Yumi Uetake, Greenfield Sluder  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Advertisements

María Dolores Vázquez-Novelle, Mark Petronczki  Current Biology 
Recruitment of Mad2 to the Kinetochore Requires the Rod/Zw10 Complex
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
DNA Damage during Mitosis in Human Cells Delays the Metaphase/Anaphase Transition via the Spindle-Assembly Checkpoint  Alexei Mikhailov, Richard W Cole,
Jakub K. Famulski, Gordon K. Chan  Current Biology 
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Inhibition of Aurora B Kinase Blocks Chromosome Segregation, Overrides the Spindle Checkpoint, and Perturbs Microtubule Dynamics in Mitosis  Marko J.
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Volume 20, Issue 24, Pages (December 2010)
Verena N. Lorenz, Michael P. Schön, Cornelia S. Seitz 
Human Blinkin/AF15q14 Is Required for Chromosome Alignment and the Mitotic Checkpoint through Direct Interaction with Bub1 and BubR1  Tomomi Kiyomitsu,
Kai Yuan, Patrick H. O’Farrell  Current Biology 
Maki Murata-Hori, Yu-li Wang  Current Biology 
Sequential Protein Recruitment in C. elegans Centriole Formation
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Kif15 Cooperates with Eg5 to Promote Bipolar Spindle Assembly
Volume 28, Issue 17, Pages e4 (September 2018)
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Spindle Pole Regulation by a Discrete Eg5-Interacting Domain in TPX2
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (May 2011)
Cancer Cells Display Profound Intra- and Interline Variation following Prolonged Exposure to Antimitotic Drugs  Karen E. Gascoigne, Stephen S. Taylor 
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
Ai-Sun Tseng, Felix B. Engel, Mark T. Keating  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Daniela Cimini, Xiaohu Wan, Christophe B. Hirel, E.D. Salmon 
Maïlys A.S. Vergnolle, Stephen S. Taylor  Current Biology 
G Protein βγ Subunits and AGS3 Control Spindle Orientation and Asymmetric Cell Fate of Cerebral Cortical Progenitors  Kamon Sanada, Li-Huei Tsai  Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 17, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Differential Activation of the DNA Replication Checkpoint Contributes to Asynchrony of Cell Division in C. elegans Embryos  Michael Brauchle, Karine Baumer,
Regulation of Sister Chromatid Cohesion between Chromosome Arms
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (November 2016)
Progressive Activation of CyclinB1-Cdk1 Coordinates Entry to Mitosis
Chk1 Is Required for Spindle Checkpoint Function
PLK1 Inhibitors: Setting the Mitotic Death Trap
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
The spindle assembly checkpoint
Samuel F. Bakhoum, Giulio Genovese, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
Vincent Vanoosthuyse, Kevin G. Hardwick  Current Biology 
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
A Role for the FEAR Pathway in Nuclear Positioning during Anaphase
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Polo-like Kinase 1 Triggers the Initiation of Cytokinesis in Human Cells by Promoting Recruitment of the RhoGEF Ect2 to the Central Spindle  Mark Petronczki,
Viktoriya Syrovatkina, Chuanhai Fu, Phong T. Tran  Current Biology 
Timing and Checkpoints in the Regulation of Mitotic Progression
Decoding the links between mitosis, cancer, and chemotherapy: The mitotic checkpoint, adaptation, and cell death  Beth A.A. Weaver, Don W. Cleveland 
Cell-Cycle Progression without an Intact Microtubule Cytoskeleton
David Vanneste, Masatoshi Takagi, Naoko Imamoto, Isabelle Vernos 
Dual Detection of Chromosomes and Microtubules by the Chromosomal Passenger Complex Drives Spindle Assembly  Boo Shan Tseng, Lei Tan, Tarun M. Kapoor,
Benjamin A. Pinsky, Christian R. Nelson, Sue Biggins  Current Biology 
Julie C Canman, David B Hoffman, E.D Salmon  Current Biology 
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (February 2005)
Swapna Kollu, Samuel F. Bakhoum, Duane A. Compton  Current Biology 
PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 Regulates Spindle Orientation in Adherent Cells
Cdk1 Modulation Ensures the Coordination of Cell-Cycle Events during the Switch from Meiotic Prophase to Mitosis  Dai Tsuchiya, Soni Lacefield  Current.
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Prolonged Prometaphase Blocks Daughter Cell Proliferation Despite Normal Completion of Mitosis  Yumi Uetake, Greenfield Sluder  Current Biology  Volume 20, Issue 18, Pages 1666-1671 (September 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.018 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Relationship between Prometaphase Duration of the Mother Cell and the Proliferative Capacity of Its Daughters (Aa–Ad) Prometaphase spindles in RPE1 cells, shown by fluorescence microscopy. DNA is shown in blue, α-tubulin is shown in green, and pericentrin is shown in red. (Aa) Control. (Ab) 0.08 μM nocodazole. (Ac) 100 μM monastrol. (Ad) 4 μM MG132 at 30 min after drug application. (B) Duration of mother cell prometaphase and the proliferative capacity of daughter cells (0.08 μM nocodazole). Each vertical bar represents a daughter cell, and the height of the bar indicates the duration of prometaphase for its mother cell. The dark line across each vertical bar represents the time the mother cell spent in prometaphase in the presence of drug. The vertical bars are rank ordered by the duration of prometaphase for the mother cells. Daughters that proliferated are to the left of the vertical red line, and those that arrested in G1 are to the right of the line. Prometaphase in control cells (cell rounding to anaphase onset) averaged 18 min (range 9–30 min; n = 117). (C) Duration of mother cell prometaphase and the proliferative capacity of the daughter cells (100 μM monastrol). (D) Duration of mother cell prometaphase and the proliferative capacity of the daughter cells. RPE1 cells were treated with 5 μM Taxol for 10 min before mitosis. Satisfaction of the mitotic checkpoint was variable, giving a range of prometaphase durations. Current Biology 2010 20, 1666-1671DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 G1 Arrest after Prolonged Prometaphase Is p53 Dependent (A) p53 and p21 expression in the daughters of RPE1 mother cells spending >1.5 hr in prometaphase (0.08 μM nocodazole). Individual mother cells and their progeny were continuously followed; daughter cells were fixed 2 and 48 hr after nocodazole removal. Nine cells in each category were double labeled with anti-p53 and anti-p21 antibodies; the rest were single labeled. The table shows the percentage of daughters that expressed nuclear p53 or p21 at the indicated times. Images show fluorescence and phase contrast. (B) Proliferative capacity of daughter RPE1 cells cultured in dishes after their mothers were held in prometaphase for 2–6 hr by 0.08 μM nocodazole. The p53+ category shows percentage of cells with BrdU incorporation and p21 expression at the indicated times after drug removal for p53 normal cells. The p53 RNAi category shows the percentages of p53 knockdown cells incorporating BrdU at the indicated times after drug removal. First image shows overlain phase-contrast and BrdU fluorescence image of p53 normal cells 24 hr after drug removal. Second image shows a phase-contrast image of two fields of p53 normal cells 168 hr after drug removal showing dead cells. Third image shows overlain phase-contrast and BrdU fluorescence image of p53 knockdown cells 24 hr after drug removal. Current Biology 2010 20, 1666-1671DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Relationship between Prometaphase Duration of the Mother Cell and the Proliferative Capacity of Its Daughters after Mitotic Checkpoint Satisfaction (Aa and Ab) The mitotic checkpoint is promptly satisfied in MG132-treated RPE1 cells. (Aa) Cells fixed and immunostained for the checkpoint proteins Mad2 and BubR1 30 min after drug application. These proteins are not detectable on centromeres, and all chromosomes are aligned on the metaphase plate. (Ab) To validate our methodology, we treated cells with 0.08 μM nocodazole. Mad2 and BubR1 were localized to unattached kinetochores of mono-oriented chromosomes but were not localized to bioriented chromosomes at the metaphase plate. (B) Duration of mother cell prometaphase and the proliferative capacity of their daughter cells. RPE1 cells in mitosis were held in prometaphase for an additional 10–70 min with 4 μM MG132. In a few cases (color-coded arrowheads), one daughter proliferated while its sister arrested in G1. Current Biology 2010 20, 1666-1671DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 G1 Arrest after Prolonged Prometaphase Is Dependent on p38 Activity after the Metaphase-Anaphase Transition (A) Duration of mother cell prometaphase and the proliferative capacity of their daughter cells when p38 activity is inhibited during prolonged prometaphase (0.08 μM nocodazole plus SB 203580). The p38 inhibitor was washed out concurrently with the nocodazole. (B) Duration of mother cell prometaphase and the proliferative capacity of their daughter cells when p38 activity is inhibited after prolonged prometaphase. Cells were held in prometaphase with 0.08 μM nocodazole alone, and SB 203580 was continuously applied after nocodazole removal. (C) Consequences of prolonged prometaphase are irreversible. We followed individual cells exposed to 0.08 μM nocodazole for 6 hr. After drug removal, SB 203580 was transiently introduced for 3–18 hr to allow daughters that would otherwise have arrested in G1 to become committed to the next cell cycle. The top panel diagrammatically shows the behavior of the progeny of 43 mothers that were held in prometaphase for >1.5 hr. The number of progeny still in view is indicated. All progeny showed the same behavior. All “granddaughters” arrested in G1 despite being born of mitoses of approximately normal duration (average 24 min, range 10–49 min from cell rounding to daughter cell flattening; controls average 27 min, range 18–36 min). The bottom panel shows the behavior of the progeny of 33 same-preparation mothers held in prometaphase <1.5 hr. All “granddaughters” proliferated. Current Biology 2010 20, 1666-1671DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.018) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions