Final Report on LOW Design

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lunar Landing GN&C and Trajectory Design Go For Lunar Landing: From Terminal Descent to Touchdown Conference Panel 4: GN&C Ron Sostaric / NASA JSC March.
Advertisements

LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08. Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Concept of Operations Subsystem Overview Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Public.
1 Pacific International Science Center for Exploration Systems (PISCES) Conference – Nov 12, 2008 Commercial Lunar Business Perspectives John Kohut Chief.
Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems.
Minimalist Human Mars Mission Surface infrastructure discussion July 26 th, 2008.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
1 6/21/2015 Space Cowboys Team Project Final Report Mobility Subsystem Brett Padgett.
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
Pioneer Venus & Galileo Probe Development: Comparison/Assessment John Givens.
New Mexico Space Grant Consortium Student Launch Program Provide annual access to space for student experiments from Spaceport America.
Alternatives Concepts White Paper IPT 02E. Project Management The University of Alabama Huntsville Team LeaderEddie Kiessling StructuresNathan Coffee.
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08. Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Concept of Operations Subsystem Overview Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Public.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
LUNAR ROVER Concept proposal meeting Dr. Ashish Dutta Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur Kanpur, INDIA ( *** for private circulation only)
1 Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) Baseline Design Presentation 1/31/08.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
Alternatives Concepts White Paper IPT 02E. Project Management The University of Alabama Huntsville Team LeaderEddie Kiessling StructuresNathan Coffee.
Hampton Black – 11/5/12 MARS ONE. WHAT IS MARS ONE? Mars One is a private, apolitical organization whose intent is to establish a colony on Mars by 2023.
Final Report on LOW Design Maximizing Science While Minimizing Single Point Failure.
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08. Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Concept of Operations Subsystem Overview Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Questions.
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
Universal Chassis for Modular Ground Vehicles University of Michigan Mars Rover Team Presented by Eric Nytko August 6, 2005 The 2 nd Mars Expedition Planning.
SE&I Pre-Proposal Meeting GSFC - JPL Systems Engineering Management Colleen McGraw.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Slides Lunar Lander Structure April 9, 2009 Lunar Descent Phase Group [Ryan Nelson] [STRC] 1.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) Customer Briefing LETS go to the Moon!
Apollo 50 Lunar Mission Concept Goal: Initiate a series of lunar campaign missions, inspired by Apollo 11, to explore the potential of the Moon for science.
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08. Agenda Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Concept of Operations Subsystem Overview Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Questions.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
Crew Mobility for Lunar Surface Exploration Dr. Rob Ambrose NASA-JSC May 2008.
Hopper Spacecraft Simulator. The “Hopping” Concept -Land on a celestial body using engines, conduct surface operations, then re-ignite engines and ‘hop’
CHAPTER 1 The Science of Chemistry 1.3 Matter and Energy.
PTAR Presentation Jonathan DeLaRosa, Jessica Nelson, Ivan Morin, JJ Rodenburg, & Tim Stelly Team Cronus.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) Team Frankenstein Phase 2 Presentation 3/6/08.
LUNAR MISSION TO CELEBRATE THE 50 TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE APOLLO LANDING 1.
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS) MAE 491 / IPT Design Competition Instructors: Dr. P.J. Benfield and Dr. Matt Turner Team Frankenstein.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
Power Philip Luers NASA/GSFC Code 561 August 16-17, 2005.
WOMEN IN DEFENSE TENNESSEE VALLEY CHAPTER
Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Technical Resource Allocations
Team Go Go Gadgets Launch Readiness Review
Viking Program Owen Keupp Period 9.
h t t p : / / w w w . u s c . e d u / g o / t t c
Unmanned Systems Aerospace Engineering
Unmanned Systems Aerospace Engineering
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08.
Advance Exploration Programs, Thales Alenia Space in Italy
Mars Sustainability Workshop Kennedy Space Center February 8, 2018
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS)
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS)
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08.
Systems Engineering Management
Lunar Descent Trajectory
RAPUNZEL RAPid NoncondUctive Nadir-Zenith TEther Laboratory
By: Josh Lukasak Attitude Group Lead Lunar Descent Phase Manager
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
ASCEND! Team – Spring 2017 Nicholas Mallott,
Alternatives Concepts White Paper IPT 02E
Lunar Exploration Transportation System (LETS)
ISO View Stereo Imaging Belly Cam GN&C
CanSat “A CanSat contains all the major subsystems of a real satellite, such as power and communications.  The only difference is that it will not go.
H&S Bakery: Drone Delivery System
Critical Design Review
Presentation transcript:

Final Report on LOW Design Team Eclipse Joseph Sandlin

The University of Alabama Huntsville Project Management The University of Alabama Huntsville Team Leader Eddie Kiessling Structures Nathan Coffee Systems Engineer Jay Gala GN & C Brandon York Joseph Sandlin Operations Brett Guin Thermal Kathryn Kirsh Payload Operations Brent Newson Power Christopher Goes Technical Editor Michael Bryan Joseph Sandlin

Overview LOW Concept Will travel to all 20 sites Carries scientific payload on board Runs off of solar cells and batteries Team Eclipse Goals Maximize Scientific Payload Minimize Single Point Failure Joseph Sandlin

Video of Mission Insert Video by Chris

Four Phases of LOW Mission: Phases of Mission Four Phases of LOW Mission: 1.) Landing 2.) Traveling 3.) Experimentation 4.) End of Mission Brett Guin

Landing-Descent Relevant Subsystems in descent phase GN&C Structures Brandon York

Landing-Unloading Relevant Subsystems Power Communications Payload Brandon York -Launch Date – All material req’d for construction of LETS shall not have long lead times and be up-to-date (including technology). Final des. constr. well b4 launch date for testing and simulation -Mass – total: 997.4 kg, prop sys dry: 64.6 kg. Left with 932.8 kg to use. Significant bc most of mass will be used for scientific equipment. -SMD/ESMD ratio – must be 2:1 ratio. SMD means scientific exploration to understand solar system; ESMD means establish sustained human/robotic presence in space. LETS primary focus is science and less on exploration sys. -Landing – landing with +/- 100m 3 sigma precision and at 12 deg. Talk about jettisoning prop sys away from lander prior to landing and troubles it creates. Talk about landing on 12 deg slope – appropriate structural capabilities req’d to accomplish this (landing on wheels as opposed to crush pads or legs) - Mobility – sampling sites 500m apart and samples taken from perm. dark and lighted terrain, need reliable mobility. Lander on wheels allows for entire sci. payload to travel with lander simul. from site to site by use of an RTG.

Traveling Relevant Subsystems Power Mobility Thermal GN&C Runs entirely off of solar arrays and batteries Use of nuclear power was avoided Nuclear power prevents 2012 launch date Nuclear power is scarce throughout the space program Mobility Thermal GN&C

Experimentation Relevant Subsystems Power Payload Communications

End of Mission Relevant Subsystems SRV Structures Payload Nathan Coffee

How LOW meets goals? Maximize Scientific Payload LOW has the potential to visit extra sites LOW can perform more in-dept experiments Minimize Single Point Failure Comprised entirely of TRL 9 technology Conservative ConOps Schedule No Lag time in data communication Eddie Kiessling