Determination of |Vcb|, mb and mc from Inclusive B Decay Distributions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stato di Vub e Vcb Concezio Bozzi INFN Ferrara Babar Italia, Trieste 14 Aprile 2005.
Advertisements

Semileptonic and EW Penguin Decay Results from BaBar John J. Walsh INFN-Pisa BaBar Collaboration XXXXth Rencontres de Moriond QCD and Hadronic Interactions.
23, June, 2005Beauty2005, Assisi, Italy Electroweak Penguin decays at Belle Akimasa Ishikawa KEK.
Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
Determination of and related results from B A B AR Masahiro Morii, Harvard University on behalf of the B A B AR Collaboration |V cb | MESON 2004, Krakow,
Radiative B Decays (an Experimental Overview) E.H. Thorndike University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration FPCP May 18, 2002.
Current Methods of determining V ub I. Endpoint of the inclusive lepton spectrum II. Exclusive decays Methods of determining V ub with small theoretical.
Radiative B meson Decays at BaBar Colin Jessop University of Notre Dame.
1 Inclusive B Decays - Spectra, Moments and CKM Matrix Elements Presented by Daniel Cronin-Hennessy University of Rochester (CLEO Collaboration) ICHEP.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
1 V cb : experimental and theoretical highlights Marina Artuso Syracuse University.
Inclusive b → uℓv and b → s  Spectrum Masahiro Morii Harvard University B A B AR Collaboration SLAC/INT Workshop on Flavor Physics and QCD May 11–14,
I. Shipsey Heavy Quark Physics ICHEP06 7/27/06 1 The Y(5S) at CLEO Introduction Bs Reconstruction at the Y(5S) CLEO PRL 96, (2006) B Reconstruction.
Inclusive B Decays - Spectra, Moments and CKM Matrix Elements Presented by Daniel Cronin-Hennessy (CLEO Collaboration) Feb 24, 2004.
Alex Smith – University of Minnesota Determination of |V cb | Using Moments of Inclusive B Decay Spectra BEACH04 Conference June 28-July 3, 2004 Chicago,
Hadronic Moments in Semileptonic B Decays Ramon Miquel Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (for the CDF II Collaboration)
Jochen Dingfelder, SLAC Semileptonic Decay Studies with B A B AR Annual DOE HEP Program Review, June 5-8, 2006, SLAC B D   X c,X u.
Elisabetta Barberio University of Melbourne Beauty 2006: Oxford September 2006 Measurements of V cb and Form Factors.
Semileptonic B Decays Masahiro Morii Harvard University Determination of |V ub | and |V cb | with Inclusive and Exclusive b  u and b  c Decays APS Meeting,
Inclusive B Decays - Spectra, Moments and CKM Matrix Elements Presented by Daniel Cronin-Hennessy University of Rochester (CLEO Collaboration) Dec 16,
1 Semileptonic B Decays at BABAR Beauty 2005 Assisi (Perugia), June 20–24, 2005 Vladimir Golubev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Guglielmo De Nardo Napoli University and INFN 7th Meeting on B Physics, Orsay, France, October 4th 2010.
Wolfgang Menges, Queen Mary Measuring |V ub | from Semileptonic B Decays Wolfgang Menges Queen Mary, University of London, UK Institute of Physics: Particle.
Wolfgang Menges, Queen Mary Semileptonic B Decays at BaBar Wolfgang Menges Queen Mary, University of London, UK Teilchenphysik Seminar, Bonn, 4 th May.
Wolfgang Menges, Queen Mary Measurement of the CKM Sides at the B-Factories Wolfgang Menges On behalf of the BaBar and Belle Collaborations Queen Mary,
Precise Determination of |V cb |, |V ub |, and the b-quark mass from inclusive B decays |V cb | at the ~1% level - The new BABAR result as an example Towards.
5th International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons, Vancouver David Waller, Carleton University Ottawa, Canada Semileptonic BR of b hadrons.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
Determination of Unitarity Triangle parameters Achille Stocchi LAL-Orsay Phenomenology Workshop on Heavy Flavours Ringberg Schloss 28 April – 2 May 2003.
RHUL Group Meeting 18. Dec. 03Henning Flächer 1 Hadronic Mass Moments from Semileptonic B Meson Decays at BABAR Henning Flächer OUTLINE Mass Moment Measurement.
1- 2 /2  1- 2 /2 u c dsb A 3 (1-  -i  ) - A 2 t d, s b b V td,V ts B Oscillations A 3 (  i  ) A 2 1 V tb c,u B decays b V ub,V cb Wolfenstein parametrization.
1 B meson semileptonic decays Physics Motivation Inclusive properties: oSemileptonic width oMoments of inclusive quantities Exclusive decays What is the.
Inclusive semileptonic B decays: experimental Elisabetta Barberio University of Melbourne FPCP: Vancouver April 2006.
Semileptonic B Decays at the B Factories Concezio Bozzi INFN Sezione di Ferrara Representing Babar and Belle At the XL Rencontres de Moriond LaThuile,
BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN
1 Marina Artuso (Syracuse Uni) Jochen Dingfelder (SLAC) Bjorn Lange (MIT) Antonio Limosani (Uni of Tokyo) Tetsuya Onogi (Yukawa Inst. Kyoto) WG2 Thursday.
1 Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton Motivation Experimental Techniques charm and beauty cross sections in DIS for the H1 & ZEUS Collaborations Paul Thompson.
Extract the partial rates We can make fits to the partial decay rates to extract (1) normalization f + (0)|V cx | (2) Form factor shape parameters r 1.
Measurements of B  X c l Decays Vera Lüth, SLAC BABAR Collaboration Inclusive BR (B  X c l ) and |V cb | Hadronic Mass Moments (Preliminary Measurement)
Inclusive and Exclusive  V ub  Measurements Edward H. Thorndike University of Rochester CLEO FPCP /5/2003.
1 Inclusive B → X c l Decays Moments of hadronic mass and lepton energy PR D69,111103, PR D69, Fits to energy dependence of moments based on HQE.
ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam Marta Calvi - Study of Spectral Moments… 1 Study of Spectral Moments in Semileptonic b Decays with the DELPHI Detector at LEP Marta.
Measurements of V cb, branching fractions, form factors E.Barberio University of Melbourne FPCP: Daegu October 2004.
EW Penguin & Leptonic B decays
Inclusive and Exclusive Vcb measurements
Exclusive |Vcb| at Belle
(BABAR Collaboration) LAL – Orsay (Marie Curie EIF)
Review of b  s l+ l- and B0  l+ l- Decays
Vub measurements with the BaBar detector
Current status and future prospects
Tom Browder (University of Hawaii)
Semileptonic B-decays (b to u transition)
Vub measurements with the BaBar detector
Experimental Heavy Quark Physics
V. Erkcan Özcan University College London April 11, 2006
CKM Status In this lecture, we study the results summarized in this plot. November 17, 2018 Sridhara Dasu, CKM Status.
A New Measurement of |Vus| from KTeV
Inclusive semileptonic B decays: experimental
Review of |Vcb| and |Vub| measurements
Experimental review of CKM sides at B factories
David Côté, Université de Montréal for the BABAR collaboration
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
University of Minnesota on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration
E.Barberio University of Melbourne Daphne04: Frascati 7-11 June 2004
Exclusive Semileptonic B Decays and |Vub|: Experimental
e+e−→ J/ D(*)D(*) & ψ(4160) → DD
Internal structure of f0(980) meson by fragmentation functions
EXPERIMENTAL UPDATE ON |Vcb| (EXCLUSIVE) Arantza Oyanguren
Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton
Pion transition form factor in the light front quark model
Presentation transcript:

Determination of |Vcb|, mb and mc from Inclusive B Decay Distributions Henning Flächer Royal Holloway, University of London 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Overview Will cover results of a fit to lepton, hadron and photon moments using calculations in kinetic scheme and discuss some applications (Phys. Rev. D 73, 073008 (2006)) Motivation Short Introduction to theoretical framework Experimental Measurements hadron and lepton moments from B → Xc lv photon energy moments from B → Xs γ Results of the combined fit Extraction of |Vcb|, mb, mc and higher order heavy quark parameters Applications and prospects for improving on current status Conclusions 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Heavy Quark Expansions The Operator Product Expansion separates perturbative from non-perturbative scales in a systematic way: Benson, Bigi, Mannel & Uraltsev, hep-ph/0410080 Gambino & Uraltsev, Eur.Phys.J. C34, 181 (2004) chromomagnetic expec. value kinetic expec. value Darwin term spin-orbit kinetic scheme Need to determine non-pert. parameters! Use moments of inclusive distributions where same parameters appear: drop full OPE formula for G_SL, put after bsg mb and μπ2 are used to parameterise both B→Xs γ and B→X lv spectra El>Ecut Hadronic Mass distribution Lepton Energy spectrum Photon Energy spectrum 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Lepton Energy Moments Vcb BABAR Y(4S) frame 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Delphi and CDF only measure higher resonances Hadronic Mass Moments BaBar, Belle and CLEO measure full spectrum Delphi and CDF only measure higher resonances BABAR p* > 0.9 GeV p* > 1.6 GeV MX CLEO 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

b→sγ Spectra and Moments Measure photon spectrum in b→sγ decays: Two main approaches: Inclusive: identify photon Semi-Inclusive: reconstruct many exclusive final states (up to 38!) CLEO Belle Babar semi-incl. Babar fully-incl. Difficult measurement: Overwhelming background from π0s for Eγ < 1.8 GeV make moment plot smaller, then intro moment fit -> also used for bsg average (extrapol) Measurement of photon spectrum and its moments gives information about inner structure of B meson: b quark mass Fermi momentum 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Available moment measurements Legend: n = order of (central) moment of observable MX, El and Eγ l = min. lepton momentum γ = min. photon energy published with covariance matrix and used in fit not used in fit Hadron Moments Lepton Moments Photon BaBar n=1,2,3,4 l=0.9-1.6  n=0,1,2,3 l=0.6-1.5 n=1,2,3 γ=1.9-2.3 Belle n= 1,2  n=1,2 γ=1.8 CLEO n=2,4 l=1.0-1.5 γ=2.0 Delphi n=2,4,6 l=0.0 n= 1,2,3 CDF l=0.7 Total of 51 measurements! Important to take correlations between moments with different min. lepton/photon energies into account 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Inclusive |Vcb| - Fit to Moments Benson, Bigi, Mannel & Uraltsev, hep-ph/0410080 Gambino & Uraltsev, hep-ph/0401063 Benson, Bigi & Uraltsev, hep-ph/0410080 Based on calculations in kinetic scheme: Lepton Moments Hadron Moments Lepton Moments Ecut (GeV) Photon Moments move after bsg Measurements highly correlated! O. Buchmueller,H.F. hep-ph/0507253 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Inclusive |Vcb| χ2= Result of fit to all 19.3/44dof exp HQE ΓSL χ2= 19.3/44dof Result of fit to all moment measurements: |Vcb| = (41.96 ± 0.23 ± 0.35 ± 0.59) 10-3 mb = 4.590 ± 0.025 ± 0.030 GeV mc = 1.142 ± 0.037 ± 0.045 μπ2 = 0.401 ± 0.019 ± 0.035 GeV2 μG2 = 0.297 ± 0.024 ± 0.046 ρD3 = 0.174 ± 0.009 ± 0.022 GeV3 ρLS3 = -0.183 ± 0.054 ± 0.071 BRclv = 10.71 ± 0.10 ± 0.08 % |Vcb| @ 2% mb < 1% mc @ 5% hep-ph/0507253 In MS scheme: mb(mb) = 4.20 ± 0.04 GeV mc(mc) = 1.24 ± 0.07 GeV mc(μ)/mb(μ)= 0.235 ± 0.012 courtesy of N.Uraltsev b→sγ b→clν combined move after bsg Good agreement with other similar analyses: Bauer et al. hep-ph/0408002 DELPHI hep-ex/0510024 Belle hep-ex/0611047 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Treatment of Theory Errors Construct combined experimental and theoretical covariance matrix Ctot = Cstat + Csyst + Ctheo Uncertainties in moment expansions to evaluate perturbative uncertainties on Wilson coefficients vary 2nd order terms by 20% 3rd order terms by 30% also assume 20 MeV uncertainty on mb and mc in corresponding terms additional uncertainties for Eγ moments due to higher Ecut vary αs around 0.22 ± 0.04 for lepton and 0.3 ± 0.1 for hadron moments errors considered fully correlated for varying Ecut and uncorrelated between moments of different order Uncertainties in ΓSL (hep-ph/0302262) pert. uncertainty in Wilson coefficient of leading bb operator - 0.5% pert. corrections to Wilson coefficients of chromomagnetic and Darwin operators - 1.2% non-perturbative soft charm effects (hep-ph/0511158) - 0.35% higher order power suppressed contributions - 0.4% “Fixed” uncertainty of 1.4% - not included in fit αs uncertainty Use “best value” for ΓSL (αs = 0.22 ± 0.01) 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Comparison with other determinations mb(mb) = 4.20 ± 0.04 GeV mc(mc) = 1.24 ± 0.07 GeV Conversion from kinetic mass scheme to MS scheme with hep-ph/9708372, hep-ph/0302262 See also report from CKM WS hep-ph/0304132 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

B→Xsγ Branching Fraction Average Photon Energy Spectrum constraint with mb and μπ2 Extrapolation Factors for BF Partial branching fractions are measured above different photon energies Need to be extrapolated to Eγ > 1.6 GeV to compare with theory Extrapolation factors based on HQE fit to b→clv and b→sγ moments hep-ph/0507253 kinetic SF KN Average label Rcut plot, don’t show all columns, only reported + Emin, units 10-6!! , only 2 numbers in 2HDM, drop 2005 To obtain spectra in other schemes: predict 1st and 2nd Eγ moment at Ecut = 1.6GeV based on result of fit in kinetic scheme. Then fit the moments in the new schemes → good agreement between calculations if comparing on basis of moments Use consistent extrapolation factors for all measurements 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

BR(B ® Xsg) Average involves Eg extrapolation! SM Prediction (NLO) 3.57 ± 0.30 x10-4 Nucl.Phys.B631:219-238,2002 NNLO: M.Misiak et al,hep-ph/0609232 BR(B→Xsγ)Eγ>1.6 GeV = (3.15 ± 0.23) x 10-4 NNLO NNLO: Becher & Neubert, hep-ph/0610067 BR(B→Xsγ)Eγ>1.6 GeV = (2.98 ± 0.26) x 10-4 CLEO PRL 87, 251807 (2001) BELLE Phys.Lett. B 511, 151 (2001) BELLE PRL.93:061803,(2004) BABAR PRD 72, 052004 (2005) BABAR PRL 97, 171803 (2006) Two NNLO calculations 1.2 and 1.4 σ below World Average 7 – 9% uncertainty for both theory and experiment HFAG Average 3.55 ± 0.26 x10-4 involves Eg extrapolation! BR(B→Xsγ)Eγ>1.6 GeV x10-4 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Prospects for the Future Include Belle measurements (see previous talk by P. Urquijo) Additional Experimental Measurements possibly measure higher order moments → higher sensitivity to higher order parameters Recent effort to calculate 1/mb4 terms in SL rate Mannel et al (hep-ph/0611168) fourth central moment in MX2 is dominated by fourth order terms enough experimental sensitivity? Measure “modified moments” Nx2 = Mx2 –2ΛEx + Λ2 Λ~500MeV under better theoretical control, leading to reduction in theory errors Measure q2 moments in B→Xc lv will constrain - or measure – non-perturbative soft charm effects (“intrinsic charm”) helps in reducing theory uncertainty on |Vcb| Revisit theory uncertainties perturbative uncertainties of Wilson Coefficients 20% and 30% variations of 2nd and 3rd order terms 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Conclusions Consistency for moment measurements between experiments Good agreement of results from semileptonic and radiative B decays Precison measurements of SM parameters: |Vcb| at 2% level Helping to reduce uncertainty on |Vub| to ~7% probing consistency with sin(2β) and hence SM mb (<1%) and mc (5%) limited by theory uncertainties in many cases Radiative B decays Consistent extrapolation for all experimental measurements BR(B→Xs γ) @ 7% important constraint on many NP models 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Backup Slides 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

Inclusive |Vcb| - Fit to Moments Benson, Bigi, Mannel & Uraltsev, hep-ph/0410080 Gambino & Uraltsev, hep-ph/0401063 Benson, Bigi & Uraltsev, hep-ph/0410080 Based on calculations in kinetic scheme: Lepton Moments Hadron Moments Ecut (GeV) Photon Moments move after bsg Measurements highly correlated! O. Buchmueller,H.F. hep-ph/0507253 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya

reduced theory error as no extrapolation Inclusive |Vub| hep-ex/0601046 Measurement of hadronic mass spectrum in B->Xu lv decays: Measure hadronic mass spectum on the recoil of fully reconstructed B mesons Measurement of spectrum up to 2.5 GeV includes 96% of total rate Standard local OPE for full rate: Uraltsev hep-ph/9905520 Hoang,Ligeti, Manohar hep-ph/9811239 reduced theory error as no extrapolation to full rate necessary modify formula (Jochen) -> just mention weight function OPE: MX < 2.50 GeV: |Vub| = (3.84 ± 0.70stat ± 0.30syst ± 0.10theo) 10-3 13 Dec 2006 CKM Workshop 2006, Nagoya