what a speaker can imply, suggest or mean, as distinct from what the speaker literally.
Speech Acts: What is a Speech Act?
PRIMENJENA LINGVISTIKA I NASTAVA JEZIKA II 2 nd class.
Chapter 8 Spoken Discourse. Linguistic Competence communicative competence: the knowledge we bring to using language as a communicative tool in conversation.
Language in Use Pragmatics Natural and conventional signs.
Functions of Speech 1. Expressive 2. Directive 3. Informative (Referential) 4. Metalinguistic 5. Poetic 6. Phatic 7. Heuristic 8. Commissive 9. Performative.
COMMUNICATION OF MEANING
In Other Words: a Coursebook on Translation (1992)
MODULE 2 Meaning and discourse in English
COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE
Mood is one of the ways of expressing modality and denotes the relation between the utterance made by the speaker and actuality. In the Subjunctive Mood.
Aylin Küntay PSYC 453 Meeting 19
Approaches to Discourse Analysis
COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLE:
Pragmatic Domains Communicative functions Discourse management
Language, Logic, and Meaning
Discourse and Pragmatics
Discourse and Pragmatics
Language in Context Week 1 Introduction.
L23B: Sociolinguistics Please Turn off all cellular phones & pagers L23B Website: 11/12/2018.
Functions of Speech 1. Expressive 2. Directive 3. Informative (Referential) 4. Metalinguistic 5. Poetic 6. Phatic 7. Heuristic 8. Commissive 9. Performative.
Lecturer: Emmogene Budhai-Alvaranga
Studying Spoken Language Text 17, 18 and 19
Communicative competence
Week 1 Kang, Nam-Joon 2014, March, 5
Q: Discuss the statement “Language exists within the context of culture.” How does this statement relate to your teaching?
Nofsinger. R., Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991
Discourse Analysis Pragmatics and Nonverbal Communication
Chapter 2 What speakers know.
Functional Pragmatic Model
Pragmatics.
Q: Discuss the statement “Language exists within the context of culture.” How does this statement relate to your teaching?
RELEVANCE THEORY Group Members Sana saif Huma Wazir Junaid Ahmed
Pragmatics Predmetni nastavnik: doc. dr Valentna Boskovic Markovic
Review of Pragmatics and its application
copyright
Introduction to pragmatics
Nofsinger. R., Everyday Conversation, Sage, 1991
Presentation transcript:

PRAGMATICS

Communicative competence „An aspect of our competence that enables us to convey and interpret messages and to negotiate meaning interpersonally within specific contexts” (Dell Hymes , 1967) CALP and BICS

Communicative competence (Celce-Murcia, 2008:36) SOCIOCULTURAL COMPETENCE LINGUISTIC COMPETENCE DISCOURSE COMPETENCE FORMULAIC COMPETENCE STRATEGIC COMPETENCE INTERACTIONAL COMPETENCE

Interactional competence Speech acts: expressing intentions Implicature: reading between the lines Conversation management Non-verbal communication Grice’s Interaction Theory (1975) Maxims of Quality Quantity Relevance Manner Cooperation

Sociocultural competence Dialect Can I help you duck? Register Naturalness Good bye, birthday boy! Pá’, viszlát, jó napot! I just love that levander shirt! (F/M) Cultural references & figures of speech I need it like a hole in my head.

Pragmatic differences across cultures Deborah Tannen level of indirectness tolerated paralinguistic signals of different speech acts different cultural expectations - stereotypes (the pushy New Yorker, the stony American Indian, the inscrutable Chinese)

Example 1: TAKING THE FLOOR Indian English (by raising volume) British English (by repeating the introductory phrase)

Attention and interest: Hungarian polite listening/interest: waiting for the other person to finish accompanying with signals of acknowledgement “cross-chatting” is acceptable

Example 2: ‘Thanksgiving dinner’ situation A: In fact one of my students told me for the first time, I taught her for over a year, that she was adopted. And then I thought – uh – THAT explains SO many things. B: What. That she was – A: Cause she’s so different from her mother B: smarter than she should have been? Or stupider than she should’ve been. A: It wasn’t smart or stupid, Actually, it was just she was so different. Just different. B: [hm]

Ethnocentric view of speech acts? Please, have a little more! You must! (P) Would you like to have a Coke? (E) No, no, thanks! (P) Vs. I’d prefer not to.(E) Open your books! vs. Would you like to open your books? (H) Intellectual traditions behind expectations of directness Generational difference Please stop it! Could you put on your boots alone? (H)

Should you not make your utterance more informative than required Should you not make your utterance more informative than required? (How are you?) Should you always be truthful? (I’m fine thanks. No, I really couldn’t take more) Should you always be relevant and straightforward? (Arab business, collectivism)

Goals of a pragmatic theory produce a classification of speech acts, analyse and define speech acts, specify the various uses of expressions, relate literary and direct language use to linguistic structure, the structure of the communicative situation, the social institutions, speaker-meaning, implication, presupposition and understanding.