Joshua B. Epel, Esq. Duke Energy Field Services, LP August 25, 2005

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 3M All Rights Reserved. Innovations in Permitting and Flexible Air Permitting as Well as Methods to Improve the Permitting Process Mark Manninen,
Advertisements

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program Optimize Separator Operating Pressures to Reduce Flash Losses SPE Paper B. Boyer -
Oil and Gas Industry Presentation Activities, GHG Emission Sources, and Potential Reductions January 14, 2009.
FLARING AND VENTING CAN WE HARMONIZE PROVINCIAL DEFINITIONS? Industry Meeting April 17, 2012 Presented by Jim Spangelo and James Vaughan, ERCB and Kevin.
Recent Air Regulatory Changes in Colorado Affecting the Oil & Gas Industry By John R. Jacus, Esq. Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP Presented to the Natural Resources.
Renewable Energy and Carbon Credits Heath Norrick Manager of Renewable Energy Hoosier Energy REC, Inc.
Garry Kaufman Deputy Director Colorado Air Pollution Control Division June 6, 2014.
“Partner Experiences” Pioneer Natural Resources, USA Presented by James Meier Processors Technology Transfer Workshop September 23, 2004 Dallas, Texas.
CONFIDENTIAL Don Lambert V.P. Product Development and Training MIRATECH Tulsa, Oklahoma 2013 Oklahoma Technology Showcase August 23, 2013 Emission Solutions.
Director of Technology Development, Emerging Technology Department
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
Western States Air Quality Study Modeling and Analysis of Oil & Gas Emissions Data University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation.
Shell Exploration & Production Copyright: Shell Exploration & Production Ltd. 8/30/2015 File Title Agenda Introductory Remarks Shell E&P U.S. Overview.
Air Emission Benefits of CHP Air Innovations Conference August 10, 2004 Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc. Prepared under contract.
ENHANCING THE POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INVESTMENT Guidance from the OECD to developing and emerging economies Karim Dahou, Investment Division,
Update on Multi-pollutant Legislation Richard Long, Region 8 Wrap Meeting Nov. 14, 2001.
Challenges in Transmission. 2 Environmental and Public Affairs Consulting for the Energy Industry Energy Sectors  Oil & Gas  Pipeline  Storage  LNG.
Miscellaneous Organic NESHAP Compliance for a New Countermeasure Flare Production Facility at the Milan Army Ammunition Plant FRANKLIN engineering group,
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) WAQS 2011b Emissions Projections University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) Ramboll-Environ.
Bill Harnett March 30, 2010 WESTAR Spring Meeting.
Game Changers. Technology Game Changer Barriers Many technologies are capable of significant deployment as “Game Changers” (energy efficiency, CH&P, renewables,
Targeting Tools United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Enforcement and Compliance Monitoring Air Enforcement Division.
Possible Timeline for Environmental Regulatory Requirements for the Utility Industry Pending EPA air and water pollution regulations for coal plants have.
Distinguishing: Clean Air Act, EPA Rules, Regulations and Guidance David Cole U.S. EPA, OAQPS Research Triangle Park, NC.
API Climate Challenge Program Bob Greco, API Natural Gas STAR Workshop June 19, 2003.
Evaluating the UK policy framework for Bio-energy R. Slade (*), C. Panoutsou and A. Bauen The policy context The UK energy system is evolving rapidly;
ARKANSAS ENVIRONMENTAL FEDERATION GHG EMMISSIONS TRADING CONFERENCE LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS MARCH 2006 Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.
Vent Gas Mitigation PTAC Environmental Forum January 30, 2002 Bruce Peachey, P.Eng. New Paradigm Engineering Ltd., Edmonton.
Clean Air Act National Enforcement Initiatives Beverly A. Spagg May 22, 2012.
1 WRAP Oil & Gas Phase II Work Plan: 2002 and 2018 Area Source Inventory Improvements and Area Source Controls Evaluation WRAP Stationary Sources Forum.
1 Addressing Air Quality Impacts from Oil and Gas Development in Colorado WESTAR Conference October 23, 2008 Rose Waldman Colorado Air Pollution Control.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SHALE GAS PRODUCTION AND CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE UNDER CO2 TAXES: MARKAL MODELING Nadja Victor and Chris Nichols Pittsburgh,
Best Operating Practices for Reducing Emissions F rom Natural Gas STAR Partners EPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program, Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc., and.
Pro–Op Process Optimization Review  How can we get as much product, produced at the wellhead, to the sales meter? PRO-OP Concept  PRO-OP – a systematic.
Carbon Sequestration A Strategic Element in Clean Coal Technology Presentation to: Mid-America Regulatory Conference (MARC) Columbus, Ohio, June 20, 2006.
PARTICULATE MATTER: REGULATORY RESPONSE Presented by: Karl Loos.
Station Name CY 2014 AQS Data Certified CY 2015 AQS Data Certified Ute 167Y68Y Ute 367Y66Y Mesa Verde National Park65Y66 Bloomfield62Y61 Navajo Dam63Y68.
Garry Kaufman Air Pollution Control Division.  Background on Oil and Gas Air Regulation in Colorado  Basis for Additional Air Quality Requirements for.
June 13, 2008 Presentation by Richard Slocomb, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. Supervisor, Reservoir Engineering Resource Conservation Section British.
Stray Current Mitigation & Cathodic Protection Regulation Pipeline Corrosion Management seminar Melbourne 29 June 2017 Peter Wade Manager Electrolysis.
Updates from Ohio EPA DAPC
EPA Phase II for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Overview of WRAP Emissions Projections
Solar Power Applications
Canadian Oil & Gas Methane Reductions: Low Cost, High Impact
CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY POLICY ANALYSIS Abhishek Chaudhary, Tim C
First in Service First in Value
Overhaul of Combustion Turbines Under NSR Regulations
Methane Emissions Management at TransCanada PipeLines
IMPLICATIONS AND STRATEGIES
Jean-Mari Peltier Counselor to the Administrator on Agriculture Policy
Company MIAB - Mölnbacka Industri AB of Deje, Sweden was established in MIAB provides equipment protecting the environment by removing solvent vapours.
Addressing Costs of Methane Waste and Future Policy Actions
Shell Center for Sustainable Development Seminar
Methane Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities
Methane Emissions Management at TransCanada PipeLines
SMARTE PROGRAM Saving money and reducing truck emissions
Department of Environmental Quality
EU-RUSSIA Cooperation in Energy Efficiency
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
DSI: AN ALTERNATIVE TO WET SCRUBBING FOR SO2 AND SO3 REMOVAL
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Curbing New Mexico’s methane pollution Opportunities for engagement
Title III Supplemental Resources
Best Available Control Technology for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Sources
Uinta Basin Industry BMPs Stuart Siffring
DOGM Collaborative Meeting
Status of Preliminary Reasonable Progress Analysis
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
State Air Directors Meeting May 20, 2015
Presentation transcript:

Joshua B. Epel, Esq. Duke Energy Field Services, LP August 25, 2005 The Private Sector: How we are currently involved with the States and Tribes Joshua B. Epel, Esq. Duke Energy Field Services, LP August 25, 2005

DEFS Midstream Operations Legend # DEFS Plants DEFS Gathering Area

DEFS Profile DEFS operates in 3 WRAP states and 4 non-WRAP states. DEFS fleet deploys 2.1MM horsepower at 850 facilities (2,500 engines). DEFS utilizes 41 amine units in 6 states to remove impurities, including CO2. DEFS manages about 58,000 miles of pipelines, all containing methane.

DEFS interacts with Multiple State Agencies 8 separate state agencies on air permitting issues (and compliance with EPA regulations) 11 Agencies on emergency venting and flaring (OCD, TRRC, etc.) 6 Departments and the OPS on pipeline compliance

DEFS must address compliance obligations consistently Title V Permitting Since 2001, DEFS has reduced the number of Title V facilities from 330 to 150—primarily through installation of catalytic converters on hundreds of engines. DEFS has controlled or is managing “flash” emissions at all of its facilities. DEFS is working with all state agencies to ensure the accuracy of its LDAR program. 3rd bullet-VOCs

Compliance obligations, cont’d Meeting these obligations requires training hundreds of employees in programs and processes. Meeting compliance obligations requires the evaluation and re-engineering at hundreds of facilities.

Innovative Approaches-CO2 Sequestration DEFS installed an acid gas injection well at its Artesia facility - with mixed results. DEFS is permitting another acid gas injection well - requiring interaction with multiple state agencies.

A Cooperative Model A State, Regional, or Federal program should promote innovation—either through direct incentives or removing regulatory barriers. Identify CO2 injection formations and develop a CO2 reduction permit where facilities can use the formation when siting facilities. State financial incentives to promote geological sequestration opportunities.

Conclusion Assume few of you have sympathy for big oil talking about fiscal constraint in this environment. Remember very 1st slide, DEFS operates in 3 WRAP and r non-WRAP states. Each strategy must be tailored for mid-stream industry-may be methane CO2. How do we proceed without being punished? DEFS reduces now, simply get a lower baseline DEFS complies with non-uniform regulations-do our competitors get an advantage?