Geometry-Based Sampling of Conformational Transitions in Proteins

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Advertisements

Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Atsushi Matsumoto, Hisashi Ishida  Structure 
Interdomain Interactions in Hinge-Bending Transitions
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Maik Goette, Martin C. Stumpe, Ralf Ficner, Helmut Grubmüller 
Conformational Change in an MFS Protein: MD Simulations of LacY
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
The Binding of Antibiotics in OmpF Porin
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Structural Basis for Dimerization in DNA Recognition by Gal4
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Kei-ichi Okazaki, Shoji Takada  Structure 
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Rainer A. Böckmann, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Joe G. Greener, Ioannis Filippis, Michael J.E. Sternberg  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
The Exomer Cargo Adaptor Features a Flexible Hinge Domain
Monica Berrondo, Marc Ostermeier, Jeffrey J. Gray  Structure 
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Close Correspondence between the Motions from Principal Component Analysis of Multiple HIV-1 Protease Structures and Elastic Network Modes  Lei Yang,
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Functional Plasticity in the Substrate Binding Site of β-Secretase
Karunesh Arora, Tamar Schlick  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
The Atomistic Mechanism of Conformational Transition in Adenylate Kinase: A TEE-REX Molecular Dynamics Study  Marcus B. Kubitzki, Bert L. de Groot  Structure 
Predicting Allosteric Changes from Conformational Ensembles
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
Gydo C.P. van Zundert, Adrien S.J. Melquiond, Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin 
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Insights from Free-Energy Calculations: Protein Conformational Equilibrium, Driving Forces, and Ligand-Binding Modes  Yu-ming M. Huang, Wei Chen, Michael J.
Xiaodong Pang, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
An Efficient Null Model for Conformational Fluctuations in Proteins
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Fig. 4 The oxidized and reduced forms of the A2 domain have different dynamics and stresses. The oxidized and reduced forms of the A2 domain have different.
Presentation transcript:

Geometry-Based Sampling of Conformational Transitions in Proteins Daniel Seeliger, Jürgen Haas, Bert L. de Groot  Structure  Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 1482-1492 (November 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2007.09.017 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Adenylate Kinase (A) Crystal structure (PDB code: 1AKE) of adenylate kinase (green) with bound inhibitor AP5A (orange). (B) Superimposition of several X-ray structures in different conformations, indicating the induced fit motion. (C and D) Principal components analysis. Experimental structures (black circles) and three simulation ensembles (blue, red, and green circles) are projected onto the first two eigenvectors. The blue ensemble was generated with CONCOORD, and the red one was generated with tCONCOORD. tCONCOORD correctly predicts the induced fit motion and samples open conformations when they are started from the closed conformation with the ligand removed. If the ligand remains in the input structure, the conformational space is restricted to conformations around the closed state (green). Structure 2007 15, 1482-1492DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.017) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Calmodulin (A) The activated form of calmodulin (PDB code: 1CLL) used as input for tCONCOORD. (B) The structure of calmodulin bound to Trifluoroperazine (TFP). The rmsd between these two structures is 14.6 Å. (C) The result of the hydrogen-bond analysis of tCONCOORD. Red sticks represent hydrogen bonds with high solvation probabilities and are not regarded as constraints in the tCONCOORD simulation. (D) The superimposition of the ligand-bound conformation (green) and the closest match of a structure from the tCONCOORD ensemble (red) with an rmsd of 2.8 Å. (E) A tCONCOORD ensemble and an NMR ensemble (PDB code: 1CFF) fitted onto the C-terminal domain. (F) The projection onto the three eigenvectors with the largest eigenvalues of a PCA. The tCONCOORD ensemble is shown as a green cloud, and the NMR ensemble is shown as red dots. The orange dot represents the X-ray structure of the open (activated) conformation, and the blue dot represents the closed (ligand-bound) state. Structure 2007 15, 1482-1492DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.017) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Aldose Reductase The loops labeled A and C form parts of the Tolrestat-binding site. Loop B interacts with the cofactor. Structure 2007 15, 1482-1492DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.017) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Projection of tCONCOORD Ensembles of Aldose Reductase onto Eigenvectors 1 and 2 of a Principal Components Analysis The structures on the right represent the predominant motions along these vectors. On the left, the two-dimensional projection of three different ensembles is shown. The green dots represent the ensemble of the entire complex, the red dots represent the holo form, and the black dots represent the apo form. The projection shows the reduced flexibility of the binding site in the presence of Tolrestat. Binding of NADP, however, has no effect on these modes. Structure 2007 15, 1482-1492DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.017) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Projection of tCONCOORD Ensembles of Aldose Reductase onto Eigenvectors 3 and 4 of a Principal Components Analysis The structures on the right represent the predominant motions along these vectors. On the left, the two-dimensional projection of three different ensembles is shown. The green dots represent the ensemble of the entire complex, the red dots represent the holo form, and the black dots represent the apo form. The projection shows increased flexibility along eigenvector 3 if NADP is removed, because loop B is predominantly involved in this motion. Eigenvector 4 mainly represents a movement of loop C, which leads to decreased flexibility for the ensemble with Tolrestat bound. Structure 2007 15, 1482-1492DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.017) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 T4-Lysozyme The upper left panel shows the structure of the closed conformation of T4-lysozyme (PDB code: 2LZM). This structure has been used as input for tCONCOORD. The picture in the middle shows the hydrogen-bond stability analysis carried out by tCONCOORD. Red-marked hydrogen bonds, like the bond between GLU22 and ARG137, are predicted to be unstable. The picture on the right shows the structure of an open conformation of T4-lysozyme (PDB code: 149L). Indeed, in this conformation, this hydrogen bond is not present anymore. The lower panel shows the result of a principal components analysis applied to the experimental structures. The experimental structures (black), the tCONCOORD ensemble (blue), and three MD trajectories (cyan, red, and green) are projected on the first two eigenvectors. Structure 2007 15, 1482-1492DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.017) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Root-Mean-Square Fluctuation in Ubiquitin Structure 2007 15, 1482-1492DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.017) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Root-Mean-Square Fluctuation in Staphylococcal Nuclease Structure 2007 15, 1482-1492DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.017) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 9 Hydrogen Bond Solvation (A) Distribution of solvation scores in a subset of 290 protein structures from the Protein Data Bank. (B) All hydrogen bonds in the human prion protein (PDB code: 1QM0). Blue sticks represent backbone-backbone hydrogen bonds, orange sticks represent backbone-side chain hydrogen bonds, and green sticks represent side chain-side chain hydrogen bonds. (C) Detection of unstable hydrogen bonds with tCONCOORD by using a threshold of 2.2. Red sticks represent hydrogen bonds that are not turned into constraints. (D) The same picture calculated with a threshold of 2.1. The number of unstable hydrogen bonds is larger than in (C). Structure 2007 15, 1482-1492DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.017) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions